Abstract
There are two mainstreams when using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). One is the standard applications of crisp distributive and ideal mode versions. The other is characterised by fuzzification of the AHP methodology and by attempts to better tackle inherently uncertain and imprecise decision processes with quantitative and qualitative data. The latter is characterised by different approaches to fuzzificating the decision problem; the way of conducting judgment and evaluating process; and finally, in synthesising the results and manipulating fuzzy numbers to devise priorities for the decision alternatives. This paper presents a fuzzy methodology for solving fully structured decision problems with criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives. It follows the logic of AHP in a simple and straightforward manner, efficiently aggregates criteria and sub-criteria into unique hierarchical level and applies a total integral method for comparing decision alternatives. The proposed methodology has been used for the assessment of water management plans in part of the Paraguacu River Basin in Brazil.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arslan T, Khisty CJ (2006) A rational approach to handling fuzzy perceptions in route choice. Eur J Oper Res 168:571–583
Bender MJ, Simonovic SP (2000) A fuzzy compromise approach to water resources systems planning under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:35–44
Boender CGE, de Graan JG, Lootsma FA (1989) Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets Syst 29:133–143
Buckley JJ (1985) Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 15:1–31
Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95:649–655
Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New York
Cheng CH (1996) Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. Eur J Oper Res 96:343–350
Deng H (1999) Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Int J Approx Reason 21:215–231
Fatti L (1989) Water research planning in South Africa. In: B. Golden et al. (eds) Application of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, New York, pp 122–137
Hwang CL, Yoon KS (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin
Karnib A (2004) An approach to elaborate priority preorders of water resources projects based on multi-criteria evaluation and fuzzy sets analysis. Water Resour Manag 18:13–33
Kwiesielewicz M (1998) A note on the fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 95: 161–172
Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241
Liou TS, Wang MJJ (1992) Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets Syst 50:247–256
Raju KS, Pillai CRS (1999) Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development. Eur J Oper Res 112:249–257
Ridgley M (1993) A multicriteria approach to allocating water under drought. Resour Manag Optim 92: 112–132
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1990) Eigenvector and logarithmic leasts squares. Eur J Oper Res 48:156–160
Singh AP, Ghosh SK, Sharma P (2007) Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna: an interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach. Water Resour Manag 21:515–532
Srdjevic B, Medeiros Y, Srdjevic Z, Schaer M (2002) Evaluating management strategies in Paraguacu river basin by analytic hierarchy process. In: AE Rizzoli, AJ Jakeman (eds) Integrated assessment and decision support, First Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, iEMSs: Manno, Switzerland, Vol I, 42–47
Tong RM, Bonissone PP (1984) Linguistic solutions to fuzzy decision problems. TIMS/Studies in the Management Sciences 20:323–334
Triantaphyllou E, Lin CT (1996) Development and evaluation of five multiattribute decision making methods. Int J Approx Reason 14:281–310
Wagenknecht M, Hartmann K (1983) On fuzzy rank ordering in polyoptimisation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11: 253–264
Wang L, Wei M, Huaicheng G, Zhenxing Z, Yong L, Yingying F (2006) An interval fuzzy multiobjective watershed management model for the lake Qionghai Watershed, China. Water Resour Manag 20: 701–721
Xu R (2000) Fuzzy least squares priority method in the AHP. Fuzzy Sets Syst 112:395–404
Yang T-C, Yu P-S (2006) Application of fuzzy multi-objective function on reducing groundwater demand for aquaculture in land-subsidence areas. Water Resour Manag 20:377–390
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
Zimmermann H-J (1987) Fuzzy sets decision making and expert systems. Kluwer, Boston
Zhu KJ, Jing Y, Chang DY (1999) A discussion on extent analysis method and applications on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 116:450–456
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y.D.P. Fuzzy AHP Assessment of Water Management Plans. Water Resour Manage 22, 877–894 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9197-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9197-5