Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating Water Transfer Projects Using Analytic Network Process (ANP)

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces the analytic network process (ANP) as an effective tool for ranking water transfer projects. Water resources are the main basis of stable development around the world. Uneven water distribution and the shortage of water in some areas have caused water managers to consider interbasin water transfer as a solution to these water problems. Due to the many different conflict criteria in ranking water projects, ranking execution projects is one of the most critical and difficult tasks in water management. Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) is a collection of methodologies to compare, select, or rank multiple alternatives that typically involve incommensurate attributes. Many decision problems cannot be structured hierarchically because they involve the interaction and dependence of higher-level elements in a hierarchy on lower-level ones. This study deals with ranking water transfer projects as a MADM problem. Due to the fact that many of the criteria are related to each other, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) is proposed for ranking projects. Ten water transfer projects in Karun River are investigated. Thirty influential factors are identified. They are classified under benefit, cost and risk criteria. The objective of this investigation is ranking alternatives with respect to different criteria in network form. Finally, sensitivity analysis is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrishamchi A, Tajrishy M (2005) Interbasin water transfers in Iran. Water conservation, reuse, and recycling. Proceedings of an Iranian-American Workshop. 252–272

  • Afkhami M, Shariat M, Jaafarzadeh M, Ghadiri H, Nabizadeh R (2007) Developing a water quality management model for Karun and Dez rivers. Iran. Environ Health Sci Eng 4(2):99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos KP, Petalas C, Pisinaras V (2005) Water resources planning using the AHP and PROMETHEE multi criteria methods: the case of NESTOS River- GREECE. The 7th Balkan Conference on Operational Research. BACOR 05. Constanta, May 2005, Romania

  • Bender MJ, Simonovic SP (2000) A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty. Fuzzy Set Syst 115:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boran S, Goztepe K, Yavuz E (2007) A study on election of personnel based on performance measurement by using Analytic Network Process (ANP). IJCSNS Int J Comp Sci Netw Secur 8(4):333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai SH, Yao XG, Ping T (2007) Evaluation of the design alternatives of emergency bridge by applying Analytic Network Process (ANP). Syst Eng–Theor Pract 27(3):63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Calizaya A, Meixner O, Bengtsson L, Berndtsson R (2010) Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resour Manag 24:2267–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CW, Wu CR, Lin CT, Lin HL (2007) Evaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes. Inform Sci 177:3383–3396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CW, Wu CR, Chen HC (2009) Analytic network process decision-making to assess slicing machine in terms of precision and control wafer quality. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf 25:641–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Hong WP, Lee KS, Burian SJ (2011) Water Resour Manag 25:641–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Lee KS (2009) Identification of spatial ranking of hydrological vulnerability using multi criteria decision making techniques: Case study of Korea. Water Resour Manag 23:2395–2416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung SH, Lee AHI, Pearn WL (2006) Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. Int J Prod Econ 96:15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell EO, Bathurst J, Kilsby C, Parkin G, Quinn P, Younger P, Anderson S, Riley M (2000) Integrating mesoscale catchments experiments with modeling: The potential for sustainable water resources management, Fifth IHP/IAHS George Kovacs Colloquium, HELP, International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Paris

  • Costa CAB, Silva PAD, Correia FN (2004) Multicriteria evaluation of flood control measures: the case of Ribeira do Livramento. Water Resour Manag 18:263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogmus S, Kapanoglu M, Koc E (2005) Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Eval Program Plann 28:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanghua H, Guanchun C (2010) A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making model based on weighted Borda scoring method for watershed ecological risk management: a case study of three Gorge reservoir area of China. Water Resour Manag 24:2139–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemi F, White I (2007) Inter-basin water transfer case studies from Australia, United states, Canada, China and India. International Hydrology series

  • Gursen E (2007) Transportation mode selection for Turkish automotive industry using Analytic Network Process. 6th WSEAS International Conference on System Science and Simulation in Engineering, Venice, Italy. November 21–23, 179–183

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JJ, Tzeng GH, Ong CS (2005) Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recogn Lett 26:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu YC (2010) Analytic network process for pattern classification problems using genetic algorithms. Inform Sci 180:2528–2539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnib A (2004) An approach to elaborate priority preorders of water resources projects based on multi-criteria evaluation and fuzzy sets analysis. Water Resour Manag 18:13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Kim SH (2000) Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Comput Oper Res 27:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Lee S, Park Y (2009) Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process. Math Comput Model 49:1274–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Kong F (2005) A new MADM algorithm based on fuzzy subjective and objective integrated weights. Int J Inform Syst Sci 1(3–4):420–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade L (1998) Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 34(3):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade LM, Presley A (2002) R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei X, Rosso R, Huang GL, Nie GS (1989) Application of analytical hierarchy process to water resources policy and management in Beijing, China. Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice (Proceedings of the Baltimore Symposium, May 1989), IAHS Publ. (180), 73–83

  • Melon MG, Navarro TG, Dutra SA (2009) An ANP approach to assess the sustainability of tourist strategies for the coastal NP of Venezuela. 5th International Vilnius Conference. Vilnius 235–240

  • Montazar A, Zadbagher E (2010) An analytic hierarchy model for assessing global water productivity of irrigation networks in Iran. Water Resour Manag 24:2817–2832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prodanovic P, Simonovic SP (2002) Comparison of fuzzy set ranking methods of implementation in water resources decision- making. Can J Civ Eng 29(5):692–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prodanovic P, Simonovic SP (2003) Fuzzy compromise programming for group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 33(3):358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Promentilla MAB, Furuichi T, Ishii K, Tanikawa N (2008) A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures. J Environ Manage 88:479–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qammaz ASB (2007) Risk assessment of international construction projects using the Analytic Network Process. Master of Science thesis. Faculty of Civil Engineering. Middle east technical university

  • Rafiei H, Rabbani M (2009) Project selection using fuzzy group Analytic Network Process. World Acad Sci Eng Tech 58:457–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj PA (1995) Multicriteria methods in river basin planning—a case study. Water Sci Technol 31(8):261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj AP, Kumar ND (1999) Ranking alternatives with fuzzy weights using maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Set Syst 105:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj AP, Kumar ND (1998) Ranking multi-criterion river basin planning alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Set Syst 100:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju SK, Duckstien L, Arondel C (2000) Multicreterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning: a case study in Spain. Water Resour Manag 14:435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1999) Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. ISAHP, Kobe. August. 12–14

  • Saaty TL (2001a) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the Analytic Network Process (second ed), Pittsburgh, USA: RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue,Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA

  • Saaty TL (2001b) Decision making with the ANP and the national missile defense example, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the AHP, ISAHP. Bem-Switzerland. 365–382

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2009) Applications of Analytic Network Process in entertainment. Iranian J Oper Res 1(2):41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the Analytic Network Process. Economic, political, social and technological. Applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Springer Science and Business medi, LLC

  • Saaty TL, Takizawa M (1986) Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. Eur J Oper Res 26:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slyeptsov A, Sodenkamp M (2007) Decision making by method of key success factors discrimination: KEYANP. 9th ISAHP 2007, Chile, Vina del Mar, August 3–6

  • Srdjevic B, Medeiros S, Faria AS (2004) An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resour Manag 18:35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzkaya G, Onut S, Tuzkaya UR, Gulsun B (2008) An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul. Turkey J Env Manag 88:970–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WW, Lee YT (2007) Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process. Expert Syst Appl 32(3):841–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfslehner B, Vacik H, Lexer MJ (2005) Application of the analytic network process in multicriteria analysis of sustainable forest management. For Ecol Manage 207:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F, Ardakanian R (2009) Multi-attribute decision making on inter-basin water transfer projects. Trans E: Ind Eng 16(1):73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarghaami M (2005) Uncertain criteria in ranking inter-basin water transfer projects in iran, 73rd Annual meeting of ICOLD, Tehran, 180-S1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Structure, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    S. L. Razavi Toosi & J. M. V Samani

Authors
  1. S. L. Razavi Toosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. V Samani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Razavi Toosi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toosi, S.L.R., Samani, J.M.V. Evaluating Water Transfer Projects Using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Water Resour Manage 26, 1999–2014 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9995-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9995-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation