Abstract
Objectives
Previous studies have shown that body size and height affect one’s perceived optimal distance during social interactions. This current study is built up on the previous research that found a relationship between men’s height and comfort distance but failed to find any effect of men’s shoulder-hip ratio (SHR) on one’s comfort distance. The current study investigated the combined effect of SHR and height to eliminate methodological issues that prevented from establishing an effect of SHR in the previous study.
Methods
In this study, a total of 49 participants (both men and women) reported their comfort distance in relation to 63 male avatars that differed in height from 150 to 190 cm (9 values) and in SHR from 1 to 1.3 ratio (7 values).
Results and Conclusion
The result of this study showed that both genders had an increment of their comfort distance as the height of the avatar increased. The effect of SHR on comfort distance was only evident with extreme SHR measurements; demonstrating that height is a better indicator of establishing comfort distance during interactions.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40750-023-00216-z/MediaObjects/40750_2023_216_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40750-023-00216-z/MediaObjects/40750_2023_216_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40750-023-00216-z/MediaObjects/40750_2023_216_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40750-023-00216-z/MediaObjects/40750_2023_216_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40750-023-00216-z/MediaObjects/40750_2023_216_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
Authors will share upon request.
References
Buck, L. E., Chakraborty, S., & Bodenheimer, B. (2022). The impact of embodiment and avatar sizing on personal space in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(5), 2102–2113.
Caplan, M. E., & Goldman, M. (1981). Personal space violations as a function of height. The Journal of social psychology, 114(2), 167–171.
Cartaud, A., Ruggiero, G., Ott, L., Iachini, T., & Coello, Y. (2018). Physiological response to facial expressions in peripersonal space determines interpersonal distance in a social interaction context. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 657.
Coello, Y., & Cartaud, A. (2021). The interrelation between peripersonal action space and interpersonal social space: Psychophysiological evidence and clinical implications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 636124.
D’Angelo, M., di Pellegrino, G., & Frassinetti, F. (2019). The illusion of having a tall or short body differently modulates interpersonal and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research, 375, 112146.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–US comparative study. Archives of sexual behavior, 39(3), 798–806.
Ellis, L. (1994). The high and the mighty among man and beast: How universal is the relationship between height (or body size) and social status. Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality, 2, 93–112.
Felipe, N. J., & Sommer, R. (1966). Invasions of personal space. Soc Probs, 14, 206.
Fink, B., Neave, N., & Seydel, H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19(1), 82–87.
Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167–1183.
Freeman, D., Evans, N., Lister, R., Antley, A., Dunn, G., & Slater, M. (2014). Height, social comparison, and paranoia: An immersive virtual reality experimental study. Psychiatry Research, 218(3), 348–352.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Hammes, J. A. (1964). The personal distance effect as a function of esthetic stimulus, anxiety and sex. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(3), 353–354.
Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological bulletin, 94(2), 293.
Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L., Cardenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., & Puts, D. A. (2013). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 334–341.
Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173–178.
Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(5), 295–304.
Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2016). Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 154–164.
Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of theoretical Biology, 47(1), 223–243.
Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., Doyle, J. F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2019a). Sex differences for preferences of shoulder to hip ratio in men and women: An eye tracking study. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(4), 405–415.
Pazhoohi, F., Silva, C., Lamas, J., Mouta, S., Santos, J., & Arantes, J. (2019b). The effect of height and shoulder-to-hip ratio on interpersonal space in virtual environment. Psychological Research, 83(6), 1184–1193.
Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., & Kingstone, A. (2022). The Interacting Effects of Height and Shoulder-to-Hip Ratio on Perceptions of Attractiveness, Masculinity, and Fighting Ability: Experimental Design and Ecological Validity Considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior,1–14.
Perkins, J. M., Subramanian, S. V., Smith, D., G., & Özaltin, E. (2016). Adult height, nutrition, and population health. Nutrition reviews, 74(3), 149–165.
Rapuano, M., Sbordone, F. L., Borrelli, L. O., Ruggiero, G., & Iachini, T. (2021). The effect of facial expressions on interpersonal space: A gender study in immersive virtual reality. Progresses in Artificial intelligence and neural Systems (pp. 477–486). Singapore: Springer.
Roser, M., Appel, C., & Ritchie, H. (2013). Human height. Published online at OurWorldInData.org Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/human-height
Ruggiero, G., Frassinetti, F., Coello, Y., Rapuano, M., Di Cola, A. S., & Iachini, T. (2017). The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1232–1240.
Ruggiero, G., Ruotolo, F., & Iachini, T. (2019). Being like you improves my comfort space: Social human-virtual confederates interactions. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2524/paper13.pdf
Sakata, N., Maeda, M., Tominaga, T., & Hijikata, Y. (2017). Controlling the interpersonal distance using the virtual body size. Transactions of the Virtual Reality Society of Japan, 22(2), 209–216.
Sell, A., Hone, L. S., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23(1), 30–44.
Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men’s bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171819.
Sorokowski, P. (2010). Politicians’ estimated height as an indicator of their popularity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1302–1309.
Stulp, G., & Barrett, L. (2016). Evolutionary perspectives on human height variation. Biological Reviews, 91(1), 206–234.
Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S., & Pollet, T. V. (2013). Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 159–171.
Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Human height is positively related to interpersonal dominance in dyadic interactions. PloS one, 10(2), e0117860.
Sundstrom, E., & Altman, I. (1976). Interpersonal relationships and personal space: Research review and theoretical model. Human Ecology, 4(1), 47–67.
Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human communication research, 33(3), 271–290.
Funding
This work was supported by grants to AK from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (2016–04319), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2019-0749).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, F.P. and A.K.; data collection, S.B.H. formal analysis, F.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.P.; writing—review and editing, F.P., S.B.H. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Behavioural Research Ethics Committee of the University of British Columbia.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pazhoohi, F., Hassan, S.B. & Kingstone, A. The Interacting Effects of Men’s Height and Shoulder-to-Hip Ratio on Comfort Distance: A Virtual Reality Study. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 9, 172–181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00216-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00216-z