Abstract
In proxemics, the interpersonal space is the optimal social distance between individuals. Evidence has shown that the emotional facial expressions and gender-related effects can modulate this distance during social interactions. Typically, this distance increases in threatening situations and decreases in safe situations. Moreover, male dyads maintain larger distances than female dyads whereas the findings about mixed-sex dyads are still unclear. Virtual Reality (VR) based technologies are becoming more and more used in different areas of everyday life and, in the scientific field, for studying social phenomena. This raises the question of the degree of similarity of VR simulations to actual phenomena, i.e. its ecological validity and its effectiveness for applied purposes. In order to clarify gender-related and emotion-related effects and the ecological validity of VR, we investigated if real females and males differently modulated their interpersonal distance while male and female virtual confederates with happy, angry and neutral faces approached them. Results showed that participants preferred larger distances with both male and female virtual confederates who showed an angry face rather than neutral and happy. Moreover, males preferred a shorter distance, particularly when facing smiling virtual females, while females preferred a larger distance from angry virtual males. These results suggest that gender differences can affect the impact of emotional facial expression on the modulation of the interpersonal space. Moreover, they confirm previous behavioural studies and add further support to the ecological validity of IVR simulations and thus its potential effectiveness as a tool for research and application interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, R.B., Ambady, N., Macrae, N., Kleck, R.E.: Emotional expressions forecast approach-avoidance behaviour. Motiv. Emot. 30, 179–188 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9020-2
Aiello, J.R.: Human Spatial behavior. In: Stokols, D., Altman, I (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 389–504. Wiley, New York (1987)
Armbrüster, C., Wolter, M., Kuhlen, T., Spijkers, W., Fimm, B.: Depth perception in virtual reality: distance estimations in peri- and extrapersonal space. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11, 9–15 (2008)
Argyle, M., Dean, J.: Eye-contact distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28, 289–304 (1965). https://doi.org/10.2307/278602
Bailenson, J.N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J.M.: Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 819–833 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007002
Bell, P.A., Greene, T.C., Fisher, J.D., Baum, A.: Environmental psychology, 5th edn. Harcourt College Publishers, New York (2005)
Damasio, A.R.: The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace, New York (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145200010773287
Darwin, C.: The Expressions of the Emotions in Men and Animals. John Murray, London (1872)
de Vignemont, F., Iannetti, G.D.: How many peripersonal spaces? Neuropsychologia 70, 327–334 (2015)
Dosey, M.A., Meisels, M.: Personal space and self-protection. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 11, 93–97 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027040
Ekman, P.: Facial expressions. In: Dalgleish, T., Power, M.J. (eds.) The Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, pp. 301–320. Wiley, New York (1999)
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., Rizzolatti, G.A.: Unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/jtics200407002
Gessaroli, E., Santelli, E., di Pellegrino, G., Frassinetti, F.: Personal space regulation in childhood autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One 8(9), e74959 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpone0074959
Graziano, M.S.A., Cooke, D.F.: Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space and defensive behaviour. Neuropsychologia 44, 845–859 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/jneuropsychologia200509011
Hall, E.T.: The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday, New York (1966)
Hayduk, L.A.: Personal space: where we now stand. Psychol. Bull. 94, 293–335 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909942293
Hebl, M.R., Kleck, R.E.: Acknowledging one’s stigma in the interview setting: effective strategy or liability? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32(2), 223–249 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00214.x
Horstmann, G.: What do facial expression convey: feeling states, behavioral intentions or actions requests? Emotion 3(2), 150–166 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-354232150
Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Ruggiero, G.: Body-space in social interactions: a comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PLoS ONE 9(11), e111511 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpone0111511
Iachini, T., Pagliaro, S., Ruggiero, G.: Near or far? It depends on my impression: moral information and spatial behavior in virtual interactions. Acta Psychol. 161, 131–136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/jactpsy200509003
Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V.P., Galante, F., Ruggiero, G.: Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: effects of gender and age. J. Environ. Psychol. 45, 154–164 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvp201601004
Keltner, D., Ekman, P., Gonzaga, G.C., Beer, J.: Facial expression of emotion. In: Richard, D.J., Klaus, K.R., Goldsmith, H.H. (eds.) Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 415–432. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)
Kennedy, D.P., Glascher, J., Tyszka, J.M., Adolphs, R.: Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1226–1227 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2381
Knutson, B.: Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. J. Nonverbal Behav. 20(3), 165–182 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02281954
Lampton, D.R., McDonald, D.P., Singer, M., Bliss, J.P.: Distance estimation in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39th Annual Meeting, pp. 1268–1272 (1995)
Loomis, J.M., Blaskovich, J.J., Beall, A.C.: Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 31, 557–564 (1999)
Lourenco, S.F., Longo, M.R., Pathman, T.: Near space and its relation to claustrophobic fear. Cognition 119, 448–453 (2011)
Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., Ohman, A.: The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience Psychology section Karolinska Institutet ISBN 91-630-7164-9 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/t27732-000
Marsh, A.A., Ambady, N., Kleck, R.E.: The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach-and avoidance related behaviors. Emotion 5(1), 119–124 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-354251119
Morganti, F., Riva, G.: Conoscenza, comunicazione e tecnologia: aspetti cognitivi della realtà virtuale. LED Edizioni Universitarie (2006)
Ruggiero, G., Frassinetti, F., Coello, Y., Rapuano, M., Schiano di Cola, A., Iachini, T.: The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychol. Res. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x
Ruggiero, G., Rapuano, M., Iachini, T.: Perceived temperature modulates peripersonal and interpersonal spaces differently in men and women. J. Environ. Psychol. 63, 52–59 (2019)
Sawada, Y.: Blood pressure and heart rate responses to an intrusion on personal space. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 45, 115–121 (2003)
Seidel, E.M., Habel, U., Kirschner, M., Gur, R.C., Derntl, B.: The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioural tendencies in women and men. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform 36, 500–507 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018169
Siegman, A.W., Feldstein, S.: Nonverbal Behavior and Communication. Psychology Press, Abingdon (2014)
Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos. T Roy. Soc. B 364(1535), 3549–3557 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
Sommer, R.: From personal space to cyberspace. In: Bechtel, R.B., Churchman, A. (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, pp. 647–657. Wiley, New York (2002)
Sussman, N.M., Rosenfeld, H.M.: Touch justification and sex: influences on the aversiveness of spatial violations. J. Soc. Psychol. 106, 215–225 (1978)
Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Pantelidou, G., Rebacz, P., Vastfjall, D., Tsakiris, M.: I space: the effects of emotional valence and source of music on interpersonal distance. PLoS ONE 6(10), e26083 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpone0026083
Uzzell, D., Horne, N.: The influence of biological sex, sexuality and gender role on interpersonal distance. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 45, 579–597 (2006)
van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A.: Approach and avoidance as action effects. Q J. Exp. Psychol. 61(9), 1298–1306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802027987
Vuilleumier, P., Pourtois, G.: Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotions face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia 45, 174–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/jneuropsychologia200606003
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA 310 (20), 2191 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rapuano, M., Sbordone, F.L., Borrelli, L.O., Ruggiero, G., Iachini, T. (2021). The Effect of Facial Expressions on Interpersonal Space: A Gender Study in Immersive Virtual Reality. In: Esposito, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Morabito, F., Pasero, E. (eds) Progresses in Artificial Intelligence and Neural Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 184. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5093-5_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5093-5_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5092-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5093-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)