Abstract
This article provides an overview of highlights from 60 years of basic research on choice that are relevant to the assessment and treatment of clinical problems. The quantitative relations developed in this research provide useful information about a variety of clinical problems including aggressive, antisocial, and delinquent behavior, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, chronic pain syndrome, intellectual disabilities, pedophilia, and self-injurious behavior. A recent development in this field is an evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics that is used to animate artificial organisms (AOs). The behavior of AOs animated by the theory has been shown to conform to the quantitative relations that have been developed in the choice literature over the years, which means that the theory generates these relations as emergent outcomes, and therefore provides a theoretical basis for them. The theory has also been used to create AOs that exhibit specific psychopathological behavior, the assessment and treatment of which has been studied virtually. This modeling of psychopathological behavior has contributed to our understanding of the nature and treatment of the problems in humans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, J. G., & Howell, R. J. (1992). The plethysmograph: A review of recent literature. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 20, 13–25.
Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22(1), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.
Baum, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269.
Baum, W. M., & Rachlin, H. C. (1969). Choice as time allocation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 861–874.
Beardsley, S. D., & McDowell, J. J. (1992). Application of Herrnstein’s hyperbola to time allocation of naturalistic human behavior maintained by naturalistic social reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1992.57-177.
Belke, T. W., & Heyman, G. M. (1994). Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: Effect on the foreground response–reinforcer relation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1994.61-65.
Berardi, V., Carretero-González, R., Klepeis, N. E., Ghanipoor Machiani, S., Jahangiri, A., Bellettiere, J., & Hovell, M. (2018). Computational model for behavior shaping as an adaptive health intervention strategy. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 8, 183–194.
Bradshaw, C. M. (1977). Suppression of response rates in variable-interval schedules by a concurrent schedule of reinforcement. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1977.tb01617.x.
Bradshaw, C. M., & Szabadi, E. (1978). Changes in operant behavior in a manic-depressive patient. Behavior Therapy, 9, 950–954.
Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1976). Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1976.26-135.
Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1977). Effect of punishment on human variable-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1977.27-275.
Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1978). Effect of variable-interval punishment on the behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of monetary reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1978.29-161.
Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., Bevan, P., & Ruddle, H. V. (1979). The effect of signaled reinforcement availability on concurrent performances in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1979.32-65.
Buskist, W. F., & Miller, H. L. (1981). Concurrent operant performance in humans: Matching when food is the reinforcer. Psychological Record, 31, 95–100.
Catania, A. C. (1966). Concurrent operants. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 213–270). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Catania, A. C., & Reynolds, G. S. (1968). A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 327–383.
Chi, C. (2019). Monkey see computer do: Simulation of dynamic behavior via the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics [Master's thesis]. https://etd.library.emory.edu/concern/etds/tm70mw37x?locale=en
Cliffe, M. J., & Parry, S. J. (1980). Matching to reinforcer value: Human concurrent variable-interval performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748008401845.
Conger, R., & Killeen, P. R. (1974). Use of concurrent operants in small group research: A demonstration. Pacific Sociological Review, 17, 399–416.
Corrado, G. S., Sugrue, L. P., Seung, H. S., & Newsome, W. T. (2005). Linear-nonlinear-Poisson models of primate choice dynamic. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84(3), 581–617. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2005.23-05.
Dallery, J., Soto, P. L., & McDowell, J. J. (2005). A test of the formal and modern theories of matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2005.108-04.
Davison, M., & Baum, W. M. (2000). Choice in a variable environment: Every reinforcer counts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.74-1.
Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
de Villiers, P. A. (1977). Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 233–287). Prentice-Hall.
de Villiers, P. A., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1976). Toward a law of response strength. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1131–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1131.
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131196.
Dishion, T. J., French, D. C., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). The development and ecology of antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 421–471). John Wiley & Sons.
Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80023-2.
Douglas, V. I. (1983). Attentional and cognitive problems. In M. Ruttler (Ed.), Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 280–329). Guilford Press.
Edelman, G. M. (1978). Group selection and phasic reentrant signaling: A theory of higher brain function. In G. Edelman & V. Mountcastle (Eds.), The mindful brain (pp. 51–100). MIT Press.
Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. Basic Books.
Epling, W. F., & Pierce, W. D. (1983). Applied behavior analysis: New directions from the laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 27–37.
Fernandez, E., & McDowell, J. J. (1995). Response–reinforcement relationships in chronic pain syndrome: Applicability of Herrnstein’s Law. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 33, 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00005-I.
Furukawa, E., Alsop, B., Shimabukuro, & Tripp, G. (2019). Is increased sensitivity to punishment a common characteristic of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder? An experimental study of response allocation in Japanese children. ADHD Attention Deficit & Hyperactivity Disorders, 11, 433–443.
Haenlein, M., & Caul, W. F. (1987). Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: A specific hypothesis of reward dysfunction. Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 356–362.
Harman, P. M. (2001). The natural philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell. Cambridge University Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1952a). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason. Free Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1952b). The sensory order: An inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. University of Chicago Press.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1981). Punishment and avoidance—Chairman's comments. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour (pp. 165–173). Elsevier/North-Holland.
Killeen, P. R. (1972). The matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1972.17-489.
Kollins, S. H., Lane, S. D., & Shapiro, S. K. (1997). Experimental analysis of childhood psychopathology: A laboratory matching analysis of the behavior of children diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Psychological Record, 47, 25–44.
Kollins, S. H., Newland, M. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (1997a). Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 208–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209395.
Kollins, S. H., Newland, M. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (1997b). “Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter?”: Erratum. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 431. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210806.
Li, D., Elliffe, D., & Hautus, M. (2018). A multivariate assessment of the rapidly changing procedure with McDowell’s evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110, 336–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.478.
McDowell, J. J. (1980). An analytic comparison of Herrnstein's equations and a multivariate rate equation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 397–408.
McDowell, J. J. (1981). On the validity and utility of Herrnstein's hyperbola in applied behavior analysis. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour (pp. 311–324). Elsevier/North-Holland.
McDowell, J. J. (1982). The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. American Psychologist, 37, 771–779.
McDowell, J. J. (1986). On the falsifiability of matching theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 63–74.
McDowell, J. J. (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 95–109.
McDowell, J. J. (2004). A computational model of selection by consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.81-297.
McDowell, J. J. (2010). Behavioral and neural Darwinism: Selectionist function and mechanism in adaptive behavior dynamics. Behavioural Processes, 84, 358–365.
McDowell, J. J. (2013a). On the theoretical and empirical status of the matching law and matching theory. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1000–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029924.
McDowell, J. J. (2013b). Representations of complexity: How nature appears in our theories. The Behavior Analyst, 36, 345–359.
McDowell, J. J. (2013c). Calculi of complexity: How phenomena emerge from rules. A review of Complexity: A guided tour by Melanie Mitchell. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.16.
McDowell, J. J. (2013d). A quantitative evolutionary theory of adaptive behavior dynamics. Psychological Review, 120(4), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034244.
McDowell, J. J. (2017). Animal cognition + optimal choice = behavior: A review of Adaptive Behavior and Learning, 2nd Ed., by J. E. R. Staddon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 108, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.262.
McDowell, J. J. (2019). On the current status of the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 111 (1), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.495
McDowell, J. J., & Calvin, N. T. (2015). Against matching theory: Predictions of an evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics. Behavioural Processes, 114, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.007.
McDowell, J. J., Calvin, O. L., Hackett, R., & Klapes, B. (2017). Falsification of matching theory and confirmation of an evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics in a critical experiment. Behavioural Processes, 140, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.025.
McDowell, J. J., & Caron, M. L. (2007). Undermatching is an emergent property of selection by consequences. Behavioural Processes, 75, 97–106.
McDowell, J. J., & Caron, M. L. (2010a). Matching in an undisturbed natural human environment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 413–431.
McDowell, J. J., & Caron, M. L. (2010b). Bias and undermatching in delinquent boys’ verbal behavior as a function of their level of deviance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-469.
McDowell, J. J., Caron, M. L., Kulubekova, S., & Berg, J. P. (2008). A computational theory of selection by consequences applied to concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 387–403.
McDowell, J. J., & Klapes, B. (2018). An evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics applied to concurrent ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110, 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.468.
McDowell, J. J., & Klapes, B. (2019). An implementation of punishment in the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 112, 128–143.
McDowell, J. J., & Klapes, B. (2020). All behavior is choice: Revisiting an evolutionary theory’s account of behavior on single schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 114, 430–446.
McDowell, J. J., & Popa, A. (2010). Toward a mechanics of adaptive behavior: Evolutionary dynamics and matching theory statics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.94-241.
McDowell, J. J., Popa, A., & Calvin, N. T. (2012). Selection dynamics in joint matching to rate and magnitude of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.98-199.
McDowell, J. J., & Riley, S. (2020). Improving on Skinner: An evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics and its neural interpretation. Behavior & Philosophy, 48, 1–7.
McDowell, J. J., Soto, P. L., Dallery, J., & Kulubekova, S. (2006). A computational theory of adaptive behavior based on an evolutionary reinforcement mechanism. In M. Keijzer (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO-2006) (pp. 175–182). ACM Press.
McDowell, J. J., & Wood, H. M. (1984). Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein’s k as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.41-183.
McDowell, J. J., & Wood, H. M. (1985). Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Rate of change of Herrnstein’s k as a function of response-force requirement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1985.43-61.
Moffat, G. H., & Koch, D. L. (1973). Escape performance as a function of delay of reinforcement and inescapable US trials. Psychological Reports, 32, 1255–1261. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1973.32.3c.1255.
Murray, L. K., & Kollins, S. H. (2000). Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: An application of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-573.
Myers, D. L., & Myers, L. E. (1977). Undermatching: A reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1977.27-203.
Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367–380.
Oliver, C., Hall, S., & Nixon, J. (1999). A molecular to molar analysis of communicative and problem behaviors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(99)00003-7.
Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1983). Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 57–76.
Pierce, W. D., Epling, W. F., & Greer, S. M. (1981). Human communication and the matching law. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour (pp. 175–182). Elsevier/North-Holland.
Plaud, J. J. (1992). The prediction and control of behavior revisited: A review of the matching law. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 23, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(92)90021-A.
McDowell, J. J, & Popa, A. (2009). Beyond continuous mathematics and traditional scientific analysis: Understanding and mining Wolfram’s A New Kind of Science. Behavioural Processes, 81, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.012
Popa, A. (2013). The evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics: Complexity, Darwinism, and the emergence of high-level phenotypes [Doctoral dissertation], Emory University. http://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/f8hw4
Pringle, J. W. S. (1951). On the parallel between learning and evolution. Behaviour, 3, 174–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853951X00269.
Rachlin, H. (1971). On the tautology of the matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1971.15-249.
Reed, D. D., Critchfield, T. S., & Martens, B. K. (2006). The generalized matching law in elite sports competition: Football play calling as operant choice. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.146-05.
Ruddle, H. V., Bradshaw, C. M., & Szabadi, E. (1981). Performance of humans in variable-interval avoidance schedules programmed singly, and concurrently with variable-interval schedules of positive reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 33B, 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400808.
Ruddle, H. V., Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Foster, T. M. (1982). Performance of humans in concurrent avoidance/positive-reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.38-51.
Snyder, J., Horsch, E., & Childs, J. (1997). Peer relationships of young children: Affiliative choices and the shaping of aggressive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2602_3.
Snyder, J., Schrepferman, L., & St. Peter, C. (1997). Origins of antisocial behavior: Negative reinforcement and affect dysregulation of behavior as socialization mechanisms in family interaction. Behavior Modification, 21, 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455970212004.
Snyder, J., West, L., Stockemer, V., Gibbons, S., & Almquist-Parks, L. (1996). A social learning model of peer choice in the natural environment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(96)90026-X.
Snyder, J. J., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). Individual differences in social aggression: A test of a reinforcement model of socialization in the natural environment. Behavior Therapy, 26, 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80111-X.
Soto, P. L., McDowell, J. J., & Dallery, J. (2005). Effects of adding a second reinforcement alternative: Implications for Herrnstein’s interpretation of re. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 185–225. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2005.09-05.
Staddon, J. E. R. (1968). Spaced responding and choice: A preliminary analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-669.
Staddon, J. E. R. (1972). Temporal control and the theory of reinforcement schedules. In R. M. Gilbert & J. R. Millenson (Eds.), Reinforcement: Behavioral analyses (pp. 209–262). Academic Press.
Stilling, S. T., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation on professional football play selection. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-435.
Symons, F. J., Hoch, J., Dahl, N. A., & McComas, J. J. (2003). Sequential and matching analyses of self-injurious behavior: A case of overmatching in the natural environment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-267.
Szabadi, E., Bradshaw, C. M., & Ruddle, H. (1981). Reinforcement processes in affective illness: Towards a quantitative analysis. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantification of steadystate operant behavior (pp. 299–310). Elsevier/North-Holland.
Takahashi, M., & Iwamoto, T. (1986). Human concurrent performances: The effects of experience, instructions, and schedule-correlated stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1986.45-257.
Taylor, D., Lincoln, A. J., & Foster, S. L. (2010). Impaired behavior regulation under conditions of concurrent variable schedules of reinforcement in children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 13, 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054708329974.
VanDeventer, A. D., & Laws, D. R. (1978). Orgasmic reconditioning to redirect sexual arousal in pedophiles. Behavior Therapy, 9, 748–765.
Vollmer, T. R., & Bourret, J. (2000). An application of the matching law to evaluate the allocation of two- and three-point shots by college basketball players. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-137.
Wearden, J. H., & Burgess, I. S. (1982). Matching since Baum (1979). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.38-3.
Kulubekova, S., and McDowell, J. J (2013). Computational model of selection by consequences: Patterns of preference change on concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 147‑164.
McDowell, J. J, & Popa, A. (2009). Beyond continuous mathematics and traditional scientific analysis: Understanding and mining Wolfram’s A New Kind of Science. Behavioural Processes, 81, 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.012
Herrnstein R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243
Acknowledgments
I thank Cyrus Chi, Samuel Morris, and Steven Riley for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This research complies with ethical standards
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDowell, J.J. Empirical Matching, Matching Theory, and an Evolutionary Theory of Behavior Dynamics in Clinical Application. Perspect Behav Sci 44, 561–580 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00296-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00296-w