Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Use of Epicutaenous Patch Testing in the Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Disease

  • Contact Dermatitis (S Jacob, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Allergy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Traditionally, gastrointestinal (GI) diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux, gastritis, esophagitis, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have not been thought of as hypersensitivity (allergy)-mediated illnesses; however, there has been growing research suggesting that food and environmental allergens may play a role in the development of GI illnesses, particularly those with refractory symptoms not responding to traditional therapies. The GI system and skin share similar components of the immune system and in some cases respond to foreign antigens in the same manner. With respect to confirmatory diagnostic testing, the skin is the more easily accessible organ compared to the gastrointestinal system. Patch testing is a well-established standardized non-invasive skin based test utilized for the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to antigenic triggers. There is growing evidence that patch testing may be helpful in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal manifestations of immune-mediated diseases. We predict that further utilization of the standard patch test in the diagnostic assessment of patients with GI symptomatology will prove useful for the identification of specific allergens and etiologic agents responsible for gastrointestinal type IV hypersensitivity reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:376–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McGowan EC, Keet CA. Prevalence of self-reported food allergy in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–2010. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:1216–9. e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nwaru BI, Hickstein L, Panesar SS, et al. The epidemiology of food allergy in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2014;69:62–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelz BJ, Bryce PJ. Pathophysiology of food allergy. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2015;62:1363–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolognia J, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mowad CM, Anderson B, Scheinman P, Pootongkam S, Nedorost S, Brod B. Allergic contact dermatitis: patient diagnosis and evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:1029–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazzarini R, Duarte I, Ferreira AL. Patch tests. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88:879–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gittler JK, Krueger JG, Guttman-Yassky E. Atopic dermatitis results in intrinsic barrier and immune abnormalities: implications for contact dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:300–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Benedetto A, Kubo A, Beck LA. Skin barrier disruption: a requirement for allergen sensitization? J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:949–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, Fisher AA, ebrary Inc. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 6th ed. Hamilton, Ont. Maidenhead: BC Decker; McGraw-Hill Education, distributor. 2008:862 p., 16 p.

  11. Sicherer SH, Burks AW, Sampson HA. Clinical features of acute allergic reactions to peanut and tree nuts in children. Pediatrics. 1998;102:e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan SM, Turcanu V, Stephens AC, Fox AT, Grieve AP, Lack G. Cutaneous lymphocyte antigen and alpha4beta7 T-lymphocyte responses are associated with peanut allergy and tolerance in children. Allergy. 2012;67:336–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker MM, Powell N, Talley NJ. Atopy and the gastrointestinal tract—a review of a common association in unexplained gastrointestinal disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;8:289–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cudowska B, Kaczmarski M. Atopy patch test in the diagnosis of food allergy in children with gastrointestinal symptoms. Adv Med Sci. 2010;55:153–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Costa AJ, Sarinho ES, Motta ME, Gomes PN, de Oliveira de Melo SM, da Silva GA. Allergy to cow’s milk proteins: what contribution does hypersensitivity in skin tests have to this diagnosis? Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011;22:e133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfohler C, Korner R, Vogt T, Muller CS. Contact allergic gastritis: an underdiagnosed entity? BMJ Case Rep. 2012; 2012.

  17. Picarelli A, Di Tola M, Vallecoccia A, et al. Oral mucosa patch test: a new tool to recognize and study the adverse effects of dietary nickel exposure. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2011;139:151–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stierstorfer MB, Sha CT, Sasson M. Food patch testing for irritable bowel syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liden M, Kristjansson G, Valtysdottir S, Venge P, Hallgren R. Cow’s milk protein sensitivity assessed by the mucosal patch technique is related to irritable bowel syndrome in patients with primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38:929–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Saneian H, Zandieh F, Akhavan P, Taherian R. Value of gluten patch test in diagnosis of celiac disease. Iran J Pediatr. 2011;21:491–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1342–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spergel JM, Andrews T, Brown-Whitehorn TF, Beausoleil JL, Liacouras CA. Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis with specific food elimination diet directed by a combination of skin prick and patch tests. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;95:336–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Syrigou E, Angelakopoulou A, Zande M, Panagiotou I, Roma E, Pitsios C. Allergy-test-driven elimination diet is useful in children with eosinophilic esophagitis, regardless of the severity of symptoms. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015;26:323–9. 35 children with EOE had symptomatic and histologic resolution of disease after allergen driven elimination diets using skin-prick and patch testing. Targeted elimination diets using allergy testing are better tolerated, and less disruptive, compared to elemental or empiric elimination diets, particular for children.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin SK, Sabharwal G, Ghaffari G. A review of the evidence linking eosinophilic esophagitis and food allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36:26–33. Review of the classification of EoE as an allergic condition. Involvment of foods are triggers of disease and the use of allergy testing and elimination diets is discussed. Data linking EoE to allergy is critically analyzed.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Karon A. Skin patch testing pinpoints dietary triggers of IBS. Atopic Dermatitis. http://www.edermatologynews.com/specialty-focus/atopic-dermatitis/single-article-page/skin-patch-testing-pinpoints-dietary-triggers-of-ibs/. Accessed 7/16/16.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Hale Zippin MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Brienne D. Cressey, Ms. Cindy Parra, and Dr. Jonathan Hale Zippin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Contact Dermatitis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cressey, B.D., Parra, C. & Zippin, J.H. The Use of Epicutaenous Patch Testing in the Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Disease. Curr Treat Options Allergy 3, 376–383 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-016-0104-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-016-0104-2

Keywords

Navigation