Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oral Mucosa Patch Test: A New Tool to Recognize and Study the Adverse Effects of Dietary Nickel Exposure

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On contact with the skin, nickel may cause allergic contact dermatitis, which can be diagnosed by an epicutaneous patch test. Nickel exposure via the intestinal mucosa can induce diarrhea, abdominal pain, and swelling. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between these symptoms and nickel intake by means of a novel oral mucosa patch test. Eighty-six patients with intestinal symptoms related to ingestion of nickel-containing foods were submitted to epicutaneous and oral mucosa patch tests for nickel. All patients with positive oral mucosa patch test results were subject to a low-nickel diet and monitored over time. Skin lesions were observed in 33 out of 86 (38.4%) patients evaluated by the epicutaneous patch test. Mucosal lesions were seen in 53 out of 86 (61.6%) patients given the oral mucosa patch test. After 2 months of a low-nickel diet, 52 out of 53 (98.1%) patients showed an improvement of their symptoms. There is a significant correlation between response time of the oral mucosa patch test and the latency of symptoms after ingestion of nickel-containing foods. Consequently, the oral mucosa patch test can be used to recognize and study the adverse effects of dietary nickel exposure that could be defined as allergic contact mucositis. A low-nickel diet is also shown to be an effective treatment for this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barceloux DG (1999) Nickel. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 37:239–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mark BJ, Slavin RG (2006) Allergic contact dermatitis. Med Clin North Am 90:169–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Torgerson RR, Davis MD, Bruce AJ et al (2007) Contact allergy in oral disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 57:315–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Gioacchino M, Boscolo P, Cavallucci E et al (2000) Lymphocyte subset changes in blood and gastrointestinal mucosa after oral nickel challenge in nickel-sensitized women. Contact Dermatitis 43:206–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Menné T, Veien NK (2001) Systemic contact dermatitis. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-L (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, pp 355–366

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen CS, Menné T, Lisby S et al (2003) Experimental systemic contact dermatitis from nickel: a dose–response study. Contact Dermatitis 49:124–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carroccio A, Campisi G, Iacono G et al (2007) Oral mucosa of coeliac disease patients produces antiendomysial and antitransglutaminase antibodies: the diagnostic usefulness of an in vitro culture system. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25:1471–1477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vetrano S, Zampaletta U, Anania MC et al (2007) Detection of anti-endomysial and anti-tissue transglutaminase autoantibodies in media following culture of oral biopsies from patients with untreated celiac disease. Dig Liver Dis 39:911–916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dieterich W, Schuppan D (2007) Is gliadin harmful from the first morsel? Dig Liver Dis 39:917–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma AD (2007) Relationship between nickel allergy and diet. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 73:307–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pazzini CA, Júnior GO, Marques LS et al (2009) Prevalence of nickel allergy and longitudinal evaluation of periodontal abnormalities in orthodontic allergic patients. Angle Orthod 79:922–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapsenberg ML, Wierenga EA, Stiekema FE et al (1992) Th1 lymphokine production profiles of nickel-specific CD4+ T-lymphocyte clones from nickel contact allergic and non-allergic individuals. J Invest Dermatol 98:59–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bour H, Nicolas JF, Garrigue JL et al (1994) Establishment of nickel-specific T cell lines from patients with allergic contact dermatitis: comparison of different protocols. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 73:142–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moulon C, Wild D, Dormoy A et al (1998) MHC-dependent and -independent activation of human nickel-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells from allergic donors. J Invest Dermatol 111:360–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cavani A, Mei D, Guerra E et al (1998) Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel and nonallergic individuals display different nickel-specific T cell responses. Evidence for the presence of effector CD8+ and regulatory CD4+ T cells. J Invest Dermatol 111:621–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Probst P, Küntzlin D, Fleischer B (1995) Th2-type infiltrating T cells in nickel-induced contact dermatitis. Cell Immunol 165:134–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Borg L, Christensen JM, Kristiansen J et al (2000) Nickel-induced cytokine production from mononuclear cells in nickel-sensitive individuals and controls. Cytokine profiles in nickel-sensitive individuals with nickel allergy-related hand eczema before and after nickel challenge. Arch Dermatol Res 292:285–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen CS, Lisby S, Larsen JK et al (2004) Characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations and cytokine profiles in peripheral blood of nickel-sensitive individuals with systemic contact dermatitis after oral nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis 50:31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boscolo P, Di Gioacchino M, Conti P et al (1998) Expression of lymphocyte subpopulations, cytokine serum levels and blood and urine trace elements in nickel sensitised women. Life Sci 63:1417–1422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Minang JT, Troye-Blomberg M, Lundeberg L et al (2005) Nickel elicits concomitant and correlated in vitro production of Th1-, Th2-type and regulatory cytokines in subjects with contact allergy to nickel. Scand J Immunol 62:289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G (1993) Low-nickel diet: an open, prospective trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 29:1002–1007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Antico A, Soana R (1999) Chronic allergic-like dermatopathies in nickel-sensitive patients. Results of dietary restrictions and challenge with nickel salts. Allergy Asthma Proc 20:235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Berardino F, Alpini D, Cesarani A (2008) Nickel earlobe dermatitis and clinical non-relevance of the oral exposure. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 22:1215–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T et al (2007) The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 57:287–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Dr. Oralia Lopez for revision of the manuscript and assistance with the English style.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Picarelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picarelli, A., Di Tola, M., Vallecoccia, A. et al. Oral Mucosa Patch Test: A New Tool to Recognize and Study the Adverse Effects of Dietary Nickel Exposure. Biol Trace Elem Res 139, 151–159 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8652-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8652-y

Keywords

Navigation