Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Theories of Strategic Leadership, Social Exchange, and Structural Capital in the Context of Buyer–Supplier Relationship: An Empirical Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is aimed at improving the purchasing cycle time in a buyer–supplier relationship by integrating the facets of strategic leadership, social exchange, and social capital theories. We developed and tested a conceptual model that postulated relationships among strategic leadership behavior, relational trust and commitment, structural capital, and purchasing cycle time. Data were collected from purchase managers and their employees working in 105 manufacturing companies and analyzed using structural equation modeling technique. Our findings indicated that strategic leadership behaviors are positively related to trust in the buyer–supplier relationship. In addition, trust enhances relational commitment between buyer and supplier, which in turn positively relates to information sharing and supplier development. Further, increased information sharing in the relationship results in reduced purchasing cycle time. Implications for both theory and practice are discussed in depth, and directions for future research are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah, Z., & Musa, R. (2014). The effect of trust and information sharing on relationship commitment in supply chain management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. H., Khoja, F. M., & Kauffman, R. (2012). An empirical study of buyer–supplier relationships within small business organizations. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1999). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bag, S., & Gupta, S. (2017). Antecedents of sustainable innovation in supplier networks: A South African experience. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(3), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14(5), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beccerra, M., & Gupta, A. K. (1999). Trust within the organization: Integrating the trust literature with agency theory and transaction costs economics. Public Administration Quarterly, 23(2), 177–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensaou, M., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between US and Japanese automakers. Management Science, 41(9), 1471–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birasnav, M. (2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1622–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birasnav, M., Mittal, R., & Loughlin, S. (2015). Linking leadership behaviors and information exchange to improve supply chain performance: A conceptual model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. V. (1973). Cognitive sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 721–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Sakano, T. (2000). Success through commitment and trust: The soft side of strategic alliance management. Journal of World Business, 35(3), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, M., Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, A. M., & Magnan, G. M. (2013). Trust and relational embeddedness: Exploring a paradox of trust pattern development in key supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyter, K., Moorman, L., & Lemmink, J. (2001). Antecedents of commitment and trust in customer–supplier relationships in high technology markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Treville, S., Shapiro, R. D., & Hameri, A. P. (2004). From supply chain to demand chain: the role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(6), 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2000). The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the US, Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Burke, G. B. (2007). Government leadership in multi-sector IT-enabled networks: Lessons from the response to the West Nile virus outbreak. In Paper presented at the Leading the Future of the Public Sector: The Third Transatlantic Dialogue. Newark, DE: University of Delaware.

  • Gillespie, N. A., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 588–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gounaris, S. P. (2005). Trust and commitment influences on customer retention: Insights from business-to-business services. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25–56). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C. K., Watts, C. A., & Kim, K. Y. (1990). The supplier development program: A conceptual model. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 26(2), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallen, L., Johanson, J., & Seyed-Mohamed, N. (1991). Interfirm adaptation in business relationships. Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D., & Pettigrew, A. (2001). Upper echelons: Donald Hambrick on executives and strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B. (1994). Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1988). The role of dependence balancing in safeguarding transaction-specific assets in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J., & Miner, A. S. (1992). The shadow of the future: effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer–seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 265–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 81–107). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrebiniak, L. G. (1974). Effects of job level and participation on employee attitudes and perceptions of influence. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4), 649–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ferrell, O. C., Hurley, R. F., & Giunipero, L. C. (2000). Leadership and relationship commitment: A focus on the supplier–buyer–user linkage. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(2), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Cavusgil, S. T., & Calantone, R. J. (2006). Knowledge as a strategic resource in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 458–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Nichols, E. L. (2002). An examination of cultural competitiveness and order fulfillment cycle time within supply chains. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004). Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., & Nichols, E. L., Jr. (1999). A study of team orientation in global purchasing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 14(3), 194–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. K., Li, W. L., & Chan, L. Y. (2004). The impact of supplier development on buyer–supplier performance. Omega, 32(2), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H., Singh, S. P., & Glardon, R. (2016). An integer linear program for integrated supplier selection: A sustainable flexible framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(2), 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., Hussain, M., & Saber, H. M. (2016). Information sharing in a sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 181(A), 208–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khorasani, S. T. (2018). A robust optimization model for supply chain in agile and flexible mode based on variables of uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(3), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. K., Park, S. H., Ryoo, S. Y., & Park, S. K. (2010). Inter-organizational cooperation in buyer–supplier relationships: Both perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 863–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingshott, R. P. (2006). The impact of psychological contracts upon trust and commitment within supplier–buyer relationships: A social exchange view. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 724–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1998). An empirical investigation of supplier development: Reactive and strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Singh, R. K., & Shankar, R. (2013). Study on coordination issues for flexibility in supply chain of SMEs: A case study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(2), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, I. W. G., & Suh, T. (2005). Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: A path analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laohavichien, T., Fredendall, L. D., & Cantrell, R. S. (2009). The effects of transformational and transactional leadership on quality improvement. Quality Management Journal, 16(2), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32(6), 991–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Humphreys, P. K., Yeung, A. C., & Cheng, T. E. (2007). The impact of specific supplier development efforts on buyer competitive advantage: An empirical model. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(1), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., & Lin, B. (2006). Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1641–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F. R., Huang, S. H., & Lin, S. C. (2002). Effects of information sharing on supply chain performance in electronic commerce. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Luo, Y., & Liu, T. (2009). Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 294–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Ding, Y., Asian, S., & Paul, S. K. (2018). From supply chain integration to operational performance: The moderating effect of market uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(Suppl. 1), S3–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmgren, H. B. (1961). Information, expectations and the theory of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(3), 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. W. (1981). Structural exchange and marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(4), 825–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, R. (2015). Charismatic and transformational leadership styles: A cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., Nair, A., Griffith, D. A., Arlbjørn, J. S., & Bendoly, E. (2009). Lock-in situations in supply chains: A social exchange theoretic study of sourcing arrangements in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 27(5), 374–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Vokurka, R. J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2016). When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 724–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Ryu, S. (2008). Alternative origins to interorganizational trust: An interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organization Science, 19(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. I., & Brock, P. (1996). Outcomes of perceived discrimination among Hispanic employees: Is diversity management a luxury or a necessity? Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 704–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., Narayanan, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2018). An investigation of justice, conflict, and moderating effects of supplier autonomy and cultural distance in buyer–supplier relationships. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(1), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villena, V. H., Choi, T. Y., & Revilla, E. (2019). Revisiting interorganizational trust: Is more always better or could more be worse? Journal of Management, 45(2), 752–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. (1990). Adding to contingent-reward behavior the augmenting effect of charismatic leadership. Group and Organization Management, 15(4), 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Ye, F., & Tan, K. H. (2014). Effects of managerial ties and trust on supply chain information sharing and supplier opportunism. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 7046–7061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W. P. (2008). Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: The mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 122–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. Y., Weng, Y. C., & Huang, I. C. (2012). A study of supply chain partnerships based on the commitment-trust theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(4), 690–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, J. H. Y., Selen, W., Zhang, M., & Huo, B. (2009). The effects of trust and coercive power on supplier integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. C., & Wilkinson, I. F. (1989). The role of trust and co-operation in marketing channels: A preliminary study. European Journal of Marketing, 23(2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., & Benton, W. C. (2007). Supply chain practice and information sharing. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1348–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Institutional Support for Research and Creativity (ISRC) Grant 2014 given by New York Institute of Technology, New York.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Birasnav.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birasnav, M., Mittal, R. & Dalpati, A. Integrating Theories of Strategic Leadership, Social Exchange, and Structural Capital in the Context of Buyer–Supplier Relationship: An Empirical Study. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 20, 219–236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00211-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00211-y

Keywords

Navigation