Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leadership For Mitigating Ripple Effects in Supply Chain Disruptions: A Paradoxical Role

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 276))

Abstract

For leadership, responding to supply chain disruptions can be paradoxical. Supply chain disruptions can rattle the stability and operational norms of a company and its stakeholders. Without an unwavering effort to contain the damage, such disruptions can easily propagate and become even more damaging. This assertion suggests that decisive leadership is fit for the purpose. However, supply chain disruptions often sever multiple value-generating streams, creating a ripple effect across organizations. Re-establishing production links in a web of inter-organizational exchanges requires careful examination of what is at stake by purchasing and supply managers. This alternative assertion suggests that an adaptive leader is fit for the purpose. The concurrent need for decisiveness in leadership and adaptiveness in leadership can be paradoxical. In this study, we explore this issue by assessing how leader’s adaptive decision-making (ADM) affects the extent of operational performance damage caused by different forms of supply chain disruptions. Using paradox and leadership theories, we offer hypotheses related to unexpected, complicated and enduring supply chain disruptions. We empirically test our hypotheses using secondary (financial) and primary (managerial assessment) data from a cross-section of 251 manufacturing firms. Results show a concave curvilinear relationship between leader’s ADM and operational damage from supply chain disruptions, suggesting that moderate levels of ADM are optimal. Higher ADM is particularly effective to diminish ripple effects in the face of rare disruptions. Instead, low ADM is more effective in the face of unexpected and complicated disruptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J. V., & Cantor, D. E. (2016). Supply chain risk mitigation competency: an individual-level knowledge-based perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1398–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1975). Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. California Management Review, 18(2), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadegan, A., & Jayaram, J. (2018) Resiliency in supply chain systems: A triadic framework using family resilience model. In Supply Chain Risk Management (pp. 269–288). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. C., Schmitt, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Winer, R. S. (2013). Managerial decision making in customer management: adaptive, fast and frugal? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(4), 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechky, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2011). Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedell-Avers, K. E., Hunter, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Conditions of problem-solving and the performance of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: A comparative experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigley, G. A., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, C., & Wagner, S. M. (2015). Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management, 36(1), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., & Lagadec, P. (2000). Preparing for the future: Critical challenges in crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 8(4), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, J. C., Gelles, M. G., Reyes, G., Civiello, C. L., & Zahner, M. (2008). Effectively planning for and managing major disasters. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 11(2), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2005). Level 5 leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 7–8, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, P. D., Giunipero, L., Handfield, R. B., & Eltantawy, R. (2006). Supply management’s evolution: Key skill sets for the supply manager of the future. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(7), 822–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culp, S. (2013) Supply chain disruption a major threat to business. Forbes. Retrived from.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S. R., & Kamoche, K. (2006). Surprises in management and organization: Concept, sources and a typology. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defee, C. C., Stank, T. P., Esper, T. L., & Mentzer, J. T. (2009). The role of followers in supply chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deverell, E. (2010). Flexibility and rigidity in crisis management and learning at Swedish public organizations. Public Management Review, 12(5), 679–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, K. R., & Borodzicz, E. P. (2008). Interwoven leadership: The missing link in multi-agency major incident response. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(4), 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittman, P. (2014). Game-changing trends in supply chain: Managing risk in the global supply chain. The Global Supply Chain Institute Report 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K. J., & Lichtenstein, B. (2008) Research methods for studying the complexity dynamics of leadership. Complexity leadrship. part I: Conceptual foundation (pp 269–290).

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBrin, A. J. (2014). Personal attributes and behaviors of effective crisis leaders. In Handbook of research on crisis leadership in organizations. Northamton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E. (1986). The processing of crisis and non‐crisis strategic issues. Journal of Management Studies, 23(5), 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R., Quarantelli, E. L., & Kreps, G. (1981). A perspective on disaster planning. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstat, R. A., Beer, M., Foote, N., Fredberg, T., & Norrgren, F. (2008). The uncompromising leader. Harvard Business Review, 86(7–8), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinger, A., & Ellinger, A. D. (2013). Leveraging human resource development expertise to improve supply chain managers’ skills and competencies. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1/2), 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essex, A., Subramanian, N., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016). The relationship between supply chain manager capabilities and performance: empirical evidence. Production Planning and Control, 27(3), 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, S. E., Andraski, J. C., Fawcett, A. M., & Magnan, G. M. (2010). The indispensible supply chain leader. Supply Chain Management Review, 14(5), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floricel, S., & Miller, R. (2001). Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large-scale engineering projects. International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gammelgaard, B., & Larson, P. D. (2001). Logistics skills and competencies for supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi, J. G., Lee-Kelley, L., & Kutsch, E. (2010). The Titanic sunk, so what? Project manager response to unexpected events. International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., McCormick, L. C., Rucks, A. C., Wingate, M. S., & Abdolrasulnia, M. (2006). Effective response to large-scale disasters: The need for high-reliability preparedness networks. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 24(3), 331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunipero, L. C., & Aly Eltantawy, R. (2004). Securing the upstream supply chain: A risk management approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(9), 698–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddon, A., Loughlin, C., & McNally, C. (2015). Leadership in a time of financial crisis: What do we want from our leaders? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 36(5), 612–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Jennings, P. L., & Thatcher, R. W. (2013). The psychological and neurological bases of leader self-complexity and effects on adaptive decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. G., & Richey, R. G. (2001). Global supply chain management: The selection of globally competent managers. Journal of International Management, 7(2), 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). Leadership in a (permanent) crisis. Harvard Business Review, 87(7/8), 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2003). The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Shea, C. M. (2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group and Organization Management, 31(2), 180–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Chabowski, B. R. (2007). Leadership, the buying center, and supply chain performance: A study of linked users, buyers, and suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G. (2004). Task leadership. In G. R. Goethels, G. J. Sorensen, & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., & Dodge, G. E. (1999). The effects of visionary and crisis-responsive charisma on followers: An experimental examination of two kinds of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 423–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Impact of situational framing and complexity on charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leaders: Investigation using a computer simulation. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2018). Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience. International Journal of Production Research 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014). The ripple effect in supply chains: Trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, E. H., & Wooten, L. P. (2005). Leadership as (Un) usual: How to display competence in times of crisis. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Wowak, K. D., & Craighead, C. W. (2014). Resource gaps and resource orchestration shortfalls in supply chain management: The case of product recalls. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovoor-Misra, S. (2002). Boxed-in:: Top managers' propensities during crisis issue diagnosis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(8), 803–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J., Shamsie, J., & Shapira, Z. (2009). Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organization Science, 20(5), 835–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Wu, Q., Holsapple, C. W., & Goldsby, T. (2017). An empirical examination of firm financial performance along dimensions of supply chain resilience. Management Research Review, 40(3), 254–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukina, I., Azadegan, A., Hooker, R., & Lucianetti, L. (2017). Leadership in the face of major supply chain disruptions: baseline and contextual traits. In Academy of Management Proceedings 2017 (vol. 1, p. 15644). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. R., & Corsi, T. M. (2013). Supply chain disruption management: Severe events, recovery, and performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(4), 270–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, J., & Christopher, M. (2005). Management development and the supply chain manager of the future. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muffet-Willett, S., & Kruse, S. (2009). Crisis leadership: Past research and future directions. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning, 3(3), 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, M., Ritsema van Eck, J. R., & De Jong, R. D. (1971). An organization in crisis and non-crisis situations. Human Relations, 24(1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, D. (2009). The Education of an Accidental CEO: Lessons Learned from the Trailer Park to the Corner Office. Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overstreet, R. E., Hanna, J. B., Byrd, T. A., Cegielski, C. G., & Hazen, B. T. (2013). Leadership style and organizational innovativeness drive motor carriers toward sustained performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 24(2), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özçelik, G., & Cenkci, T. (2014). Moderating effects of job embeddedness on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and in-role job performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 872–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Hong, P., & Roh, J. J. (2013). Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan. Business Horizons, 56(1), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. G., & Anderson, E. G. (2002). From buyer to integrator: The transformation of the supply-chain manager in the vertically disintegrating firm. Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, T. O., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2008). A tale of two situations: An empirical study of behavior by not-for-profit managerial leaders. Public Performance and Management Review, 31(4), 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, R., & Meindl, J. R. (1998). Context and charisma: A “meso” level examination of the relationship of organic structure, collectivism, and crisis to charismatic leadership. Journal of Management, 24(5), 643–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokesh, S. (1986). Man in the News; A Leader in Crisis: James E Burke. The New York Times, 2(19), B6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (1997). Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. Disasters, 21(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. G., Tokman, M., & Wheeler, A. R. (2006). A supply chain manager selection methodology: Empirical test and suggested application. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. C., & Bradley, R. T. (1988). Limits of charisma. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2001). The transformational-transactional leadership model in practice. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(8), 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr, T., Modi, S. B., Benton, W. C., Carter, C. R., Choi, T. Y., Larson, P. D., et al. (2012). Research opportunities in purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4556–4579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, M. W., Sellnow T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (2003). Communication and organizational crisis. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, I., Azadegan, A., Lucianetti, L., & Qi, L. (2017). Leading organizations through supply chain disruptions: An exploratory study of necessary traits. Rutgers Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, I., Azadegan, A., & Davis, D. (2018). After the triggering event: A phasic perspective on leadership during supply chain disruptions. In Academy of management proceedings forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., & Goda, K. (2004). From disaster to sustainable civil society: The Kobe experience. Disasters, 28(1), 16–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. (2015). The power of resilience: How the best companies manage the unexpected. New York: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B., Jr. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan management review, 47(1), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenkman, R. (2000). Presidential ambition: Gaining power at any cost. Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shou, Y., & Wang, W. (2017). Multidimensional competences of supply chain managers: An empirical study. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W., & Wei, Y. (2014). From superstorms to factory fires: Managing unpredictable supply-chain disruptions. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. F., French, R., & Harvey, C. E. (2002). Leadership and negative capability. Human Relations, 55(10), 1209–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soergel, A. (2016). Economy still reeling from west coast slowdown. US News and World Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, B., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Pavlov, A. (2016). Structural quantification of the ripple effect in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 152–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., Jr., & Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management: A perspective on partnerships. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stank, T., Crum, M., & Arango, M. (1999). Benefits of interfirm coordination in food industry supply chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(2), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton J. E. (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 501–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E. (2013). Preparing: The sixth task of crisis leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). The origins of vision: Charismatic versus ideological leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 343–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundnes, K. O., & Birnbaum, M. L. (2003). Health disaster management: Guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 17 (Supplement 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G. (2000). A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30(9), 731–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatham, P., & Kovács, G. (2010). The application of “swift trust” to humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, L. M., Esper, T. L., & Autry, C. W. (2016). Leader or lobbyist? How organizational politics and top supply chain manager political skill impacts supply chain orientation and internal integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(4), 42–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukiainen, S., Aaltonen, K., & Murtonen, M. (2010). Coping with an unexpected event: Project managers’ contrasting sensemaking in a stakeholder conflict in China. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(3), 526–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek, R. I., Chatham, R., & Wilding, R. (2002). Managers in supply chain management, the critical dimension. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(3), 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & Cremer, D. De. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wart, M., & Kapucu, N. (2011). Crisis management competencies: The case of emergency managers in the USA. Public Management Review, 13(4), 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2006). An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(6), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., & Kemmerling, R. (2015). Supply chain management executives in corporate upper echelons. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(3), 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., Parida, V., & Kreiser, P. M. (2013). Nonlinear effects of entrepreneurial orientation on small firm performance: The moderating role of resource orchestration capabilities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(2), 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, A., Handfield, R. B., & Durach, C. F. (2016). Mapping the landscape of future research themes in supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 37(3), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. R., Esper, T. L., & Ozment, J. (2002). The electronic supply chain: Its impact on the current and future structure of strategic alliances, partnerships and logistics leadership. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32(8), 703–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., & Barbat, V. (2015). The supply chain manager as political-entrepreneur? Industrial Marketing Management, 49(8), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., & Xie, M. (2000). A study of operational and testing reliability in software reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 70(3), 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn, S., Yang, M. G. M., & Hong, P. (2012). Integrative leadership for effective supply chain implementation: An empirical study of Korean firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2005). Leadership in organizations. United Kingdom: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Florida Tampa, Tampa, Florida, USA

    Iana Shaheen & Robert Hooker

  2. Rutgers Business School New Brunswick, Piscataway Township, New Jersey, USA

    Arash Azadegan

  3. University of Chieti and Pescara, Pescara, Italy

    Lorenzo Lucianetti

Authors
  1. Iana Shaheen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arash Azadegan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Hooker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lorenzo Lucianetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iana Shaheen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Economics, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Germany

    Dmitry Ivanov

  2. Department of Automation, Production and Computer Sciences, IMT Atlantique, LS2N - CNRS UMR, Nantes, France

    Alexandre Dolgui

  3. SPIIRAS, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Boris Sokolov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shaheen, I., Azadegan, A., Hooker, R., Lucianetti, L. (2019). Leadership For Mitigating Ripple Effects in Supply Chain Disruptions: A Paradoxical Role. In: Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. (eds) Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 276. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14302-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation