Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid expansion and auto-grafting efficiency of porcine full skin expanded by a skin bioreactor ex vivo

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Full skin auto-grafts are required for reconstruction of skin burns and trauma scars. However, currently available clinical approaches such as sheet skin graft, mesh skin grafts, artificial skin graft, and in vivo skin expansion have limitations due to their potential danger for secondary damage and scar formation at the donor site, and discomfort during skin expansion. We developed an advanced bioreactor system and evaluated its function in skin expansion using porcine full skin. The reactor was designed as a pneumatic cylinder type, was programmed to adjust the pressure and the operating time. The system was composed of culture chamber unit, environmental control unit, and monitoring unit. Skins were expanded at 200 kPa pneumatic force and the expanded skins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and histology. Furthermore we carried out auto-grafting experiment of the expanded skins in vivo using Yucatan pigs and skins were harvested and histologically analyzed after 8 weeks. The results showed that the bioreactor expanded skins to 160% in 4 hours. Histological analysis of the expanded skins revealed that epidermal cells and dermal fibroblasts were viable and remained integrity. The results of auto-grafting experiment indicated that fibrosis and scars were not detected in the grafted skins. This study demonstrates that the newly developed skin bioreactor enabled to obtain large sized full skin rapidly and successful grating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansen SL, Mathes SJ, Young DM. Skin and subcutaneous tissue. In: Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Mathews JB, et al., editors. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. Columbus, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2008. p. 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holmes JH, Heimbach DM. Burns. In: Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Mathews JB, et al., editors. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. Columbus, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2005. p. 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shenaq SM, Kim JY, Bienstock A, Yuksel E. Plastic and reconstructive surgery: soft tissue reconstruction. In: Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Mathews JB, et al., editors. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. Columbus, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2007. p. 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atiyeh BS, Hayek SN, Gunn SW. New technologies for burn wound closure and healing—review of the literature. Burns 2005;31:944–956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrenreich M, Ruszczak Z. Update on tissue-engineered biological dressings. Tissue Eng 2006;12:2407–2424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansbrough JF, Mozingo DW, Kealey GP, Davis M, Gidner A, Gentzkow GD. Clinical trials of a biosynthetic temporary skin replacement, dermagraft-transitional covering, compared with cryopreserved human cadaver skin for temporary coverage of excised burn wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 1997;18(1 Pt 1):43–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang EM, Eiberg CA, Brandis M, Stark GB. Biobrane in the treatment of burn and scald injuries in children. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:485–489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Machens HG, Berger AC, Mailaender P. Bioartificial skin. Cells Tissues Organs 2000;167:88–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Radovan C. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the temporary expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:195–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spence RJ. Clinical use of a tissue expander—enhanced transposition flap for face and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1988;21:58–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tausche AK, Skaria M, Böhlen L, Liebold K, Hafner J, Friedlein H, et al. An autologous epidermal equivalent tissue-engineered from follicular outer root sheath keratinocytes is as effective as split-thickness skin autograft in recalcitrant vascular leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11:248–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 1995;21:243–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Waymack P, Duff RG, Sabolinski M. The effect of a tissue engineered bilayered living skin analog, over meshed split-thickness autografts on the healing of excised burn wounds. The Apligraf Burn Study Group. Burns 2000;26:609–619.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Augustine R, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S. An in vitro method for the determination of microbial barrier property (MBP) of porous polymeric membranes for skin substitute and wound dressing applications. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2015;12:12–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung E, Choi H, Lim JE, Son Y. Development of skin inflammation test model by co-culture of reconstituted 3D skin and RAW264. 7 cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2014;11:87–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong HS, Son Y. Substance-p-mobilized mesenchymal stem cells accelerate skin wound healing. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2014;11:483–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huh MI, Kim MS, Kim HK, Lim JO. Effect of conditioned media collected from human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells (hAFSCs) on skin regeneration and photo-aging. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2014;11:171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ladd MR, Lee SJ, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Bioreactor maintained living skin matrix. Tissue Eng Part A 2009;15:861–868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeong C, Chung HY, Lim HJ, Lee JW, Choi KY, Yang JD, et al. Applicability and safety of in vitro skin expansion using a skin bioreactor: a clinical trial. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:661–667.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fung MA, Sharon VR, Ratnarathorn M, Konia TH, Barr KL, Mirmirani P. Elastin staining patterns in primary cicatricial alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;69:776–782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ouhtit A, Muller HK, Davis DW, Ullrich SE, McConkey D, Ananthaswamy HN. Temporal events in skin injury and the early adaptive responses in ultraviolet-irradiated mouse skin. Am J Pathol 2000;156:201–207.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aberle H, Schwartz H, Kemler R. Cadherin-catenin complex: protein interactions and their implications for cadherin function. J Cell Biochem 1996;61:514–523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jamora C, Fuchs E. Intercellular adhesion, signalling and the cytoskeleton. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4:E101–E108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Ok Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huh, MI., An, S.H., Kim, HG. et al. Rapid expansion and auto-grafting efficiency of porcine full skin expanded by a skin bioreactor ex vivo . Tissue Eng Regen Med 13, 31–38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-016-9096-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-016-9096-0

Keywords

Navigation