Skip to main content
Log in

Polymer powder and pellets comparative performances as bio-based composites

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Iranian Polymer Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polypropylene (PP) is adopted as a matrix. This polymer is usually processed in the form of pellets with natural fillers to fabricate biocomposites. The micronized powder form of PP is rarely used by polymer manufacturers. This paper investigates the effect of polymer powder form on the overall properties of date palm filler-based composites. In particular, the mechanical, physical, and thermal properties of newly developed date palm powder (DPP)-filled composites were experimentally characterized, evaluated, and compared with two forms of PP: powder (PW) and pellet (PL). Specimens were fabricated using a laboratory-scale single-screw extruder followed by compression molding. The experimental characterization of materials supported by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the PW form of PP when used as a matrix in the biocomposites was very important to achieve a higher degree of homogeneity in filler distribution, stronger interfacial strength and thus enhancing the performance. Therefore, biocomposites fabricated using the PW form exhibited more advanced properties than those used with the PL form. Depending on the fiber content, tensile strength and flexural strength for PW-based biocomposites were 53% and 27% higher than similar values for PL-based biocomposites, respectively. Water absorption was lower in the case of PW form which indicated good durability of the developed material. The findings of the present study may help manufacturers to effectively process date palm powder-filled biocomposites to achieve better properties and enhanced performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faruk O, Bledzki AK (2012) Wood plastic composite: present and future. Wiley Ency Compos 16:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ammar M, Mechi N, Saad MEK, Elaloui E, Moussaoui Y (2018) Characterisation of composite panels produced from lignin-glyoxal-resin reinforced by date palm petiole fibers. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 76:1295–1302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Soccalingame L, Bourmaud A, Perrin D, Bénézet JC, Bergeret A (2015) Reprocessing of wood flour reinforced polypropylene composites: impact of particle size and coupling agent on composite and particle properties. Polym Degrad Stab 113:72–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aroso IM, Fernandes EM, Pires RA, Mano JF, Reis RL (2015) Cork extractives exhibit thermo-oxidative protection properties in polypropylene–cork composites and as direct additives for polypropylene. Polym Degrad Stab 116:45–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaaba NF, Ismail H, Jaafar M (2016) Recycled polypropylene/peanut shell powder composites: pre-treatment of lignin using alkaline peroxide. Bio Resour 11:3524–3537

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nassar MMA, Arunachalam R, Alzebdeh KI (2017) Machinability of natural fiber reinforced composites: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:2985–3004

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vinayagamoorthy R (2019) Influence of fiber surface modifications on the mechanical behavior of Vetiveria zizanioides reinforced polymer composites. J Nat Fibers 16:163–174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moura A, Bolba C, Demori R, Lima LPFC, Santana RMC (2018) Effect of rice husk treatment with hot water on mechanical performance in poly (hydroxybutyrate)/rice husk biocomposite. J Polym Environ 26:2632–2639

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed MJ, Balaji MS, Saravanakumar SS, Sanjay MR, Senthamaraikannan P (2019) Characterization of Areva javanica fiber—a possible replacement for synthetic acrylic fiber in the disc brake pad. J Ind Text 49:294–317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zadeh KM, Inuwa IM, Arjmandi R, Hassan A, Almaadeed M, Mohamad Z, Khanam PN (2017) Effects of date palm leaf fiber on the thermal and tensile properties of recycled ternary polyolefin blend composites. Fiber Polym 18:1330–1335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao KMM, Rao KM (2007) Extraction and tensile properties of natural fibers: Vakka, date and bamboo. Compos Struct 77:288–295

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang L, Roach AW, Gardner DJ, Han Y (2018) Mechanisms contributing to mechanical property changes in composites of polypropylene reinforced with spray-dried cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose 25:439–448

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bansal SA, Singh AP, Kumar S (2018) High strain rate behavior of epoxy graphene oxide nanocomposites. Int J Appl Mech 10:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu X, Liao Y, Meng G, Tang L, Zhou Z, Li Q, Huang W (2019) SiO2/carbon fiber-reinforced polypropylene–thermoplastic polyurethane composites: electrical conductivity and mechanical and thermal properties. Iran Polym J 28:527–537

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bansal SA, Singh AP, Kumar S (2019) Reinforcing graphene oxide nanoparticles to enhance viscoelastic performance of epoxy nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:4000–4006

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salavati M, Yousefi AA (2019) Polypropylene–clay micro/nanocomposites as fused deposition modeling filament: effect of polypropylene-g-maleic anhydride and organo-nanoclay as chemical and physical compatibilizers. Iran Polym J 28:611–620

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seth SA, Tokan A, Aji IS (2019) Investigation of the impact, hardness, density and water absorption of polypropylene filled Doum palm shell particles composite. J Inf Eng Appl 8:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaudemanche S, Perrot A, Pimbert S, Lecompte T, Faure F (2018) Properties of an industrial extruded HDPE-WPC: the effect of the size distribution of wood flour particles. Constr Build Mater 162:543–552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Richard S, Rajadurai JS, Manikandan V (2016) Influence of particle size and particle loading on mechanical and dielectric properties of biochar particulate-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 21:462–477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Essabir H, Achaby MEI, Hilali EM, Bouhfid R, Qaiss AEi, (2015) Morphological, structural, thermal and tensile properties of high density polyethylene composites reinforced with treated argan nut shell particles. J Bionic Eng 12:129–141

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chun KS, Husseinsyah S, Osman H (2015) Utilization of cocoa pod husk as filler in polypropylene biocomposites: effect of maleated polypropylene. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 28:1507–1521

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bavasso I, Bracciale MP, Sbardella F, Tirillò J, Sarasini F, Di Palma L (2019) Effect of yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) residue and coupling agent on the mechanical and thermal properties of polyolefin-based composites. Polym Compos 41:161–173

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salama M, Hassabo AG, El-Sayed AA, Salem T, Popescu C (2017) Reinforcement of polypropylene composites based on recycled wool or cotton powders. J Nat Fibers 14:823–836

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Panigrahi S, Li X, Tabil L (2008) Injection moulding processing of flax fibre-reinforced polyethylene biocomposites.In: International Conference on flax and other bast plants, pp 399–407

  25. Gironès J, Lopez JP, Vilaseca F, Bayer R, Herrera-Franco PJ, Mutjé P (2011) Biocomposites from Musa textilis and polypropylene: evaluation of flexural properties and impact strength. Compos Sci Technol 71:122–128

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang W, Han G, Zhang Y, Wang M (2010) Fast compositional analysis of ramie using near-infrared spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 81:937–941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Watkins D, Nuruddin M, Hosur M, Tcherbi-Narteh A, Jeelani S (2015) Extraction and characterization of lignin from different biomass resources. J Mater Res Technol 4:26–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang H, Yao X, Sui G, Yin L, Wang L (2015) Properties of Xanthoceras sorbifolia husk fibers with chemical treatment for applications in polymer composites. J Mater Sci Technol 31:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM (2016) A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part A 83:98–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Alzebdeh KI, Nassar MMA, Arunachalam R (2019) Effect of fabrication parameters on strength of natural fiber polypropylene composites: Statistical assessment. Measurement 146:195–207

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yuan S, Bai J, Kai Chua C, Zhou K, Wei J (2016) Characterization of creeping and shape memory effect in laser sintered thermoplastic polyurethane. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 16:041007–041012

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alzebdeh KI, Nassar MMA, Al-Hadhrami MA, Al-Aamri O, Al-Defaai S, Al-Shuaily S (2017) Characterization of mechanical properties of aligned date palm frond fiber-reinforced low density polyethylene. J Eng Res 14:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mujika F, Carbajal N, Arrese A, Mondragon I (2006) Determination of tensile and compressive moduli by flexural tests. Polym Test 25:766–771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jia J, Raabe D (2008) Crystallinity and crystallographic texture in isotactic polypropylene during deformation and heating. arXiv preprint arXiv:0811.2412

  36. Guo CG, Wang QW (2008) Influence of m-isopropenyl-α, α-dimethylbenzyl isocyanate grafted polypropylene on the interfacial interaction of wood-flour/polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 109:3080–3086

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Otaibi MS, Alothman OY, Alrashed MM, Anis A, Naveen J, Jawaid M (2020) Characterization of date palm fiber-reinforced different polypropylene matrices. Polymers 12:597

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahmoudi N (2013) Use of date palm fibers as reinforcement for thermoplastic-based composites. Mech Ind 14:71–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Eslami-farsani R (2017) Effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of date palm fiber reinforced PP/EPDM composites. Adv Compos Mater 24:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rizal S, Ikramullah, Gopakumar DA, Thalib S, Huzni S, Abdul Khalil HPS (2018) Interfacial compatibility evaluation on the fiber treatment in the Typha fiber reinforced epoxy composites and their effect on the chemical and mechanical properties. Polymers 10:1316

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sosiati H, Nahyudin A, Wijayanti DA, Triyana KS (2018) Effect of alkali treatment and MAPP addition on tensile strength of sisal/polypropylene composites. J Adv Manuf Technol 12:65–77

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tusnim J, Jenifar NS, Hasan M (2020) Effect of chemical treatment of jute fiber on thermo-mechanical properties of jute and sheep wool fiber reinforced hybrid polypropylene composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 27:0892705720944220

    Google Scholar 

  43. Luthra P, Singh R, Kapur GS (2019) Development of polypropylene/banana peel (treated and untreated) composites with and without compatibilizer and their studies. Mater Res Express 6:095313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. de Cipriano JP, Zanini NC, Dantas IR, Mulinari DR (2019) Mechanical properties of polypropylene composites reinforced with Macadamia nutshell fibers. J Renew Mater 7:1047–1053

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao X, Sun Z, Tang A (2020) Effects of hyperbranched polyamide on the properties of sisal fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. J Nat Fibers. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1787923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Carraher CEJ (2007) Polymer Chemistry. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Väisänen T, Das O, Tomppo L (2017) A review on new bio-based constituents for natural fiber-polymer composites. J Clean Prod 149:582–596

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lau K, Yan HP, Zhu MH, Hui D (2018) Properties of natural fibre composites for structural engineering applications. Compos Part B Eng 136:222–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the Surface Science Lab and the Nano-Technology Research Center at Sultan Qaboos University for their help to obtain SEM images and XRD results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid I. Alzebdeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nassar, M.M.A., Alzebdeh, K.I., Pervez, T. et al. Polymer powder and pellets comparative performances as bio-based composites. Iran Polym J 30, 269–283 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-020-00888-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-020-00888-4

Keyword

Navigation