Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retrospective evaluation of the effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on data derived from two prospective open-label observational multicenter studies in Italy regarding elective colorectal surgery. MBP for elective colorectal surgery remains a controversial issue with contrasting recommendations in current guidelines. The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group, therefore, decided to estimate the effects of no MBP (treatment variable) versus MBP for elective colorectal surgery. A total of 8359 patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis were enrolled in two consecutive prospective studies in 78 surgical centers in Italy from January 2019 to September 2021. A retrospective PSMA was performed on 5455 (65.3%) cases after the application of explicit exclusion criteria to eliminate confounders. The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates; the secondary endpoints included SSI subgroups, overall and major morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates. Overall length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) was also considered. Two well-balanced groups of 1125 patients each were generated: group A (No MBP, true population of interest), and group B (MBP, control population), performing a PSMA considering 21 covariates. Group A vs. group B resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of AL [42 (3.5%) vs. 73 (6.0%) events; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38–0.84; p = 0.005]. No difference was recorded between the two groups for SSI [73 (6.0%) vs. 85 (7.0%) events; OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63–1.22; p = 0.441]. Regarding the secondary endpoints, no MBP resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of reoperation and LOS > 6 days. This study confirms that no MBP before elective colorectal surgery is significantly associated with a lower risk of AL, reoperation rate, and LOS < 6 days when compared with MBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request from Marco Catarci, iCral Study Group coordinator (email: marco.catarci@aslroma2.it).

References

  1. Bucher P, Gervaz P, Soravia C, Mermillod B, Erne M, Morel P (2005) Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 92:409–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koskenvuo L, Lehtonen T, Koskensalo S, Rasilainen S, Klintrup K, Ehrlich A, Pinta T, Scheinin T, Sallinen V (2019) Mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus no bowel preparation for elective colectomy (MOBILE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, single-blinded trial. Lancet 394:840–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rollins KE, Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Lobo DN (2018) impact of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 24:519–536

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders G, Mercer SJ, Saeb-Parsey K et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial of intravenous fluid replacement during bowel preparation for surgery. Br J Surg 88:1363–1365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 43:659–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McChesney SL, Zelhart MD, Green RL et al (2020) Current U.S. Pre-operative bowel preparation trends: a 2018 survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Members. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 21:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Willis MA, Keller PS, Sommer N, Koch F, Ritz J-P, Beyer K, Reißfelder C, Hardt J, Herold A, Buhr HJ, Emmanuel K, Kalff JC, Vilz TO (2023) Adherence to fast track measures in colorectal surgery-a survey among German and Austrian surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis 38:80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04379-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Toh JWT, Phan K, Hitos K, Pathma-Nathan N, El-Khoury T, Richardson AJ, Morgan G, Engel A, Ctercteko G (2018) Association of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective colorectal surgery with surgical site infection a network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 1(6):e183226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rollins KE, Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Acheson AG, Lobo DN (2019) The role of oral antibiotic preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 270:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rollins KE, Lobo DN (2021) The controversies of mechanical bowel and oral antibiotic preparation in elective colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 273:e13–e15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson RL, Hassan M, Grant MD (2020) Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: are oral, intravenous or both best and is mechanical bowel preparation necessary? Tech Coloproctol 24:1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02301-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson RL, Gladman E, Barbateskovic M (2014) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD001181. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001181.pub4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Willis MA, Toews I, Soltau SLV, Kal JC, Meerpohl JJ, Vilz TO (2023) Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:014909. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014909.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Catarci M, Ruffo G, Viola MG et al (2022) ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study. Surg Endosc 36:3965–3984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leakage ICA (2023) Patient-reported outcomes, return to intended oncological therapy and enhanced recovery pathways after colorectal surgery: a prospective multicenter observational investigation by the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral 3) study group. Ann Surg Open 4(1):e267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathew G, Agha R, for the STROCSS Group (2021) STROCSS 2021: strengthening the Reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in Surgery. Int J Surg 96:106165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K et al (2016) Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today 46(6):668–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147(3):339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA (2008) CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 36:309–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46(3):399–424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Stürmer T (2006) Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol 163(12):1149–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C et al (2009) Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 13(9):782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Austin PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 10(2):150–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ho DE, Imai K, King G et al (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit Anal 15(3):199–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenbaum PR (2020) The power of a sensitivity analysis and its limit. In: Rosenbaum PR (ed) Design of Observational studies Springer Series in Statistics. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 317–336

    Google Scholar 

  29. Catarci M, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, Borghi F, Garulli G, Marini P, Baldazzi G, Scatizzi M, on behalf of the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group (2023) High adherence to enhanced recovery pathway independently reduces major morbidity and mortality rates after colorectal surgery: a reappraisal of the iCral2 and iCral3 multicenter prospective studies. G Chir 43:2. https://doi.org/10.1097/IA9.0000000000000024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Mäkelä JT, Pääkkönen ME (2000) Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:669–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fry DE (2011) Colon preparation and surgical site infection. Am J Surg 202:225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guenaga KF, Matos D, Wille Jorgensen P (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:001544

    Google Scholar 

  34. Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Montemurro LA, Ciano P, Benedetti M, Delrio P, Garulli G, Pirozzi F, Scatizzi M, Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) Study Group (2023) Blood transfusions and adverse events after colorectal surgery: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a hen-egg issue. Diagnostics 13(5):952

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Baldazzi G, Scatizzi M, on behalf of the the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group (2023) Three- versus two-rows circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts. Int J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Poole GV (1991) (1991) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during bowel preparation: an example of clinical translocation. South Med J 84:1412–1413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kale TI, Kuzu MA, Tekeli A, Tanik A, Aksoy M, Cete M (1998) Aggressive bowel preparation does not enhance bacterial translocation, provided the mucosal barrier is not disrupted: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41:636–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lieberman D, Ghormley J, Flora K (1996) Effect of oral sodium phosphate colon preparation on serum electrolytes in patients with normal serum creatinine. Gastrointest Endosc 43:467–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Watanabe M, Murakami M, Nakao K, Asahara T, Nomoto K, Tsunoda A (2010) Randomized clinical trial of the influence of mechanical bowel preparation on faecal microflora in patients undergoing colonic cancer resection. Br J Surg 97:1791–1797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weir MR, Rolfe M (2010) Potassium homeostasis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5(3):531–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li Z, Chu Y, Zhao Z, Jiangping F, Peng Q, Zhang J, Wang B, Luo X, Huang Z, Fan L, Liu J (2023) High-intensity mechanical bowel preparation before curative colorectal surgery is associated with poor long-term prognosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 38:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04295-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yao XI, Wang X, Speicher PJ et al (2017) Reporting and guidelines in propensity score analysis: a systematic review of cancer and cancer surgical studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 109(8):djw323

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Simoneau G, Pellegrini F, Debray TPA, Rouette J, Muñoz J, Platt RW, Petkau J, Bohn J, Shen C, de Moor C, Karim ME (2022) Recommendations for the use of propensity score methods in multiple sclerosis research. Mult Scler J 28(9):1467–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. García-Granero E, Navarro F, Cerdán Santacruz C et al (2017) Individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for leak after double-stapled colorectal anastomosis: An institutional analysis of 800 patients. Surgery 162(5):1006–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Assistance with the study: † iCral study group co-investigators are

Raffaele De Luca, Ferdinando Ficari, Stefano Scabini, Andrea Liverani, Stefano Mancini, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Roberto Santoro, Walter Siquini, Gianluca Guercioni, Massimo Basti, Corrado Pedrazzani, Mauro Totis, Alessandro Carrara, Andrea Lucchi, Maurizio Pavanello, Andrea Muratore, Stefano D’Ugo, Alberto Di Leo, Giusto Pignata, Ugo Elmore, Gabriele Anania, Massimo Carlini, Francesco Corcione, Nereo Vettoretto, Graziano Longo, Mario Sorrentino, Antonio Giuliani, Giovanni Ferrari, Lucio Taglietti, Augusto Verzelli, Mariantonietta Di Cosmo, Davide Cavaliere, Marco Milone, Stefano Rausei, Giovanni Ciaccio, Giovanni Tebala, Giuseppe Brisinda, Stefano Berti, Paolo Millo, Luigi Boni, Mario Guerrieri, Roberto Persiani, Dario Parini, Antonino Spinelli, Michele Genna, Vincenzo Bottino, Andrea Coratti, Dario Scala, Umberto Rivolta, Micaela Piccoli, Carlo Talarico, Franco Roviello, Alessandro Anastasi, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Mauro Montuori, Pierpaolo Mariani, Nicolò de Manzini, Annibale Donini, Mariano Fortunato Armellino, Carlo Feo, Silvio Guerriero, Andrea Costanzi, Federico Marchesi, Moreno Cicetti, Maria Sole Mattei, Elena Belloni, Daniela Apa, Matteo Di Carlo, Simone Cicconi, Irene Marziali, Marco Clementi, Elisa Bertocchi, Gaia Masini, Amedeo Altamura, Francesco Rubichi, Desirée Cianflocca, Marco Migliore, Diletta Cassini, Antonio Sciuto, Ugo Pace, Andrea Fares Bucci, Francesco Monari, Grazia Maria Attinà, Valerio Sisti, Marcella Lodovica Ricci, Angela Maurizi, Bruno Sensi, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Lorenzo Pandolfini, Alessandro Falsetto, Michele Simone, Francesco Giudici, Fabio Cianchi, Gabriele Baldini, Alessandra Aprile, Domenico Soriero, Andrea Scarinci, Andrea Sagnotta, Sarah Molfino, Pietro Amodio, Alessandro Cardinali, Diletta Frazzini, Cristian Conti, Nicolò Tamini, Marco Braga, Michele Motter, Giuseppe Tirone, Giacomo Martorelli, Alban Cacurri, Carlo Di Marco, Patrizia Marsanic, Nicoletta Sveva Pipitone Federico, Marcello Spampinato, Lorenzo Crepaz, Jacopo Andreuccetti, Ilaria Canfora, Giulia Maggi, Matteo Chiozza, Domenico Spoletini, Rosa Marcellinaro, Giorgio Lisi, Umberto Bracale, Roberto Peltrini, Maria Michela Di Nuzzo, Emanuele Botteri, Simone Santoni, Massimo Stefanoni, Giovanni Del Vecchio, Carmelo Magistro, Silvia Ruggiero, Arianna Birindelli, Andrea Budassi, Daniele Zigiotto, Leonardo Solaini, Giorgio Ercolani, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Silvia Tenconi, Paolo Locurto, Antonio Di Cintio, Maria Michela Chiarello, Maria Cariati, Andrea Gennai, Manuela Grivon, Elisa Cassinotti, Monica Ortenzi, Alberto Biondi, Maurizio De Luca, Francesco Carrano, Francesca Fior, Antonio Ferronetti, Giuseppe Giuliani, Graziella Marino, Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio, Francesca Pecchini, Vincenzo Greco, Roberto Piagnerelli, Giuseppe Canonico, Marco Colasanti, Enrico Pinotti, Roberta Carminati, Edoardo Osenda, Luigina Graziosi, Ciro De Martino, Giovanna Ioia, Fioralba Pindozzi, Lorenzo Organetti, Michela Monteleone, Giorgio Dalmonte, Gabriele La Gioia.

From the 20Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari; 21General Surgery and IBD Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze; 22General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, IRCCS “San Martino” National Cancer Center, Genova; 23General Surgery Unit, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano Laziale (RM); 24General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Roma 1; 25General Surgery Unit 3, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia; 26General Oncologic Surgery Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo; 27General Surgery Unit, S. Lucia Hospital, Macerata; 28General Surgery Unit, Spirito Santo Hospital, Pescara; 29General & HPB Surgery Unit, University Hospital, Verona; 30Colorectal Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza; 311st General Surgery Unit, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento; 32General Surgery Unit, “Ceccarini” Hospital, Riccione (RN); 33General Surgery Unit, AULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Conegliano Veneto (TV); 34General Surgery Unit, “E. Agnelli” Hospital, Pinerolo (TO); 35General Surgery Unit, “V. Fazzi” Hospital, Lecce; 36General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, San Camillo Hospital, Trento; 372nd General Surgery Unit 2, Spedali Civili di Brescia; 38Gastroenterologic Surgery Unit, IRCCS S. Raffaele Hospital, Milano; 39General & Laparoscopic Surgery Unit, University Hospital, Ferrara; 40General Surgery Unit, S. Eugenio Hospital, ASL Roma 2; 41General Oncologic and Mininvasive Surgery Unit, “Federico II” University, Napoli; 42General Surgery Unit, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Montichiari (BS); 43General Surgery Unit, Policlinico Casilino, Roma; 44General Surgery Unit, Latisana-Palmanova Hospital, Friuli Centrale University (UD); 45General Surgery Unit, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza; 46General Oncologic and Mininvasive Surgery Unit, Great Metropolitan Niguarda Hospital, Milano; 47General Surgery Unit, ASST Valcamonica, Esine (BS); 48General Surgery Unit, Profili Hospital, Fabriano (AN); 49General & Upper GI Surgery Unit, University Hospital, Verona; 50General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì (FC); 51General & Endoscopic Surgery Unit, “Federico II” University, Napoli; 52General Surgery Unit, Gallarate Hospital (VA); 53General Surgery Unit, S. Elia Hospital, Caltanissetta; 54General Surgery Unit, S. Maria Hospital, Terni; 55General Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Crotone; 56General Surgery Unit, ASL 5 Liguria POLL, La Spezia; 57General Surgery Unit, “U. Parini” Regional Hospital, Aosta; 58General Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Policlinico Maggiore Hospital, Milano; 59Surgical Clinic, Torrette Hospital, University of Ancona; 60General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma; 61General Surgery Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo; 62Colorectal Surgery Unit, Humanitas University, Rozzano (MI); 63General & Bariatric Surgery Unit, University Hospital, Verona; 64General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Evangelico Betania Hospital, Napoli; 65General Surgery Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto; 66Abdominal Oncologic Surgery Unit, Basilicata Oncologic Hospital, Rionero in Vulture (PZ); 67General Surgery Unit, Fornaroli Hospital, ASST Ovest Milanese, Magenta (MI); 68General Surgery Unit, Civil Hospital, Baggiovara (MO); 69General Surgery Unit, Villa dei Gerani Hospital, Vibo Valentia (VV); 70Surgical Clinic, University of Siena; 71General Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Firenze; 72General & Transplant Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Roma; 73General & Mininvasive Surgery Unit, S. Pietro Hospital, Ponte San Pietro (BG); 74General Surgery Unit, Pesenti Fenaroli Hospital, Alzano Lombardo (BG); 75Surgical Clinic, University of Trieste; 76General & Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Perugia; 77General & Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona Hospital, Salerno; 78General Surgery Unit, Delta Hospital, Lagosanto (FE); 79General Surgery Unit, “F. Murri” Hospital, Fermo; 80General Surgery Unit, S. Leopoldo Hospital, Merate (LC); 81Surgical Clinic, University of Parma; 82General Surgery Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Urbino (PU); Italy.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Medtronic SI® Italy provided unconditioned support to the organization of three iCral2 study investigator meetings, held in Rome, Italy—October 2018, Matera, Italy—June 2019 and Bologna, Italy—October 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MC: iCral Study Group coordinator, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: MC, SG, GR, GV, FB, GB, FP, PD, GG, PM, AP, RC, AM, PC, MB, GG, GS, MC, and MS. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: MC, SG, GR, MSV, FB, GB, FP, PD, GG, PM, AP, RC, AM, PC, MB, GG, MS, and MS. Drafting of the manuscript: MC, SG, and FM. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: MC, SG, GR, MGV, FB, GB, FP, PD, GG, PM, AP, RC, AM, PC, MB, GG, GS, MC, and MS. Statistical analysis: FM and SG.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Catarci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Catarci reports personal fees from Baxter Spa outside the submitted work. Dr. Guadagni, Ruffo, Viola, Borghi, Baldazzi, Pirozzi, Delrio, Garulli, Marini, Patriti, Campagnacci, Montemurro, Ciano, Benedetti, Guercioni, Sica, Caricato, and Scatizzi have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Both studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines for good clinical practice E6 (R2). The study protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the coordinating center (Marche Regional Ethics Committee—CERM—2018/334 released on 11/28/2018 for iCral2; CERM—2020/192 released on 07/30/2020 for iCral3) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03771456 for iCral2 and NCT04397627 for iCral3).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of the Study group coordinator and iCral study group co-investigators are listed in the Acknowledgments section.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 42 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catarci, M., Guadagni, S., Masedu, F. et al. Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts. Updates Surg 76, 107–117 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01670-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01670-w

Keywords

Navigation