Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Care for the Cancer Caregiver: a Qualitative Study of Facilitators and Barriers to Caregiver Integration and Support

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Informal family caregivers are critically important for patient care throughout the cancer care trajectory. Family-centered care, which seeks to integrate family members as experts, is a framework that values partnerships with family members and can benefit both the physical and psychosocial health of patients. However, little standardization or system-level implementation of family-centered care models to integrate and support family caregivers have emerged in adult oncology care settings in the USA. To better understand potential barriers and facilitators to the integration and support of family caregivers in cancer care settings, we conducted semi-structured interviews with informal family caregivers (n = 12) and members of the cancer center leadership team and health care providers (n = 11) at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. We frame our results using the social ecological model and identified facilitators and barriers at the individual, interpersonal, and system level. While caregivers and team members were able to identify facilitators and barriers at the individual (i.e., caregivers are motivated to learn, but overwhelmed and focused only on the patient) and interpersonal levels (i.e., relationships are a valuable resource, but communication is sometimes challenging), team members were more likely to identify system-level barriers (i.e., constraints within the larger healthcare structure). To implement family-centered care in cancer settings, it is incumbent on the healthcare system to pursue standardization of communication, programs that facilitate family integration and support, and advocate for policy change. Barriers must be addressed at multiple levels to provide inclusive and supportive environments for all patients and their families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available by reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Code availability

N/A.

References

  1. National Alliance for Caregiving. Cancer caregiving in the US – an intense, episodic, and challenging care experience. National Alliance for Caregiving in partnership with the National Cancer Institute Cancer Support Community; 2016.

  2. Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, Litzelman K, Chou W-YS, Shelburne N, Timura C, O’Mara A, Huss K (2016) Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 122(13):1987–1995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim Y, Carver CS, Shaffer KM, Gansler T, Cannady RS (2015) Cancer caregiving predicts physical impairments: roles of earlier caregiving stress and being a spousal caregiver. Cancer. 121(2):302–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood P (2012) The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs. 28(4):205–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burgdorf J, Roth DL, Riffin C, Wolff JL. Factors associated with receipt of training among caregivers of older adults factors associated with receipt of training among caregivers of older adults. Letters. 2019.

  6. Dionne-Odom JN, Applebaum AJ, Ornstein KA, Azuero A, Warren PP, Taylor RA, Rocque GB, Kvale EA, Demark-Wahnefried W, Pisu M, Partridge EE, Martin MY, Bakitas MA (2018) Participation and interest in support services among family caregivers of older adults with cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 27(3):969–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kokorelias KM, Gignac MA, Naglie G, Cameron JI (2019) Towards a universal model of family centered care: a scoping review. BMC health services research. 19(1):564

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaslow NJ, Dunn SE, Henry T, Partin C, Newsome J, O'Donnell C, Wierson M, Schwartz AC (2020) Collaborative patient- and family-centered care for hospitalized individuals: best practices for hospitalist care teams. Families, Systems, & Health. 38(2):200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldfarb MJ, Bibas L, Bartlett V, Jones H, Khan N (2017) Outcomes of patient- and family-centered care interventions in the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care Medicine. 45(10):1751–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caregiving NAf. From insight to advocacy: addressing family caregiving as a National Public Health Issue. 2018.

  11. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 12 ed2018.

  12. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers: Sage; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schielke HJ, Fishman JL, Osatuke K, Stiles WB (2009) Creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data: the Ward method. Psychotherapy Research. 19(4-5):558–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sallis J, Owen N, Fisher E (2008) Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K (eds) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 465–486

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guest G (2015) Sampling and selecting participants in field research. In: Bernard HR, Gravlee CC (eds) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, 2nd edn. Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp 215–250

    Google Scholar 

  16. Price ML, Surr CA, Gough B, Ashley L (2020) Experiences and support needs of informal caregivers of people with multimorbidity: a scoping literature review. Psychology & Health. 35(1):36–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tranberg M, Andersson M, Nilbert M, Rasmussen BH Co-afflicted but invisible: a qualitative study of perceptions among informal caregivers in cancer care. J Health Psychol 0(0):1359105319890407

  18. Kelley DE, Lewis MA (2017) Southwell BG. Perceived support from a caregiver's social ties predicts subsequent care-recipient health, Prev Med Rep

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Division of Behavioral Social Sciences and Education, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Behavioral Cognitive and Sensory Sciences, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Committee on the Health Medical Dimensions of Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults (2020) Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care system. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang SY, Groene O (2020) The effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions on physician behavioral change: a systematic literature review. PLOS ONE. 15(6):e0234149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D (2010) Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 4(1):74–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Siminoff LA, Wilson-Genderson M, Baker S Jr (2010) Depressive symptoms in lung cancer patients and their family caregivers and the influence of family environment. Psycho-Oncology. 19(12):1285–1293

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, Fisher A, Juraskova I (2017) Oncologists’ and oncology nurses’ attitudes and practices towards family involvement in cancer consultations. European Journal of Cancer Care. 26(1):e12470

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was conducted as part of the Society for Behavioral Medicine Leadership Institute.

Funding

The National Cancer Institute 5T32CA090314-15 funded Dr. Ketcher’s effort.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Maija Reblin: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft, writing–review & editing, supervision; Dana Ketcher: formal analysis, writing–original draft, writing–review & editing; Susan Vadaparampil: supervision, writing–review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maija Reblin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Advarra Institutional Review Board. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to Participate

Verbal informed consent was obtained prior to the interview.

Consent for Publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reblin, M., Ketcher, D. & Vadaparampil, S.T. Care for the Cancer Caregiver: a Qualitative Study of Facilitators and Barriers to Caregiver Integration and Support. J Canc Educ 37, 1634–1640 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02001-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02001-6

Keywords

Navigation