Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Redox conditions and nutrients affect the mobility of arsenic in coastal sediments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effects of redox conditions, nitrogen (NH4+–N and NO3–N) and phosphate in the overlying water on the release of arsenic (As) in coastal sediments were investigated. The results indicated that the release of As under anaerobic conditions presented a release—dynamic equilibrium pattern. The reduction of arsenate (As(V)) to arsenite (As(III)) under anaerobic conditions was the main factor promoting the release of As. The reductive dissolution of Fe(III) oxides contributed very limited to the release; the release–remove–release pattern was observed under aerobic conditions. Although Fe(III) oxides has strong adsorption capacity for As, sulfide oxidation may be a source of As, which may continuously release As under aerobic conditions. In addition, low concentration (< 6 mg L−1) of nitrogen may stimulate anaerobic metabolism of microorganisms, resulting in reduction and dissolution of As. The low pH of high concentration (> 6 mg L−1) of nitrogen may affect the microbial community and thus decreased the concentration of As. Since the reduction of Fe(III) oxides decreased the adsorption sites, the competitive adsorption of phosphate had no significant effect on the release of As under anaerobic conditions. Totally, this study provides a new understanding of the behavior of As in coastal sediments under variable environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acquavita A, Floreani F, Covelli S (2021) Occurrence and speciation of arsenic and mercury in alluvial and coastal sediments. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 22:100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeyens W, Mirlean N, Bundschuh J, de Winter N, Baisch P, da Silva Júnior FMR, Gao Y (2019) Arsenic enrichment in sediments and beaches of Brazilian coastal waters: a review. Sci Total Environ 681:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battistel M, Stolze L, Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2021) Arsenic release and transport during oxidative dissolution of spatially—distributed sulfide minerals. J Hazard Mater 409:124651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton ED, Johnston SG, Bush RT (2011) Microbial sulfidogenesis in ferrihydrite-rich environments: Effects on iron mineralogy and arsenic mobility. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 75:3072–3087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton ED, Johnston SG, Planer-Friedrich B (2013) Coupling of arsenic mobility to sulfur transformations during microbial sulfate reduction in the presence and absence of humic acid. Chem Geol 343:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Wang L, Liu S, Hu J, He Y, Zhou H, Zhang X (2013) Profiling of microbial community during in situ remediation of volatile sulfide compounds in river sediment with nitrate by high throughput sequencing. Int Biodeter Biodegr 85:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou P, Ng D, Li I, Lin Y (2018) Effects of dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity and humic acid on the release of metal ions from PbS, CuS and ZnS during a simulated storm event. Sci Total Environ 624:1401–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couture R-M, Gobeil C, Tessier A (2010) Arsenic, iron and sulfur co-diagenesis in lake sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:1238–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui L, Wang X, Li J, Gao X, Zhang J, Liu Z (2021) Ecological and health risk assessments and water quality criteria of heavy metals in the Haihe river. Environ Pollut 290:117971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das SK, Das SK (2020) Influence of phosphorus and organic matter on microbial transformation of arsenic. Environ Technol Innov 19:100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahota P, Mikutta C, Falteisek L, Duchoslav V, Klementova M (2017) Biologically induced formation of realgar deposits in soil. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 218:237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahota P, Peřestá M, Trubač J, Mihaljevič M, Vaněk A (2021) Arsenic fractionation and mobility in sulfidic wetland soils during experimental drying. Chemosphere 277:130306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan L, Song J, Yin M, Yuan H, Li X, Zhang Y, Yin X (2021) Dynamics of arsenic and its interaction with Fe and S at the sediment–water interface of the seasonal hypoxic Changjiang estuary. Sci Total Environ 769:145269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhreddine S, Prommer H, Gorelick SM, Dadakis J, Fendorf S (2020) Controlling arsenic mobilization during managed aquifer recharge: the role of sediment heterogeneity. Environ Sci Technol 54:8728–8738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Hernandez J, Glenn EP, Flessa K (2013) Identification of chemicals of potential concern (COPECs) in anthropogenic wetlands of the Colorado river delta. Ecol Eng 59:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Ordiales E, Covelli S, Braidotti G, Petranich E, Pavoni E, Acquavita A, Sanz-Prada L, Roqueñí N, Loredo J (2020) Mercury and arsenic mobility in resuspended contaminated estuarine sediments (Asturias, Spain): a laboratory-based study. Sci Total Environ 744:140870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh K-H, Lim T-T (2004) Geochemistry of inorganic arsenic and selenium in a tropical soil: effect of reaction time, pH, and competitive anions on arsenic and selenium adsorption. Chemosphere 55(6):849–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu X, Ouyang W, Xu L, Tysklind M, Lin C, He M, Wang B, Xin M (2020) Occurrence, migration, and allocation of arsenic in multiple media of a typical semi-enclosed bay. J Hazard Mater 384:121313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillen MT, Delgado J, Albanese S, Nieto JM, Lima A, De Vivo B (2012) Heavy metals fractionation and multivariate statistical techniques to evaluate the environmental risk in soils of Huelva township (SW Iberian Peninsula). J Geochem Explor 119:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han YS, Park JH, Kim SJ, Jeong HY, Ahn JS (2019) Redox transformation of soil minerals and arsenic in arsenic-contaminated soil under cycling redox conditions. J Hazard Mater 378:120745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta-Diaz MA, Tessier A, Carignan R (1998) Geochemistry of trace metals associated with reduced sulfur in freshwater sediments. Appl Geochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(97)00060-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humans IWGotEoCRt (2004) Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 84:1–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS, Hossain MB, Matin A, Sarker MSI (2018) Assessment of heavy metal pollution, distribution and source apportionment in the sediment from Feni river estuary, Bangladesh. Chemosphere 202:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji ZH, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Chen T, Long ZW, Li M, Pei YS (2019) Distribution, ecological risk and source identification of heavy metals in sediments from the Baiyangdian lake, Northern China. Chemosphere 237:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Sheng Y, Liu Q, Wang W, Liu X (2021) Conversion mechanisms between organic sulfur and inorganic sulfur in surface sediments in coastal rivers. Sci Total Environ 752:141829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang M, Tian Y, Peng S, Wang M (2019) Effect of dissolved oxygen and nutrient levels on heavy metal contents and fractions in river surface sediments. Sci Total Environ 648:861–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk MF, Roden EE, Crossey LJ, Brealey AJ, Spilde MN (2010) Experimental analysis of arsenic precipitation during microbial sulfate and iron reduction in model aquifer sediment reactors. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 74:2538–2555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocar BD, Herbel MJ, Tufano KJ, Fendorf S (2006) Contrasting effects of dissimilatory iron(III) and arsenic(V) reduction on arsenic retention and transport. Environ Sci Technol 40:6715–6721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Diao Z, Xu X, Xie Q (2019) Effects of dissolved oxygen, salinity, nitrogen and phosphorus on the release of heavy metals from coastal sediments. Sci Total Environ 666:894–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Sheng Y, Wang W, Li C, Zhao G (2020) Remediation and its biological responses of Cd contaminated sediments using biochar and minerals with nanoscale zero-valent iron loading. Sci Total Environ 713:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Sheng Y, Wang W, Liu X (2021) Efficacy and microbial responses of biochar-nanoscale zero-valent during in-situ remediation of Cd-contaminated sediment. J Clean Prod 287:125076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew D, Gireeshkumar TR, Balachandran KK, Udayakrishnan PB, Shameem K, Deepulal PM, Nair M, Madhu NV, Muraleedharan KR (2020) Influence of hypoxia on phosphorus cycling in Alappuzha mud banks, southwest coast of India. Reg Stud Mar Sci 34:101083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao S, DeLaune RD, Jugsujinda A (2006) Influence of sediment redox conditions on release/solubility of metals and nutrients in a Louisiana Mississippi river deltaic plain freshwater lake. Sci Total Environ 371:334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon EM, Bush RT, Gibbs DHM, Mata JP (2017) Divergent Fe and S mineralization pathways during the oxidative transformation of greigite, Fe3S4. Chem Geol 468:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neidhardt H, Rudischer S, Eiche E, Schneider M, Stopelli E, Duyen VT, Trang PTK, Viet PH, Neumann T, Berg M (2021) Phosphate immobilisation dynamics and interaction with arsenic sorption at redox transition zones in floodplain aquifers: insights from the Red river delta Vietnam. J Hazard Mater 411:125128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Hasi M, Wang R, Wang Y, Geng Q, Hu S, Xu X, Yang J, Wang C, Han X, Huang J (2021) Soil microbial community responses to long-term nitrogen addition at different soil depths in a typical steppe. Appl Soil Ecol 167:104054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan VTH, Bernier-Latmani R, Tisserand D, Bardelli F, Le Pape P, Frutschi M, Gehin A, Couture R-M, Charlet L (2019) As release under the microbial sulfate reduction during redox oscillations in the upper Mekong delta aquifers, Vietnam: a mechanistic study. Sci Total Environ 663:718–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinklebe J, Shaheen SM, Frohne T (2016) Amendment of biochar reduces the release of toxic elements under dynamic redox conditions in a contaminated floodplain soil. Chemosphere 142:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinos DA, Iglesias L, Diaz-Fierros F, Barral MT (2011) Interacting effect of pH, phosphate and time on the release of arsenic from polluted river sediments (Anllns river, Spain). Aquat Geochem 17:281–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu L, Ng JC, Tang W, Zhao Y, Sun L, Zhang H (2021) Assessment methodology applied to arsenic pollution in lake sediments combining static and dynamic processes. Chemosphere 277:130260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Zhang M, Zhang J, Lyu T, Cooper M, Pan G (2021) Reducing arsenic toxicity using the interfacial oxygen nanobubble technology for sediment remediation. Water Res 205:117657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Xu L, Zhao Z, Wang S, Jia Y, Wang H, Wang X (2012) Arsenic retention and remobilization in muddy sediments with high iron and sulfur contents from a heavily contaminated estuary in China. Chem Geol 314–317:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Lin C, He M, Liu X, Liu S (2013) Arsenic distribution and adsorption behavior in the sediments of the Daliao river system in China. Water Environ Res 85:687–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu R, Wang Q, Xu F, Men C, Shen Z (2016a) Bioavailability and risk assessment of arsenic in surface sediments of the Yangtze river estuary. Mar Pollut Bull 113:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.08.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Long X, Chong Y, Yu G (2016b) Potential risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments during the denitrification process enhanced by calcium nitrate addition: effect of AVS residual. Ecol Eng 87:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Xu J, Xia J, Wu F, Zhang Y (2018) A kinetic study of concurrent arsenic adsorption and phosphorus release during sediment resuspension. Chem Geol 495:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Tu X, Zhang H, Cui J, Ni K, Chen J, Cheng Y, Zhang J, Chang SX (2020) Effects of ammonium-based nitrogen addition on soil nitrification and nitrogen gas emissions depend on fertilizer-induced changes in pH in a tea plantation soil. Sci Total Environ 747:141340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Wang P, Zhang J, Chen C, Wang Z, Kopittke PM, Kretzschmar R, Zhao F (2019) Microbial sulfate reduction decreases arsenic mobilization in flooded paddy soils with high potential for microbial Fe reduction. Environ Pollut 251:952–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav SK, Ramanathan AL, Kumar M, Chidambaram S, Gautam YP, Tiwari C (2020) Assessment of arsenic and uranium co-occurrences in groundwater of central Gangetic plain, Uttar Pradesh. India Environ Earth Sci 79(6):154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Cheng H, Gao H, An SS (2020) Response and driving factors of soil microbial diversity related to global nitrogen addition. Land Degrad Dev 31:190–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Meng X, Jing C (2020) Influence of sulfur on the mobility of arsenic and antimony during oxic-anoxic cycles: differences and competition. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 288:51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Xiao X, Zhao Y, Zhou J, Sun B, Liang Y (2021) Patterns of microbial arsenic detoxification genes in low-arsenic continental paddy soils. Environ Res 201:111584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Zhao H, Abashina T, Vainshtein M (2021) Review on arsenic removal from sulfide minerals: an emphasis on enargite and arsenopyrite. Miner Eng 172:107133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No.: XDA23050203). Additional support was from the Key Project of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.: ZR2020KE048).

Funding

The study was funded by Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No.: XDA23050203) and Key Project of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.: ZR2020KE048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanqing Sheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 196 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Ma, T., Liu, Q. et al. Redox conditions and nutrients affect the mobility of arsenic in coastal sediments. Environ Earth Sci 81, 451 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10573-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10573-9

Keywords

Navigation