Skip to main content
Log in

Slope creep behavior: observations and simulations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock slopes undergoing long–term effects of weathering and gravity may gradually deform or creep downslope leading to geological structures such as bending, bucking, fracturing, or even progressive failure. This study uses geomechanics-based numerical modeling to qualitatively explain the cause and evolution of slope creep behavior. Constitutive models used include the creep, Mohr–Coulomb, and anisotropic models. The last two models are used with the strength reduction in calculation. First, the results of field investigation around a landslide site occurring in slate are present. The causes and modes of creep structures observed on slopes and underground are studied. Second, the study investigates the influences of slope topography and anisotropy orientations on slope creep behavior. Finally, progressive failure of slopes with different shapes is examined. The simulated results show that the bending type of structures develops near slope surfaces, and the buckling type of structures is associated with the deformation or slides of a slope. The creep pattern varies with the orientation and position of an original planar structure. The shear zone involves a joint or fracture along which displacement has taken place. Moreover, creep behavior is more significant on slopes with greater height and inclination as well as on steeper portions whether on concave or convex slopes. In addition, with the same topographic conditions, consequent slopes with coinciding cleavage and obsequent slopes with steep cleavage result in greater creep behavior. Without the effects of anisotropic cleavage, concave and straight slopes develop failure surfaces from the crowns downwards, whereas convex slopes develop failure surfaces from the toes upwards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amadei B (1996) Importance of anisotropy when estimating and measuring in situ stresses in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(3):293–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Akagi T, Kawamoto T (1996) The squeezing potential of rock around tunnels: theory and prediction with examples taken from Japan. Rock Mech Rock Eng 29:125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovis MJ, Evans SG (1996) Extensive deformations of rock slopes in southern Coast Mountains, southwest British Columbia, Canada. Eng Geol 44:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brideau M, Stead D (2012) Evaluating kinematic controls on planar translational slope failure mechanisms using three-dimensional distinct element modeling. Geotech Geol Eng 30:991–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkgreve RBJ, Broere W, Waterman D (2008) PLAXIS, finite element code for soil and rock analyses, 2D-version 9

  • Cai M, Kaiser PK, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2007) Determination of residual strength parameters of jointed rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang KT, Wan S, Lei TC (2010) Development of a spatial decision support system for monitoring earthquake-induced landslides based on aerial photographs and the finite element method. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 12(6):448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chigira M (1992) Long-term gravitational deformation of rocks by mass rock creep. Eng Geol 32:157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai CS, Samtani NC, Vulliet L (1995) Constitutive modeling and analysis of creeping slopes. J Geotech Eng 121:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey RK, Gairola VK (2008) Influence of structural anisotropy on creep of rock salt from Simla Himalaya, India: an experimental approach. J Struct Geol 30:710–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt E, Thuro K, Luginbuehl M (2005) Slope instability mechanisms in dipping interbedded conglomerates and weathered marls—the 1999 Rufi landslide, Switzerland. Eng Geol 77:35–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Bedoui S, Guglielmi Y, Lebourg T, Pérez J (2009) Deep-seated failure propagation in a fractured rock slope over 10,000 years: the La Clapière slope, the south-eastern French Alps. Geomorphology 105:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre G, Pellet F (2006) Creep and time-dependent damage in argillaceous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:950–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhimi AA, Fairhurst C (1994) A model for the time-dependent behavior of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 31:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federico A, Popescu M, Elia G, Fidelibus C, Interno` G, Murianni A (2012) Prediction of time to slope failure: a general framework. Environ Earth Sci 66:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Merodo JA, García-Davalillo JC, Herrera G, Mira P, Pastor M (2012) 2D viscoplastic finite element modelling of slow landslides: the Portalet case study (Spain). Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-012-0370-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer L, Amann F, Moore JR, Huggel C (2010) Assessment of periglacial slope stability for the 1988 Tschierva rock avalanche. Eng Geol 116:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics. Wiley

  • Goodman RE (1993) Engineering geology. Wiley

  • Grøneng G, Lu M, Nilsen B, Jenssen AK (2010) Modelling of time-dependent behavior of the basal sliding surface of the Åknes rockslide area in western Norway. Eng Geol 114:414–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 edn. In: Proceedings of NARMS-TAC Conference, vol 1. Toronto, pp 267–273

  • Jarman D (2006) Large rock slope failures in the Highlands of Scotland: characterization, causes and spatial distribution. Eng Geol 83:161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malan DF (1999) Time-dependent behaviour of deep level tabular excavations in hard rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32:123–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margielewski W (2006) Structural control and types of movements of rock mass in anisotropic rocks: case studies in the Polish Flysch Carpathians. Geomorphology 77:47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin Y (2000) Modelling hillslope evolution: linear and nonlinear transport relations. Geomorphology 34:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley

  • Mufundirwa A, Fujii Y, Kodama J (2010) A new practical method for prediction of geomechanical failure-time. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1079–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino A, Prestininzi A (2007) Impact of weathering on the geomechanical properties of rocks along thermal—metamorphic contact belts and morpho-evolutionary processes: the deep-seated gravitational slope deformations of Mt. Granieri-Salincriti (Calabria–Italy). Geomorphology 87:176–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN, Higuchi T, Petley DJ, Bulmer MH, Carey J (2005) Development of progressive landslide failure in cohesive materials. Geology 33:201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi S, Xu Q, Lan H, Zhang B, Liu J (2010) Spatial distribution analysis of landslides triggered by 2008.5.12 Wenchuan earthquake, China. Eng Geol 116:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience Inc (2013) RocLab, rock mass strength analysis using the generalized Hoek–Brown failure criterion. version 1

  • Shao JF, Zhu QZ, Su K (2003) Modeling of creep in rock materials in terms of material degradation. Comput Geotech 30:549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin K, Okubo S, Fukui K, Hashiba K (2005) Variation in strength and creep life of six Japanese rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil and Water Conservation Bureau of Taiwan (2006) Remediation and investigation of the landslide from 88 K to 91 K of the route 14. Report No. SWCB-95-074

  • Turner AK, Schuster RL (1996) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. Landslides, analysis and control. Transp Res Board Spec Rep 176:11–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangensteen B, Guðmundsson Á, Eiken T, Kääb A, Farbrot H, Etzelmüller B (2006) Surface displacements and surface age estimates for creeping slope landforms in Northern and Eastern Iceland using digital photogrammetry. Geomorphology 80:59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willenberg H, Evans KF, Eberhardt E, Spillmann T, Loew S (2008) Internal structure and deformation of an unstable crystalline rock mass above Randa (Switzerland): part II—three-dimensional deformation patterns. Eng Geol 101:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method, 5th edn. Oxford

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this research by the National Science Council, Taiwan through the Grant NSC 99-2625-M-005-006-MY3 is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuang-Tsung Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, KT., Ge, L. & Lin, HH. Slope creep behavior: observations and simulations. Environ Earth Sci 73, 275–287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3423-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3423-2

Keywords

Navigation