Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pre-emptive Diclofenac Versus Ketoprofen as a Transdermal Drug Delivery System: How They Face

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To compare the analgesic efficacy of Diclofenac vis-a-vis Ketoprofen transdermal patch, in the management of immediate post-operative pain following orthognathic procedures.

Material and Method

A prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled study was conducted among 50 subjects, between 2012 and 2015. These patients were diagnosed clinically and cephalometrically as skeletal and dental class II malocclusion and underwent bi-jaw surgical procedure. In total, 25 Diclofenac and 25 Ketoprofen transdermal patches, sealed in envelopes and numbered, were administered to subjects. The patches used, contained 100 mg of either Diclofenac or Ketoprofen and administered by a nurse prior to induction. Duration of analgesia, severity of pain using Visual Analog Scale, necessity of rescue analgesia (spontaneous pain > 5 on a 10-cm scale) and any other adverse effect associated with the drug were evaluated.

Results

Mean duration of analgesia was significantly higher in the Ketoprofen group (20 h), compared to Diclofenac group (13 h) (p = 0.001). Rescue analgesia was required in 12% of subjects who received Diclofenac patch, compared to 4% in Ketoprofen group. None of the subjects showed any allergic reactions.

Conclusion

The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of transdermal patch in reduction of post-operative pain in subjects undergoing bi-jaw surgeries. Subjects in both groups were comfortable and returned to early function. However, Ketoprofen transdermal patch had an edge over the Diclofenac transdermal patch with respect to analgesic efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ng P, Kam CW, Yau HH (2001) A comparison of Ketoprofen and Diclofenac for acute musculoskeletal pain relief: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Hong Kong. J Emerg Med 8:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dhiman S, Gurjeet TS, Rehni AK (2011) Transdermal patch: a recent approach to the new drug delivery system. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 3(5):26–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar SV, Tarun P, Kumar TA (2013) Transdermal drug delivery system for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a review indo American. J Pharm Res 3(5):3588–3605

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R (2004) Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev 3:115–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazières B, Rouanet S, Velicy J, Scarsi C, Reiner V (2005) Topical Ketoprofen patch (100 mg) for the treatment of ankle sprain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Sports Med 33:515–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heyneman CA, Lawless- Liday C, Wall GC (2000) Oral vs topical NSAIDS in rheumatic diseases: a comparison. Drugs 60(3):555–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Prabhakar H, Shrirao SA, Shelgaonkar VC, Ghosh AA (2005) Comparative evaluation of intramuscular Ketoprofen and Diclofenac sodium for postoperative pain relief. Internet J Anesthesiol 11:1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanna MH, Elliott KM, Stuart-Taylor ME (2003) Comparative study of analgesic efficacy and morphine sparing effect of intramuscular dexketoprofen trometamol with Ketoprofen or placebo after major orthopaedic surgery. Br J Clin Pharmacol 55(2):126–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Atzeni F, SarziPuttini P, Lanata L, Bagnasco M (2013) Efficacy of Ketoprofen vs ibuprofen and Diclofenac: a systematic review of the literature and meta analysis. Arthritis Rheum 31(5):731–738

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krishna R, Nataraj MS (2012) Efficacy of a single dose of a transdermal Diclofenac patch as pre-emptive postoperative analgesia: a comparison with intramuscular Diclofenac. S Afr J Anaesth Analg 18(4):194–197

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elhakim M (1991) A comparison of intravenous Ketoprofen with pethidine for postoperative pain relief following nasal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 35:279–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adachi H, Ioppolo F, Paloni M, Santilli V (2011) Physical characteristics, pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy of the Ketoprofen patch: a new patch formulation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 15:823–830

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ritchie LD (1996) A clinical evaluation of flurbiprofen LAT and piroxicam gel: a multicentre study in general practice. Clin Rheumatol 15:243–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanida N, Sakurada S (2008) Skin permeability, anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of Ketoprofen-containing tape and loxoprofen sodium containing tape. Jpn Pharmacol Ther 36:1123–1129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Galer BS, Rowbotham M, Perander J (2000) Topical Diclofenac patch relieves minor sports injury pain: results of a multicenter controlled clinical trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 19:287–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kostamovaara PA, Hendolin H, Kokki H (1998) Ketorolac, Diclofenac and Ketoprofen are equally efficacious for pain relief after total hip replacement surgery. Br J Anaesth 81:369–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rorarius MGE, Suominen P, Baer GA (1993) Diclofenac and Ketoprofen for pain treatment after elective caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 70:293–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooks PM, Day RO (1991) Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs-differences and similarities. N Engl J Med 324:1716–1725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perttunen K, Kalso E, Heinonen J, Salo J (1992) IV Diclofenac in post thoracotomy pain. Br J Anaesth 68:474–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Anisha and Dr. Sasank for their general support and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pranavi Jadhav.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jadhav, P., Sinha, R., Uppada, U.K. et al. Pre-emptive Diclofenac Versus Ketoprofen as a Transdermal Drug Delivery System: How They Face. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 17, 488–494 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1048-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1048-1

Keywords

Navigation