Abstract
Soil investigation (SI) work is a process of collecting subsurface ground profile information in evaluating soil engineering properties for a construction project. The standard penetration method (SPT) is widely accepted worldwide as a feasible and relatively inexpensive method over other field tests. Pressuremeter test (PMT), on the other hand, is costly and more popular in situ method in interpreting soil deformation behavior. Considering SPT is available in almost site investigation works for all sizes of project, it was tempting to establish the correlation between SPT and PMT results, specifically in local geologic setting. The study was conducted in Kenny Hill Formation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The correlation established in this study is between pressuremeter modulus (EM) and SPT blow count (N60). In addition to in situ methods, the physical properties of soil extruded from boreholes were tested in geotechnical laboratories to determine soil properties, such as particle size distribution, liquid limit, and plastic limit. These parameters need to be considered during prediction of EM. Group method of data handling (GMDH) neural network has been used to achieve this objective. The mean absolute error (MAE) results show that the GMDH neural networks produce values of 8.04 and 8.59 for training and testing. The root mean square error (RMSE) yields 10.61 and 10.84 for training and testing, respectively. Further, the results of the coefficients of determination (R2) are 0.794 and 0.726 for training and testing demonstrates a good correlation exists between predicted and measured values. Based on the GMDH results, N60, sand, and clay are required input variables for determination of EM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Aal RE (2005) GMDH-based feature ranking and selection for improved classification of medical data. J Biomed Inform 38:456–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2005.03.003
Agarwal A (1999) Abductive networks for two-group classification: a comparison with neural networks. J Appl Bus Res 15:1. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v15i2.5675
Aggour MS, Radding WR (2001) Standard penetration test (SPT) correction. Standard penetration test (SPT) correction. Report No. MD02-007B48, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore
Akca N (2003) Correlation of SPT – CPT data from the United Arab Emirates. Eng Geol 67:219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00181-3
Anantanasakul P, Yamamuro JA, Kaliakin VN (2012) Stress-strain and strength characteristics of silt-clay transition soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138:1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000692
Anbazhagan P, Parihar A, Rashmi HN (2012) Review of correlations between SPT N and shear modulus: a new correlation applicable to any region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 36:52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.005
Anwar MB (2016) Correlation between PMT and SPT results for calcareous soil. HBRC J 14:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2016.03.001
Bowles JE (1997) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw- Hill, New York
Bozbey I, Togrol E (2010) Correlation of standard penetration test and pressuremeter data: a case study from Istanbul, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:505–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0248-4
BS1377 (1990) British Standard Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. In: British Standards
BS5930 (1999) Code of practice for site investigations. In: British Standards
Cernica JN (1995) Geotechnical engineering: soil mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York
Cheshomi A, Ghodrati M (2015) Estimating Menard pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure from SPT in silty sand and silty clay soils. A case study in Mashhad, Iran. Geomech Geoengin 10:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2014.933894
Chiang YC, Ho YM (1980) Pressuremeter method for foundation design in Hong Hong. In: Proceedings of sixth Southeast Asian conference on soil engineering 1:31–42
Farlow SJ (1984) Self-organizing methods in modeling. GMDH type algorithms, Vol. 54, Marcel Dekker, New York
Garg V (2015) Inductive group method of data handling neural network approach to model basin sediment yield. J Hydrol Eng 20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001085
GEO (1987) Guide to site investigation (Geoguide 2). Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office
Geological map of Selangor Darul Ehsan (2005) Department of Mineral and Geoscience Malaysia
Geotechnical Design Manual (2013) Engineering properties of soil and rock, M 46–03.08, 5(5)
Hettiarachchi H, Brown T (2009) Use of SPT blow counts to estimate shear strength properties of soils: energy balance approach. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(6):830–834
Hutchison CS, Tan DNK (1989) Geology of Peninsular Malaysia
Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. Penetration testing Proc 2nd Eur Symp Amsterdam
Kayabasi A (2012) Prediction of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by simple and non-linear multiple regression techniques: a case study from Mersin, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 66:2171–2183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1439-4
Kong TB (2017) Engineering geology in Malaysia – some case studies. Bull Geol Soc Malaysia 64:65–79. https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm64201707
Kong TB, Komoo I (1990) Urban geology: case study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Eng Geol 28:71–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(90)90034-X
Kovacs WD, Salomone LA, Yokel FY (1981) Energy measurement in the standard penetration test. U.S. Department of Commerce and National Bureau of Standards, Washington (DC)
L’Heureux J-S, Long M (2017) Relationship between shear-wave velocity and geotechnical parameters for Norwegian clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143:04017013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001645
Law KH, Othman SZ, Hashim R, Ismail Z (2014) Determination of soil stiffness parameters at a deep excavation construction site in Kenny Hill Formation. Meas J Int Meas Confed 47:645–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.09.030
Mohamed Z, Rafek AG, Komoo I (2007) Characterisation and classification of the physical deterioration of tropically weathered Kenny Hill rock for civil works. Electron J Geotech Eng
Montgomery GJ, Drake KC (1991) Abductive reasoning networks. Neurocomputing 2:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-2312(91)90055-G
Nocilla A, Coop MR, Colleselli F (2006) The mechanics of an Italian silt: an example of “transitional” behaviour. Geotechnique 56, 261, 271 https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.4.261
Oommen T, Baise LG (2010) Model development and validation for intelligent data collection for lateral spread displacements. J Comput Civ Eng 24:467–477. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000050
Özvan A, Akkaya İ, Tapan M (2017) An approach for determining the relationship between the parameters of pressuremeter and SPT in different consistency clays in eastern Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1020-9
Regmi NR, Giardino JR, McDonald EV, Vitek JD (2015) A review of mass movement processes and risk in the critical zone of earth. Developments in Earth Surface Processes, In
Schmertmann JH, Palacios A (1979) Energy dynamics of SPT. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 17:A6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(80)90085-6
Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:3(458), 109, 458, 482
Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng 111:1425–1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425)
Sivrikaya O, Toǧrol E (2006) Determination of undrained strength of fine-grained soils by means of SPT and its application in Turkey. Eng Geol 86:52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.05.002
Stark TD, Ebeling RM, Vettel JJ (1994) Hyperbolic stress-strain parameters for silts. J Geotech Eng 120:420–441. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:2(420)
Townsend FC (1985) Geotechnical characteristics of residual soils. J Geotech Eng 111:77–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:1(77)
Yagiz S, Akyol E, Sen G (2008) Relationship between the standard penetration test and the pressuremeter test on sandy silty clays: a case study from Denizli. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:405–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-008-0153-2
Yin JH (2002) Stress-strain strength characteristics of a marine soil with different clay contents. Geotech Test J 25:9652. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj11298j
Acknowledgments
The first author is grateful to Universiti Malaysia Perlis and the Ministry of Education Malaysia for a study leave in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Thanks to the MRT Corp for the data and technical support.
Funding
This work received financial support provided by grant FRGS: MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MALAYSIA for the topic of “Establishment of Kenny Hill Small Strain Stiffness Parameter and Stiffness Degradation Curve for Sustainable Urban Underground Infrastructure Development in Malaysia” (FRGS 1/2018/TK08/USM/02/2) and Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University Grant (203111/PAWAM/6071393).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaki, M.F.M., Ismail, M.A.M., Govindasamy, D. et al. Prediction of pressuremeter modulus (EM) using GMDH neural network: a case study of Kenny Hill Formation. Arab J Geosci 13, 360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05336-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05336-4