Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correlation of standard penetration test and pressuremeter data: a case study from Istanbul, Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, correlations were obtained between standard penetration test (SPT) and pressuremeter data measured during an extensive geotechnical investigation conducted in Istanbul, Turkey. In this context, SPT blow counts (N) were correlated with pressuremeter modulus (E PMT) and limit pressure (p L). Empirical equations were proposed to estimate limit pressure from pressuremeter modulus, and E PMT/p L ratios were calculated and evaluated. An attempt was also made to correlate limit pressure to undrained shear strength (s u) measured by unconfined compression strength test. Correlations were carried out for sandy and clayey soils separately. The quantity (total of 182) and quality of the data (use of same equipment and procedures during data acquisition in a well defined geological setting) mean the obtained correlations may be valuable for similar soils. It is anticipated that the correlations obtained may help designers in evaluating, comparing, interpreting or cross checking the soil parameters obtained from these two important in situ tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggour MS, Radding WR (2001) Standard penetration test (SPT) correction. Research report submitted to Maryland Department of Transportation, Report No. SP007B48, State Highway Administration

  • Akca N (2003) Correlation of SPT–CPT data from the United Arab Emirates. Eng Geol 67(3/4):219–231. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00181-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (1999) Standard test method for penetration test and split-barrel sampling of soils (D1586). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2000a) Standard test method for unconfined compression strength of cohesive soil (D2166). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2000b) Standard test method for pre-bored pressuremeter testing in soils (D4719). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Baguelin F (1982) Rules of foundation design using self boring pressuremeter results. In: Proceedings of international symposium on pressuremeter marine applications, pp 347–360

  • Baguelin F, Jézéquel JF, Shields DH (1978) The pressuremeter and foundation engineering. Trans Tech Publications

  • Baguelin F, Jézéquel JF, Le Méhaute A (1979) Le pressiométre autoforeur et le calcul des foundations. In: Proceedings of 7th European conference SMFE, Brighton. 2:185–190

  • Birand A (2006) Shallow foundations. Teknik Yayınevi (in Turkish)

  • Bowles JE (1997) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozbey I, Togrol E (2008) Correlation of pressuremeter and SPT test results in sandy and clayey soils. In: Proceedings of 12th national conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Konya (in Turkish) 1:217–228

  • Chiang YC, Ho YM (1980) Pressuremeter method for foundation design in Hong Hong. In: Proceedings of sixth Southeast Asian conference on soil engineering 1:31–42

  • Clarke BG (1995) Pressuremeters in geotechnical design. Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu HT, Togrol E (1974) Penetration testing in Turkey: state of the art report. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on penetration testing, Stockholm, p 137

  • Gonin H, Vandangeon P, Lafeullade MP (1992) Correlation study between standard penetration and pressuremeter tests. Rev Fr Géotech 58:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:203–213. doi:10.2007/s10064-006-0063-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz RD, Kovacs WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  • Isik NS, Doyuran V, Ulusay R (2008a) Assessment of deformation modulus of weak rock masses from pressuremeter tests and seismic surveys. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:293–303. doi:10.1007/s10064-008-0163-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isik NS, Ulusay R, Doyuran V (2008b) Deformation modulus of heavily jointed-sheared and block greywackes by pressuremeter tests: Numerical, experimental and empirical assessments. Eng Geol 101:269–282. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kögler F (1933) Baugrundprüfung im bohrloch, der bauingenieur

  • Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Electic Power Research Institute, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KM, Rowe RK (1989) Deformation caused by surface loading and tunnelling: the role of elastic anisotropy. Geotechnique 39(1):125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair RJ, Wood DM (1987) Pressuremeter testing-methods and interpretation. CIRIA, ISSN:0-408-02434-8

  • Marsland A, Randolph MF (1977) Comparisons on the results from pressuremeter tests and large in situ plate tests in London clay. Geotechnique 27(2):217–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard L (1957) An apparatus for measuring the strength of soils in place. Thesis, University of Illinois

  • Ohya S, Imai T, Matsubara M (1982) Relationship between N value by SPT and LLT Pressuremeter Results. Proceedings, 2. European symposium on penetration testing 1:125–130

  • Ozgul N, Akmese I, Bilgin I, Kokuz R, Ozcan I, Yildiz Z, Yildirim U, Akdag O, Tekin M (2005). Geological properties of Istanbul City, report prepared for Istanbul Greater Municipality. Istanbul Greater Municipality, Earthquake and Soil Investigation Division (in Turkish)

  • Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Evaluation of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36:625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schields DH, Bauer GE (1975) Determination of modulus of deformation of sensitive clay using laboratory and in situ tests. In: Proceedings of ASCE special conference. In situ measurement of soil properties 1, Raleigh, pp 395–421

  • Sivrikaya O, Togrol E (2006) Determination of undrained strength of fine-grained soils by means of SPT and its application in Turkey. Eng Geol 82:52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn, Wiley, ISBN: 978-0-471-08638-1

  • Yagiz S, Akyol E, Sen G (2008) Relationship between the standard penetration test and the pressuremeter test on sandy silty clays: a case study from Denizli. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Sadri Yazgan (M.Sc. in Civil Engineering), who has given the permission to use the data used in this study and the anonymous reviewers for the critical reviews and valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Istanbul University, Avcilar, 34320, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ilknur Bozbey & Ergun Togrol

Authors
  1. Ilknur Bozbey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ergun Togrol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilknur Bozbey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bozbey, I., Togrol, E. Correlation of standard penetration test and pressuremeter data: a case study from Istanbul, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69, 505–515 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0248-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0248-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation