Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current trends on limb length discrepancy treatment: results of a survey among 11 dedicated Italian centres

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limb length discrepancies (LLD) are quite frequent, especially in lower limbs. The evolution of the available devices and the refinement of the techniques for correcting the differences in limb length have progressively improved the approach to these deformities. Nevertheless, several points still remain debated. The aim of the study was to investigate the Italian pediatric orthopedic surgeons’ choices in approaching and treating LLD in both lower and upper limbs. A survey on the treatment of limb length discrepancy was sent to a group of 11 Italian orthopedic centers, specialising in limb lengthening and belonging to the Italian Society of Pediatric Orthopedics and Trauma and the Italian Society of External Fixation. Despite improvements in knowledge of bone biology and distractional osteogenesis as well as the increase in available hardware for lengthening, many aspects of LLD correction still remain debated. Both the relative rarity of the conditions which lead to significant shortening and the lack of wide groups of patients analysed at adult age, continue to be the main limitations for every surgeon who deals with LLD. Only by overcoming our own convictions and sharing our experiences in multicentric studies, may we reach our goal of developing a shared treatment protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dahl MT, Morrison SG, Laine JC, Novotny SA, Georgiadis AG (2020) Extramedullary motorized lengthening of the femur in young childre. J Pediatr Orthop 40(10):e978–e983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dammarer D, Kirschbicher L, Donnan G, Kaufmann G, Krismer M, Biedermann R (2011) Clinical value of the Taylor spatial frame: a comparison with the Ilizarov and Orthofix fixator. J Child Orthop 5:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farr S, Mindler G, Ganger R, Girsch W (2016) Bone lenghtening in the pediatric upper extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1490–1503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaudreau J, Mekhail M, Hamdy R, Villemure I (2019) Remote controlled internal lengthening plate for distraction osteogenesis in pediatric patients. Expert Rev Med Devices 16(4):333–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon JE, Davis LE (2019) Leg length discrepancy: the natural history (and what do we really know). J Pediatr Orthop 39(6):s10–s13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guichet JM, Spivak JM, Trouilloud P, Grammont PM (1991) Lower Limb-length discrepancy. An epidemiologic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 272: 235–241

  7. Hasler CC, Krieg AH (2012) Current concepts of leg lengthening. J Child Orthop 6:89–104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hellsing AL (1978) Leg length inequality. A prospective study of young men during their military service. Ups J Med Sci 93: 245–253

  9. Hosny GA (2020) Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts. J Orthop Traumatol 21:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilizarov GA (1988) The principle of the Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst. 48(1):1–11

  11. Karthik K, Nimbalkar S (2017) Cosmetic limb lengthening in a patient with normal stature: ethical considerations. Indian J Med Ethics 2(1):45–48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Launay F, Pesenti S (2016) Bone lengthening: bridging joints, soft tissue releases, physiotherapy. J Child Orthop 10:517–519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Manner HM, Huebl M, Radler C, Ganger R, Petje G, Grill F (2007) Accuracy of complex lower limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator. J Child Orthop 1:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Masada K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawai H, Kawabata H, Noguchi K, Ono K (1989) Operations for forearm deformity caused by multiple osteochondromas. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71(1):24–29

  15. Matsubara H, Tsuchiya H, Sakurakichi K, Yamashiro T, Watanabe K, Tomita K (2006) Correction and lengthening for deformities of the forearm in multiple cartilanous exostoses. J Orthop Sci 11(5):459–466

  16. McLawhorn AS, Sherman SL, Blyakher A, Widmann RF (2011) Humeral lengthening and deformity correction with the multiaxial correction system. J Ped Orthop B 20(2):112–116

  17. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Pareiman G, Bhave A (1997) Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1464–1480

  18. Paley D (2015) Precice intramedullary limb lengthening system. Expert Rev Med Devices 12(3): 231–249

  19. Randal RM, Samora JB, Shannon C, Humbyrd CJ (2019) Ethical considerations in limb lengthening and deformity correction: Do aesthetics matter? J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:428–431

    Google Scholar 

  20. Testworth K, Krome J, Paley D (1991) Lengthening and deformity correction of the upper extremity by the Ilizarov technique. Orthop Clin North Am 22(4):689–713

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the surgeons involved in this study (S. Agostini, B. Bertani, S. Boero, M. Catagni, L. Di Gennaro, O. Donzelli, C. Gigante, B. Magnan, M. Massobrio, A. Memeo, R. Mora, E. Samaila, V. Setzu, S. Stilli, F. Verdoni). The study would not have been possible without their contribution

Funding

No financial support was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Origo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Origo, C., Lazzotti, C. Current trends on limb length discrepancy treatment: results of a survey among 11 dedicated Italian centres. Musculoskelet Surg 107, 165–170 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-022-00752-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-022-00752-z

Keywords

Navigation