Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical value of the Taylor Spatial Frame: a comparison with the Ilizarov and Orthofix fixators

  • Original Clinical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluation of the advantages and limitations of the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) with regard to the healing index (HI), distraction–consolidation time (DCT), accuracy of correction complications, and cost of the device.

Methods

Comparison of results with the traditional Ilizarov apparatus and a unilateral Orthofix fixator in a consecutive patient series with 135 bony deformity corrections.

Results

The HI did not differ significantly between all three fixators and was 57 days/cm for all patients. The DCT was significantly shorter for the TSF (148 days) compared to the Ilizarov fixator (204 days) and the Orthofix device (213 days). The accuracy of deformity correction was higher for the TSF than the other devices. The mean values of the measured angles after correction did not differ, but the variance of the results was the lowest. Also, the total rate of complications was considerably lower for the TSF. The Orthofix device showed a high rate of angular deformity during treatment, whereas both ring fixators had a relatively higher number of pin-related problems.

Conclusions

The findings in our patient series suggest the use of the Orthofix apparatus for simple lengthening over short to median distances and the Ilizarov device for the correction of simple bony deformities and pure lengthening over long distances. The TSF allows multiplanar corrections and lengthenings without complex modifications of the device. But, due to the remarkably higher costs, it has not yet been established as our routine device.

Level of evidence

Level IV—case series. Therapeutic Study—Investigating the Results of Treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fadel M, Hosny G (2005) The Taylor spatial frame for deformity correction in the lower limbs. Int Orthop 29:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rozbruch SR, Segal K, Ilizarov S, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov G (2010) Does the Taylor Spatial Frame accurately correct tibial deformities? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1352–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman DS, Madan SS, Koval KJ, van Bosse HJ, Bazzi J, Lehman WB (2003) Correction of tibia vara with six-axis deformity analysis and the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Pediatr Orthop 23:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sluga M, Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Nehrer S (2003) Lower limb deformities in children: two-stage correction using the Taylor spatial frame. J Pediatr Orthop B 12:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rozbruch SR, Pugsley JS, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov S (2008) Repair of tibial nonunions and bone defects with the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Orthop Trauma 22:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blondel B, Launay F, Glard Y, Jacopin S, Jouve JL, Bollini G (2009) Limb lengthening and deformity correction in children using hexapodal external fixation: preliminary results for 36 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:425–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iobst C (2010) Limb lengthening combined with deformity correction in children with the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Pediatr Orthop B 19:529–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eidelman M, Bialik V, Katzman A (2006) Correction of deformities in children using the Taylor spatial frame. J Pediatr Orthop B 15:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aronson J (1997) Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1243–1258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grill F (1989) Correction of complicated extremity deformities by external fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241:166–176

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dahl MT, Gulli B, Berg T (1994) Complications of limb lengthening. A learning curve. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noonan KJ, Leyes M, Forriol F, Cañadell J (1998) Distraction osteogenesis of the lower extremity with use of monolateral external fixation. A study of two hundred and sixty-one femora and tibiae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:793–806

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manner HM, Huebl M, Radler C, Ganger R, Petje G, Grill F (2007) Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator. J Child Orthop 1:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanitski DF, Bullard M, Armstrong P, Stanitski CL (1995) Results of femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov technique. J Pediatr Orthop 15:224–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rödl R, Leidinger B, Böhm A, Winkelmann W (2003) Correction of deformities with conventional and hexapod frames—comparison of methods. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi-Brivio L, Trivella G (1987) Limb lengthening by callus distraction (callotasis). J Pediatr Orthop 7:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aldegheri R (1997) Femoral callotasis. J Pediatr Orthop B 6:42–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischgrund J, Paley D, Suter C (1994) Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 301:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104

    Google Scholar 

  20. Donnan LT, Saleh M, Rigby AS (2003) Acute correction of lower limb deformity and simultaneous lengthening with a monolateral fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tension–stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:8–26

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bonnard C, Favard L, Sollogoub I, Glorion B (1993) Limb lengthening in children using the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 293:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi Brivio L (1984) The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:538–545

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rozbruch SR, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov S (2006) Correction of tibial deformity with use of the Ilizarov–Taylor Spatial Frame. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:156–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakurakichi K, Tsuchiya H, Kabata T, Yamashiro T, Watanabe K, Tomita K (2005) Correction of juxtaarticular deformities in children using the Ilizarov apparatus. J Orthop Sci 10:360–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aldegheri R (1999) Distraction osteogenesis for lengthening of the tibia in patients who have limb-length discrepancy or short stature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:624–634

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leyes M, Noonan KJ, Forriol F, Cañadell J (1998) Statistical analysis of axial deformity during distraction osteogenesis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop 18:190–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tetsworth KD, Paley D (1994) Accuracy of correction of complex lower-extremity deformities by the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gordon JE, Kelly-Hahn J, Carpenter CJ, Schoenecker PL (2000) Pin site care during external fixation in children: results of a nihilistic approach. J Pediatr Orthop 20:163–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsuchiya H, Uehara K, Abdel-Wanis ME, Sakurakichi K, Kabata T, Tomita K (2002) Deformity correction followed by lengthening with the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 402:176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shtarker H, Volpin G, Stolero J, Kaushansky A, Samchukov M (2002) Correction of combined angular and rotational deformities by the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 402:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Department of Orthopaedics, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    D. Dammerer, G. Kaufmann, M. Krismer & R. Biedermann

  2. Clinical Department of Orthopaedics, AKH Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4021, Linz, Austria

    K. Kirschbichler

  3. Clinical Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia

    L. Donnan

Authors
  1. D. Dammerer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Kirschbichler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Donnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Kaufmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Krismer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Biedermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Biedermann.

About this article

Cite this article

Dammerer, D., Kirschbichler, K., Donnan, L. et al. Clinical value of the Taylor Spatial Frame: a comparison with the Ilizarov and Orthofix fixators. J Child Orthop 5, 343–349 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-011-0361-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-011-0361-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation