Skip to main content
Log in

Biopolishing of Cellulosic Fabrics: A Study on Low-Stress Mechanical Properties, Microstructure, and Dye Uptake

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of biopolishing using cellulase enzymes on the low stress mechanical properties, microstructure, and dye uptake of different cellulosic fabrics (cotton, modal, and cotton denim). The tactile features were studied via the Kawabata evaluation system (KES) and showed increments in tensile elongation, tensile resilience and surface properties leading to wearing comfort, whereas the enhanced shear and bending properties of yarns in the fabrics became stronger and more rigid. The surface morphology of the cellulosic fabrics was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the results indicated that the surface of the treated fabrics became smooth and polished. Biotreatment enhanced comfort, luster, and smoothness without affecting other important properties of the fabrics. The effect of biopolishing before and after the dyeing process has been studied. This was the first study to compare cotton, modal, and denim fabrics for the evaluation of low-stress mechanical properties by employing biopolishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Madhu and J. N. Chakraborty, J. Clean. Prod., 145, 114 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Nolte, D. P. Bishop, and Höcker, J. Text. I., 87, 212 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. W. Shyr, P. N. Wang, and K. B. Cheng, Fibres Text. East. Eur., 15, 81 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. K. Choudhary and P. Bansal in “Manikins for Textile Evaluation”, 1st ed. (R. Nayak and R. Padhye Eds.), p.173, Woodhead Publishing, 2017.

  5. S. Srivastava, “The Basics of Fashion Technology”, Pushpa Publishing House, India, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Madhav, A. Ahamad, P. Singh, and P. K. Mishra, Environ. Qual. Manage., 27, 31 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H.-J. Jo, E.-J. Park, K. Cho, E.-H. Kim, and J. Jung, Chemosphere, 70, 949 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. N. M. Sivaram, P. M. Gopal, and D. Barik in “Energy from Toxic Organic Waste for Heat and Power Generation”, 1st ed. (D. Barik Ed.), Woodhead Publishing, 2019.

  9. M. Montazer and T. Harifi, “Nanofinishing of Textile Materials”, 1st ed., pp.1–17, Woodhead Publishing, 2018.

  10. S. Shah, Res. J. Eng. Sci., 3, 1 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Sarkar and J. Etters, J. Cotton Sci., 8, 254 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Saravanan, N. S. Vasanthi, and T. Ramachandran, Carbohydr. Polym., 76, 1 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. A. Ibrahim, K. EL-Badry, B. M. Eid, and T. M. Hassan, Carbohydr. Polym., 83, 116 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. A. Ibrahim, M. El-Hossamy, M. M. Hashem, R. Refai, and B. M. Eid, Carbohydr. Polym., 74, 880 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. W. Kan and C. H. Au, Carbohydr. Polym., 101, 451 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Sheikh and I. Bramhecha in “The Impact and Prospects of Green Chemistry for Textile Technology”, 1st ed. (S. ul-Islam and B. S. Butola Eds.), p.135, Woodhead Publishing, 2018.

  17. B. Tiber and H. E. Balcıoğlu, Polym. Compos., 40, 217 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. H. Yang, C. W. Kan, W. Y. Wong, and M. C. Law, Fiber. Polym., 14, 669 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Hao, R. Wang, L. Wang, K. Fang, J. Liu, and Y. Men, Cellulose, 23, 929 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kumar and A. Harnden, Text. Chem. Color. Am. Dyest. Rep., 31, 37 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Kalantzi, D. Mamma, P. Christakopoulos, and D. Kekos, Bioresour. Technol., 99, 8185 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Calafell and P. Garriga, Enzyme Microb. Tech., 34, 326 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Cavaco-Paulo, J. Cortez, and L. Almeida, J. Soc. Dyers Colour., 113, 218 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Nithya, R. Radhai, R. Rajendran, S. Shalini, V. Rajendran, and S. Jayakumar, Carbohydr. Polym., 83, 1652 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. J. J. Kaschuk, T. M. Lacerda, V. Coma, and E. Frollini, Cellulose, 24, 2437 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Haga and T. Takagishi, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 80, 1675 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Sankarraj and G. Nallathambi, Carbohydr. Polym., 191, 95 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. A. A. U. de Souza, F. C. S. Ferreira, and S. M. A. G. U. Souza, Carbohydr. Polym., 93, 412 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. N. Varghese and G. Thilagavathi, J. Text. Apparel, Technol. Manag., 8, 1 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Q. Yang, W. Zhou, G. C. Lickfield, and K. Parachura, Text. Res. J., 73, 1057 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. L. Gulrajani, R. Agarwal, A. Grover, and M. Suri, Indian J. Fibre Text., 25, 69 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Betcheva, M. Stamenova, C. Boutris, and T. Tzanov, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 288, 957 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. C. S. Viswanath, Indian J. Fibre Text., 35, 342 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Verenich, K. Arumugam, E. Shim, and B. Pourdeyhimi, Text. Res. J., 78, 540 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Yamada, Y. Amano, E. Horikawa, K. Nozaki, and T. Kanda, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 69, 45 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. G. Buschle-Diller, Y. El Mogahzy, M. K. Inglesby, and S. H. Zeronian, Text. Res. J., 68, 920 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. P. S. Vankar and R. Shanker, Desalination, 230, 62 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the ICAR Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology (ICAR-CIRCOT), Mumbai, for providing facilities to carry out this work. The authors are also thankful to the Institute of Chemical Technology (ICT), Mumbai, for providing experimental and testing support. We also acknowledge the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on our manuscript, which helped us improve the manuscript significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, M., Shukla, S.R., Arputharaj, A. et al. Biopolishing of Cellulosic Fabrics: A Study on Low-Stress Mechanical Properties, Microstructure, and Dye Uptake. Fibers Polym 22, 2803–2814 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0356-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0356-8

Keywords

Navigation