Skip to main content
Log in

Ternary fission

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present the ternary fission of 252Cf and 236U within a three-cluster model as well as in a level density approach. The competition between collinear and equatorial geometry is studied by calculating the ternary fragmentation potential as a function of the angle between the lines joining the stationary middle fragment and the two end fragments. The obtained results for the 16O accompanying ternary fission indicate that collinear configuration is preferred to equatorial configuration. Further, for all the possible third fragments, the potential energy surface (PES) is calculated corresponding to an arrangement in which the heaviest and the lightest fragments are considered at the end in a collinear configuration. The PES reveals several possible ternary modes including true ternary modes where the three fragments are of similar size. The complete mass distributions of Si and Ca which accompanied ternary fission of 236U is studied within a level density picture. The obtained results favour several possible ternary combinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K Manimaran and M Balasubramaniam, Phys. Rev. C 79, 024610 (2009)

  2. K Manimaran and M Balasubramaniam, Eur. Phys. J. A 45, 293 (2010)

  3. K Manimaran and M Balasubramaniam, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 37, 045104 (2010)

  4. K Manimaran and M Balasubramaniam, Phys. Rev. C 83, 034609 (2011)

  5. K R Vijayaraghavan, W von Oertzen and M Balasubramaniam, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 27 (2012)

  6. K R Vijayaraghavan, M Balasubramaniam and W von Oertzen, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024601 (2014)

  7. R K Gupta, Sov. J. Part. Nucleus 8, 289 (1977)

  8. J A Maruhn, W Greiner and W Scheid, Heavy ion collisions edited by R Bock (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980) Vol. 2, Chap. 6

  9. A Sǎndulescu, D N Poenaru and W Greiner, Sov. J. Part. Nucleus 11, 528 (1980)

  10. R K Gupta, in: Heavy elements and related new phenomena edited by W Greiner and R K Gupta (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999) Vol. II, p. 730

  11. R K Gupta and W Greiner, ibid. [10], I 397; 536 (1999)

  12. G Audi, A H Wapstra and C Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A 729, 337 (2003)

  13. M W Kermode, M M Mustafa and N Rowley, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 16, L299 (1990)

  14. M Rajasekaran and V Devanathan, Phys. Rev. C 24, 2606 (1981)

  15. P Fong, Phys. Rev. 102, 434 (1956)

  16. H Bethe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 69 (1937)

  17. https://www-nds.iaea.org/RIPL-3/

  18. P Möller, W D Myers, W J Swiatecki and J Treiner, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 39, 225 (1988)

  19. R Capote et al, Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3107 (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M BALASUBRAMANIAM.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

BALASUBRAMANIAM, M., VIJAYARAGHAVAN, K.R. & KARTHIKRAJ, C. Ternary fission. Pramana - J Phys 85, 423–430 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1057-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-015-1057-x

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation