Abstract
Targeting the non-nuclear estrogen receptor (ER) signaling has been postulated as novel therapeutic strategy for central nervous system pathologies. Recently, we showed that newly designed PaPE-1 (Pathway Preferential Estrogen-1), which selectively activates ER non-nuclear signaling pathways, elicited neuroprotection in a cellular model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) when it was applied at the same time as amyloid-β (Aβ). Since delayed treatment reflects clinical settings better than cotreatment does, current basic study proposes a novel therapeutic approach for AD that relies on a posttreatment with PaPE-1. In this study, mouse neuronal cell cultures treated with preaggregated Aβ1-42 (10 µM) showed the presence of extracellular Aβ1-42, confirming the adequacy of the AD model used. We are the first to demonstrate that a 24-h delayed posttreatment with PaPE-1 decreased the degree of Aβ-induced neurodegeneration, restored neurite outgrowth, and inhibited the expression of AD-related genes, i.e., Rbfox, Apoe, Bace2, App, and Ngrn, except for Chat, which was stimulated. In addition, PaPE-1 elicited anti-apoptotic effects by inhibiting Aβ-induced caspase activities as well as attenuating apoptotic chromatin condensation, and in these ways, PaPE-1 prevented neuronal cell death. Posttreatment with PaPE-1 also downregulated the Aβ-affected mRNA expression of apoptosis-specific factors, such as Bax, Gsk3b, Fas, and Fasl, except for Bcl2, which was upregulated by PaPE-1. In parallel, PaPE-1 decreased the protein levels of BAX, FAS, and FASL, which were elevated in response to Aβ. PaPE-1 elicited a decrease in the BAX/BCL2 ratio that corresponds to increased methylation of the Bax gene. However, the PaPE-1-evoked Bcl2 gene hypermethylation suggests other PaPE-1-dependent mechanisms to control Aβ-induced apoptosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization, more than 55 million people suffer from dementia worldwide, and this number is predicted to increase by 10 million every year. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, accounting for 60–70% of all its cases. AD is an age-related neurodegenerative disorder with characteristic progressive deterioration of memory and cognitive functions. Since it affects not only patients but also their relatives, i.e., unpaid caregivers, it is a serious economic problem in modern society. Molecular changes initiate AD long before clinical manifestation. These changes include extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles along with synaptic and neural loss. Aβ peptides are derived from amyloid precursor protein (APP) following cleavage by β- and γ-secretases [1]. Then, the monomeric Aβ is secreted into the extracellular space, where it forms toxic oligomers and fibrils. The main mechanisms of Aβ toxicity involve cell membrane destruction, mitochondrial damage, Ca2+ homeostasis dysregulation, alteration of receptor signaling, and aberrant activation of certain apoptotic factors [2, 3].
The loss of neurons is inversely related to patients’ cognitive skills. Extensive neuronal loss in AD is attributed to apoptosis [4]. Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death that eventually leads to the activation of apoptosis-specific cysteine-aspartic proteases, i.e., caspases. These enzymes can be divided into two categories: inducing (caspase-2, caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-10, and caspase-12) and executive (caspase-3, caspase-6, and caspase-7) [5]. Extracellular and intracellular pathways can initiate apoptosis. The intracellular apoptotic pathway involves, among others, BCL2 and BAX, associated with the formation of pores in the mitochondrial membrane that cause cytochrome c release and caspase-9 activation [6]. The extracellular apoptotic pathway starts with the activation of death receptors by cognate ligands (e.g., FAS and FASL) and then leads to caspase-8 activation [7]. Inducing caspases (caspase-8 and caspase-9) activate executive caspase-3, which leads to cell death. Caspases are known to be engaged in AD pathology [8]. In addition to its role in apoptotic cell death, caspase-3 is also able to cleave both APP and tau [9,10,11,12] and induce tau hyperphosphorylation [13]. In the nervous system, caspases are also vital for a plethora of physiological functions, including but not limited to neural tube shaping, dendritic pruning, axon guidance, synaptogenesis, and maintenance of synaptic plasticity [14]. Caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3 were also shown to be engaged in the neurite outgrowth process [15].
There is an urgent need to find novel pharmaceuticals that effectively target AD. Currently available pharmacological approaches are based on cholinesterase inhibition (donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine) and NMDA receptor antagonism (memantine) [16]. Although these drugs may help control some cognitive and behavioral symptoms, they do not alter disease progression. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved two new Aβ-targeting monoclonal antibodies, aducanumab and lecanemab, but their usefulness in clinical settings remains to be determined. Despite the fact that these pharmaceuticals may delay clinical progression of AD, their usage can also cause undesirable effects such as microhemorrhages and brain edema. None of the abovementioned drugs target apoptosis-related neuronal loss. Since direct caspase inhibitors are not able to distinguish between physiological and pathological caspase activation, more selective approaches are required [17]. Activation of estrogen receptors (ERs) in the nervous system has been repeatedly demonstrated to be anti-apoptotic as well as to positively impact neural plasticity and synapse formation [7]. ER signaling can be divided into nuclear and non-nuclear. In the nuclear signaling, ESR1/ERα and ESR2/ERβ act as ligand-activated transcription factors. The non-nuclear signaling is often associated with activation of membrane-associated ERs that can be divided into G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which include GPER1, Gq-mER, and ER-X, and non-GPCR mERα and mERβ. Many studies indicate that activation of nuclear ER signaling can lead to cardiovascular problems and hormonal-dependent cancers; for this reason, targeting non-nuclear ER signaling pathways, mainly via mERα and mERβ, appears to be a much safer but still effective alternative [18]. Pathway preferential estrogen-1 (PaPE-1; (S)-5-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethyl-phenyl)-indan-1-ol) has been designed to preferentially activate ER non-genomic signaling without stimulating direct nuclear signaling [19].
Compared to estradiol, PaPE-1 has greatly lowered binding affinities to ERα and ERβ and greatly increased dissociation rate from ERα [19]. Activation of the ERα by PaPE-1 lasts less than 1 min which is enough to initiate signaling cascades, but too short to evoke direct genomic effects [19]. PaPE-1 does not cause the recruitment of ERα or ERK2 to chromatin but stimulates the recruitment of RNA Pol II [19]. Moreover, in contrast to estradiol, ERα complexes with PaPE-1 do not bind SRC3 (steroid receptor coactivator 3) [19]. What is of importance, PaPE-1 activity is lost in ERα-knockout mice [19]. PaPE-1 selectively activates extranuclear-initiated ER-regulated genes, which was shown by LRRC54 stimulation, but does not activate the nuclear-initiated ER gene target PgR [19]. In the MCF-7 cell line, PaPE-1 has been shown to selectively activate MAPK and mTOR signaling [19].
PaPE-1 has already been demonstrated to provide beneficial metabolic and vascular effects without stimulating reproductive tissues [19]. In addition, PaPE-1 administered before middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) has been shown to attenuate stroke severity and neuroinflammation and promote functional recovery [20]. PaPE-1 has also been shown to be an effective neuroprotective agent in the posttreatment paradigm in hypoxic and ischemic models in vitro [21]. Our previous study demonstrated that cotreatment with PaPE-1 is a promising approach against AD, as shown in an in vitro model based on Aβ-induced neurotoxicity [22].
Since a posttreatment paradigm is the most relevant approach in AD treatment, the present study aims to identify the neuroprotective potential and mechanisms of action of PaPE-1 as a posttreatment therapy in an Aβ-based in vitro model of AD.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was obtained from Biomed Lublin (Lublin, Poland). Neurobasal medium and B27 were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). Culture plates for cell cultures were obtained from Techno Plastic Products AG (Trasadingen, Switzerland), Corning (Corning, NY, USA) and Ibidi (Gräfelfing, Germany). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate hydrate (CHAPS), ammonium persulfate, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethane-1,2-diamine (TEMED), 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol (Trizma base), sodium deoxycholate, DL-dithiothreitol, poly-L-ornithine, (S)-5-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethyl-phenyl)-indian-1-ol (PaPE-1), Tween 20, radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA) and protease inhibitor cocktail, SP600125, and GenElute™ Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kits were purchased from Sigma‒Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Amyloid-β was obtained from rPeptide (Watkinsville, GA, USA). The RNeasy Mini Kit, EpiTect MethyLight PCR Kit, and EpiTect Bisulfite Kit were obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). High-Capacity cDNA-Reverse Transcription Kit, Neurite Outgrowth Staining Kit, TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix, and TaqMan probes for specific genes encoding Hprt, Actb, Gapdh, Fas, Fasl, Bax, Bcl2, Gsk3b, Rbfox, Ache, Apoe, Chat, Bace1, Bace2, Mapt, App, Rcan1, Ide, and Ngrn were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Bradford reagent, Laemmli sample buffer, and 0.5 M Tris–HCL buffer 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Protein Gels were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Munich, Germany). The ROS-Glo™ H2O2 assay was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). JC-10 Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay Kit, Z-IETD-FMK, Z-LEHD-FMK, TDZD 8, and SB203580 were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). 2-Mercaptoethanol was obtained from Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany). Immobilon-P membranes were purchased from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA). Fluoro-Jade C was obtained from Biosensis Pty Ltd. (Thebarton, Australia). Antibodies used for western blot and immunofluorescence staining were as follows: anti-GAPDH (MAB374), anti-BCL-2 (SAB5700155), and anti-MAP2 (M9942)-obtained from Sigma‒Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); anti-amyloid β (bs-0107R)-purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA); and anti-BAX (SC-7480), anti-GSK3β (sc-9166), anti-FAS (sc-74540), anti-FASL (sc-19681), and anti-MAP2 (sc-20172)-purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
Primary Neuronal Cell Culture
Primary neuronal cell cultures were established using Swiss CD1 mice obtained from Charles River Laboratory (Germany) as described previously [23, 24]. Cortices acquired from embryos were fragmented and incubated with 0.1% trypsin at 37 °C for 15 min. Next, the cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 × g in medium with 10% FBS. The obtained neuronal cells were then seeded on multiwell plates coated with poly-L-ornithine (0.1 mg/ml) at a density of ~2.0 × 105 and further cultured in Neurobasal medium with the addition of L-glutamine, B27, and an antibiotic cocktail containing penicillin and streptomycin. Cells were cultured for 7 days at 37 °C with humidified air with a CO2 concentration of 5%. For the first 2 days, the cells were cultured with FBS added to the culture medium. All animals used in the research were maintained according to the principles of the Three Rs in compliance with European Union Legislation (Directive 2010/63/EU, amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/1010).
Treatment
Preparation of Aβ1-42 was conducted as previously described [22]. Non-specific aggregation of Aβ1-42 was negated using HFIP (hexafluoroisopropanol). Next, HFIP was removed under N2 flux, and Aβ1-42 was dissolved using DMSO to prepare a stock solution, which was further dissolved in culture medium. The obtained solution of Aβ1-42 was then incubated overnight to induce specific aggregation and then used to treat the cell cultures. After 24-h treatment with preaggregated Aβ1-42 (10 µM), PaPE-1 (at concentrations of 5 and 10 µM) was applied for the following 6 h. To determine the contribution of apoptotic signaling, we applied Z-IETD-FMK (caspase-8 inhibitor; 40 µM), Z-LEHD-FMK (caspase-9 inhibitor; 40 µM), TDZD 8 (GSK3β inhibitor; 1 µM), SP600125 (JNK inhibitor; 1 µM), and SB 203580 (p38 MAPK inhibitor; 1 µM) to cells treated with Aβ. DMSO was used as a solvent for all compounds at concentrations not exceeding 0.1% in the culture medium.
Assessment of Caspase Activity
In this research, we assessed the activity of caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9. The assessment procedure is identical for each of the enzymes, with the only difference being the substrate used and, consequently, the product of the reaction.
For caspase-3, the colorimetric substrate was Ac-DEVD-pNA (N-acetyl-asp-glu-val-asp-p-nitroanilide, Sigma‒Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the product was p-nitroanilide. For caspase-8, the substrate was Ac-VETD-AMC (Ac-val-glu-thr-asp-AMC), and the product was 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin. For caspase-9, the substrate was Ac-DL-Leu-DL-Glu-DL-His-DL-Asp-pNA, and the product is p-nitroanilide.
The activity of caspases was measured as described earlier [25]. Samples were first incubated with CAB (Caspase Assay Buffer) for 15 min at 4 °C and then with substrate specific for each caspase for 60 min at 37 °C. The levels of caspase reaction products were measured with an Infinite M200PRO microplate reader (Tecan, Switzerland) at excitation = 400 nm and emission = 530 nm for caspase-8 activity measurement and absorbance = 405 nm for caspase-3 and caspase-9 activity measurements. The obtained data were analyzed with i-control software and normalized to the blank, and the final results are presented as a percentage of the control ± SEM.
Identification of Living Cells
In this experiment, living cells were identified via calcein AM staining as previously described by Kajta et al. [26]. First, the cells grown on glass cover slips were washed with 10 mM PBS and then incubated with 2 mM calcein AM/PBS solution at room temperature for 10 min. As described above, qualitative analysis was conducted using a Leica DM IL LED Inverted Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) coupled with a CoolSnap camera (Vision Systems GmbH, Puchheim, Germany) with MetaMorph software (MetaMorph® Microscopy Automation & Image Analysis Software, Molecular Devices LLC, California, United States). Cells presenting bright green cytoplasm were considered living cells. In this case, the intensity of fluorescence was measured from entire photos using ImageJ software. The final results are presented as a percentage of the control ± SEM.
Identification of Apoptotic Cells
Detection of apoptotic cells was conducted with Hoechst-33342 staining after the initial experiment as described [27]. Cortical primary cells cultured on glass cover slips were washed with 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with Hoechst-33342 at a concentration of 0.6 mg/ml at room temperature for 5 min. Qualitative analysis was conducted using a Leica DM IL LED Inverted Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar Germany) coupled with a CoolSnap camera (Vision Systems GmbH, Puchheim, Germany) with MetaMorph software (MetaMorph® Microscopy Automation & Image Analysis Software, Molecular Devices LLC, California, United States). Bright blue stained nuclei with condensed chromatin are widely recognized as a symptom of apoptosis. Fluorescence intensity was measured based on singular nuclei using ImageJ software. The final results are presented as a percentage of the control ± SEM.
mRNA Analysis Using qPCR
Total RNA from primary cell cultures was obtained using reagents from an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, as previously described by Wnuk et al. [28, 29]. The RNA was eluted in 40 µl of RNAse-free water. Then, the amount of RNA was assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer at 260 nm, and the 260/280 ratio was obtained (ND/1000UV/VIS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A A260/A280 ratio of ~ 2.0 is considered to be an honest indicator of pure RNA. Subsequently, after isolation, the RNA extract was reverse transcribed to avoid freeze‒thaw cycles. Reverse transcription was conducted with a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol using a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The collected cDNA was stored at − 20 °C overnight and subsequently subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Amplification of the cDNA was conducted using FastStart Universal Probe Master containing TaqMan Gene Expression Assays specific for Bax, Bcl2, Gsk3b, Fas, Fasl, Rbfox, Ache, Apoe, Chat, Bace1, Bace2, Mapt, App, Rcan1, Ide, Ngrn, Hprt1, Gapdh, and Actb. In amplification, the following substances were used: a mixture containing 10 µl of FastStart Universal Probe Master, 1 µl of cDNA as template, 1 µl of the TaqMan Gene Expression Assay mix, and 8 µl of RNAse-free water in a total volume of 20 µl. qPCR was conducted using a CFX96 Real-Time system (Bio-Rad, USA), and the procedure consisted of intervals of varying temperatures as follows: 2 min at 50 °C, 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C. The obtained data were analyzed with the delta delta Ct method. The reference gene was chosen with the use of the following algorithms: geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and delta Ct; the three algorithms recommended hypoxanthine–guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt1).
Western Blot Analysis
Once the experiment was concluded, neocortical cells underwent lysis in RIPA buffer with the addition of protease inhibitor. After lysis, the cells were sonicated to obtain homogenous solution, which was subsequently centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. To assess the protein concentration, a Bradford assay was conducted using Bradford reagent and bovine serum albumin as standards. Samples were then reconstituted and denatured in Laemmli sample buffer with β-mercaptoethanol. Subsequently, the samples underwent electrophoresis in 15-well [4–15%] SDS polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, USA), and then, proteins were electrotransferred to PVDF membranes with the Bio-Rad Mini Trans-Blot apparatus as previously described [30, 31]. To block the non-specific binding sites, the PVDF membranes were incubated for 2 h with a solution of dried milk (5%) and Tween-20 (0.2%) in 0.02 M Tris-buffered saline (TBS). Next, the membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4 °C. Primary antibodies were diluted using solution of Tween-20 and TBS in proportions as follows: anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal antibody (diluted 1:3500), anti-BCL-2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (diluted 1:100), anti-BAX mouse monoclonal antibody (diluted 1:100), anti-GSK3β rabbit polyclonal antibody (diluted 1:700), anti-FAS mouse monoclonal antibody (diluted 1:80), and anti-FASL mouse monoclonal antibody (diluted 1:80). Next, the membranes were washed with Tween-20/TBS solution and incubated for 1 h with secondary antibodies coupled with horseradish peroxidase diluted in Tween-20/TBS solution 1:100 and 1:3500. Detection of the chemiluminescent signal was conducted employing BM (Chemiluminescence Blotting Substrate) and visualization using a Luminescence Image Analyzer Fuji-Las 4000 (Fuji, Japan). The intensity of the obtained bands was quantified with the MultiGauge V3.0 program (ScienceLab).
Bax and Bcl2 Gene-Specific Methylation
Specific methylation of Bax and Bcl2 genes was measured as described previously [32, 33]. Genomic DNA was obtained with GenElute™ Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kits, and the quantity of obtained DNA was assessed spectrophotometrically at wavelengths of 260 nm and 260/280 nm with a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV‒Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, denaturation followed by bisulfite conversion of GC-rich DNA was conducted with an EpiTect Bisulfite Kit obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). Samples were then eluted in a 10 µl volume and underwent qPCR (MethyLight) with an EpiTect MethyLight PCR Kit. The methylation regions in the Bax and Bcl2 genes were verified in CpG hot spots in the 5′ flanking sequence (2000 bp). Methyl Primer Express Software 1.0 was employed to design primers for methylated and unmethylated target sequences. Fully methylated and fully unmethylated TaqMan probes were designed for the Bax and Bcl2 promoters, and the internal reference set for the Hprt1 gene was designed to control the input of DNA. For the EpiTect MethyLight assays, the specific TaqMan probes contained FAM™ as the reporter dye. The degree of methylation of each sample was calculated by taking the threshold cycles determined as percentage of methylation [%]: Cmeth = 100/[1 + 2(∆Ctmeth − ∆Ctunmeth)].
Immunofluorescence Staining
To visualize the cellular localization of the studied proteins and to confirm the neuronal character of cultured cells, immunofluorescence labeling followed by confocal microscopy was employed as previously described [34]. The cortical cells were cultured on glass coverslips and subjected to immunofluorescence labeling. Cells were fixed with a 4% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS for 15 min at room temperature and further incubated with blocking buffer, i.e., 5% normal donkey serum and 0.3% Triton X-100 in 0.01 PBS for 1 h. Subsequently, the neurons were incubated with the following primary antibodies for 24 h at 4 °C: anti-Aβ rabbit (diluted 1:50), anti-MAP2 mouse (1:100), anti-BAX mouse (1:50), anti-BCL2 rabbit (1:50), anti-FAS mouse (1:50), anti-FASL mouse (1:50), and anti-GSK3β rabbit (1:50). Next, the neocortical cells were incubated with secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor Plus 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:200 and 1:600) and Alexa Fluor Plus 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200). Finally, the microscopic preparations were washed with PBS, mounted, and cover-slipped. For viewing the preparations, a Leica TCS SP8 WLL confocal laser scanning microscope (DMi8-CS, Leica Microsystem, Wetzlar, Germany) was employed.
Fluoro-Jade C Staining
Fluoro-Jade C staining was used to assess the level of degenerating neurons as previously described [33, 35]. To conduct the staining, a stock solution with a concentration of 0.01% was prepared by diluting the Fluoro-Jade C in distilled water. The stock solution was then further diluted into a 0.005% working solution in Neurobasal medium. Then, the culture medium was removed from the 96-well plates, and the working solution was added at 100 µl per well. The plates were incubated for 45 min at room temperature. Then, the level of fluorescence was measured, with excitation = 490 nm and emission = 525 nm, using an Infinite M200 PRO microplate reader (Tecan Mannedorf, Switzerland). The results were analyzed by i-control software and presented as the percentage of the control ± SEM. Fluoro-Jade C is a green fluorescence dye. Microscopic images were obtained with a Leica DM IL LED Inverted Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). In this study, we used ImageJ to change the color to magenta.
Neurite Outgrowth Staining
To assess neurite outgrowth, the Neurite Outgrowth Staining Kit was employed. First, the cells were washed with PBS, and then, the appropriate amount of 1X working Fix/Stain Solution was added to each well. Then, the cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Next, the staining was visualized using a Leica TCS SP8 WLL confocal laser scanning microscope (DMi8-CS, Leica Microsystem, Wetzlar, Germany). The obtained images were analyzed with ImageJ, and the fluorescence intensity from entire images was measured. The data were normalized to the signal intensity of vehicle-treated cells and expressed as a percentage of the control ± SEM.
ROS Activity Measurement
The ROS-Glo™ H2O2 Assay was used to assess the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in neocortical cells exposed to Aβ and PaPE-1. The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The bioluminescence was measured using a GloMax® Navigator Microplate Luminometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The detected signal was proportional to the amount of H2O2 in cultured cells. The data were normalized to the signal intensity of vehicle-treated cells and expressed as a percentage of the control ± SEM.
Assessment of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential
The JC-10 dye is a commonly employed fluorescent marker that forms aggregates (emitting red fluorescence) within mitochondria when the mitochondrial membrane potential is high. When mitochondrial membrane potential is decreased, JC-10 stays in the cytoplasm in monomeric form (green fluorescence). The assay was performed following the manufacturer’s protocol and fluorescence measurements were taken at Ex/Em = 490/525 nm and Ex/Em = 540/590 nm using an Infinite M200 PRO microplate reader (Tecan Mannedorf, Switzerland). The fluorescence intensity data were used to calculate the ratio, and the results were expressed as a percentage relative to the control, with the standard error of the mean (SEM). The data were normalized to the fluorescence intensity of control cells.
Data Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed on raw data. The obtained results are presented as the mean absorbance, fluorescence or luminescence units per well containing 50,000 cells for the caspase activity assessment, JC-10, ROS activity and Fluoro-Jade C, mean fluorescence of the whole picture or single nuclei for calcein AM, Hoechst 33342 and neurite outgrowth staining, the fluorescence units per 1.5 million cells for qPCR and specific gene methylation, and the mean optical density per 10 µg of protein for western blot assays. To determine overall significance, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. The differences between the control and experimental groups were defined with a post hoc Newman‒Keuls test that was preceded by Levene’s test for homogeneity.
Differences of statistical significance were indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (versus control cultures) and ^p < 0.05, ^^p < 0.01, ^^^p < 0.001 (versus cultures exposed to Aβ). The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Results
Aβ is Present in Primary Neocortical Cell Cultures 30 h Post Application
In the present study, primary neocortical cell cultures were exposed to Aβ (10 μM) for 30 h. Utilized concentration was chosen based on our previous study [22]. Immunofluorescence staining with the neuronal marker MAP2 (blue labeling) and Aβ (green labeling) showed the presence of preaggregated extracellular Aβ in Aβ-treated cultures. However, in control and Aβ-treated cells, endogenous intracellular Aβ was also present (Fig. 1).
Aβ-Induced Cell Death Involves Apoptosis-Specific Pathways
In the present study, primary neocortical cell cultures exposed to Aβ (10 μM) for 30 h showed increased activity of caspase-3 (211% of the control), a hallmark of apoptosis (Fig. 2). Treatment with caspase-8 and caspase-9 inhibitors prevented caspase-3 activity elevation (106 and 117% of the control). Exposure to Aβ together with JNK inhibitor lowered caspase-3 elevation by 15%, while GSK3β and p38 MAPK inhibition had no effect on Aβ-induced caspase-3 activity (Fig. 2).
PaPE-1 Inhibited Aβ-Induced Caspase-3 and Caspase-9 but Not Caspase-8 Overactivation
In the current study, cells were exposed to Aβ (10 μM) for 24 h, and then, PaPE-1 was added for the following 6 h. Thirty hours of exposure to Aβ increased caspase-8 (Fig. 3a), caspase-9 (Fig. 3b), and caspase-3 (Fig. 3c) activities to 166, 198, and 202% of the control, respectively. Posttreatment with PaPE-1 (5 and 10 μM) decreased both caspase-3 (170 and 162% of the control) and caspase-9 activities (162 and 117% of the control) but had no impact on caspase-8 activity (Fig. 3). These results indicate that PaPE-1-induced neuroprotective effects include inhibition of caspase-9 and caspase-3. PaPE-1 did not alter the activity of any of the abovementioned enzymes under control conditions (Supplementary material Table S1).
PaPE‑1 Restored Cell Viability Decreased by Exposure to Aβ and Reversed Aβ-Induced Apoptotic Chromatin Condensation, but It Did Not Affect ROS Activity and Mitochondrial Membrane Potential
Staining with calcein AM showed that treatment with 10 μM Aβ decreased cell viability to 55% of the control. After treatment with PaPE-1 (10 μM), cell viability reached approximately 80% of the control, i.e., PaPE-1 increased this parameter by 25% (Fig. 4a, b). Hoechst 33342 enables visualization of condensed chromatin—another characteristic of apoptosis. Exposure to Aβ resulted in an increased number of bright-blue stained nuclei (159% of the control) that was partially reversed by posttreatment with PaPE-1 (126% of the control) (Fig. 4a, c). The staining provided additional evidence of extensive apoptosis in response to Aβ. In the control conditions, PaPE-1 altered neither cell viability nor apoptotic chromatin condensation (Supplementary material Table S1).
In addition, we did not observe any change in reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity in response to either Aβ (10 μM) or PaPE-1 (10 μM; Supplementary material Fig. S1). In contrast, mitochondrial membrane potential decreased in Aβ-treated cells, but application of PaPE-1 (5 and 10 μM) did not evoke changes of this parameter (Supplementary material Fig. S2).
PaPE-1 Altered Aβ-Induced Changes in the Expression of Apoptosis-Specific Factors
Exposure to Aβ (10 μM) resulted in an increase in the expression of all investigated apoptosis-specific genes, i.e., Bax (1.71-fold), Bcl2 (1.81-fold), Gsk3b (1.66-fold), Fas (99.24-fold), and Fasl (3.43-fold; Fig. 5a). PaPE-1 at a concentration of 10 μM partially reversed Aβ-induced changes in the expression of all the abovementioned proapoptotic genes, i.e., Bax (from 1.71-fold to 1.45-fold), Gsk3b (from 1.66-fold to 1.32-fold), Fas (from 99.24-fold to 66.50-fold), and Fasl (from 3.43-fold to 2.48-fold; Fig. 5a). PaPE-1 also influenced anti-apoptotic Bcl2, causing a further increase in its expression from 1.81-fold to 2.20-fold (Fig. 5a).
Concerning the protein levels, Aβ elevated the expression of BAX (126% of the control), FAS (143% of the control), and FASL (134% of the control) (Fig. 5b). Posttreatment with PaPE-1 normalized Aβ-induced changes in BAX, FAS, and FASL levels (Fig. 5b). Levels of BCL2 and GSK3β were not altered in response to either Aβ or PaPE-1 (Fig. 5b). Immunofluorescent labeling of BAX, BCL2, GSK3β, FAS, and FASL confirmed the results obtained using western blotting (Fig. 5c).
In the control conditions, PaPE-1 increased the mRNA expression of Fasl 1.66-fold (Supplementary material Table S2) and did not alter any other apoptosis-specific mRNA levels. At the protein level, PaPE-1 decreased BAX expression (70% of the control) and increased GSK3β expression to approximately 120% of the control (Supplementary material Table S3).
Aβ and PaPE-1 Altered the Methylation Rate of the Bax and Bcl2 Genes
The basic methylation rate of the Bax gene was 88%, and PaPE-1 (10 μM) did not affect the rate (Fig. 6a, Supplementary material Table S4). Aβ (10 μM) decreased the Bax methylation rate (37%), while posttreatment with PaPE-1 partially reversed the observed change (65%) (Fig. 6a).
The Bcl2 methylation rate in the control condition was 29%. This value was elevated to 48% after application of Aβ. PaPE-1 increased both the control and Aβ-affected Bcl2 methylation rates to 69% and 65%, respectively (Fig. 6b, Supplementary material Table S4).
PaPE‑1 Partially Reversed Aβ‑Evoked Neurodegeneration
Fluoro-Jade C staining showed that Aβ (10 μM) elevated the degree of neurodegeneration to 166% of the control. Posttreatment with PaPE-1 at a concentration of 10 μM effectively decreased the parameter to 130% of the control. The 5 μM PaPE-1 appeared ineffective (Fig. 7). PaPE-1 did not alter the parameter in the control conditions (Supplementary material Table S1).
PaPE-1 Restored Neurite Outgrowth, Which Decreased in Response to Aβ
Aβ (10 μM) application decreased neurite outgrowth to 52% of the control, and posttreatment with PaPE-1 (10 μM) increased the parameter to 77% of the control (Fig. 8a, b). Neurite outgrowth was not altered by treatment with PaPE-1 under control conditions (Supplementary material Table S1).
PaPE-1 Reversed Aβ-Induced Changes in AD-Related Gene Expression
Treatment with Aβ (10 μM) increased the expression of Rbfox (2.2-fold), Apoe (3.8-fold), Bace2 (2.6-fold), and App (1.3-fold) (Fig. 9). Cells posttreated with PaPE-1 (10 μM) showed partial reversal of all of the abovementioned changes. PaPE-1 induced Rbfox decrease from 2.2-fold to 1.6-fold, Apoe from 3.8-fold to 2.2-fold, Bace2 from 2.6-fold to 1.5 fold, and App from 1.3-fold to 1.0 fold (Fig. 9). In addition, in Aβ-treated cells PaPE-1 elevated the expression of Chat (1.9-fold) and reduced the expression of Ngrn (0.6-fold). The levels of Ache, Bace1, Mapt, Rcan1, and Ide did not change in response to either Aβ or PaPE-1 (Fig. 9). Interestingly, in the control conditions, PaPE-1 reduced the expression of Bace1 and did not alter other AD-related mRNAs (0.03-fold) (Supplementary material Table S2).
Discussion
Targeting the non-nuclear estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, mainly via mERα and mERβ, has been postulated as novel therapeutic strategy for central nervous system pathologies. Recently, we showed that PaPE-1, which selectively activates ER non-nuclear signaling pathways, elicited neuroprotection in a cellular model of AD [22]; however, in the study, the ligand was applied at the same time as Aβ. In the present study, to increase the translational value of the research, we assessed the neuroprotective capacity and mechanisms of action of PaPE-1 in a posttreatment paradigm, i.e., 24 h after initiating Aβ-induced neurotoxicity. In this study, primary neocortical cell cultures treated with preaggregated Aβ1-42 (10 µM) showed the presence of extracellular Aβ1-42, confirming the adequacy of the AD model used. Extracellular storage of Aβ is a common feature of AD pathology and causes synaptic loss and neurodegeneration [36]. The Aβ protein is a primary risk factor for AD known to accumulate and aggregate in the brains of AD patients. Cerebral organoids from Dutch-type cerebral amyloid angiopathy (D-CAA) patients exhibited Aβ accumulation, thus confirming the potential of cerebral organoids as an in vitro disease model [37]. Similar to our study, aggregated Aβ was observed in primary cultures of rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons that were treated with preaggregated Aβ [38]. Aβ aggregates were also seeded in mouse primary neurons treated with APP/PSEN1 brain lysates, as detected with an antibody against Aβ42 and immunofluorescence labeling [39].
We are the first to show in this study that a 24-h delayed posttreatment with PaPE-1 decreased the degree of Aβ-induced neurodegeneration, restored neurite outgrowth, and inhibited the expression of AD-related genes, i.e., Rbfox, Apoe, Bace2, App, and Ngrn, except for Chat, which was stimulated. There are no relevant data to compare our results with, since except for our study no attempt has been made to selectively activate non-nuclear ER signaling pathways, particularly mERα and mERβ, and to measure AD-related parameters. Furthermore, in most studies, the neuroprotective capacities of new ER ligands have been tested as pre- or cotreatment paradigms but not as posttreatment paradigm, as in the present study. The only relevant study was based upon 1-h posttreatment with a single dose of 4-estren-3α,17β-diol (estren), a non-classical ER pathway activator, which inhibited the loss of cholinergic cortical projections and attenuated Aβ1-42-induced learning deficits in ovariectomized mice [40]. This is why we discussed the neuroprotective effect of posttreatment with PaPE-1 against Aβ1-42-induced neurotoxicity in the context of other ER ligands without dissecting non-nuclear ER signaling pathways specific effects.
Similar to our results, a phytoestrogen genistein that displays strong binding affinity for ERα and has the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) property appeared to inhibit Aβ-induced neurotoxicity in hippocampal neurons and to improve brain function [41, 42]. In addition, selective modulators of ERβ were effective in protecting against AD pathology in transgenic models of the disease [43], and treatment with hydroxytyrosol acetate caused ERβ-dependent cognitive improvement in APP/PS1 transgenic mice [44]. A phytoSERM that contains genistein, daidzein, and S-equol and preferentially targets ERβ was found to preserve cognitive function in women with genetic risk modulators for AD, i.e., mitochondrial haplogroup and APOE genotype [45]. A functional link between ER signaling and AD could rely on APOE-mediated modulation of ESR1 that involves CEBPB/ATF4, miR-155-5p, or miR-1-3p [46]. Therefore, the cited studies confirm the rationale for undertaking our research; however, they do not indicate the exclusive participation of non-nuclear ER signaling pathways in neuroprotection against AD as our present study does.
We demonstrated that the AD-attributed effects were accompanied by activation of apoptosis-dependent caspases (caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9) and JNK kinases, as evidenced using relevant inhibitors. Previously, we also showed the involvement of apoptosis in the response of neuronal cells to Aβ, including activation of caspase-3, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and induction of apoptosis-specific factors [22]. Many other studies have also supported the process of apoptosis as an initial trigger of AD both in vivo and in vitro [4, 47]. In this study, posttreatment with PaPE-1 elicited anti-apoptotic effects by inhibiting Aβ-induced caspase-3 and caspase-9 activities as well as attenuating apoptotic nuclei formation, thus preventing neuronal cell death. The anti-apoptotic properties of ER agonists have been supported by a wide variety of studies, including the beneficial actions of S-equol (ERβ agonist) on platelet mitochondria cytochrome oxidase (COX) activity in AD women [48] and neuroprotective effects exerted by a newly synthesized benzopyran FMDB (R-9-(4fluorophenyl)-3-methyl-10,10-hydrogen-6-hydrogen-benzopyran) on cognition, neurogenesis, and apoptosis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice with ERβ knockdown [49]. Furthermore, ERα is known to promote nonamyloidogenic APP processing via the MAPK/ERK pathway [50], and ginsenoside was shown to regulate ERα phosphorylation to protect against AD pathology [51]. Our results indicate that PaPE-1-mediated anti-apoptotic effects involve caspase-9 inhibition. Tamayev et al. [52] showed that inhibition of caspase-9 activity rescues both synaptic plasticity and memory deficits in Danish dementia knock-in mice, implicating caspase-9 in the pathogenesis of the disease and suggesting that PaPE-1 by reducing caspase-9 activity could be a valid therapeutic approach to treating human dementias.
In addition, posttreatment with PaPE-1 downregulated the Aβ-affected mRNA expression of apoptosis-specific factors such as Bax, Gsk3b, Fas, and Fasl, except for Bcl2, which was upregulated. In parallel, PaPE-1 decreased the protein levels of BAX, FAS, and FASL, which were elevated due to Aβ treatment, as detected by western blotting and immunofluorescence labeling. Interestingly, PaPE-1 also decreased the control level of BAX, but increased the control level of GSK3β. Since GSK3β activity is determined by its phosphorylation on specific sites, and only the active GSK3β is a measure of apoptosis, we do not interpret PaPE-1-evoked increase in the control level of GSK3β as a proapoptotic effect. GSK3β inhibition was observed in response to trehalose, which upregulated ERα and ERβ and protected APP/PS1 mice against dietary advanced glycation end product (dAGE)-induced neurotoxicity and cognitive impairment [53]. Our results are also in line with the ERα-mediated anti-apoptotic effects of adenosine against Aβ25-35-induced brain damage [54] and of formononetin in AD patients [55], as well as the ER/PI3K/Akt-mediated effect of naringenin against Aβ25-35-caused damage in neuronally differentiated PC12 cells [56].
In our model of AD, Aβ caused Bax hypomethylation and Bcl2 hypermethylation, which suggests opposite regulation of the expression levels of the genes and related proteins. Accordingly, the PaPE-1-evoked decrease in the BAX/BCL2 ratio corresponds to increased methylation of the Bax gene and implies a decreased BAX protein level. However, Bcl2 gene hypermethylation and intact BCL2 protein levels suggest other PaPE-1-dependent mechanisms to control Aβ-induced apoptosis. BCL2 upregulation has been unexpectedly detected in response to hypoxia, ischemia, and neurodegenerative diseases and was explained as a compensatory mechanism preventing neurons from acute or chronic injury [21, 22, 33, 35, 57,58,59]. BCL2 dysregulation may be related to the dual role of autophagy during neurodegeneration, depending on its interaction with the process of apoptosis and abilities to bind and inhibit Ca2+ flux of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) and ryanodine receptors (RyRs). Paradoxically, the anti-apoptotic function of BCL2 may be neutralized by sensitizers such as BAD, BIK, NOXA, PUMA, HRK, and BMF, which in turn may predispose cells to apoptosis. In AD patients, BCL2 immunoreactivity in neurons increases in parallel with increasing disease severity [60]. However, in AD patients with confirmed neurofibrillary degeneration, BCL2 immunoreactivity decreases, which supports the unclear role of this protein in preventing Aβ-induced apoptosis, including PaPE-1-evoked Bcl2 gene hypermethylation observed in the present study.
Summing up, current basic study proposes a novel therapeutic approach for AD that relies on a posttreatment with the newly designed PaPE-1 which selectively activates ER non-nuclear signaling pathways, inhibits the expression of AD-related genes and apoptosis process that involves enhanced DNA methylation of specific genes, and in these ways protects from Aβ-induced neurodegeneration.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some data may not be made available because of privacy or ethical restrictions.
References
Thinakaran G, Koo EH (2008) Amyloid precursor protein trafficking, processing, and function. J Biol Chem 283(44):29615–29619. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R800019200
Shimohama S (2000) Apoptosis in Alzheimer’s disease–an update. Apoptosis 5(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009625323388
Huang YR, Liu RT (2020) The toxicity and polymorphism of β-amyloid oligomers. Int J Mol Sci 21(12):4477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124477
Sharma VK, Singh TG, Singh S, Garg N, Dhiman S (2021) Apoptotic pathways and Alzheimer’s disease: probing therapeutic potential. Neurochem Res 46(12):3103–3122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-021-03418-7
Thornberry NA, Rano TA, Peterson EP, Rasper DM, Timkey T, Garcia-Calvo M, Houtzager VM, Nordstrom PA et al (1997) A combinatorial approach defines specificities of members of the caspase family and granzyme B. Functional relationships established for key mediators of apoptosis. J Biol Chem 272(29):17907–17911. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.29.17907
Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, Alnemri ES, Altucci L et al (2018) Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ 25(3):486–541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4
Wnuk A, Kajta M (2017) Steroid and xenobiotic receptor signalling in apoptosis and autophagy of the nervous system. Int J Mol Sci 18(11):2394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112394
Dhage PA, Sharbidre AA, Magdum SM (2023) Interlacing the relevance of caspase activation in the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Bull 192:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.11.008
Gervais FG, Xu D, Robertson GS, Vaillancourt JP, Zhu Y, Huang J, LeBlanc A, Smith D et al (1999) Involvement of caspases in proteolytic cleavage of Alzheimer’s amyloid-beta precursor protein and amyloidogenic A beta peptide formation. Cell 97(3):395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80748-5
Plouffe V, Mohamed NV, Rivest-McGraw J, Bertrand J, Lauzon M, Leclerc N (2012) Hyperphosphorylation and cleavage at D421 enhance tau secretion. PLoS ONE 7(5):e36873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036873
Zhou Y, Shi J, Chu D, Hu W, Guan Z, Gong CX, Iqbal K, Liu F (2018) Relevance of phosphorylation and truncation of tau to the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 10:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00027
Park G, Nhan HS, Tyan SH, Kawakatsu Y, Zhang C, Navarro M, Koo EH (2020) Caspase activation and caspase-mediated cleavage of APP is associated with amyloid β-protein-induced synapse loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Rep 31(13):107839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107839
Pérez MJ, Vergara-Pulgar K, Jara C, Cabezas-Opazo F, Quintanilla RA (2018) Caspase-cleaved tau impairs mitochondrial dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol 55(2):1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0385-x
Nguyen TTM, Gillet G, Popgeorgiev N (2021) Caspases in the developing central nervous system: apoptosis and beyond. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:702404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.702404
Hollville E, Deshmukh M (2018) Physiological functions of non-apoptotic caspase activity in the nervous system. Semin Cell Dev Biol 82:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.037
Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, Chételat G, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, Nixon RA, Jones DT (2021) Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00269-y
Rohn TT, Head E (2009) Caspases as therapeutic targets in Alzheimer’s disease: is it time to “cut” to the chase? Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2(2):108–118
Wnuk A, Przepiórska K, Pietrzak BA, Kajta M (2023) Emerging evidence on membrane estrogen receptors as novel therapeutic targets for central nervous system pathologies. Int J Mol Sci 24(4):4043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044043
Madak-Erdogan Z, Kim SH, Gong P, Zhao YC, Zhang H, Chambliss KL, Carlson KE, Mayne CG et al (2016) Design of pathway preferential estrogens that provide beneficial metabolic and vascular effects without stimulating reproductive tissues. Sci Signal 9(429):ra53. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aad8170
Selvaraj UM, Zuurbier KR, Whoolery CW, Plautz EJ, Chambliss KL, Kong X, Zhang S, Kim SH et al (2018) Selective nonnuclear estrogen receptor activation decreases stroke severity and promotes functional recovery in female mice. Endocrinology 159(11):3848–3859. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2018-00600
Wnuk A, Przepiórska K, Pietrzak BA, Kajta M (2021) Posttreatment strategy against hypoxia and ischemia based on selective targeting of nonnuclear estrogen receptors with PaPE-1. Neurotox Res 39(6):2029–2041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-021-00441-y
Wnuk A, Przepiórska K, Rzemieniec J, Pietrzak B, Kajta M (2020) Selective targeting of non-nuclear estrogen receptors with PaPE-1 as a new treatment strategy for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotox Res 38(4):957–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-020-00289-8
Kajta M, Trotter A, Lasoń W, Beyer C (2006) Impact of 17beta-estradiol on cytokine-mediated apoptotic effects in primary hippocampal and neocortical cell cultures. Brain Res 1116(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.105
Przepiórska K, Wnuk A, Beyer C, Kajta M (2023) Amorfrutin B protects mouse brain neurons from hypoxia/ischemia by inhibiting apoptosis and autophagy processes through gene methylation- and miRNA-dependent regulation. Mol Neurobiol 60(2):576–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-022-03087-9
Kajta M, Litwa E, Rzemieniec J, Wnuk A, Lason W, Zelek-Molik A, Nalepa I, Grzegorzewska-Hiczwa M et al (2014) Isomer-nonspecific action of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane on aryl hydrocarbon receptor and G-protein-coupled receptor 30 intracellular signaling in apoptotic neuronal cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 392(1–2):90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2014.05.008
Kajta M, Domin H, Grynkiewicz G, Lason W (2007) Genistein inhibits glutamate-induced apoptotic processes in primary neuronal cell cultures: an involvement of aryl hydrocarbon receptor and estrogen receptor/glycogen synthase kinase-3beta intracellular signaling pathway. Neuroscience 145(2):592–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.11.059
Kajta M, Wójtowicz AK, Maćkowiak M, Lasoń W (2009) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated apoptosis of neuronal cells: a possible interaction with estrogen receptor signaling. Neuroscience 158(2):811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.045
Wnuk A, Rzemieniec J, Litwa E, Lasoń W, Krzeptowski W, Wójtowicz AK, Kajta M (2016) The crucial involvement of retinoid X receptors in DDE neurotoxicity. Neurotox Res 29(1):155–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-015-9572-6
Wnuk A, Rzemieniec J, Lasoń W, Krzeptowski W, Kajta M (2018) Apoptosis induced by the UV filter benzophenone-3 in mouse neuronal cells is mediated via attenuation of Erα/Pparγ and stimulation of Erβ/Gpr30 signaling. Mol Neurobiol 55(3):2362–2383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0480-z
Rzemieniec J, Litwa E, Wnuk A, Lason W, Krzeptowski W, Kajta M (2016) Selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulator 3,3′-diindolylmethane impairs AhR and ARNT signaling and protects mouse neuronal cells against hypoxia. Mol Neurobiol 53(8):5591–5606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9471-0
Wnuk A, Rzemieniec J, Lasoń W, Krzeptowski W, Kajta M (2018) Benzophenone-3 impairs autophagy, alters epigenetic status, and disrupts retinoid X receptor signaling in apoptotic neuronal cells. Mol Neurobiol 55(6):5059–5074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0704-2
Wnuk A, Rzemieniec J, Przepiórska K, Pietrzak BA, Maćkowiak M, Kajta M (2021) Prenatal exposure to triclocarban impairs ESR1 signaling and disrupts epigenetic status in sex-specific ways as well as dysregulates the expression of neurogenesis- and neurotransmitter-related genes in the postnatal mouse brain. Int J Mol Sci 22(23):13121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222313121
Wnuk A, Przepiórska K, Pietrzak BA, Kajta M (2021) Post-treatment with amorfrutin B evokes PPARγ-mediated neuroprotection against hypoxia and ischemia. Biomedicines 9(8):854. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9080854
Kajta M, Rzemieniec J, Litwa E, Lason W, Lenartowicz M, Krzeptowski W, Wojtowicz AK (2013) The key involvement of estrogen receptor β and G-protein-coupled receptor 30 in the neuroprotective action of daidzein. Neuroscience 238:345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.02.005
Pietrzak BA, Wnuk A, Przepiórska K, Łach A, Kajta M (2023) Posttreatment with ospemifene attenuates hypoxia- and ischemia-induced apoptosis in primary neuronal cells via selective modulation of estrogen receptors. Neurotox Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-023-00644-5
Hampel H, Hardy J, Blennow K, Chen C, Perry G, Kim SH, Villemagne VL, Aisen P et al (2021) The amyloid-β pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry 26(10):5481–5503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01249-0
Daoutsali E, Pepers BA, Stamatakis S, van der Graaf LM, Terwindt GM, Parfitt DA, Buijsen RAM, van Roon-Mom WMC (2023) Amyloid beta accumulations and enhanced neuronal differentiation in cerebral organoids of Dutch-type cerebral amyloid angiopathy patients. Front Aging Neurosci 14:1048584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1048584
Ferreira A, Sinjoanu RC, Nicholson A, Kleinschmidt S (2011) Aβ toxicity in primary cultured neurons. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, N.J.) 670:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-744-0_11
Roos TT, Garcia MG, Martinsson I, Mabrouk R, Israelsson B, Deierborg T, Kobro-Flatmoen A, Tanila H et al (2021) Neuronal spreading and plaque induction of intracellular Aβ and its disruption of Aβ homeostasis. Acta Neuropathol 142(4):669–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-021-02345-9
Kwakowsky A, Potapov K, Kim S, Peppercorn K, Tate WP, Ábrahám IM (2016) Treatment of beta amyloid 1–42 (Aβ(1–42))-induced basal forebrain cholinergic damage by a non-classical estrogen signaling activator in vivo. Sci Rep 6:21101. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21101
Wang YX, Xia ZH, Jiang X, Li LX, Wang HG, An D, Liu YQ (2020) Genistein inhibits amyloid peptide 25–35-induced neuronal death by modulating estrogen receptors, choline acetyltransferase and glutamate receptors. Arch Biochem Biophys 693:108561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2020.108561
Duan X, Li Y, Xu F, Ding H (2021) Study on the neuroprotective effects of Genistein on Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Behav 11(5):e02100. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2100
Zhao L, Woody SK, Chhibber A (2015) Estrogen receptor β in Alzheimer’s disease: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Ageing Res Rev 24(Pt B):178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.08.001
Qin C, Hu S, Zhang S, Zhao D, Wang Y, Li H, Peng Y, Shi L et al (2021) Hydroxytyrosol acetate improves the cognitive function of APP/PS1 transgenic mice in ERβ-dependent manner. Mol Nutr Food Res 65(3):e2000797. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202000797
Wang Y, Hernandez G, Mack WJ, Schneider LS, Yin F, Brinton RD (2020) Retrospective analysis of phytoSERM for management of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms and cognitive decline: a pilot study on pharmacogenomic effects of mitochondrial haplogroup and APOE genotype on therapeutic efficacy. Menopause (New York, NY) 27(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001418
Liu J, Yuan S, Niu X, Kelleher R, Sheridan H (2022) ESR1 dysfunction triggers neuroinflammation as a critical upstream causative factor of the Alzheimer’s disease process. Aging 14(21):8595–8614. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204359
Calissano P, Matrone C, Amadoro G (2009) Apoptosis and in vitro Alzheimer disease neuronal models. Commun Integr Biol 2(2):163–169. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.7704
Wilkins HM, Mahnken JD, Welch P, Bothwell R, Koppel S, Jackson RL, Burns JM, Swerdlow RH (2017) A mitochondrial biomarker-based study of S-equol in Alzheimer’s disease subjects: results of a single-arm, pilot trial. J Alzheimer’s Dis 59(1):291–300. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170077
Ren XQ, Huang X, Xing SY, Long Y, Yuan DH, Hong H, Tang SS (2023) Neuroprotective effects of novel compound FMDB on cognition, neurogenesis and apoptosis in APP/PS1 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int 165:105510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2023.105510
Shi C, Zhu X, Wang J, Long D (2014) Estrogen receptor α promotes non-amyloidogenic processing of platelet amyloid precursor protein via the MAPK/ERK pathway. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 144 Pt B:280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.06.010
Yan X, Hu G, Yan W, Chen T, Yang F, Zhang X, Zhao G, Liu J (2017) Ginsenoside Rd promotes non-amyloidogenic pathway of amyloid precursor protein processing by regulating phosphorylation of estrogen receptor alpha. Life Sci 168:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.11.002
Tamayev R, Akpan N, Arancio O, Troy CM, D’Adamio L (2012) Caspase-9 mediates synaptic plasticity and memory deficits of Danish dementia knock-in mice: caspase-9 inhibition provides therapeutic protection. Mol Neurodegener 7:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-7-60
Zhou HH, Luo L, Zhai XD, Chen L, Wang G, Qin LQ, Yu Z, Xin LL et al (2021) Sex-specific neurotoxicity of dietary advanced glycation end products in APP/PS1 mice and protective roles of trehalose by inhibiting tau phosphorylation via GSK-3β-TFEB. Mol Nutr Food Res 65(23):e2100464. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.202100464
Zeng M, Feng A, Zhao C, Zhang B, Guo P, Liu M, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Fan R, Lyu J, Zheng X (2022) Adenosine ameliorated Aβ25-35-induced brain injury through the inhibition of apoptosis and oxidative stress via an ERα pathway. Brain Res 1788:147944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147944
Xiao H, Qin X, Wan J, Li R (2019) Pharmacological targets and the biological mechanisms of formononetin for Alzheimer’s disease: a network analysis. Med Sci Monitor 25:4273–4277. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.916662
Zhang N, Hu Z, Zhang Z, Liu G, Wang Y, Ren Y, Wu X, Geng F (2018) Protective role of naringenin against Aβ25-35-caused damage via ER and PI3K/Akt-mediated pathways. Cell Mol Neurobiol 38(2):549–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-017-0519-8
Satou T, Cummings BJ, Cotman CW (1995) Immunoreactivity for Bcl-2 protein within neurons in the Alzheimer’s disease brain increases with disease severity. Brain Res 697(1–2):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(95)00748-f
O’Barr S, Schultz J, Rogers J (1996) Expression of the protooncogene bcl-2 in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Neurobiol Aging 17(1):131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-4580(95)02024-1
Kitamura Y, Shimohama S, Kamoshima W, Ota T, Matsuoka Y, Nomura Y, Smith MA, Perry G et al (1998) Alteration of proteins regulating apoptosis, Bcl-2, Bcl-x, Bax, Bak, Bad, ICH-1 and CPP32. Alzheimer’s Dis Brain Res 780(2):260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01202-x
Callens M, Kraskovskaya N, Derevtsova K, Annaert W, Bultynck G, Bezprozvanny I, Vervliet T (2021) The role of Bcl-2 proteins in modulating neuronal Ca2+ signaling in health and in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochimica et biophysica acta. Mol Cell Research 1868(6):118997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118997
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the advice and assistance of Professor Davide Franceschini, PhD, in the preparation of Aβ oligomers.
Funding
This work was supported by grant no. 2020/39/B/NZ7/00974 from the National Science Centre of Poland and the statutory fund of the Maj Institute of Pharmacology at the Polish Academy of Sciences in Krakow, Poland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.A.P.W.: data curation, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing—original draft; A.W.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing—original draft; K.P.D.: data curation, investigation, methodology, and validation; A.Ł.: investigation and writing—original draft; M.K.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, supervision, and writing—original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pietrzak-Wawrzyńska, B.A., Wnuk, A., Przepiórska-Drońska, K. et al. Posttreatment with PaPE-1 Protects from Aβ-Induced Neurodegeneration Through Inhibiting the Expression of Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Genes and Apoptosis Process That Involves Enhanced DNA Methylation of Specific Genes. Mol Neurobiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03819-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03819-5