Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of Native and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Incremental Attributes of Functional FDG PET/CT over Morphologic Imaging

  • Nuclear Cardiology (V Dilsizian, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The clinical and incremental value of functional imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) for the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (IE).

Recent Findings

The diagnosis of IE is challenging because of the highly variable clinical presentations, especially in the case of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). FDG PET/CT has been shown to play an important role for the diagnosis of PVE as a major Duke criterion. Whether FDG PET/CT could play a similar role in patients with suspected native valve endocarditis (NVE) is less well established. It is increasingly recognized that IE is a multisystem disorder, and identification of extra-cardiac manifestations on whole-body FDG PET/CT impacts management and prognosis of patients with IE. Finally, FDG PET/CT provides incremental prognostic value over other clinical and para-clinical parameters, enabling prediction of in-hospital mortality, IE recurrence, hospitalization, and new onset heart failure and embolic events.

Summary

FDG PET/CT plays a key role in the investigation of patients with suspected IE, enabling detection of valvular infection and extra-cardiac manifestations of the infection which has important prognostic implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Thuny F, Grisoli D, Collart F, Habib G, Raoult D. Management of infective endocarditis: challenges and perspectives. Lancet. 2012;379:965–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoen B, Alla F, Selton-Suty C, Béguinot I, Bouvet A, Briançon S, et al. Changing profile of infective endocarditis: results of a 1-year survey in France. JAMA. 2002;288:75–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pant S, Patel NJ, Deshmukh A, Golwala H, Patel N, Badheka A, et al. Trends in infective endocarditis incidence, microbiology, and valve replacement in the United States from 2000 to 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2070–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Toyoda N, Chikwe J, Itagaki S, Gelijns AC, Adams DH, Egorova NN. Trends in infective endocarditis in California and New York state, 1998-2013. JAMA. 2017;317:1652–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen W, Kim J, Molchanova-Cook OP, Dilsizian V. The potential of FDG PET/CT for early diagnosis of cardiac device and prosthetic valve infection before morphologic damages ensue. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16:459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen W, Sajadi MM, Dilsizian V. Merits of FDG PET/CT and functional molecular imaging over anatomic imaging with echocardiography and CT angiography for the diagnosis of cardiac device infections. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:1679–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands SR, Bergmann SR, Delbeke D, Dorbala S, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Oct;23(5):1187–226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dilsizian V, Taillefer R. Journey in evolution of nuclear cardiology: will there be another quantum leap with the F-18 labeled myocardial perfusion tracers? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1269–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen W, Dilsizian V. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging of coronary atherosclerosis and plaque inflammation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:179–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen W, Dilsizian V. Targeted PET/CT imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques: microcalcification with sodium fluoride and inflammation with fluorodeoxyglucose. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:364–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Zaghal A, Raynor WY, Seraj SM, Werner TJ, Alavi A. FDG-PET imaging to detect and characterize underlying causes of fever of unknown origin: an unavoidable path for the foreseeable future. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Termaat MF, Raijmakers PGHM, Scholten HJ, Bakker FC, Patka P, Haarman HJTM. The accuracy of diagnostic imaging for the assessment of chronic osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2464–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hariri H, Tan S, Martineau P, Lamarche Y, Carrier M, Finnerty V, et al. Utility of FDG-PET/CT for the detection and characterization of sternal wound infection following sternotomy. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;53:253–262.

  14. Rojoa D, Kontopodis N, Antoniou SA, Ioannou CV, Antoniou GA. 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of vascular prosthetic graft infection: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:292–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarrazin J-F, Trottier M, Tessier M. How useful is 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected vascular graft infection? J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;27:303–304

  16. Lucinian YA, Lamarche Y, Demers P, Martineau P, Harel F, Pelletier-Galarneau M. FDG-PET/CT for the detection of infection following aortic root replacement surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 13;S1936-878X(20)30161–3 [Ahead of Print].

  17. Dilsizian V, Chandrashekhar Y. Distinguishing active vasculitis from sterile inflammation and graft infection: a call for a more specific imaging target. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:1085–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarrazin J-F, Philippon F, Trottier M, Tessier M. Role of radionuclide imaging for diagnosis of device and prosthetic valve infections. World J Cardiol. 2016;8:534–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarrazin J-F, Philippon F, Tessier M, Guimond J, Molin F, Champagne J, et al. Usefulness of fluorine-18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for identification of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1616–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dilsizian V, Achenbach S, Narula J. On adding versus selecting imaging modalities for incremental diagnosis: a case-study of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in prosthetic valve endocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:1020–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim J, Feller ED, Chen W, Dilsizian V. FDG PET/CT imaging for LVAD associated infections. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:839–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim J, Feller ED, Chen W, Liang Y, Dilsizian V. FDG PET/CT for early detection and localization of left ventricular assist device infection: impact on patient management and outcome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:722–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen W, Dilsizian V. Is FDG PET/CT more reliable than clinical standard diagnosis for guiding patient management decisions in cardiac implantable electronic device infection? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7):e009453.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Salomäki SP, Saraste A, Kemppainen J, Bax JJ, Knuuti J, Nuutila P, et al. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in infective endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:195–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. •• Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta J-P, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3075–128 European Society of Cardiology Infective Endocarditis guidelines, which were the first to introduce FDG-PET/CT as a major Duke Criterion.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bai AD, Steinberg M, Showler A, Burry L, Bhatia RS, Tomlinson GA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for infective endocarditis findings using transesophageal echocardiography as the reference standard: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:639–646.e8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Raoult D, Casalta JP, Richet H, Khan M, Bernit E, Rovery C, et al. Contribution of systematic serological testing in diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5238–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the international collaboration on endocarditis-prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:463–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Morris AJ, Drinkovic D, Pottumarthy S, Strickett MG, MacCulloch D, Lambie N, et al. Gram stain, culture, and histopathological examination findings for heart valves removed because of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:697–704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lamas CC, Fournier P-E, Zappa M, Brandão TJD, Januário-da-Silva CA, Correia MG, et al. Diagnosis of blood culture-negative endocarditis and clinical comparison between blood culture-negative and blood culture-positive cases. Infection. 2016;44:459–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Topan A, Carstina D, Slavcovici A, Rancea R, Capalneanu R, Lupse M. Assesment of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis after twenty-years. An analysis of 241 cases. Clujul Med. 2015;88:321–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Prendergast BD. Diagnostic criteria and problems in infective endocarditis. Heart. 2004;90:611–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and Management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:1435–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Habib G, Derumeaux G, Avierinos JF, Casalta JP, Jamal F, Volot F, et al. Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:2023–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. • Abikhzer G, Martineau P, Grégoire J, Finnerty V, Harel F, Pelletier-Galarneau M. [18F]FDG-PET CT for the evaluation of native valve endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02092-6. Retrospective study demonstrating that the addition of FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of NVE as a major criterion improves sensitivity of the Duke Criteria without affecting their specificity.

  36. Habib G. Management of infective endocarditis. Heart. 2006;92:124–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fukuchi T, Iwata K, Ohji G. Failure of early diagnosis of infective endocarditis in Japan—a retrospective descriptive analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93:e237.

  38. Vaidyanathan S, Patel CN, Scarsbrook AF, Chowdhury FU. FDG PET/CT in infection and inflammation--current and emerging clinical applications. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:787–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sajadi MM, Chen W, Dilsizian V. Targeted bacteria-specific 18F-fluoro-maltohexaose but not FDG PET distinguishes infection from inflammation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(5):887–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Juneau D, Pelletier-Galarneau M. Revisiting the relevance of the 3-month safety period in the evaluation of prosthetic valve endocarditis with FDG-PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02070-y.

  41. Chen W, Dilsizian V. Molecular imaging of cardiovascular device infection: targeting the bacteria or the host–pathogen immune response? J Nucl Med. 2020;61:319–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dilsizian V. FDG uptake as a surrogate marker for antecedent ischemia. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(12):1909–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pelletier-Galarneau M, Ruddy TD. Molecular imaging of coronary inflammation. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2019;29:191–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pelletier-Galarneau M, Ardle BM, Ohira H, Leung E, Ruddy TD. Role of PET/CT in assessing cardiac sarcoidosis. Schindler T., George R., Lima J. (eds). Molecular and multimodality imaging in cardiovascular disease: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 49–78.

  45. Martineau P, Pelletier-Galarneau M, Juneau D, Leung E, Birnie D, Beanlands RSB. Molecular imaging of cardiac sarcoidosis. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2018;11:6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pelletier-Galarneau M, Ruddy TD. PET/CT for diagnosis and management of large-vessel vasculitis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Glaser N, Jackson V, Holzmann MJ, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Prosthetic valve endocarditis after surgical aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2017;136:329–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tanis W, Budde RPJ, van der Bilt IAC, Delemarre B, Hoohenkerk G, van Rooden J-K, et al. Novel imaging strategies for the detection of prosthetic heart valve obstruction and endocarditis. Neth Heart J. 2016;24:96–107.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hill EE, Herijgers P, Claus P, Vanderschueren S, Peetermans WE, Herregods M-C. Abscess in infective endocarditis: the value of transesophageal echocardiography and outcome: a 5-year study. Am Heart J. 2007;154:923–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Choussat R, Thomas D, Isnard R, Michel PL, Iung B, Hanania G, et al. Perivalvular abscesses associated with endocarditis; clinical features and prognostic factors of overall survival in a series of 233 cases. Perivalvular Abscesses French Multicentre Study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:232–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. San Román JA, Vilacosta I, Sarriá C, de la Fuente L, Sanz O, Vega JL, et al. Clinical course, microbiologic profile, and diagnosis of periannular complications in prosthetic valve endocarditis. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1075–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Graupner C, Vilacosta I, SanRomán J, Ronderos R, Sarriá C, Fernández C, et al. Periannular extension of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1204–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Juneau D, Golfam M, Hazra S, Erthal F, Zuckier LS, Bernick J, et al. Molecular imaging for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2018;253:183–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. •• Mahmood M, Kendi AT, Ajmal S, Farid S, O’Horo JC, Chareonthaitawee P, et al. Meta-analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26:922–35 Meta-analysis evaluating the performance of FDG PET/CT for the detection of PVE.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gomes A, Glaudemans AWJM, Touw DJ, van Melle JP, Willems TP, Maass AH, et al. Diagnostic value of imaging in infective endocarditis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:e1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Philip M, Tessonnier L, Mancini J, Mainardi JL, Lussato D, Cammilleri S, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVIE): a prospective multicenter study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis Suppl. 2020;12:63–4.

    Google Scholar 

  57. • Habib G, Erba PA, Iung B, Donal E, Cosyns B, Laroche C, et al. Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3222–32 Results of the European Infective Endocarditis Registry reporting on the diagnostic performance of different modalities.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pizzi MN, Roque A, Fernández-Hidalgo N, Cuéllar-Calabria H, Ferreira-González I, Gonzàlez-Alujas MT, et al. Improving the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in prosthetic valves and Intracardiac devices with 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography angiography: initial results at an infective endocarditis referral center. Circulation. 2015;132:1113–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Swart LE, Gomes A, Scholtens AM, Sinha B, Tanis W, Lam MGEH, et al. Improving the diagnostic performance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in prosthetic heart valve endocarditis. Circulation. 2018;138:1412–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. • Mathieu C, Mikaïl N, Benali K, Iung B, Duval X, Nataf P, et al. Characterization of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake pattern in noninfected prosthetic heart valves. Circulation: cardiovascular imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017. Study characterizing the uptake patterns of non-infective prosthetic valves.

  61. Schouten LRA, Verberne HJ, Bouma BJ, van Eck-Smit BLF, Mulder BJM. Surgical glue for repair of the aortic root as a possible explanation for increased F-18 FDG uptake. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:146–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. • San S, Ravis E, Tessonier L, Philip M, Cammilleri S, Lavagna F, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:1031–40 Study demonstrating the incremental prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in IE.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Saby L, Laas O, Habib G, Cammilleri S, Mancini J, Tessonnier L, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis: increased valvular 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a novel major criterion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2374–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kouijzer IJE, Berrevoets MAH, Aarntzen EHJG, de Vries J, van Dijk APJ, Oyen WJG, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography combined with computed tomography as a diagnostic tool in native valve endocarditis. Nucl Med Commun. 2018;39:747–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. de Camargo RA, Bitencourt MS, Meneghetti JC, Soares J, Gonçalves LFT, Buchpiguel CA, et al. The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of left-sided endocarditis: native vs. prosthetic valves endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;70:583–94.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Koslow M, Kuperstein R, Eshed I, Perelman M, Maor E, Sidi Y. The unique clinical features and outcome of infectious endocarditis and vertebral osteomyelitis co-infection. Am J Med. 2014;127:669.e9–669.e15.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Holle SLK, Andersen MH, Klein CF, Bruun NE, Tønder N, Haarmark C, et al. Clinical usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for identification of abnormal extra-cardiac foci in patients with infective endocarditis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 7];36:939–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01787-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Boursier C, Duval X, Mahida B, Hoen B, Goehringer F, Selton-Suty C, et al. Hypermetabolism of the spleen or bone marrow is an additional albeit indirect sign of infective endocarditis at FDG-PET. J Nucl Cardiol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 7]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02050-2.

  69. Thuny F, Beurtheret S, Mancini J, Gariboldi V, Casalta J-P, Riberi A, et al. The timing of surgery influences mortality and morbidity in adults with severe complicated infective endocarditis: a propensity analysis. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2027–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen W, Dilsizian V. FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis: expert consensus vs evidence-based practice. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26:313–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Chu VH, Cabell CH, Benjamin DK, Kuniholm EF, Fowler VG, Engemann J, et al. Early predictors of in-hospital death in infective endocarditis. Circulation. 2004;109:1745–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Thuny F, Di Salvo G, Disalvo G, Belliard O, Avierinos J-F, Pergola V, et al. Risk of embolism and death in infective endocarditis: prognostic value of echocardiography: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation. 2005;112:69–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. San Román JA, López J, Vilacosta I, Luaces M, Sarriá C, Revilla A, et al. Prognostic stratification of patients with left-sided endocarditis determined at admission. Am J Med. 2007;120:369.e1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kestler M, Muñoz P, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Rotger A, Jimenez-Requena F, Mari A, et al. Role of (18)F-FDG PET in patients with infectious endocarditis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1093–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Piper C, Korfer R, Horstkotte D. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Heart. 2001;85:590–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wahadat AR, Tanis W, Scholtens AM, Bekker M, Graven LH, Swart LE, et al. Normal imaging findings after aortic valve implantation on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-02025-y Online ahead of print.

  77. Roque A, Pizzi MN, Fernández-Hidalgo N, Permanyer E, Cuellar-Calabria H, Romero-Farina G, et al. Morpho-metabolic post-surgical patterns of non-infected prosthetic heart valves by [18F]FDG PET/CTA: “normality” is a possible diagnosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21:24–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Erba PA, Conti U, Lazzeri E, Sollini M, Doria R, De Tommasi SM, et al. Added value of 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leukocyte SPECT/CT in the characterization and management of patients with infectious endocarditis. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1235–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Rouzet F, Chequer R, Benali K, Lepage L, Ghodbane W, Duval X, et al. Respective performance of 18F-FDG PET and radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy for the diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1980–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Cantoni V, Sollini M, Green R, Berchiolli R, Lazzeri E, Mannarino T, et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis on [18F] FDG PET/CT and radiolabelled leukocyte SPECT–SPECT/CT imaging in infectious endocarditis and cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Clin Transl Imaging. 2018;6:3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Lancellotti P, Habib G, Oury C, Nchimi A. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in device infective endocarditis: ready for prime time. Circulation. 2015;132:1076–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Panizzi P, Nahrendorf M, Figueiredo J-L, Panizzi J, Marinelli B, Iwamoto Y, et al. In vivo detection of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis by targeting pathogen-specific prothrombin activation. Nat Med. 2011;17:1142–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau, Gad Abikhzer, Francois Harel, and Vasken Dilsizian declare that they have no conflict of interest. Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau is supported by a Junior 1 Research Award from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS).

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nuclear Cardiology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pelletier-Galarneau, M., Abikhzer, G., Harel, F. et al. Detection of Native and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Incremental Attributes of Functional FDG PET/CT over Morphologic Imaging. Curr Cardiol Rep 22, 93 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01334-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01334-w

Keywords

Navigation