Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

As a treatment summary (TS) documents information for follow-up care, it is believed to be an important communication tool for the patient, their GP, and other health professionals. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate the impact of receiving a TS for cancer survivors when compared to receiving standard care and to identify knowledge gaps to inform future research.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken from August 2018 to October 2018. Studies were included if participants (cancer survivors) were over 18 years of age and had received a TS, and if outcomes for TS could be separated from other survivorship interventions. The McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was then conducted.

Results

Seven studies (one prospective cohort and six cross-sectional studies) met the inclusion criteria. The impact of TS was assessed using widely varied outcomes in these studies. Overall, receipt of a TS was related to greater patient understanding and perception of the quality of care provided. However, caution is required when interpreting these results due to methodological limitations.

Conclusions

This systematic review found that TS may have a positive impact on patient understandings about and perceptions of cancer care. However, more robust research including perspectives of cancer survivors is required.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

TS could play an important role for cancer survivors especially in terms of knowledge of cancer care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia. Canberra: AIHW2019.

  2. Committee on Cancer Survivorship: Improving Care and Quality of Life, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. From cancer patient to cancer survivor lost in transition. Washington DC2006.

  3. Hahn EE, Ganz PA. Survivorship programs and care plans in practice: variations on a theme. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7(2):70–5. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2010.000115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobsen PB, DeRosa AP, Henderson TO, Mayer DK, Moskowitz CS, Paskett ED, et al. Systematic review of the impact of cancer survivorship care plans on health outcomes and health care delivery. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(20):2088–100. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.77.7482.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Halpern MT, Viswanathan M, Evans TS, Birken SA, Basch E, Mayer DK. Models of cancer survivorship care: overview and summary of current evidence. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(1):e19–27. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2014.001403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Dennis DL, Leitz L, Watson HC, Tanliao JJ. Survivorship care plans: a work in progress. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont). 2014;21(3):e466–e79. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Salz T, Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS, Layne TM, Bach PB. Survivorship care plans in research and practice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(2):101–17. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer DK, Birken SA, Check DK, Chen RC. Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006–2013). Cancer. 2015;121(7):978–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulvey TM. Treatment plan and summary templates: the experience of one practice. J Oncol Pract. 2009;5(3):106–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.0934403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer DK, Nekhlyudov L, Snyder CF, Merrill JK, Wollins DS, Shulman LN. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical expert statement on cancer survivorship care planning. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(6):345–51. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2014.001321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beesley VL, Alemayehu C, Webb PM. A systematic literature review of trials of survivorship interventions for women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers. 0(0):e13057. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13057.

  12. Brennan ME, Gormally JF, Butow P, Boyle FM, Spillane AJ. Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1899–908. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M, et al. Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(4):359–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0232-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenzik KM. Health care use during cancer survivorship: review of 5 years of evidence. 2018;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31852.

  15. Klemanski DL, Browning KK, Kue J. Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2016;10(1):71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0452-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawrence RA, McLoone JK, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJJJoGIM. Primary care physicians’ perspectives of their role in cancer care: a systematic review. 2016;31(10):1222–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3746-7.

  17. Monterosso L, Platt V, Bulsara M, Berg M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient reported outcomes for nurse-led models of survivorship care for adult cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.12.007.

  18. Jabson JM. Treatment summaries, follow-up care instructions, and patient navigation: could they be combined to improve cancer survivor's receipt of follow-up care? Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2015;9(4):692–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0444-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. University of York.

  20. Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J. Westmorland M. Critical review form—quantitative studies. In: Evidence-based practice research group at McMaster University, editor. McMaster University: McMaster University; 1998.

  21. Coleman K. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines: stage 2 consultation. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Blanch-Hartigan D, Chawla N, Beckjord EI, Forsythe LP, de Moor JS, Hesse BW, et al. Cancer survivors’ receipt of treatment summaries and implications for patient-centered communication and quality of care. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1274–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jabson JM. Follow-up care instructions, treatment summaries, and cancer survivors’ receipt of follow-up health care and late/long term effects. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(7):1851–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2532-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jabson JM, Bowen DJ. How do follow-up care instructions and treatment summaries relate to cancer survivors' cancer-related pain? J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(6):1247–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenzik KM, Kvale EA, Rocque GB, Demark-Wahnefried W, Martin MY, Jackson BE, et al. Treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions for cancer survivors: improving survivor self-efficacy and health care utilization. Oncologist. 2016;21(7):817–24. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nissen MJ, Tsai ML, Blaes AH, Swenson KK, Koering S. Effectiveness of treatment summaries in increasing breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2013;7(2):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0261-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oancea SC, Cheruvu VK. Psychological distress among adult cancer survivors: importance of survivorship care plan. J Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016;24(11):4523–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3291-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rechis RB, Ellen B, Nutt S. Potential benefits of treatment summaries for survivors’ health and information needs: results from a LIVESTRONG Survey. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(1):75–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2013.000973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maher J, Petchey L, Greenfield D, Levitt G, Fraser M. Implementation of nationwide cancer survivorship plans: experience from the UK. J Cancer Policy. 2018;15:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpo.2018.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. de Rooij BH, Ezendam NP, Nicolaije KA, Vos MC, Pijnenborg JM, Boll D, et al. Effects of survivorship care plans on patient reported outcomes in ovarian cancer during 2-year follow-up—the ROGY care trial. 2017;145(2):319–28.

  32. Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, Maunsell E, Coyle D, Folkes A, et al. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(36):4755–62. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.36.8373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Kranwinkel G, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138(3):795–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2486-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Majhail NS, Murphy E, Laud P, Preussler JM, Denzen EM, Abetti B et al. Randomized controlled trial of individualized treatment summary and survivorship care plans for hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. Haematologica. 2019;104(5):1084–1092. doi:https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.203919 Haematologica.

  35. Maly RC, Liang LJ, Liu Y, Griggs JJ, Ganz PA. Randomized controlled trial of survivorship care plans among low-income, predominantly Latina breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(16):1814–21. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.9497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor K, Chivers P, Bulsara C, Joske D, Bulsara M, Monterosso L. Care After Lymphoma (CALy) trial: a phase II pilot pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led model of survivorship care. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019;40:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2019.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tevaarwerk AJ, Hocking WG, Buhr KA, Gribble M, Seaborne LA, Wisinski KB, et al. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed survivorship care plan receipt on patient satisfaction and knowledge of diagnosis and treatment. 2019;125(6):1000–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31875.

  38. Birken SA, Clary AS, Bernstein S, Bolton J, Tardif-Douglin M, Mayer DK, et al. Strategies for successful survivorship care plan implementation: results from a qualitative study. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(8):e462–e83. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.17.00054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Handberg C, Thorne S, Maribo T. When a policy decision meets practice realities: the case of cancer survivorship care and rehabilitation needs assessment. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;33:70–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2018.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Isaacson MJ, Hulme PA, Cowan J, Kerkvliet J. Cancer survivorship care plans: processes, effective strategies, and challenges in a Northern Plains rural state. 2018;35(4):291–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12393.

  41. Mayer DK, Gerstel A, Leak AN, Smith SK. Patient and provider preferences for survivorship care plans. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(4):e80–e6. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2011.000401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Monterosso L, Taylor K, Platt V, Lobb E, Krishnasamy M, Musiello T, et al. A qualitative study of the post-treatment experiences and support needs of survivors of lymphoma. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;28:62–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2017.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rubinstein EB, Miller WL, Hudson SV, Howard J, O'Malley D, Tsui J, et al. Cancer survivorship care in advanced primary care practices: a qualitative study of challenges and opportunities. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(12):1726–32. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sterba KR, Zapka J, LaPelle N, Garris TK, Buchanan A, Scallion M, et al. Development of a survivorship needs assessment planning tool for head and neck cancer survivors and their caregivers: a preliminary study. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2017;11(6):822–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0621-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tait D, Scammell J, Mills A, Waight S, Heaslip V, Sheppard Z, et al. An evaluation of the progress made towards the implementation of treatment summaries for cancer patients across Wessex. Poole, England: Centre for Implementation Science,Wessex Strategic Clinical Networks; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Taylor K, Monterosso L, Bulsara C. Qualitative results from a phase II pilot randomised controlled trial of a lymphoma nurse-led model of survivorship care. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;35:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2018.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Williamson S, Beaver K, Gardner A, Martin-Hirsch P. Telephone follow-up after treatment for endometrial cancer: a qualitative study of patients’ and clinical nurse specialists' experiences in the ENDCAT trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;34:61–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2018.02.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Aaronson NK, Mattioli V, Minton O, Weis J, Johansen C. Dalton SO et al. Beyond treatment—psychosocial and behavioural issues in cancer survivorship research and practice. 2014;12(1):54–64.

  49. Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Smith JL, Rowland JH, Forsythe LP, Pollack L, et al. Receipt of cancer treatment summaries and follow-up instructions among adult cancer survivors: results from a national survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(1):32–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0242-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Eriksson H, Lyth J, Månsson-Brahme E, Frohm-Nilsson M, Ingvar C, Lindholm C, et al. Low level of education is associated with later stage at diagnosis and reduced survival in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a nationwide population-based study in Sweden. 2013;49(12):2705–16.

  51. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank you to the University of South Australia library staff for the assistance in database searching.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia

    Nadia Corsini & Kim Neylon

  2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia

    Nadia Corsini, Kim Neylon & Rebecca Sharp

  3. School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia

    Esther Jie Tian, Elminur Mahpirof, Amy McLaughlin, Susan Mcleod, Paul McNamara, Mary Metaxas, Sophia Minos & Saravana Kumar

Authors
  1. Nadia Corsini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kim Neylon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Esther Jie Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elminur Mahpirof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amy McLaughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Susan Mcleod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Paul McNamara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mary Metaxas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sophia Minos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rebecca Sharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Saravana Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Nadia Corsini and Saravana Kumar; Literature search, title and abstract screening and initial draft preparation: Elminur Mahpirof, Amy McLaughlin, Susan Mcleod, Paul McNamara, Mary Metaxas, Sophia Minos and Saravana Kumar; Full-text screening, data extraction and analysis, and review and editing of the manuscript: Nadia Corsini, Kim Neylon, Esther Jie Tian and Rebecca Sharp; Supervision: Saravana Kumar. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saravana Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 81 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corsini, N., Neylon, K., Tian, E.J. et al. Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 14, 405–416 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00859-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00859-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation