Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review was to describe and examine the current use of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans (TSs/SCPs) for cancer survivors, as well as to summarize and critically assess relevant literature regarding their preferences and usefulness. There is a knowledge gap regarding the preferences of stakeholders as to what is useful on a treatment summary or survivorship care plan.

Methods

A systematic review of eligible manuscripts was conducted using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies were identified via PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 through 2013. Eligible studies were critically appraised with qualitative and quantitative appraisal tools.

Results

There were 29 studies included in this review; 19 were quantitative. Survivors and primary care physicians preferred a printable format delivered 0 to 6 months posttreatment and highlighting signs and symptoms of recurrence, late, and long-term effects, and recommendations for healthy living. Oncology providers supported the concept of treatment summary and survivorship care plan but reported significant barriers to their provision. No studies incorporated caregiver perspectives of treatment summary and survivorship care plan.

Conclusion

This systematic review did not reveal conclusive evidence regarding the needs of survivors or providers regarding treatment summaries and survivorship care plans. A lack of rigorous studies contributed to this.

Implications for cancer survivors

Treatment summaries and survivorship care plans are useful for cancer survivors; however, future rigorous studies should be conducted to identify and prioritize the preferences of survivors regarding these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures 2014-2015. Atlanta.

  3. ASCO Survivorship Care Plan Template In: Cancer survivorship. American Society of Clinical Oncology. http://www.asco.org/practice-research/cancer-survivorship. Accessed December 16, 2014.

  4. Survivorship Care Plan Builder. Journey Forward. 2014. http://www.journeyforward.org/professionals/survivorship-care-plan-builder. Accessed December 16, 2014.

  5. LIVESTRONG™ Care Plan powered by Penn Medicine’s OncoLink. 2014. http://www.livestrongcareplan.org/. Accessed December 16, 2014.

  6. The Prescription for Living Plan. The American Cancer Society, Oncology Nursing Society, the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, American Journal of Nursing, and the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing. 2014. http://www.nursingcenter.com/lnc/static?pageid=721732. Accessed December 16, 2014.

  7. What’s Next? Life after Cancer Treatment. In: Cancer survivorship care plan. The Minnesota Cancer Alliance. http://mncanceralliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/SurvivorCarePlan3202012_Final.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2014.

  8. Survivorship Toolkit. Society of Gynecologic Oncology. 2014. https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/management/survivorship-toolkit/. Accessed December 16, 2014.

  9. Cancer Program Standards 2012, version 1.2.1: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care Manual. American College of Surgeons. 2014. https://www.facs.org/quality%20programs/cancer/coc/standards. Accessed May 13, 2014.

  10. Birken SA, Mayer DK, Weiner BJ. Survivorship care plans: prevalence and barriers to use. J Canc Educ. 2013. doi:10.1007/s13187-013-0469-x.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Forsythe LP, Parry C, Alfano CM, Kent EE, Leach CR, Haggstrom DA, et al. Use of survivorship care plans in the United States: associations with survivorship care. J Natl Cancer I. 2013. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt258.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Risendal B, Jones A, Panzer S, Ganz PA, et al. Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5:358–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merport A, Lemon SC, Nyambose J, Prout MN. The use of cancer treatment summaries and care plans among Massachusetts physicians. Support Care Cancer. 2012. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1458-z.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blanch-Hartigan D, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Tenbroeck S, Nekhlyudov L, Ganz PA, et al. Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2014. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7540.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Accreditation Committee Clarifications for Standard 3.3 Survivorship Care Plan. In: The CoC source. American College of Surgeons. 2014. https://www.facs.org/publications/newsletters/coc-source/special-source/standard33. Accessed December 16, 2014.

  16. Mayer DK, Birken SA, Check DK, Chen RC. Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006-2013). Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1002/cncr.28884.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brennan ME, Gormally JF, Butow P, Boyle FM, Spillane AJ. Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes. Brit J Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.505.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Smith SM, Mitby PA, Eshelman-Kent DA, et al. Increasing rates of breast cancer and cardiac surveillance among high-risk survivors of childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma following a mailed, one-page survivorship care plan. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;56:818–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Palmer SC, Jacobs LA, DeMichele A, Risendal B, Jones AF, Stricker CT. Metrics to evaluate treatment summaries and survivorship care plans: a scorecard. Support Care Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2107-x.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shalom MM, Hahn EE, Casillas J, Ganz PA. Do survivorship care plans make a difference? a primary care provider perspective. J Oncol Pract. 2011. doi:10.1200/JOP.2010.000208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dulko D, Pace CM, Dittus KL, Sprague BL, Pollack LA, Hawkins NA, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013. doi:10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, Harvey C. Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2007. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0826.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jefford M, Lotfi-Jam K, Baravelli C, Grogan S, Rogers M, Krishnasamy M, et al. Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led posttreatment support package for bowel cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2011. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f22f02.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Salz T, McCabe MS, Onstad EE, Baxi SS, Deming RL, Franco RA, et al. Survivorship care plans: is there buy-in from community oncology providers? Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1002/cncr.28472.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Birken SA, Deal AM, Mayer DK, Weiner BJ. Determinants of survivorship care plan use in US cancer programs. J Cancer Educ. 2014. doi:10.1007/s13187-014-0645-7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: a power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Quality Assessment Tool For Quantitative Studies. Effective Public Health Practice Project. 1998. http://www.ephpp.ca/index.html. Accessed May 13, 2014.

  29. Quality Assessment Tool For Quantitative Studies Dictionary. Effective Public Health Practice Project. 2009. http://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/QADictionary_dec2009.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2014.

  30. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brothers BM, Easley A, Salani R, Andersen BL. Do survivorship care plans impact patients’ evaluations of care? a randomized evaluation with gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129:554–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, Maunsell E, Coyle D, Folkes A, et al. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.36.837.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Kranwinkel G, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2486-1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baravelli C, Krishnasamy M, Pezaro C, Schofield P, Lotfi-Jam K, Rogers M, et al. The views of bowel cancer survivorship and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow-up. J Cancer Surviv. 2009. doi:10.1007/s11764-009-0086-1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Blinder VS, Norris VW, Peacock NW, Griggs JJ, Harrington DP, Moore A, et al. Patient perspectives on breast cancer treatment plan and summary documents in community oncology care. Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1002/cncr.27856.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Brennan ME, Butow P, Spillane J, Boyle FM. Survivorship care after breast cancer: follow-up practices of Australian health professionals and attitudes to a survivorship care plan. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01286.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Burg MA, Lopez EDS, Dailey A, Keller ME, Prendergast B. The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2009. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1012-y.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Faul LA, Rivers B, Shibata D, Townsend I, Carbrera P, Quinn GP, et al. Survivorship care planning in colorectal cancer: feedback from survivors & providers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012; doi: 0.1080/07347332.2011.651260.

  39. Haq R, Heus L, Baker NA, Dastur D, Leung FH, Leung E, et al. Designing a multifaceted survivorship care plan to meet the information and communication needs of breast cancer patients and their family physicians: results of a qualitative pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decis. 2013. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-76.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hill-Kayser CE, Vachani CC, Hampshire MK, Di Lullo G, Jacobs LA, Metz JM. Impact of internet-based cancer survivorship care plans on health care and lifestyle behaviors. Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1002/cncr.28286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kent EE, Arora NK, Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM, Forsythe LP, Hamilton AS, et al. Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long–term cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:345–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Marbach TJ, Griffie J. Patient preference concerning treatment plans, survivorship care plans, education, and support services. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;38:335–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mayer DK, Gerstel A, Leak AN, Smith SK. Patient and provider preference for survivorship care plans. J Oncol Pract. 2012. doi:10.1200/JOP.2011.000401.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Partridge AH, Norris VW, Blinder VS, Cutter BA, Halpern MT, Malin J, et al. Implementing a breast cancer registry and treatment plan/summary program in clinical practices: a pilot program. Cancer. 2012. doi:10.1002/cncr.27625.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Salz T, Oeffinger KC, Lewis PR, Williams RL, Rhyne RL, Yeazel MW. Primary care providers’ needs and preferences for information about colorectal cancer survivorship care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012; doi: 0.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120083

  46. Sima JL, Perkins SM, Haggstrom DA. Primary care physician perceptions of adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013. doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000000061.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Singh-Carlson S, Nguyen SKA, Wong F. Perceptions of survivorship care among south Asian female breast cancer survivors. Curr Oncol. 2013;20:80–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Singh-Carlson S, Wong F, Martin L, Nguyen SKA. Breast cancer survivorship and South Asian women: understanding about the follow-up care plan and perspective and preferences for information post treatment. Curr Oncol. 2013;20:63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Smith SL, Singh-Carlson S, Downie L, Payeur N, Wai ES. Survivors of breast cancer: patient perspectives on survivorship care planning. J Cancer Surviv. 2011. doi:10.1007/s11764-011-0185-7.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smith SL, Wai ES, Alexander C, Singh-Carlson S. Caring for survivors of breast cancer: perspective of the primary care physician. Curr Oncol. 2011;18:e218–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Sprague BL, Dittus KL, Pace CM, Dulko D, Pollack LA, Hawkins NA, et al. Patient satisfaction with breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care plans. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:266–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Watson EK, Sugden EM, Rose PW. Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2010. doi:10.1007/s11764-010-0117-y.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wiljer D, Urowitz S, Jones J, Kornblum A, Secord S, Catton P. Exploring the use of survivorship consult in providing survivorship care. Support Care Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1760-4.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Reviewers’ Manual, Appendix III. Joanna Briggs Institute. 2014. http://joannabriggs.org/assets/ docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2014.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2014.

  55. Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:529–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2010. doi:10.1177/1049732310378656.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, et al. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Health Serv Res Policy. 2007. doi:10.1258/135581907779497486.

    Google Scholar 

  59. SUMARI: The Joanna Briggs Institute system for the unified management, assessment and review of information. Joanna Briggs Institute. 2007. http://www.joannabriggs.org/sumari.html. Accessed May 13, 2014.

  60. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND The Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. CONSORT Statement. 2010. http://www.consort-statement.org/downloads/consort-statement. Accessed April 8, 2014.

  64. Armstrong R, Waters E, Doyle J. Chapter 21: reviews in health promotion and public health. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed April 8, 2104.

  65. De Padova S, Rosti G, Scarpi E, Salvioni R, Amadori D, De Giorgi U. Expectations of survivors, caregivers and healthcare providers for testicular cancer survivorship and quality of life. Tumori. 2011;97:367–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Given BA, Sherwood P, Given CW. Support for caregivers of cancer patients: transition after active treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Dolce MC. The internet as a source of health information: experiences of cancer survivors and caregivers with healthcare providers. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011. doi:10.1188/11.ONF.353-359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Mary Beth Happ, PhD, RN, FGSA, FAAN, Janine Overcash, PhD, GNP-BC, and Beverly S. Reigle, PhD, RN, for reading and providing feedback on drafts of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, 460 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Dori L. Klemanski & Kristine K. Browning

  2. The Ohio State University College of Nursing, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Kristine K. Browning & Jennifer Kue

Authors
  1. Dori L. Klemanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristine K. Browning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer Kue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dori L. Klemanski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klemanski, D.L., Browning, K.K. & Kue, J. Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv 10, 71–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0452-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0452-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation