Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Use and impact of breast cancer survivorship care plans: a systematic review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Survivorship care plan (SCP) comprising a treatment summary and plan for follow-up care is recommended by various organizations to address long-term needs of an increasing number of breast cancer survivors. Although there have been previous systematic reviews of SCPs in cancer, none has focused on breast cancer exclusively. This systematic review evaluates the use and impact of SCP in breast cancer survivors.

Methods

Randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized (non-RCT) studies evaluating health care and patient-related outcomes after implementation of SCPs for survivors were identified by searching databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, and Scopus). Data were extracted, quality assessed, and summarized on the basis of qualitative synthesis.

Results

Ten non-RCTs and 14 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Although the overall quality of RCTs was superior to non-RCTs with mean quality score of 81.5% vs 64.3%, two mixed-methods non-RCTs which were individualized and included both provider and patient perspectives had comparable scores like RCTs. Several models of SCP were evaluated (paper based/online, oncologist/nurse/primary-care physician-delivered, and different templates). Descriptive information from non-RCTs suggests improvement in survivorship knowledge, satisfaction with care, and improved communication with providers. Findings from RCTs were variable. Potential gaps existed in content of SCP including unclear recommendation on frequency and ownership of follow-up. Levels of survivor satisfaction with, and self-reported understanding of, their SCP were high. Distal outcomes like health care delivery measures including costs and efficiency were mostly mixed, but heterogeneous study designs make interpretation difficult.

Conclusions

Existing research provides positive impact of SCPs on more proximal outcomes of patient experience and care delivery but mixed results for health outcomes in breast cancer survivors. Future research should focus on better defining SCP content and ensuring follow-up recommendations are acted upon, and provider feedback is included and use of novel tools to empower stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li N, Deng Y, Zhou L, et al. Global burden of breast cancer and attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer Data in Australia [online book]. Canberra, ACT: AIHW; 2020. [Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/contents/cancer-rankings-data-visualisation].

  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2017. Canberra, ACT: AIHW; 2017. [Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-in-australia-2017/contents/table-of-contents].

  4. Institute of Medicine. 2006. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition: n American Society of Clinical Oncology and Institute of Medicine Symposium. The National Academies Press, Washington

  5. Bettencourt BA, Schlegel RJ, Talley AE, et al. The breast cancer experience of rural women: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2007;16(10):875–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Souza V, Daudt H, Kazanjian A. Survivorship care plans for breast cancer patients: understanding the quality of the available evidence. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(6):e446–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Anbari AB, Wanchai A, Graves R. Breast cancer survivorship in rural settings: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(8):3517–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) Model of Survivorship Care Working Group. Model of Survivorship Care: Critical Components of Cancer Survivorship Care in Australia Position Statement (Version 1.0). Sydney, NSW: COSA; November, 2016. [Available from: https://www.cosa.org.au/media/332340/cosa-model-of-survivorship-care-full-version-final-20161107.pdf].

  9. Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, et al. Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2270–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre (Peter McCallum Cancer Centre). Survivorship Care Plans: Toolkit. Melbourne, VIC: Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; 2016; p. 37. [Available from: https://www.petermac.org/sites/default/files/media-uploads/ACSC_Survivorship_Care_Plan_toolkit_Jan_2016.pdf].

  11. Commission on Cancer (CoC). Cancer Program Standards: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care. Chicago, ILL: American College of Surgeons; 2016. [Available from: https://apos-society.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CoCStandards.pdf].

  12. Mayer DK, Shapiro CL, Jacobson P et al. Assuring quality cancer survivorship care: we've only Just Begun: American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 35. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2015. [Available from: https://ascopubs.org/doi/pdfdirect/]. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e583

  13. Ganz PA, Casillas J, Hahn EE. Ensuring quality care for cancer survivors: implementing the survivorship care plan. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008;24(3):208–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cowens-Alvarado R, Sharpe K, Pratt-Chapman M, et al. Advancing survivorship care through the National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center: developing American Cancer Society guidelines for primary care providers. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(3):147–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Faul LA, Rivers B, Shibata D, et al. Survivorship care planning in colorectal cancer: feedback from survivors and providers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012;30(2):198–216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brennan M, Gormally J, Butow P, et al. Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(10):1899–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Klemanski DL, Browning KK, Kue J. Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(1):71–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicolaije KAH, Ezendam NPM, Vos MC, et al. Oncology providers’ evaluation of the use of an automatically generated cancer survivorship care plan: longitudinal results from the ROGY Care trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(2):248–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Birken SA, Raskin S, Zhang Y, et al. Correction to: survivorship care plan implementation in US cancer programs: a national survey of cancer care providers. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(3):623–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Birken SA, Deal AM, Mayer DK, et al. Following through: the consistency of survivorship care plan use in United States cancer programs. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29(4):689–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Blanch-Hartigan D, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, et al. Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15):1578–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Parry C, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, et al. Can’t see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(21):2651–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):43–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi Y, Smith KC, Shukla A, et al. Breast cancer survivorship care plans: what are they covering and how well do they align with national guidelines? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;179(2):415–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coughlin SS, Caplan L, Stewart JL, et al. Do breast cancer survivorship care plans improve health outcomes? J Cancer Treatment Diagn. 2019;3(1):28–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. National Health and Medical Research Council. How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence. Canberra, ACT: NHMRC; 2000. [Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/reports/clinical%20guidelines/how-to-use-evidence-cp69.pdf].

  28. Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, et al. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(4):746–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Su HI, Stark S, Kwan B, et al. Efficacy of a web-based women’s health survivorship care plan for young breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176(3):579–89.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fang S-Y, Wang Y-L, Lu W-H, et al. Long-term effectiveness of an E-based survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors: a quasi-experimental study. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(3):549–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maly RC, Liang L-J, Liu Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial of survivorship care plans among low-income, predominantly Latina breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(16):1814–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kvale EA, Huang CHS, Meneses KM, et al. Patient-centered support in the survivorship care transition: outcomes from the Patient-Owned Survivorship Care Plan Intervention. Cancer. 2016;122(20):3232–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruddy KJ, Guo H, Baker EL, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial of a coordinated breast cancer follow-up care program. Cancer. 2016;122(22):3546–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenlee H, Molmenti CLS, Crew KD, et al. Survivorship care plans and adherence to lifestyle recommendations among breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(6):956–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boekhout AH, Maunsell E, Pond GR, et al. A survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors: extended results of a randomized clinical trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(4):683–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Coyle D, Grunfeld E, Coyle K, et al. Cost effectiveness of a survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(2):e86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, et al. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(36):4755–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Faul LA, Luta G, Sheppard V, et al. Associations among survivorship care plans, experiences of survivorship care, and functioning in older breast cancer survivors: CALGB/Alliance 369901. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):627–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rocque GB, Wisinski KB, Buhr KA, et al. Development and evaluation of a survey to assess survivor knowledge change after survivorship care plans: WiSDOM-B (Wisconsin Survey of cancer DiagnOsis and Management in Breast cancer). J Cancer Educ. 2014;29(2):270–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138(3):795–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(6):848–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, et al. Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1996;313(7058):665–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Krok-Schoen JL, Naughton MJ, Noonan AM, et al. Perspectives of survivorship care plans among older breast cancer survivors: a Pilot Study. Cancer Control. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274820917208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Nápoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Chacón L, et al. Feasibility of a mobile phone app and telephone coaching survivorship care planning program among Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors. JMIR Cancer. 2019;5:e13543. https://doi.org/10.12196/13543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Singh-Carlson S, Wong F, Oshan G. Evaluation of the delivery of survivorship care plans for South Asian female breast cancer survivors residing in Canada. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(4):e265–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Rohan EA, Townsend JS, Fleischmann A, et al. “When I needed it”: Evaluation of the use and timing of Sharsheret’s Thriving Again program for young breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(5):976–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Hea E, Wu J, Dietzen L, et al. The Polaris Oncology Survivorship Transition (POST) System: a patient-and provider-driven cancer survivorship planning program. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2016;7(10):11–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Palmer SC, Stricker CT, Panzer SL, et al. Outcomes and satisfaction after delivery of a breast cancer survivorship care plan: results of a multicenter trial. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(2):e222–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Tevaarwerk AJ, Wisinski KB, Buhr KA, et al. Leveraging electronic health record systems to create and provide electronic cancer survivorship care plans: a pilot study. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(3):e150–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Blinder VS, Norris VW, Peacock NW, et al. Patient perspectives on breast cancer treatment plan and summary documents in community oncology care: a pilot program. Cancer. 2013;119(1):164–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Haq R, Heus L, Baker NA, et al. Designing a multifaceted survivorship care plan to meet the information and communication needs of breast cancer patients and their family physicians: results of a qualitative pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sprague BL, Dittus KL, Pace CM, et al. Patient satisfaction with breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care plans. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(3):266–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hill-Kayser CE, Vachani C, Hampshire MK, et al. High level use and satisfaction with internet-based breast cancer survivorship care plans. Breast J. 2012;18(1):97–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hill RE, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ, et al. Survivorship care plans in cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review of care plan outcomes. Oncologist. 2020;25(2):e351–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jacobsen PB, DeRosa AP, Henderson TO, et al. Systematic review of the impact of cancer survivorship care plans on health outcomes and health care delivery. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(20):2088–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Birken SA, Urquhart R, Munoz-Plaza C, et al. Survivorship care plans: are randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes that are relevant to stakeholders? J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12(4):495–508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding sources to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Australia

    Abhishek Joshi, Sarah Larkins, Rebecca Evans, Nishila Moodley, Amy Brown & Sabe Sabesan

Authors
  1. Abhishek Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Larkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nishila Moodley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amy Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sabe Sabesan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Joshi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All participating authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, A., Larkins, S., Evans, R. et al. Use and impact of breast cancer survivorship care plans: a systematic review. Breast Cancer 28, 1292–1317 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01267-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01267-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation