Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Novel Amidosulfobetaine Surfactant–Polymer Systems for EOR Applications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

Experimental studies were conducted to evaluate the thermal stability and rheological properties of novel surfactant–polymer (SP) systems for enhanced oil recovery applications. One in-house synthesized amphoteric amidosulfobetaine surfactant 3-(N-pentadecanamidopropyl-N,N-dimethylammonium)propanesulfonate and three different polymers were evaluated. Polymer A was a terpolymer of acrylamide, acrylamido tert-butyl sulfonate, and acrylic acid, whereas polymers B and C were terpolymers of acrylamide, N-vinylpyrrolidone, and acrylamido tert-butyl sulfonate with different anionicity. Long-term thermal stability of the surfactant was assessed using FTIR, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR. The surfactant was compatible with seawater at 90 °C and no precipitation was observed. Structural analysis showed good thermal stability and no structural changes were observed after aging at 90 °C. The effects of surfactant concentration, shear rate, salinity, and polymer concentration on rheological properties of the SP systems were determined. Polymer A showed highest viscosity among the investigated polymers in deionized and seawater. The interactions between the surfactant and polymer A were assessed using rheological measurements. In the presence of salts, the viscosity of all three polymers reduced significantly as a result of charge screening. At low shear rates, the added surfactant slightly decreased the viscosity and storage modulus of polymer A. At high shear rates, the effect of the surfactant on the viscosity and storage modulus of polymer A was insignificant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lakatos I, Toth J, Bodi T, Lakatos-szabo J, Miskolc U, Berger PD, Christie L (2007) Application of viscoelastic surfactants as mobility-control agents in low-tension surfactant floods. In: International symposium on oilfield chemistry, 28 February–2 March, Houston, Texas, 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/106005-MS

  2. Yuan F-Q, Cheng Y-Q, Wang H-Y, Xu Z-C, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhao S (2015) Effect of organic alkali on interfacial tensions of surfactant solutions against crude oils. Colloid Surf A 470:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liyanage PJ, Lu J, Arachchilage GWP, Weerasooriya UP, Pope GA (2015) A novel class of large-hydrophobe tristyrylphenol (TSP) alkoxy sulfate surfactants for chemical enhanced oil recovery. J Petrol Sci Eng 128:73–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goudarzi A, Delshad M, Mohanty KK, Sepehrnoori K (2015) Surfactant oil recovery in fractured carbonates: experiments and modeling of different matrix dimensions. J Petrol Sci Eng 125:136–145. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olajire AA (2014) Review of ASP EOR (alkaline surfactant polymer enhanced oil recovery) technology in the petroleum industry: prospects and challenges. Energy 77:963–982. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu J, Goudarzi A, Chen P, Kim DH, Delshad M, Mohanty KK, Sepehrnoori K, Weerasooriya UP, Pope GA (2014) Enhanced oil recovery from high-temperature, high-salinity naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs by surfactant flood. J Petrol Sci Eng 124:122–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan MY, Samanta A, Ojha K, Mandal A (2009) Design of alkaline/surfactant/polymer (ASP) slug and its use in enhanced oil recovery. Pet Sci Technol 27(17):1926–1942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Samanta A, Ojha K, Sarkar A, Mandal A (2011) Surfactant and surfactant-polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery. Adv Pet Explor Dev 2(1):13–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Samanta A, Bera A, Ojha K, Mandal A (2012) Comparative studies on enhanced oil recovery by alkali–surfactant and polymer flooding. J Pet Explor Prod Te 2(2):67–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang XM, Guo YJ, Liu JX, Zhu YW, Hu J, Feng RS, Fu CY (2014) Adaptability of a hydrophobically associating polyacrylamide/mixed-surfactant combination flooding system to the Shengli Chengdao oilfield. J Appl Polym Sci 131:12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamal MS, Sultan AS, Al-Mubaiyedh UA, Hussein IA, Feng Y (2015) Rheological properties of thermoviscosifying polymers in high-temperature and high-salinity environments. Can J Chem Eng 93(7):1194–1200. doi:10.1002/cjce.22204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saleh L, Wei M, Bai B (2104) Data analysis and novel screening criteria for polymer flooding based on a comprehensive database. In: SPE improved oil recovery symposium, 12–16 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2014. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/169093-MS

  13. Kuang W, Xia Y (2014) A novel dendritic-like terpolymer as a viscosifying additive for enhanced oil recovery. Mater Lett 115:109–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bock J, Pace SJ, Schulz DN (1987) Enhanced oil recovery with hydrophobically associating polymers containing N-vinyl-pyrrolidone functionality. US 4709759 A

  15. Kamal MS, Sultan AS, Al-Mubaiyedh UA, Hussien IA, Pabon M (2014) Evaluation of rheological and thermal properties of a new fluorocarbon surfactant-polymer system for eor applications in high-temperature and high-salinity oil reservoirs. J Surfactants Deterg 17(5):985–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamal MS, Hussien IA, Sultan AS, Han M (2013) Rheological study on ATBS-AM copolymer-surfactant system in high-temperature and high-salinity environment. J Chem. doi:10.1155/2013/801570

  17. Doe P, Moradi-Araghi A, Shaw J, Stahl G (1987) Development and evaluation of EOR polymers suitable for hostile environments part 1: copolymers of vinylpyrrolidone and acrylamide. SPE Reservoir Eng 2(4):461–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zargartalebi M, Kharrat R, Barati N (2015) Enhancement of surfactant flooding performance by the use of silica nanoparticles. Fuel 143:21–27. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamari A, Sattari M, Mohammadi AH, Ramjugernath D (2015) Reliable method for the determination of surfactant retention in porous media during chemical flooding oil recovery. Fuel 158:122–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamal MS, Sultan AS, Hussein IA (2015) Screening of amphoteric and anionic surfactants for cEOR applications using a novel approach. Colloid Surf A 476:17–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Levitt D, Jackson A, Heinson C, Britton L, Malik T, Dwarakanath V, Pope G (2009) Identification and evaluation of high-performance EOR surfactants. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/100089-pa

  22. Hirasaki G, Miller C, Puerto M (2011) Recent advances in surfactant EOR. SPE J 16(4):3–5. doi:10.2118/115386-pa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamal MS (2016) A review of gemini surfactants: potential application in enhanced oil recovery. J Surfactants Deterg 19(2):1–14. doi:10.1007/s11743-015-1776-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuseni A, Han M, Al-Mobith (2013) A phase behavior and interfacial tension properties of an amphoteric surfactant for EOR application. In: SPE Saudi Arabia section technical symposium and exhibition, 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/168104-MS

  25. Wu X, Han M, Zahrani BH, Guo L (2015) Effect of surfactant-polymer interaction on the interfacial properties for chemical EOR. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/172706-MS

  26. Zhou X, Han M, Fuseni A, Yousef A (2012) Adsorption of an amphoteric surfactant onto permeable carbonate rocks. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/153988-MS

  27. Lv W, Bazin B, Ma D, Liu Q, Han D, Wu K (2011) Static and dynamic adsorption of anionic and amphoteric surfactants with and without the presence of alkali. J Petrol Sci Eng 77(2):209–218. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2011.03.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaillard N, Giovannetti B, Leblanc T, Thomas A, Braun O, Favero C (2015) Selection of customized polymers to enhance oil recovery from high temperature reservoirs. In: SPE Latin American and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, 2015. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/177073-MS

  29. Shakil Hussain SM, Muhammad Shahzad Kamal MAA, Nisar U, Ibnelwaleed AH, Abdullah SS (2016) Synthesis, characterization and surface properties of amidosulfobetaine surfactants bearing odd-number hydrophobic tail. J Surfactants Deterg 19(2):413–420

  30. Hussain SS, Animashaun MA, Kamal MS, Ullah N, Hussein IA, Sultan AS (2016) Synthesis, characterization and surface properties of amidosulfobetaine surfactants bearing odd-number hydrophobic tail. J Surfactants Deterg 19(2):413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kamal MS, Sultan AS, Al-Mubaiyedh UA, Hussein IA (2015) Review on polymer flooding: rheology, adsorption, stability, and field applications of various polymer systems. Polym Rev 55(3):491–530. doi:10.1080/15583724.2014.982821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang D, Cheng J, Xia H, Li Q, Shi J (2001) Ltd DOILCO Viscous-elastic fluids can mobilize oil remaining after water-flood by force parallel to the oil-water interface. In: SPE Asia Pacific improved oil recovery conference, 6–9 Oct. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2001. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/72123-ms

  33. L-j Zhang, X-a Yue (2008) Displacement of polymer solution on residual oil trapped in dead ends. J Central South Univ Technol 15:84–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia H, Wang D, Wu J, Kong F (2004) Elasticity of HPAM solutions increases displacement efficiency under mixed wettability conditions. In: SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, Australia. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/88456-MS

  35. Zhang Z, Li J, Zhou J (2011) Microscopic roles of “viscoelasticity” in HPMA polymer flooding for EOR. Transport Porous Med 86(1):199–214. doi:10.1007/s11242-010-9616-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang D, Xia H, Liu Z, Yang Q (2001) Study of the mechanism of polymer solution with visco-elastic behavior increasing microscopic oil displacement efficiency and the forming of steady “oil thread” flow channels. In: SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, 17–19 April, Jakarta, Indonesia. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/68723-ms

  37. Urbissinova TS, Trivedi JJ, Kuru E (2010) Effect of elasticity during viscoelastic polymer flooding: a possible mechanism of increasing the sweep efficiency. In: SPE western regional meeting, 27–29 May, Anaheim, California. 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/133471-MS

  38. Bataweel MA, Nasr-El-Din HA (2012) Rheological study for surfactant-polymer and novel alkali-surfactant-polymer solutions. In: North Africa technical conference and exhibition, 20–22 February 2012, Cairo, Egypt. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/150913-MS

  39. Al-Amodi AO, Al-Mubaiyedh UA, Sultan AS, Kamal MS, Hussein IA (2016) Novel fluorinated surfactants for enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. Can J Chem Eng 94(3):454–460. doi:10.1002/cjce.22406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) through the Science & Technology Unit at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) through project No. 10-OIL1378-04 as part of the National Science Technology and Innovation Plan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah S. Sultan.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamal, M.S., Shakil Hussain, S.M. & Sultan, A.S. Development of Novel Amidosulfobetaine Surfactant–Polymer Systems for EOR Applications. J Surfact Deterg 19, 989–997 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-016-1848-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-016-1848-1

Keywords

Navigation