Abstract
This study delves into challenges in designing resilient retail supply chains, examining recent research on strategies amidst uncertainty. It employs stochastic programming to integrate uncertainties into a two-stage model, incorporating nine resilient strategies for both pre and post-disruption scenarios. This model’s practicality is enhanced by considering proactive and reactive approaches. The inclusion of a centralized management system, a novel strategy in the global retail supply chain context, further refines the model. Tested under COVID-19 and geopolitical disruptions, the model offers valuable managerial insights while assessing total retail supply chain costs. Sensitivity assessment explores the effectiveness of resilient strategies by intentionally stressing certain parameters under different disruptive scenarios. Stress testing reveals a combined use of nine resilient strategies effectively minimizing total retail supply chain costs post-disruption, demonstrating the significance of a comprehensive approach to enhance resilience in unpredictable events.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available on request from the authors.
References
Fernie J, Sparks L (2018) Logistics and retail management: emerging issues and new challenges in the retail supply chain. Kogan Page Publishers
Wen X, Choi T-M, Chung S-H (2019) Fashion retail supply chain management: a review of operational models. Int J Prod Econ 207:34–55
Gera R, Yadav R, Khera GS, Saxena A, Chadha P, Dixit S, Sergeevna LY (2022) A systematic literature review of supply chain management practices and performance. Mater Today: Proc 69:624–632
Hanne T, Dornberger R (2017) Introduction to logistics and supply chain management. Computational intelligence in logistics and supply chain management, vol 244. Springer, Cham, pp 1–12
Burch D, Lawrence G (2005) Supermarket own brands, supply chains and the transformation of the agri-food system. Int J Sociol Agric Food 13(1):1–18
Alikhani R, Torabi SA, Altay N (2021) Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities. Int J Prod Econ 234(January):108042
Paul SK, Sarker R, Essam D (2017) A quantitative model for disruption mitigation in a supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 257(3):881–895
Simchi-Levi D, Wang W, Wei W (2018) Increasing supply chain robustness through process flexibility and inventory. Prod Oper Manag 27(8):1476–1491
Adobor H, McMullen RS (2018) Supply chain resilience: a dynamic and multidimen- sional approach. Int J Logist Manag 29(4):1451–1471
Fortuna F, Risso M, Musso F (2021) Omnichannelling and the predominance of big retailers in the post-COVID era. Symphonya Emerg Issues Manag 2:142–157
Lotfi R, Kargar B, Rajabzadeh M, Hesabi F, Özceylan E (2022) Hybrid fuzzy and data-driven robust optimization for resilience and sustainable health care supply chain with vendor-managed inventory approach. Int J Fuzzy Syst 24(2022):1216–1231
Ning C, You F (2018) Data-driven decision making under uncertainty integrating robust optimization with principal component analysis and kernel smoothing methods. Comput Chem Eng 112:190–210
Snoeck A, Udenio M, Fransoo JC (2019) A stochastic program to evaluate disruption mitigation investments in the supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 274(2):516–530
Sadghiani SN, Torabi SA, Sahebjamnia N (2015) Retail supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 75(2015):95–114
Baghalian A, Rezapour S, Farahani RZ (2013) Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: a real-life case. Eur J Oper Res 227(1):199–215
Mohammaddust F, Rezapour S, Farahani RZ, Mofidfar M, Hill A (2017) Developing lean and responsive supply chains: a robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs. Int J Prod Econ 183(2017):632–653
Hasani A, Khosrojerdi A (2016) Robust global supply chain network design under dis- ruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: a parallel memetic algorithm for a real- life case study. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 87(2016):20–52
Sawik T (2022) Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: a COVID-19 pandemic related study. Omega 109:102596
Taleizadeh AA, Ahmadzadeh K, Sarker BR, Ghavamifar A (2022) Designing an optimal sustainable supply chain system considering pricing decisions and resilience factors. J Clean Prod 332(2022):129895
Manupati VK, Schoenherr T, Ramkumar M, Panigrahi S, Sharma Y, Mishra P (2022) Recovery strategies for a disrupted supply chain network: leveraging blockchain technology in pre- and post-disruption scenarios. Int J Prod Econ 245(2022):108389
Fattahi M, Govindan K, Keyvanshokooh E (2018) A multi-stage stochastic program for supply chain network redesign problem with price-dependent uncertain demands. Comput Oper Res 100:314–332
Jahani H, Abbasi B, Alavifard F, Talluri T (2018) Supply chain network redesign with demand and price uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 205:287–312
Nagurney A (2010) Optimal supply chain network design and redesign at minimal total cost and with demand satisfaction. Int J Prod Econ 128(1):200–208
Kungwalsong K, Mendoza A, Kamath V, Pazhani S, Marmolejo-Saucedo JA (2022) An application of interactive fuzzy optimization model for redesigning supply chain for resilience. Ann Oper Res 315:1803–1839
Tukamuhabwa BR, Stevenson M, Busby J, Zorzini M (2015) Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. Int J Prod Res 53(18):5592–5623
Mahmoodjanloo M, Parvasi SP, Ramezanian R (2016) A tri-level covering fortification model for facility protection against disturbance in r-interdiction median problem. Comput Ind Eng 102(2016):219–232
Tofighi S, Torabi SA, Mansouri SA (2016) Humanitarian logistics network design under mixed uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 250(1):239–250
Lücker F, Seifert RW, Biçer I (2019) Roles of inventory and reserve capacity in mitigat- ing supply chain disruption risk. Int J Prod Res 57(4):1238–1249
Tang C, Tomlin B (2008) The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. Int J Prod Econ 116(1):12–27
Otto A, Schoppengerd FJ, Shariatmadari R (2009) Success in the consumer products market—understanding direct store delivery. Direct store delivery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–27
Darwish MA, Odah OM (2010) Vendor managed inventory model for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 204(3):473–484
Renna P (2010) Negotiation policies and coalition tools in e-marketplace environment. Comput Ind Eng 59(4):619–629
Mohebbi S, Li X (2015) Coalitional game theory approach to modeling suppliers’ collaboration in supply networks. Int J Prod Econ 169:333–342
Zhang J, Guo B, Ding X, Hu D, Wang B, Tang J, Jiang Y (2024) A self-adaptive exception adjustment approach of multi-core value nets in industry alliance. J Manuf Syst 72:163–179
Jabbarzadeh A, Fahimnia B, Sheu JB, Moghadam HS (2016) Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions. Transport Res Part B: Methodol 94(2016):121–149
Azaron A, Brown KN, Tarim SA, Modarres M (2008) A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk. Int J Prod Econ 116(1):129–138
Hasani A, Mokhtari H, Fattahi M (2021) A multi-objective optimization approach for green and resilient supply chain network design: a real-life case study. J Clean Prod 278:123199
Bode C, Wagner SM (2015) Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. J Oper Manag 36:215–228
Tordecilla RD, Juan AA, Montoya-Torres JR, Quintero-Araujo CL, Panadero J (2021) Simulation-optimization methods for designing and assessing resilient supply chain networks under uncertainty scenarios: a review. Simulation modelling practice and theory, vol 106. Elsevier
Asking P, Gustavsson S (2011) Cost breakdown analysis: a study of product costs in kitchen appliances at IKEA of Sweden. Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmers
Torabi SA, Baghersad M, Mansouri SA (2015) Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 79:22–48
Govindan K, Fattahi M, Mohammad E (2017) Supply chain network design under uncertainty: a comprehensive review and future research directions. Eur J Oper Res 263(1):108–141
Spiegler VLM, Naim MM, Wikner J (2012) A control engineering approach to the assessment of supply chain resilience. Int J Prod Res 50(21):6162–6187
Alam ST, Ahmed S, Ali SM, Sarker S, Kabir G (2021) Challenges to COVID-19 vaccine supply chain: implications for sustainable development goals. International J Prod Econ 239:108193
Zamiela C, Hossain NUI, Jaradat R (2022) Enablers of resilience in the healthcare supply chain: a case study of US healthcare industry during COVID-19 pandemic. Res Transp Econ 93:101174
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hemendra Roy contributed to the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, result visualization and preparing initial draft. Eman Almehdawe and Golam Kabir contributed to the conceptualization, data curation, model validation, result visualization, drafting the final document, and project supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, H.N., Almehdawe, E. & Kabir, G. A two-stage stochastic optimization framework for retail supply chain modeling with contemporaneous resilient strategies. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-024-01279-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-024-01279-x