Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-scale investigation of active failure for various modes of wall movement

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retained backfill response to wall movement depends on factors that range from boundary conditions to the geometrical characteristic of individual particles. Hence, mechanical understanding of the problem warrants multi-scale analyses that investigate reciprocal relationships between macro and micro effects. Accordingly, this study attempts a multi-scale examination of failure evolution in cohesionless backfills. Therefore, the transition of retained backfills from at-rest condition to the active state is modeled using the discrete element method (DEM). DEM allows conducting virtual experiments, with which the variation of particle and boundary properties is straightforward. Hence, various modes of wall movement (translation and rotation) toward the active state are modeled using two different backfills with distinct particle shapes (spherical and nonspherical) under varying surcharge. For each model, cumulative rotations of single particles are tracked, and the results are used to analyze the evolution of shear bands and their geometric characteristics. Moreover, dependencies of lateral pressure coefficients and coordination numbers, as respective macro and micro behavior indicators, on particle shape, boundary conditions, and surcharge levels are investigated. Additionally, contact force networks are visually determined, and their influences on pressure distribution and deformation mechanisms are discussed with reference to the associated modes of wall movement and particle shapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coulomb C A. An attempt to apply the rules of maxima and minima to several problems of stability related to architecture. Memoirs of the Royal Academy of Sciences, 1776, 7: 343–382

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rankine W J M. On the stability of loose earth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1857, 147: 9–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Terzaghi K. A fundamental fallacy in earth pressure computations. Boston Society of Civil Engineers Journal, 1936, 23(2): 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tsagareli Z V. Experimental investigation of the pressure of a loose medium on retaining walls with a vertical back face and horizontal backfill surface. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1965, 2(4): 197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Narain R J, Saran S, Nandakumaran P. Model study of passive pressure in sand. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1969, 95(4): 969–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang Y S, Ishibashi I. Static earth pressures with various wall movements. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1986, 112(3): 317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang Z C. A rigid retaining wall centrifuge model test of cohesive soil. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 1988, 25(2): 48–56

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Lin X, Chai H, Xu J. Coulomb-type solutions for passive earth pressure with steady seepage. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2008, 2(1): 56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamrouni A, Dias D, Sbartai B. Soil spatial variability impact on the behavior of a reinforced earth wall. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(2): 518–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wen H, Cheng Q, Meng F, Chen X. Diaphragm wall-soil-cap interaction in rectangular-closed diaphragm-wall bridge foundations. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2009, 3(1): 93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. White D J, Take W A, Bolton M D. Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry. Geothechnique, 2003, 53(7): 619–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stanier S A, Blaber J, Take W A, White D J. Improved image-based deformation measurement for geotechnical applications. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(5): 727–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salehi Alamdari N, Khosravi M H, Katebi H. Distribution of lateral active earth pressure on a rigid retaining wall under various motion modes. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 2020, 54(1): 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patel S, Deb K. Study of active earth pressure behind a vertical retaining wall subjected to rotation about the base. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(4): 04020028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paikowsky S G, Tien H S. Experimental examination of the arching mechanism on the micro level. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Discrete Element Methods. New Mexico: ASCE Press, 2002, 222–228

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Fang Y, Guo L, Hou M. Arching effect analysis of granular media based on force chain visualization. Powder Technology, 2020, 363: 621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He Z, Liu Z, Liu X, Bian H. Improved method for determining active earth pressure considering arching effect and actual slip surface. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(7): 2032–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nuebel K. Experimental and numerical investigation of shear localization in granular material. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Baden Wurttemberg: Karlsruhe University, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niedostatkiewicz M, Lesniewska D, Tejchman J. Experimental analysis of shear zone patterns in cohesionless for earth pressure problems using particle image velocimetry. Strain, 2011, 47: 218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gutberlet C, Katzenbach R, Hutter K. Experimental investigation into the influence of stratification on the passive earth pressure. Acta Geotechnica, 2013, 8(5): 497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soltanbeigi B, Altunbas A, Cinicioglu O. Influence of dilatancy on shear band characteristics of granular backfills. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2021, 25(7): 1201–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pietrzak M, Leśniewska D. Strains inside shear bands observed in tests on model retaining wall in active state. In: Micro to Macro Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics. Reggio Calabria: Springer, 2018, 257–265

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Leśniewska D, Nitka M, Tejchman J, Pietrzak M. Contact force network evolution in active earth pressure state of granular materials: Photo-elastic tests and DEM. Granular Matter, 2020, 22(3): 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khosravi M H, Pipatpongsa T, Takemura J. Experimental analysis of earth pressure against rigid retaining walls under translation mode. Geotechnique, 2013, 63(12): 1020–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu F Q. Lateral earth pressures acting on circular retaining walls. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2014, 14(3): 04014002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Altunbas A, Soltanbeigi B, Cinicioglu O. Determination of active failure surface geometry for cohesionless backfills. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2017, 12(6): 983–1001

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li M G, Chen J J, Wang J H. Arching effect on lateral pressure of confined granular material: Numerical and theoretical analysis. Granular Matter, 2017, 19(2): 20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou Q Y, Zhou Y T, Wang X M, Yang P Z. Estimation of active earth pressure on a translating rigid retaining wall considering soil arching effect. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 48(3): 541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang M, Tang X. Rigid retaining walls with narrow cohesionless backfills under various wall movement modes. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(11): 04017098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cundall P A, Strack O D L. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique, 1979, 29(1): 47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Ren H, Zhuang X, Cai Y, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(12): 1451–1476

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Ren H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 318: 762–782

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang M, Zhu H, Li X. Strain localization analyses of idealized sands in biaxial tests by distinct element method. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2010, 4(2): 208–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Raychowdhury P, Jindal S. Shallow foundation response variability due to soil and model parameter uncertainty. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(3): 237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guo Y, Yu X B. Design and analyses of open-ended pipe piles in cohesionless soils. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 22–29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Tejchman J, Kozicki J, Leśniewska D. Discrete simulations of shear zone patterning in sand in earth pressure problems of a retaining wall. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2011, 48(7–8): 1191–1209

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Nadukuru S S, Michalowski R L. Arching in distribution of active load on retaining walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(5): 575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jiang M, He J, Wang J, Liu F, Zhang W. Distinct simulation of earth pressure against a rigid retaining wall considering inter-particle rolling resistance in sandy backfill. Granular Matter, 2014, 16(5): 797–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang M, Deng B. Simplified method for calculating the active earth pressure on retaining walls of narrow backfill width based on dem analysis. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Albaba A, Lambert S, Nicot F, Chareyre B. Relation between microstructure and loading applied by a granular flow to a rigid wall using DEM modeling. Granular Matter, 2015, 17(5): 603–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nitka M, Tejchman J, Kozicki J. Discrete modelling of microstructural phenomena in granular shear zones. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Bifurcation and Degradation in Geomaterials. Limassol: Springer, 2014, 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chen R P, Liu Q W, Wu H N, Wang H L, Meng F Y. Effect of particle shape on the development of 2D soil arching. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 125: 103662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu J, Wang L, Cheng Q. Soil arching effect of Lattice-Shaped Diaphragm Wall as bridge foundation. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Khosravi M H, Azad F H, Bahaaddini M, Pipatpongsa T. DEM analysis of backfilled walls subjected to active translation mode. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 2017, 51(2): 191–197

    Google Scholar 

  48. O’Sullivan C. Particulate Discrete Element Modelling: A Geomechanics Perspective. 1st ed. London: Tylor and Francis Group, 2011

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. EDEM. EDEM 2018 User Guide, 2018

  50. Talebi H, Silani M, Bordas S P A, Kerfriden P, Rabczuk T. A computational library for multiscale modeling of material failure. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(5): 1047–1071

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Budarapu P R, Gracie R, Bordas S P A, Rabczuk T. An adaptive multiscale method for quasi-static crack growth. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(6): 1129–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. de Bono J P, McDowell G R. DEM of triaxial tests on crushable sand. Granular Matter, 2014, 16(4): 551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. de Bono J P, McDowell G R. On the micro mechanics of yielding and hardening of crushable granular soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 97(January): 167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. de Bono J P, Li H, McDowell G R. A new abrasive wear model for railway ballast. Soil and Foundation, 2020, 60(3): 714–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Grabowski A, Nitka M, Tejchman J. 3D DEM simulations of monotonic interface behaviour between cohesionless sand and rigid wall of different roughness. Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 16(4): 1001–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. de Bono J P, McDowell G R. Micro mechanics of the critical state line at high stresses. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018(98): 181–188

  57. de Bono J P, McDowell G R. Micro mechanics of drained and undrained shearing of compacted and overconsolidated crushable sand. Geotechnique, 2017, 68(7): 575–589

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yamamuro J A, Lade P V. Drained sand behavior in axisymmetric tests at high pressures. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(2): 109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bandini V, Coop M R. The influence of particle breakage on the location of the critical state line of sands. Soils and Foundations, 2011, 51(4): 591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Cho G C, Dodds J, Santamarina J C. Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: Natural and crushed sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(5): 591–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Soltanbeigi B, Papanicolopulos S, Ooi J Y. Particle shape effect on deformation localization during quasi-static flow at active state. In: 5th International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics. Tehran, 2016

  62. Soltanbeigi B, Podlozhnyuk A, Kloss C, Pirker S, Ooi J Y, Papanicolopulos S A. Influence of various DEM shape representation methods on packing and shearing of granular assemblies. Granular Matter, 2021, 23(2): 26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hamdia K M, Silani M, Zhuang X, He P, Rabczuk T. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hamdia K M, Ghasemi H, Zhuang X, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for flexoelectric nanostructures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 337: 95–109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100(October): 19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Oda M, Kazama H. Microstructure of shear bands and its relation to the mechanisms of dilatancy and failure of dense granular soils. Geotechnique, 1998, 48(4): 465–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zheng H, Wang D, Tong X, Li L, Behringer R P. Granular scale responses in the shear band region. Granular Matter, 2019, 21(4): 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Fannin R J, Eliadorani A, Wilkinson J M T. Shear strength of cohesionless soils at low stress. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(6): 467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Cinicioglu O, Abadkon A. Dilatancy and friction angles based on in situ soil conditions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(4): 06014019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Amirpour Harehdasht S, Hussien M N, Karray M, Roubtsova V, Chekired M. Influence of particle size and gradation on shear strength-dilation relation of granular materials. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2019, 56(2): 208–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Arda C, Cinicioglu O. The influences of micro-mechanical properties of cohesionless soils on active failure surface geometries. Teknik Dergi, 2019, 30(5): 9399–9420 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Fei W, Narsilio G A. Impact of three-dimensional sphericity and roundness on coordination number. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(12): 06020025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Fonseca J, O’Sullivan C, Coop M R, Lee P D. Quantifying the evolution of soil fabric during shearing using scalar parameters. Geotechnique, 2013, 63(10): 818–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Fonseca J, Sim W W, Shire T, O’Sullivan C, Wang Y, Dallo Y A H. Microstructural analysis of sands with varying degrees of internal stability. Geotechnique, 2015, 65(7): 620–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Gezgin A T, Soltanbeigi B, Cinicioglu O. Discrete-element modelling of pile penetration to reveal influence of soil characteristics. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 1–42

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Scientific and Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for supporting this study with project number 119M849.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Bogazici University, Istanbul, 34342, Turkey

    Ahmet Talha Gezgin & Ozer Cinicioglu

  2. Estimating & Engineering Department, Van Oord Dredging and Marine Contractors, Rotterdam, 3063 NH, The Netherlands

    Behzad Soltanbeigi

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Medipol University, Istanbul, 34810, Turkey

    Adlen Altunbas

Authors
  1. Ahmet Talha Gezgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Behzad Soltanbeigi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adlen Altunbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ozer Cinicioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozer Cinicioglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gezgin, A.T., Soltanbeigi, B., Altunbas, A. et al. Multi-scale investigation of active failure for various modes of wall movement. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 961–979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0738-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0738-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation