Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing and Validating a Dynamic Nomogram to Predict Response to Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Suboptimal response is one of the major problems for bariatric surgery, and constructing an individualized model for predicting outcomes of bariatric surgery is essential. Thus, the aim of this study is to develop a nomogram to predict the response to bariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods

509 patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2019 to 2020 from 6 centers were retrieved and assessed. Multiple Imputation was used to replace missing data. Patients with %TWL ≥ 20% 1 year after bariatric surgery were classified as patients with optimal response, while the others were patients with suboptimal response. A web-based nomogram was constructed and validated. ROC curve and calibration curve were used to determine the predictive ability of our model.

Results

56 (11.0%) patients were classified as patients with suboptimal response, and they showed advanced age, lower pre-operative BMI, smaller waist circumference, higher fasting glucose, higher HbA1c and lower fasting insulin compared to patients with optimal response. A forward likelihood ratio logistic regression analysis indicated that age (OR = 0.943, 95% CI: 0.915–0.971, p < 0.001), pre-operative BMI (OR = 1.109, 95% CI: 1.002–1.228, p = 0.046) and waist circumference (OR = 1.043, 95% CI: 1.000–1.088, p = 0.048) were essential factors contributing to the response to bariatric surgery. Lastly, a web-based nomogram was constructed to predict the response to bariatric surgery and demonstrated an AUC of 0.829 and 0.798 upon internal and external validation.

Conclusion

Age, BMI and fasting glucose were proved to be essential factors influencing the response to bariatric surgery. The nomogram constructed in this study demonstrated good adaptivity.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Prof. Junjiang Wang, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Martin CB, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence by race and hispanic origin-1999-2000 to 2017–2018. JAMA. 2020;324:1208–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellison-Barnes A, Johnson S, Gudzune K. Trends in obesity prevalence among adults aged 18 through 25 years, 1976–2018. JAMA. 2021;326:2073–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, et al. Projected U.S. state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2440–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators, Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Okunogbe A, Nugent R, Spencer G, et al. Economic impacts of overweight and obesity: current and future estimates for 161 countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7:e009773.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gadde KM, Martin CK, Berthoud H-R, et al. Obesity: pathophysiology and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:69–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen NT, Varela JE. Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders: state of the art. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:160–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arterburn DE, Telem DA, Kushner RF, et al. Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in adults: a review. JAMA. 2020;324:879–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. El Ansari W, Elhag W. Weight regain and insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery: definitions, prevalence, mechanisms, predictors, prevention and management strategies, and knowledge Gaps-a scoping review. Obes Surg. 2021;31:1755–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO): indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;2022:S1550728922006414.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zou S, Yang C, Shen R, et al. Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and the incidence of diabetes in people with different phenotypes of obesity: a retrospective study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:784616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozmen MM, Guldogan CE, Gundogdu E. Changes in HOMA-IR index levels after bariatric surgery: Comparison of Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch-proximal approach (SADS-p) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB). Int J Surg. 2020;78:36–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luo P, Cao Y, Li P, et al. Insulin resistance remission following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with a body mass index of 27.5-32.5 kg/m2. Front Physiol. 2021;12:772577.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Grover BT, Morell MC, Kothari SN, et al. Defining weight loss after bariatric surgery: a call for standardization. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang L, Cui H, Chen Q, et al. A web-based dynamic Nomogram for predicting instrumental activities of daily living disability in older adults: a nationally representative survey in China. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Blume CA, Brust-Renck PG, Rocha MK, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model of success in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2021;31:1030–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutiérrez-Repiso C, Garrido-Sánchez L, Alcaide-Torres J, et al. Predictive role of gut microbiota in weight loss achievement after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234:861–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tu Y, Pan Y, Han J, et al. A total weight loss of 25% shows better predictivity in evaluating the efficiency of bariatric surgery. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45:396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barthold D, Brouwer E, Barton LJ, et al. Minimum threshold of bariatric surgical weight loss for initial diabetes remission. Diabetes Care. 2022;45:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:587–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Rijswijk A-S, van Olst N, Schats W, et al. What is weight loss after bariatric surgery expressed in percentage total weight loss (%TWL)? A systematic review. Obes Surg. 2021;31:3833–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tu Y, Bao Y, Zhang P. Metabolic surgery in China: present and future. J Mol Cell Biol. 2021;13:594–609.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Belligoli A, Bettini S, Segato G, et al. Predicting responses to bariatric and metabolic surgery. Curr Obes Rep. 2020;9:373–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Raaff CAL, Coblijn UK, de Vries N, et al. Predictive factors for insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery: does obstructive sleep apnea influence weight loss? Obes Surg. 2016;26:1048–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yarigholi F, Bahardoust M, Mosavari H, et al. Predictors of weight regain and insufficient weight loss according to different definitions after sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective analytical study. Obes Surg. 2022;32:4040–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao J, Jiang Y, Qian J, et al. A nomogram model based on the combination of the systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index predicts weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023;19:50–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bioletto F, Pellegrini M, D’Eusebio C, et al. Development and validation of a scoring system for pre-surgical and early post-surgical prediction of bariatric surgery unsuccess at 2 years. Sci Rep. 2021;11:21067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Mao R, Guo P, Lin Z, et al. Nomograms for predicting non-remission in patients who underwent bariatric surgery: a multicenter retrospective study in China. Obes Surg. 2021;31:1967–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tettero OM, Monpellier VM, Janssen IMC, et al. Early postoperative weight loss predicts weight loss up to 5 years after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, banded Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2022;32:2891–902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Su Y-T, Su Y-H, Tam K-W, et al. Prediction of 5-Year weight loss and weight regain according to early weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2023;33:1366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by National key Clinical Specialty Construction Project (2021–2024, No. 2022YW030009) and Bethune-Merck Research Fund for young surgeons (2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangwen Zhao, Yong Li or Junjiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national ethics committee (KY2023-123–02) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

1. Patients with suboptimal response showed advanced age, lower BMI, smaller waist circumference, lower fasting insulin and higher fasting glucose and HbA1c before receiving bariatric surgery, compared to those patients with great response.

2. Age, pre-operative BMI and waist circumference were important characters that may contribute to the response after receiving bariatric surgery.

3. A web-based dynamic nomogram, which could help make clinical decisions, were constructed and showed predictive accuracy and discriminative ability.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diao, W., Chen, Y., Liang, L. et al. Constructing and Validating a Dynamic Nomogram to Predict Response to Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. OBES SURG 33, 2898–2905 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06729-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06729-6

Keywords

Navigation