Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In Vitro and In Silico Studies of Kinase Inhibitor of MAPK3 Protein to Determine Leishmania martiniquensis Treatment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Parasitologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease transmitted by the bite of the phlebotomine female sand fly. Currently, no reported effective vaccines are available for the treatment of leishmaniasis; consequently, restricting this disease completely depends on controlling its transmission. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases have been reported to be involved in the regulation of the flagellum length and hence play an important role in disease transmission, especially the MAPK3 protein. Therefore, the current work focused on identifying approved drugs that can inhibit the MAPK3 protein.

Methods

First, the recombinant plasmid (pET28b( +) MAPK3) was cloned into E. coli strain BL21 using the heatshock method. Afterward, E. coli was induced using IPTG, and cells were harvested for protein purification in the next step. After that, the MAPK3 protein was purified using Ni–NTA column. Then, the inhibition kinase activity of the purified MAPK3 protein was performed using an ADP-Glo Kinase Assay kit. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity of Leishmania cells were detected by alamarBlue Cell Viability Reagent. Finally, the binding affinity within the binding site of MAPK3 protein was performed by computational methods.

Results

Purification of the MAPK3 protein was done using an Ni–NTA column and a protein band was identified at the expected 44 kDa molecular weight. Afterward, the ability of commercial drugs (afatinib and lapatinib) to inhibit the purified MAPK3 kinase activity was performed using an ADP-Glo Kinase Assay kit. The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of two drugs inhibited the MAPK3 protein within the same range of IC50 values (3.27 and 2.22 µM for afatinib and lapatinib, respectively). Furthermore, the cytotoxicity assay of compounds toward the extracellular promastigote and intracellular amastigote stages was investigated using alamarBlue Cell Viability Reagent. The results showed that both drugs were more efficient against extracellular promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of both Leishmania donovani and Leishmania martiniquensis. Finally, the molecular dynamics simulation (MD) was performed to study the intermolecular interactions of both drugs with MAPK3 protein. From 100 ns molecular dynamics simulation, the structural stability of both drugs in a complex with MAPK3 was quite stable.

Conclusion

This work was suggesting that afatinib and lapatinib act as MAPK3 inhibitors and might be developed for leishmaniasis treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data and material are included in this article.

References

  1. Torres-Guerrero, E., M.R. Quintanilla-Cedillo, J. Ruiz-Esmenjaud, and R. Arenas (2017) Leishmaniasis: a review. FRes. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11120.1

  2. Mann S et al (2021) A review of Leishmaniasis: current knowledge and future directions. Curr Trop Med Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-021-00232-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kedzierski L, Sakthianandeswaren A, Curtis JM, Andrews PC, Junk PC, Kedzierska K (2009) Leishmaniasis: current treatment and prospects for new drugs and vaccines. Curr Med Chem 16(5):599–614. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986709787458489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lackovic K et al (2010) Inhibitors of Leishmania GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase identified by high-throughput screening of small-molecule chemical library. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54(5):1712–1719. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01634-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Morales MA et al (2008) Phosphoproteomic analysis of Leishmania donovani pro- and amastigote stages. Proteomics 8(2):350–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsigankov P, Gherardini PF, Helmer-Citterich M, Spath GF, Myler PJ, Zilberstein D (2014) Regulation dynamics of Leishmania differentiation: deconvoluting signals and identifying phosphorylation trends. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(7):1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M114.037705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsigankov P, Gherardini PF, Helmer-Citterich M, Späth GF, Zilberstein D (2013) Phosphoproteomic analysis of differentiating leishmania parasites reveals a unique stage-specific phosphorylation motif. J Proteome Res 12(7):3405–3412. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr4002492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kultz D (1998) Phylogenetic and functional classification of mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases. J Mol Evol 46(5):571–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00006338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hindley A, Kolch W (2002) Extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK)-independent functions of Raf kinases. J Cell Sci 115(Pt 8):1575–1581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrell JE Jr, Bhatt RR (1997) Mechanistic studies of the dual phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 272(30):19008–19016. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.30.19008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Efstathiou A, Smirlis D (2021) Leishmania protein kinases: important regulators of the parasite life cycle and molecular targets for treating leishmaniasis. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040691

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aronson N et al (2017) Diagnosis and treatment of Leishmaniasis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (idsa) and the American society of tropical medicine and hygiene (ASTMH). Am J Trop Med Hyg 96(1):24–45. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-84256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuenda A (2019) Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPK) in Cancer. In: Boffetta P, Hainaut P (eds) Encyclopedia of Cancer (Third Edition). Academic Press, Oxford, pp 472–480

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abou-El-Naga IF, Mady RF, N.M. Fawzy Hussien Mogahed, (2020) In vitro effectivity of three approved drugs and their synergistic interaction against Leishmania infantum. Biomedi. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.4891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raj S, Saha G, Sasidharan S, Dubey VK, Saudagar P (2019) Biochemical characterization and chemical validation of Leishmania MAP Kinase-3 as a potential drug target. Sci Rep 9(1):16209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52774-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dichiara M, Marrazzo A, Prezzavento O, Collina S, Rescifina A, Amata E (2017) Repurposing of human kinase inhibitors in neglected protozoan diseases. Chem Med Chem 12(16):1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201700259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aiebchun T et al (2021) Identification of Vinyl Sulfone Derivatives as EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor. Molecules, In Vitro and In Silico Studies. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082211

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanachai K et al (2021) Discovery of novel JAK2 and EGFR inhibitors from a series of thiazole-based chalcone derivatives. RSC Med Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MD00436G

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sangpheak K et al (2019) Biological evaluation and molecular dynamics simulation of chalcone derivatives as epidermal growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061092

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Siripattanapipong S, Boontanom P, Leelayoova S, Mungthin M, Tan-Ariya P (2019) In vitro growth characteristics and morphological differentiation of Leishmania martiniquensis promastigotes in different culture media. Acta Trop 197:105039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.05.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Intakhan N et al (2020) Antileishmanial activity and synergistic effects of amphotericin B Deoxycholate with Allicin and Andrographolide against Leishmania martiniquensis In Vitro. Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010049

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R (1997) Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking11Edited by F. E. Cohen. J Mol Biol 267(3):727–748. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Botelho FD et al (2020) Ligand-based virtual screening molecular docking, molecular dynamics, and MM-PBSA calculations towards the identification of potential novel ricin inhibitors. Toxins. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120746

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Joshi T et al (2021) Computational investigation of drug bank compounds against 3C-like protease (3CL(pro)) of SARS-CoV-2 using deep learning and molecular dynamics simulation. Mol Divers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-021-10330-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiriwan D, Choowongkomon K (2021) In silico structural elucidation of the rabies RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) toward the identification of potential rabies virus inhibitors. J Mol Model 27(6):183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04798-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ornnork N, Kiriwan D, Lirdprapamongkol K, Choowongkomon K, Svasti J, Eurtivong C (2020) Molecular dynamics, MM/PBSA and in vitro validation of a novel quinazoline-based EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor identified using structure-based in silico screening. J Mole Graph Model 99:107639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Menezes-Souza D, de Oliveira Mendes TA, de Araujo Leao AC, de Souza Gomes M, Fujiwara RT, Bartholomeu DC (2015) Linear B-cell epitope mapping of MAPK3 and MAPK4 from Leishmania braziliensis: implications for the serodiagnosis of human and canine leishmaniasis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(3):1323–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6168-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller BR III, McGee TD Jr, Swails JM, Homeyer N, Gohlke H, Roitberg AE (2012) MMPBSA.py: an efficient program for end-state free energy calculations. J Chem The Comput 8(9):3314–3321. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300418h

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y et al (2019) How does chirality determine the selective inhibition of histone deacetylase 6? A lesson from Trichostatin a enantiomers based on molecular dynamics. ACS Chem Neurosci 10(5):2467–2480. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fu TT et al (2021) Subtype-selective mechanisms of negative allosteric modulators binding to group I metabotropic glutamate receptors. Acta Pharmacol Sin 42(8):1354–1367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-020-00541-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xue W et al (2018) What contributes to serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors’ Dual-targeting mechanism? The key role of transmembrane domain 6 in human serotonin and norepinephrine transporters revealed by molecular dynamics simulation. ACS Chem Neurosci 9(5):1128–1140. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Erdmann M, Scholz A, Melzer IM, Schmetz C, Wiese M (2006) Interacting protein kinases involved in the regulation of flagellar length. Mol Biol Cell 17(4):2035–2045. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e05-10-0976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sanderson L, Yardley V, Croft SL (2014) Activity of anti-cancer protein kinase inhibitors against Leishmania spp. J Antimicrob Chemother 69(7):1888–1891. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute, (KURDI), Bangkok, Thailand under 404 KURDI (FF(KU)6.64).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and design: KC and TA; designed and performed the experiments: KC, TA, NR, DK, and SS; data collection and analysis: TA; writing—original draft: TA; writing—review and editing: KC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiattawee Choowongkomon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not required.

Informed consent

Not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aiebchun, T., Rasri, N., Kiriwan, D. et al. In Vitro and In Silico Studies of Kinase Inhibitor of MAPK3 Protein to Determine Leishmania martiniquensis Treatment. Acta Parasit. 68, 240–248 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00659-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00659-0

Keywords

Navigation