Skip to main content
Log in

The properties of dilute debris flow and hyper-concentrated flow in different flow regimes in open channels

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique was used to test the analogues of hyper-concentrated flow and dilute debris flow in an open flume. Flow fields, velocity profiles and turbulent parameters were obtained under different conditions. Results show that the flow regime depends on coarse grain concentration. Slurry with high fine grain concentration but lacking of coarse grains behaves as a laminar flow. Dilute debris flows containing coarse grains are generally turbulent flows. Streamlines are parallel and velocity values are large in laminar flows. However, in turbulent flows the velocity diminishes in line with the intense mixing of liquid and eddies occurring. The velocity profiles of laminar flow accord with the parabolic distribution law. When the flow is in a transitional regime, velocity profiles deviate slightly from the parabolic law. Turbulent flow has an approximately uniform distribution of velocity and turbulent kinetic energy. The ratio of turbulent kinetic energy to the kinetic energy of time-averaged flow is the internal cause determining the flow regime: laminar flow (/ < 0.1); transitional flow (0.1 < / < 1); and turbulent flow (/ > 1). Turbulent kinetic energy firstly increases with increasing coarse grain concentration and then decreases owing to the suppression of turbulence by the high concentration of coarse grains. This variation is also influenced by coarse grain size and channel slope. The results contribute to the modeling of debris flow and hyper-concentrated flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian RJ (2005) Twenty years of particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids 39(2): 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0991-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas JH, Best JL, Peakall J, et al. (2009) A phase diagram for turbulent, transitional, and laminar clay suspension flows. Journal of Sedimentary Research 79(4): 162–183. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2009.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1954) Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a newtonian fluid under shear. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical and Physical Sciences 225(1160): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1954.0186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman K, Perret L, Savory E (2014) Effect of upstream flow regime on street canyon flow mean turbulence statistics. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 15(4): 823–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9386-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien N (1989) Hyper-concentrated flow movement. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier D, LeCouturier MN, Amos CL, et al. (2006) The effects of suspended sediment concentration on turbulence in an annular flume. Aquatic Ecology 40(4): 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-005-4810-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman NL (1981) Velocity profiles with suspended sediment. Journal of Hydraulic Research 19(3): 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688109499516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles D (1956) The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1(2): 191–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112056000135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P, Laigle D, Arattano M, et al. (1998) Direct determination of rheological characteristics of debris flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-Asce 124(8): 865–868. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1998)124:8(865)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P, Meunier M (1996) Recognition, classification and mechanical description of debris flows. Earth-Science Reviews 40(3–4): 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(95)00065-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HA, Chien N (1955) Effects of heavy sediment concentration near the bed on velocity and sediment distribution. University of California, Institute of Engineering Research, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enos P (1977) Flow regimes in debris flow. Sedimentology 24(1): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1977.tb00123.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei XJ, Shu AP (2004) Movement mechanism and disaster control for debris flow. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan YA, Blanchat TK, Seeley CH, et al. (1992) Simultaneous velocity-measurements of both components of a 2-phase flow using particle image velocimetry. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 18(3): 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(92)90023-a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Reviews of Geophysics 35(3): 245–296. https://doi.org/10.1029/97rg00426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan CD (2009) Effects of solid particles on the rheological parameters of bingham fluid. Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation 40(1): 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitna R, Dietrich WE, Hsu L (2014) Surface slopes, velocity profiles and fluid pressure in coarse-grained debris flows saturated with water and mud. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 741: 377–403. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2013.675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiger KT, Pan C (2000) PIV technique for the simultaneous measurement of dilute two-phase flows. Journal of Fluids Engineering-Transactions of the Asme 122(4): 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1314864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher M, Fraccarollo L, Armanini A, et al. (2007) Set of measurement data from flume experiments on steady uniform debris flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research 45(sup 1): 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindken R, Merzkirch W (2002) A novel PIV technique for measurements in multiphase flows and its application to twophase bubbly flows. Experiments in Fluids 33(6): 814–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-002-0500-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major JJ, Pierson TC (1992) Debris flow rheology: Experimental analysis of fine-grained slurries. Water Resources Research 28(3): 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1029/91wr02834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muste M, Yu K, Fujita I, et al. (2005) Two-phase versus mixedflow perspective on suspended sediment transport in turbulent channel flows. Water Resources Research 41(10): n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003595

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikora VI, Goring DG (2002) Fluctuations of suspended sediment concentration and turbulent sediment fluxes in an open-channel flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 128(2): 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2002)128:2(214)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prandtl L (1926) Über die ausgebildete turbulenz. Verh. 2nd Intl Kong. fur Tech. Mech., Zurich: 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzmann M, Fischer P, Bezzola GR (2003) Rheological Behavior of Fine and Large Particle Suspensions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129(10): 796. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:10(796)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosio R, Crosta GB (2009) Rheology of concentrated granular suspensions and possible implications for debris flow modeling. Water Resources Research 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006920

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1981) Debris flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 13: 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.13.010181.000421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1980) Debris flow on prismatic open channel. Journal of the Hydraulics Division-Asce 106(3): 381–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1991) Mechanics and the existence criteria of various types of flows during massive sediment transport. 37: 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0011196

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodorsson-Norheim E (1986) Kruskal-Wallis test: BASIC computer program to perform nonparametric one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons on ranks of several independent samples. Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine 23(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(86)90081-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanoni VA (1946) Transportation of suspended sediment by water. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 111: 67–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Karman T (1930) Mechanische Ähnlichkeit und Turbulenz, nach Ges. Wiss. Gottingen. Math. Physik. Klasse: 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JS (2007) Effects of Sediment Composition on Debris Flow Rheological Parameters. National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XY, Yuan DL, He Q, et al. (2014) Effects of intertidal wetland vegetation and suspended sediment on flow velocity profiles and turbulence characteristics. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 146: 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YY, Jan CD, Yang BY (2014) Debris flow rheology and movement. Hunan Science & Technology Press, Changsha, Hunan, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Larsen P (1994) Turbulent structure of water and clay suspensions with bed load. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 120(5): 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1994)120:5(577)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willert CE, Gharib M (1991) Digital particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids 10(4): 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu HJ, Bai YC (2008) Stability characteristics of hyperconcentration flow in open channel. Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy 51(9): 1316–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-008-0119-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HJ, Wei FQ, Hu KH, et al. (2015) Comparison of rheometric devices for measuring the rheological parameters of debris flow slurry. Journal of Mountain Science 12(5): 1125–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3543-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 201503), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KZZD-EW-05-01),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51579163) and the Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University (Grant No. SKHL1426).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xie-kang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Wang, Hf., Chen, Hy. et al. The properties of dilute debris flow and hyper-concentrated flow in different flow regimes in open channels. J. Mt. Sci. 14, 1728–1738 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4132-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4132-y

Keywords

Navigation