Abstract
In this study, shoots were regenerated from in vitro leaf tissues of ‘Prelude,’ a red raspberry known for its hardiness, vigorous growth, and early fruit ripening. Experiments were conducted to discover the effect of plant growth regulators (PGRs) on plant regeneration of ‘Prelude’ red raspberry. Four cytokinins, thidiazuron (TDZ), 6-benzylaminopurine (BA), zeatin, and kinetin, at various levels were analyzed for shoot regeneration when in vitro leaf tissues were cultured on woody plant medium (WPM). The maximum shoot regeneration rate was observed in the medium containing 0.5 μM TDZ with an average of 65.7% of the explants forming shoots. BA at 5.0 μM resulted in a shoot regeneration rate of 11.6%, and increasing the BA concentration slightly reduced the regeneration rate. Neither zeatin nor kinetin exhibited a significant effect on plant regeneration of ‘Prelude.’ In vitro shoots were dipped in a commercial rooting powder, TakeRoot®, and inserted into a potting medium for rooting and acclimatization. The average ex vitro rooting rate was 71.1%. Rooted plants were grown in the greenhouse. The development of an efficient plant regeneration system for ‘Prelude’ will facilitate the biotechnological improvement of raspberry and other Rubus species in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldwinckle H, Malnoy M (2009) Plant regeneration and transformation in the Rosaceae. Transgenic J 3:1–39
Birch RG (1997) Plant transformation: problems and strategies for practical application. Annu Rev Plant Biol 48:297–326
Bonga JM, Klimaszewska KK, von Aderkas P (2010) Recalcitrance in clonal propagation, in particular of conifers. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 100:241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9647-2
Dai W, Magnusson VA, Hatterman-Valenti H, Carter JF (2006) Micropropagation of ‘Amethyst’ purple raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L. x R. idaeus L. ‘Amethyst’). J Environ Hort 24:35–38
Davik J, Røen D, Lysøe E, Buti M, Rossman S, Alsheikh M et al (2022) A chromosome-level genome sequence assembly of the red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). PLoS ONE 17(3):e0265096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265096
Dewir YH, Nurmansyah NY, Teixeira da Silva JA (2018) Thidiazuron-induced abnormalities in plant tissue cultures. Plant Cell Rep 37:1451–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-018-2326-1
Dhar U, Joshi M (2005) Efficient plant regeneration protocol through callus for Saussurea obvallata (DC.) Edgew. (Asteraceae): effect of explant type, age and plant growth regulators. Plant Cell Rep 24:195–200
Erland LAE, Giebelhaus RT, Victor JMR, Murch SJ, Saxena PK (2020) The morphoregulatory role of thidiazuron: metabolomics-guided hypothesis generation for mechanisms of activity. Biomolecules 10:1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091253
Foster TM, Bassil NV, Dossett M, Worthington ML, Graham J (2019) Genetic and genomic resources for Rubus breeding: a roadmap for the future. Hort Res 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0199-2
Graham J, Iasi L, Millam S (1997) Genotype-specific regeneration from a number of Rubus cultivars. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 48:167–173
Graham J, Jennings N (2009) Raspberry breeding. In: Jain SM, Priyadarshan PM (eds) Breeding plantation tree crops: temperate species. Springer, New York, pp 233–248
Hall HK, Hummer KE, Jamieson AR, Jennings SN, Weber CA (2009) Raspberry breeding and genetics. Plant Breed Rev 32:44–62
Huetteman CA, Preece JE (1993) Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 33:105–119
Khadgi A, Weber CA (2021) 2021) Genome-wide association study (GWAS) for examining the genomics controlling prickle production in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Agronomy 11:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010027
Kim C, Dai W (2020) Plant regeneration of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) cultivars ‘Joan J’ and ‘Polana.’ In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 56:390–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-10051-1
Kumar N, Reddy MP (2012) Thidiazuron (TDZ) induced plant regeneration from cotyledonary petiole explants of elite genotypes of Jatropha curcas: A candidate biodiesel plant. Ind Crop Prod 39:62–68
Lenz RR, Magnusson VA, Dai W (2016) Plant regeneration of ‘Amethyst’ purple raspberry (Rubus occidentalis × R. idaeus ‘Amethyst’) from in vitro leaf tissues. Acta Hortic 1133:491–496
Lloyd G, McCown B (1980) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc Intl Plant Prop Soc 30:421–427
Long Y, Yang Y, Pan G, Shen Y (2022) New insights into tissue culture plant-regeneration mechanisms. Front Plant Sci 13:926752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.926752
McNicol RJ, Graham J (1999) Genetic transformation of Rubus and Ribes. Acta Hort 505:207–214
Mezzetti B, Savini G, Carnevali F, Mott D (1997) Plant genotype and growth regulators interaction affecting in vitro morphogenesis of blackberry and raspberry. Biol Plant 39:139–150
Millan-Mendoza B, Graham J (1999) Organogenesis and micropropagation in red raspberry using forchlorfenuron (CPPU). J Hort Sci Biotechnol 74:219–223
Monthony AS, Kyne ST, Grainger CM, Jones AMP (2021) Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study. PLoS One 16:e0235525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235525
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Murch SJ, Saxena PK (2001) Molecular fate of thidiazuron and its effects on auxin transport in hypocotyls tissues of Pelargonium × hortorum Bailey. Plant Growth Regul 35:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014468905953
Murthy BNS, Murch SJ, Saxena PK (1998) Thidiazuron: A potent regulator of in vitro plant morphogenesis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 34:267–275
Polivanova OB, Bedarev VA (2022) Hyperhydricity in plant tissue culture. Plants 11:3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233313
Rukavtsova EB, Zakharchenko NS, Lebedev VG, Shestibratov KA (2023) CRISPR-Cas genome editing for horticultural crops improvement: advantages and prospects. Horticulturae 9:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9010038
Song GQ, Prieto H, Orbovic V (2019) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tree fruit crops: methods, progress, and challenges. Front Plant Sci 10:226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00226
Trigiano RN, Gray DJ (2011) Plant tissue culture, development, and biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Turk BA, Swartz HJ, Zimmerman RH (1994) Adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro-cultured leaves of Rubus genotypes. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 38:11–17
VanBuren R, Bryant D, Bushakra JM, Vining KJ, Edger PP, Rowley ER et al (2016) The genome of black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis). Plant J 87:535–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13215
Visser C, Qureshi JA, Gill R, Saxena PK (1992) Morphoregulatory role of thidiazuron substitution of auxin and cytokinin requirement for the induction of somatic embryogenesis in geranium hypocotyl cultures. Plant Physiol 99:1704–1707. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.4.1704
Weber CA, Maloney KE, Sanford JC (2004) ‘Prelude’ everbearing raspberry. HortScience 39:633–634. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.3.633
Wight H, Zhou J, Li M, Hannenhalli S, Mount SM, Liu Z (2019) Draft genome assembly and annotation of red raspberry Rubus idaeus. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/546135
Zawadzka M, Orlikowska T (2006) Factors modifying regeneration in vitro of adventitious shoots in five red raspberry cultivars. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 14:105–115
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, W., Dai, W. In vitro plant regeneration of ‘Prelude’ red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 59, 461–466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-023-10355-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-023-10355-3