Skip to main content
Log in

Maximization of micropropagule production in banana cultivars Grand naine (AAA) and Elakki (AB)

  • Plant Tissue Culture
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shoot tips from two different cultivars of banana known as Grand Naine (AAA) and Elakki (AB), were evaluated for their in vitro response in different concentrations of cytokinin and auxin which included 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BAP; 2, 3, and 4 mg L−1) and α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA; 1 mg L−1) which was added to Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal media. The mean survival rates for cultured Grand Naine and Elakki explants in the varied growth regulator treatments were 66.25% and 52.5%, respectively. Rooting was initiated in the seventh passage using half-strength MS medium supplemented with 200 mg L−1 activated charcoal and 20 mg L−1 adenine sulfate (AS). The highest mean number of shoots generated per explant at the end of the seventh subculture from Grand Naine was 20.10 ± 0.73, and in Elakki, it was 11.20 ± 0.53. MS media supplemented with 2 mg L−1 6-BAP, and 1 mg L−1 NAA was found to be the best combination for shoot proliferation in both the cultivars. The in vitro-regenerated plants were hardened primarily under shade net conditions using cocopeat substrate and were later transferred to a 1:1:1 ratio of cocopeat, red soil, and sand mix before exposure to field conditions. The survival rate for Grand Naine and Elakki cultivars was 98.5% and 96.5%, respectively, during the acclimatization period of the micropropagules under shade net conditions. Polymorphism was not observed between the mother plant and the in vitro-regenerated micropropagules when analyzed for specific randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeats (SSR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S, Sharma A, Singh AK, Wali VK, Kumari P (2014) In vitro multiplication of banana (Musa sp.) cv. Grand naine. Afr J Biotechnol 13:2696–2703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Amin MD, Karim MR, Amin MR, Rahman S, Mamun ANM (2009) In vitro micropropagation of banana. Bangladesh J Agric Res 34:645–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias O (1993) Commercial micropropagation of banana. In: Biotechnology applications for Banana and Plantain Improvement. INIBAP, Montpellier, pp 139–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown N, Venkatasamy S, Khittoo G, Bahorun T, Jawaheer S (2009) Evaluation of genetic diversity between 27 banana cultivars (Musa spp.) in Mauritius using RAPD markers. Afr J Biotechnol 8:1834–1840

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costache MA, Campeanu G, Neata G (2012) Studies concerning the extraction of chlorophyll and total carotenoids from vegetables. Rom Biotechnol Lett 17:7703–7708

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronauer SS, Krikorian AD (1984) Multiplication of Musa from excised stem tips. Ann Bot 53:321–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch JH, Crouch HK, Constandt H, Van Gysel A, Breyne P, Van Montagu M, Ortiz R (1999) Comparison of PCR-based molecular marker analyses of Musa breeding populations. Mol Breed 5:233–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahot MU (2007) Effect of immersion systems on chlorophyll contents in micro-propagating banana. Afr J Biotechnol 6:1095–1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Kesari V, Rangan L (2010) Plant regeneration in Curcuma species and assessment of genetic stability of regenerated plants. Biol Plant 54:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanapal S, Sekar DS, Satheesh PM (2014) Efficiency of RAPD, SSR and ISSR markers in evaluating the genetic fidelity for micropropagated Musa acuminata plant exposed to coal extracted humic acid and commercially available products. Int J Agric Sci Res 4:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves JC, Diogo G, Amâncio S (1998) In vitro propagation of chestnut (Castanea sativa × C. crenata): effects of rooting treatments on plant survival, peroxidase activity and anatomical changes during adventitious root formation. Sci Hortic 72:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowen SR (1995) Pests. In: Bananas and plantains. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 382–402

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Habiba U, Reza S, Saha ML, Khan MR, Hadiuzzaman S (2002) Endogenous bacterial contamination during in vitro culture of table banana: identification and prevention. Plant Tissue Cult 12:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirimburagama K, Gamage N (1996) In vitro multiplication of local cultivars of banana (MUSA spp.) through shoot-tip culture. J Natl Sci Found Sri Lanka 24:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirimburegama K, Gamage N (1997) Cultivar specificity with respect to in vitro micropropagation of Musa spp. (banana and plantain). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 72:205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK, Saini ML, Pathak H, Gupta VK (2007) Analysis of genetic variation in different banana (Musa species) variety using random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Afr J Biotechnol 6:1987–1989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalimuthu K, Saravanakumar M, Senthilkumar R (2007) In vitro micropropagation of Musa sapientum L. (Cavendish dwarf). Afr J Biotechnol 6:1106–1109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labrousse P, Delmail D, Decou R, Carlué M, Lhernould S, Krausz P (2012) Nemesia root hair response to paper pulp substrate for micropropagation. Sci World J 2012:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11:591–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madhulatha P, Anbalagan M, Jayachandran S, Sakthivel N (2004) Influence of liquid pulse treatment with growth regulators on in vitro propagation of banana (Musa spp. AAA). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 76:189–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meenakshi S, Sowmya HD, Usharani TR, Vijayalakshmi, Pavithra S, Sukhada M (2014) Efficient regeneration system for a very low proliferating diploid (AB) banana cv. Elakki bale (syn Ney poovan). J Cell Tissue Res 14:4077–4082

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S, Panda MK, Sahoo S, Nayak S (2011) Micropropagation of Zingiber rubens and assessment of genetic stability through RAPD and ISSR markers. Biol Plant 55:16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oriero CE, Odunola OA, Lokko Y, Ingelbrecht I (2006) Analysis of B-genome derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in Musa spp. Afr J Biotechnol 5:126–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JS, Cavell AC, Dolan L, Roberts K, Grierson CS (2000) Genetic interactions during root hair morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12:1961–1974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RL, Farquhar ML (1996) Root hairs: specialized tubular cells extending root surfaces. Bot Rev 62:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roels S, Escalona M, Cejas I, Noceda C, Rodriguez R, Canal MJ, Debergh P (2005) Optimization of plantain (Musa AAB) micropropagation by temporary immersion system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 82:57–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy OS, Bantawa P, Ghosh SK, da Silva JAT, Ghosh PD, Mondal TK (2010) Micropropagation and field performance of ‘Malbhog’ (Musa paradisiaca, AAB group): a popular banana cultivar with high keeping quality of North East India. Tree For Sci Biotech 4:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy VB, Vasil IK (1992) Biochemical and molecular analysis of plants derived from embryogenic tissue cultures of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum K. Schum). Theor Appl Genet 83:947–955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique R (2014) Optimization of genomic DNA extraction protocol for molecular profiling of banana/plantain (Musa species). Eur Sci J 10:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW, Shepherd K (1955) The taxonomy and origins of the cultivated bananas. Bot J Linn Soc 55:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stover RH, Simmonds NW (1987) Bananas. In: Tropical Agricultural series, 3rd edn. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalam L, Sreedhar RV, Bhagyalakshmi N (2007) Micropropagation in banana using high levels of cytokinins does not involve any genetic changes as revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Growth Regul 51:193–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the management of Vellore Institute of Technology for providing the laboratory and nursery facilities for experimentation and maintenance of the banana suckers utilized for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepa Sankar Parasurama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Editor: Neftali Ochoa-Alejo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvakumar, S., Parasurama, D.S. Maximization of micropropagule production in banana cultivars Grand naine (AAA) and Elakki (AB). In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 56, 515–525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-020-10060-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-020-10060-5

Keywords

Navigation