Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding new seedless grapes using in ovulo embryo rescue and marker-assisted selection

  • Biotechnology/Genetic Transformation/Functional Genomics
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A program for producing new seedless table and raisin grape cultivars was initiated using embryo culture methods. F1 descendants of the cross Delight × Ruby Seedless (DRs) were used as the female parent and crossed with various seedless cultivars. The berries of DRs have excellent table traits but they retain small seed traces at maturity. Blush Seedless and DRs were used as female parents, and 354 ovules from five crosses were tested. The percentage of embryos that developed using DRs as the female parent was higher (26.7–35.8%) than when a seedless cultivar was the female parent (5.9–6.7%). The best ovule excision time [days after flowering (DAF)] for ovule inoculation was tested in another set of crosses and found to be DAF 48, 50, and 50 for DR1 × Monukka, DR6 × Thompson Seedless, and DR7 × Zhengguo Seedless, respectively. A total of 569 hybrid progeny were obtained from 13 hybrid combinations; 311 of these survived and were established in soil after hardening. We used three molecular markers (SCC8, SCF27, and GSLP1) to analyze 15 parents used in the hybrid combinations. SCC8 had a 1018-bp band in the seedless parents and in some of the DR parents, while SCF27 had a 2000-bp band in all seedless and DR parents. GSLP1 had a 569-bp band in all of the seedless parents tested, whereas the seeded and DR parents had no bands of this size. Therefore, GSLP1 was used to screen the progeny for possible seedlessness. Eight strains had the 569-bp band; these were preliminarily identified as being seedless since they are in juvenile phase, but they have not yet been evaluated for fruiting characteristics. If the strains identified by using GSLP1 are confirmed to be seedless, this marker will be a valuable tool in breeding for seedlessness in grape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam-Blondon AF, Lahogue F, Bouquet A, Boursiquot JM, This P (2001) Usefulness of two SCAR markers for marker assisted selection of seedless grapevine cultivars. Vitis 40:147–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bharathy PV, Karibasappa GS, Biradar AB, Kulkarni DD, Solanke AU, Patil SG, Agrawal DC (2003) Influence of pre-bloom sprays of benzyladenine on in vitro recovery of hybrid embryos from crosses of Thompson Seedless and 8 seeded varieties of grape (Vitis spp.). Vitis 42:199–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bharathy PV, Karibasappa US, Patil SG, Agrawal DC (2005) In ovulo rescue of hybrid embryos in Flame Seedless grapes—influence of pre-bloom sprays of benzyladenine. Sci Hortic 106:353–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bin H, Sharon B, Roger K, Brian M, Wilf K (1991) Plant regeneration from microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus: effect of embryo age, culture temperature, osmotic pressure, and abscisic acid. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 27:28–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouquet A, Danglot Y (1996) Inheritance of seedlessness in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L). Vitis 35:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas JA, Cervera MT, Ruiz-Garcia L, Carreno J, Martinez-Zapater JM (2006) A genetic analysis of seed and berry weight in grapevine. Genome 49:1572–1585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini L, Battilana J, Lamaj F, Fanizza G, Grando MS (2008) Berry and phenology-related traits in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): from quantitative trait loci to underlying genes. BMC Plant Biol 8:38

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doligez A, Bouquet A, Danglot Y, Lahogue F, Riaz S, Meredith CP, Edwards KJ, This P (2002) Genetic mapping of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) applied to the detection of QTLs for seedlessness and berry weight. Theor Appl Genet 105:780–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emershad RL, Ramming DW (1984) In-ovulo embryo culture of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Thompson Seedless’. Am J Bot 71:873–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emershad RL, Ramming DW (1994) Somatic embryogenesis and plant development from immature zygotic embryos of seedless grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Cell Rep 14:6–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emershad RL, Ramming DW, Serpe MD (1989) In ovulo embryo development and plant formation from stenospermic genotypes of Vitis vinifera. Am J Bot 76:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DJ, Mortensen JA, Benton CM, Durham RE, Moore GA (1990) Ovule culture to obtain progeny from hybrid seedless bunch grapes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:1019–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • He PC, Luo GG (1994) Grapevine science. Chinese Agricultural Press, Peking (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • He PC, Wang YJ, Wang GY, Ren ZB, He CC (1991) The studies on the disease resistance of Chinese wild Vitis species. Agric Sci China 24:50–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji W, Wang Y (2013) Breeding for seedless grapes using Chinese wild Vitis spp. II. In vitro embryo rescue and plant development. J Sci Food Agric 93:3870–3875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ji W, Li ZQ, Zhou Q, Yao WK, Wang YJ (2013) New seedless grape breeding by means of in vitro embryo rescue. Genet Mol Res 12:859–869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karaagac E, Vargas AM, de Andrés MT, Carreño I, Ibáñez J, Carreño J (2012) Marker assisted selection for seedlessness in table grape breeding. Tree Genet Genomes 8:1003–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpas A, Baranek M, Pidra M, Hradilik J (2009) Behaviour of two SCAR markers for seedlessness within central European varieties of grapevine. Vitis 48:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahogue F, This P, Bouquet A (1998) Identification of a codominant scar marker linked to the seedlessness character in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet 97:950–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li GR, Wang YJ, Tang DM, Luo QW (2004) Study on the sampling dates of embryo rescue techniques for seedless grape. J Agric Uni Hebei 27:17–21 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li ZT, Dhekney SA, Gray DJ (2010) Molecular characterization of a SCAR marker purportedly linked to seedlessness in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) reveals a lack of sequence fidelity. Mol Breed 25:637–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li GR, Ji W, Wang G, Zhang JX, Wang YJ (2014) An improved embryo-rescue protocol for hybrid progeny from seedless Vitis vinifera grapes × wild Chinese Vitis species. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 50:110–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu SM, Sykes SR, Clingeleffer PR (2003) Improved in ovulo embryo culture for stenospermocarpic grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Crop Pasture Sci 54:869–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd GB, McCown BH (1980) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc Int Plant Propag Soc 30:421–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis NH, Weinberger JH (1979) Inheritance studies of seedlessness in grape. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104:181–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejía N, Hinrichsen P (2003) A new, highly assertive scar marker potentially useful to assist selection for seedlessness in table grape breeding. Acta Horticult 603:559–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejía N, Gebauer M, Munoz L, Hewstone N, Munoz C, Hinrichsen P (2007) Identification of QTLs for seedlessness, berry size, and ripening date in a seedless × seedless table grape progeny. Am J Enol Vitic 58:499–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejía N, Soto B, Guerrero M, Casanueva X, Houel C, Miccono MA, Ramos R, Le Cunff L, Boursiquot JM, Hinrichsen P, Adam-Blondon AF (2011) Molecular, genetic and transcriptional evidence for a role of VvAGL11 in stenospermocarpic seedlessness in grapevine. BMC Plant Biol 11:57

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Midani AR, Sharma HC, Singh SK (2002) Effect of ovule age on ovulo-embryo culture in seeded and seedless grape genotypes. Indian J Hortic 59:359–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanaswamy S, Norstog K (1964) Plant embryo culture. Bot Rev 30:587–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pommer CV, Ramming DW, Emershad RL (1995) Influence of grapes genotype, ripening season, seed trace size, and culture date on in ovule embryo development and plant formation. Bragantia, Campinas 54:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce MT, Agüero CB, Gregori MT, Tizio R (2000) Factors affecting the development of stenospermic grape (Vitis vinifera L.) embryos cultured in vitro. Acta Horticult 528:667–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce MT, Guinazu ME, Tizio R (2002) Improved in vitro embryo development of stenospermic grape by putrescine. Biocell 26:263–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramming DW, Emershad RL (1982) In ovulo embryo culture of seeded and seedless Vitis vinifera (Abstr.). HortSci 17:487

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramming DW, Ledbrtter CA, Tarailo R (1990) Hybridization of seedless grape. Vitis 439–444

  • Singh NV, Singh SK, Singh AK (2011) Standardization of embryo rescue technique and bio-hardening of grape hybrids (Vitis vinifera L.) using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under sub-tropical conditions. Vitis 50:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel-Roy P, Sahar PN, Baron J (1985) In vitro culture and plant formation from grape cultivars with abortive ovules and seeds. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110:109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout A (1936) Seedlessness in grapes. vol 238. New York Agr Exp Stat Technol Bull, Geneva, New York

  • Tang DM, Wang YJ, Cai JS, Zhao RH (2009) Effects of exogenous application of plant growth regulators on the development of ovule and subsequent embryo rescue of stenospermic grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci Hortic 120:51–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian LL, Wang YJ, Niu L, Tang DM (2008) Breeding of disease-resistant seedless grapes using Chinese wild Vitis spp. I. In vitro embryo rescue and plant development. Sci Hortic 117:136–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsolova V (1990) Obtaining plants from crosses of seedless grapevine varieties by means of in vitro embryo culture. Vitis 29:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ, Lamikanra O (2002) Application and synthesis on the DNA probe for detecting seedless genes in grapevine. J Northwest Sci-Tech Univ Agric For (Natural Science Edition) 3:42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ, Liu Y, He P, Chen J, Lamikanra O, Lu J (1995) Evaluation of foliar resistance to Uncinula necator in Chinese wild Vitis species. Vitis 34:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang KQ, Wang YJ, Zhang JJ, Wang XP, Wan YZ, Zhang JX (2005) Mapping of seedlessness gene in grapes using SCAR markers. Acta Genetica Sinica 32:297–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the “948” Program, Ministry of Agriculture, China (grant No. 2011-G21), and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research Systems for the grape industry (Grant No. CARS-30-yz-7). Work was also supported by the Program for Fruit Breeding from Cyrus Tang Foundation in Northwest A&F University to Yan Xu and “Overall innovation project of Shaanxi province plant science and technology” (2013KTCL02-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Xu.

Additional information

Editor: Jay Subramanian

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Li, T., Wang, Y. et al. Breeding new seedless grapes using in ovulo embryo rescue and marker-assisted selection. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 51, 241–248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9677-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9677-x

Keywords

Navigation