Skip to main content
Log in

Lenvatinib Versus Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Targeted Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether adding immunotherapy to antiangiogenic therapy benefits patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC) more in the first-line setting remains controversial.

Objective

In this analysis, we compared the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib monotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy in advanced uHCC in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched on 23 April 2023. The “metaSurvival” and “meta” packages of the R software (version 4.2.2) were used to summarize the survival curves and meta-analyze the survival data. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were defined as dual primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

Overall, the pooled median OS was 18.4 months in the lenvatinib group versus 18.5 months in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group; the pooled median PFS was 6.9 months in the lenvatinib group versus 7.3 months in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. Lenvatinib therapy showed similar OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55–1.52, p = 0.72] and PFS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56–1.12, p = 0.19) compared with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy. In addition, a comparable ORR [odds ratio (OR): 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65–1.20, p = 0.44) was observed between lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Conclusions

Comprehensive analysis suggested that lenvatinib monotherapy exhibited survival outcomes comparable to those of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy, which may provide useful insights for clinicians in future clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ducreux M, Abou-Alfa GK, Bekaii-Saab T, Berlin J, Cervantes A, de Baere T, et al. The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 24th ESMO/world congress on gastrointestinal cancer, Barcelona, 2022. ESMO Open. 2023;8: 101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordan JD, Kennedy EB, Abou-Alfa GK, Beg MS, Brower ST, Gade TP, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4317–45. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:1163–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finn RS, Ikeda M, Zhu AX, Sung MW, Baron AD, Kudo M, et al. Phase Ib study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2960–70. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00808.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Finn RS, Kudo M, Merle P, Meyer T, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. LBA34 Primary results from the phase III LEAP-002 study: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib as first-line (1L) therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Ann Oncol. 2022;33:S1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1894–905. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng AL, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2022;76:862–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fulgenzi CAM, D’Alessio A, Airoldi C, Scotti L, Demirtas CO, Gennari A, et al. Comparative efficacy of novel combination strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network metanalysis of phase III trials. Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350: g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang BC, Fu C, Lin GH. The efficacy of adebrelimab compared with durvalumab and atezolizumab in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a survival analysis of reconstructed patient-level data. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1185577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1185577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson D, White IR, Thompson SG. Extending DerSimonian and Laird’s methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2010;29:1282–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson D, White IR, Riley RD. Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2012;31:3805–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5453.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Combescure C, Foucher Y, Jackson D. Meta-analysis of single-arm survival studies: a distribution-free approach for estimating summary survival curves with random effects. Stat Med. 2014;33:2521–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rimini M, Persano M, Tada T, Suda G, Shimose S, Kudo M, et al. Survival outcomes from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib in Child Pugh B unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(10):7565–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04678-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Persano M, Rimini M, Tada T, Suda G, Shimose S, Kudo M, et al. Clinical outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter real-world study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(9):5591–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04512-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Su CW, Teng W, Lin PT, Jeng WJ, Chen KA, Hsieh YC, et al. Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2023;12:7077–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Casadei-Gardini A, Rimini M, Tada T, Suda G, Shimose S, Kudo M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a large real-life worldwide population. Eur J Cancer. 2023;180:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Niizeki T, Tokunaga T, Takami Y, Wada Y, Harada M, Shibata M, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Target Oncol. 2022;17:643–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-022-00921-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rimini M, Rimassa L, Ueshima K, Burgio V, Shigeo S, Tada T, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib in non-viral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an international propensity score matching analysis. ESMO Open. 2022;7: 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Tada T, Hirooka M, Kariyama K, Tani J, et al. Does first-line treatment have prognostic impact for unresectable HCC?—atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib. Cancer Med. 2023;12:325–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4854.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maesaka K, Sakamori R, Yamada R, Doi A, Tahata Y, Miyazaki M, et al. Comparison of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib in terms of efficacy and safety as primary systemic chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2022;52:630–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.13771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim BK, Cheon J, Kim H, Kang B, Ha Y, Kim DY, et al. Atezolizumab/bevacizumab vs. lenvatinib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world, multi-center study. Cancer. 2022;14:1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Laethem JLV, Borbath I, Karwal M, Verslype C, VanVlierberghe H, Kardosh A, et al. 933P Updated results for pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase II KEYNOTE-224 study. Annal Oncol. 2021;32:S819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abou-Alfa GK, Chan SL, Kudo M, Lau G, Kelley RK, Furuse J, et al. Phase 3 randomized, open-label, multicenter study of tremelimumab (T) and durvalumab (D) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): HIMALAYA. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:379. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.4_suppl.379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abou-Alfa Ghassan K, Lau G, Kudo M, Chan Stephen L, Kelley Robin K, Furuse J, et al. Tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2100070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, Xu A, Cang S, Du C, et al. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2–3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:977–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00252-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamashita T, Kudo M, Ikeda K, Izumi N, Tateishi R, Ikeda M, et al. REFLECT-a phase 3 trial comparing efficacy and safety of lenvatinib to sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of Japanese subset. J Gastroenterol. 2020;55:113–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01642-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Wang’s group for providing statistical support and for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bi-Cheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

Bi-Cheng Wang, Bo-Hua Kuang, and Guo-He Lin declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Availability of Data and Materials

All included real-world studies were searched for and downloaded from official websites. 1. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04678-2; 2. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04512-1; 3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5506; 4. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959-8049(22)01762-2; 5. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-022-00921-x; 6. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2059-7029(22)00221-6; 7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4854; 8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.13771; 9. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/7/1747.

Code Availability

Not applicable

Author Contributions

Study design: Bi-Cheng Wang; data extraction: Bi-Cheng Wang and Guo-He Lin; data analysis: Bi-Cheng Wang and Bo-Hua Kuang; Manuscript writing and editing: all authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, BC., Kuang, BH. & Lin, GH. Lenvatinib Versus Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies. Targ Oncol 19, 203–212 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01035-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01035-2

Navigation