Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three-dimensional numerical simulation for plastic injection-compression molding

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compared with conventional injection molding, injection-compression molding can mold optical parts with higher precision and lower flow residual stress. However, the melt flow process in a closed cavity becomes more complex because of the moving cavity boundary during compression and the nonlinear problems caused by non-Newtonian polymer melt. In this study, a 3D simulation method was developed for injection-compression molding. In this method, arbitrary Lagrangian- Eulerian was introduced to model the moving-boundary flow problem in the compression stage. The non-Newtonian characteristics and compressibility of the polymer melt were considered. The melt flow and pressure distribution in the cavity were investigated by using the proposed simulation method and compared with those of injection molding. Results reveal that the fountain flow effect becomes significant when the cavity thickness increases during compression. The back flow also plays an important role in the flow pattern and redistribution of cavity pressure. The discrepancy in pressures at different points along the flow path is complicated rather than monotonically decreased in injection molding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuo H C, Jeng M C. The influence of injection molding and injection compression molding on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene polymer microfabrication. International Polymer Processing, 2011, 26(5): 508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang M S, Chung C F. Injection molding and injection compression molding of thin-walled light-guided plates with Vgrooved microfeatures. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2011, 121(2): 1151–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guan W S, Huang H X. Back melt flow in injection-compression molding: Effect on part thickness distribution. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 39(6): 792–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Young W B. On the residual stress and shrinkage in injection compression molding. International Polymer Processing, 2003, 18 (3): 313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang H, Li K, Li S. Injection-compression molded part shrinkage uniformity comparison between semicrystalline and amorphous plastics. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2008, 48 (1): 64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee H S, Yoo Y G. Effects of processing conditions on cavity pressure during injection-compression molding. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2012, 13(12): 2155–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva C A, Viana J C, van Hattum F W J, et al. Fiber orientation in divergent/convergent flows in expansion and compression injection molding. Polymer Composites, 2006, 27(5): 539–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim N H, Isayev A I. Birefringence in injection-compression molding of amorphous polymers: Simulation and experiment. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2013, 53(8): 1786–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang C, Wang P. Analysis of optical properties in injection-molded and compression-molded optical lenses. Applied Optics, 2014, 53 (11): 2523–2531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie M, Chen J, Li H. Morphology and mechanical properties of injection-molded ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/polypropylene blends and comparison with compression molding. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2009, 111(2): 890–898

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen S, Chen Y, Peng H. Simulation of injection-compressionmolding process. II. Influence of process characteristics on part shrinkage. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2000, 75(13): 1640–1654

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ho J Y, Park J M, Kang T G, et al. Three-dimensional numerical analysis of injection-compression molding process. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2012, 52(4): 901–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Zhang Y, Li D. Shrinkage analysis of injection-compression molding for transparent plastic panel by 3D simulation. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 44–47: 1029–1033

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cao W, Min Z Y, Zhang S X, et al. Numerical simulation for flowinduced stress in injection/compression molding. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2016, 56(3): 287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao W, Hua S Z, Zhang S X, et al. Three-dimensional viscoelastic simulation for injection/compression molding based on arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian description. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2016, 11(5): 051004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tryggvason G, Bunner B, Esmaeeli A, et al. A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 169(2): 708–759

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gueyffier D, Li J, Nadim A, et al. Volume-of-fluid interface tracking with smoothed surface stress methods for three-dimensional flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 152(2): 423–456

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Young W B. Filling and postfilling analysis of injection/compression molding. International Polymer Processing, 2000, 15(4): 416–422

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Araújo B J, Teixeira J C F, Cunha A M, et al. Parallel threedimensional simulation of the injection molding process. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 59(7): 801–815

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Muzaferija S, Gosman D. Finite-volume CFD procedure and adaptive error control strategy for grids of arbitrary topology. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 138(2): 766–787

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ubbink O, Issa R. A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 153(1): 26–50

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Patankar S. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Columbus: McGraw Hill, 1980, 126–130

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Agassant J F, Mackley M R. A personal perspective on the use of modelling simulation for polymer melt processing. International Polymer Processing, 2015, 30(1): 121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51635006 and 51675199), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 2016YXZD059 and 2015ZDTD028), and the Beijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Structural Transparencies for the Modern Traffic System.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Material Processing and Die & Mold Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Yun Zhang, Wenjie Yu, Junjie Liang & Dequn Li

  2. Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing, 100095, China

    Jianlin Lang

Authors
  1. Yun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenjie Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junjie Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianlin Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dequn Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Yu, W., Liang, J. et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation for plastic injection-compression molding. Front. Mech. Eng. 13, 74–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0490-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0490-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation