Skip to main content
Log in

Calculating electron-phonon coupling matrix: Theory introduction, code development and preliminary application

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electron-phonon coupling (EPC) in bulk materials is an important effect in multifarious physical and chemical phenomena. It is the key to explaining the mechanisms for superconductivity, electronic transport, etc. The EPC matrix describes the coupling of the electronic eigenstates of the studied system under the perturbation of phonons. Although the EPC matrix is closely relevant to many fundamental physicochemical properties, it remains a challenge to calculate the EPC matrix precisely due to the high computational cost. In recent years, Giustino et al. developed the EPW method on open-source ab-initio software Quantum Espresso, which uses Wannier functions (WFs) to calculate EPC matrix. However, due to the limitation of their implementation, it is not possible yet to calculate the EPC matrix under some important computational conditions, e.g., for DFT+U and HSE calculation. Given the importance of these computational conditions (e.g., for transition metal oxides), we have developed our own implementation of EPC matrix calculation based on the domestic ab-initio software PWmat. Our code allows the DFT+U and HSE correction, so we can get a more accurate EPC matrix in the related problems. In this article, we will first review the formulae and elucidate how to calculate the EPC matrix by constructing WFs. Then we will introduce our code along with its workflow on PWmat and present our test results of two classical semiconductor systems AlAs and Si, showing consistency with EPW. Next, the EPC matrix of LiCoO2, a classical cathode material for lithium-ion batteries, is calculated using different exchange correlation (XC) functionals including LDA, PBE, DFT+U and HSE. A comparison is provided for the related EPC matrix. It shows there could be a significant difference for the EPC matrix elements due to the use of different XC functionals. Our implementation thus opens the way for fast calculation of EPC for the important class of materials, like the transition metal oxides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baroni S, de Gironcoli S, dal Corso A, et al. Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory. Rev Mod Phys, 2001, 73: 515–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li J F, Pan Y, Wu C F, et al. Processing of advanced thermoelectric materials. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 1347–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang X, Qiao X F, Shi W, et al. Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from monolayer, multilayer to bulk material. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44: 2757–2785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giustino F. Electron-phonon interactions from first principles. Rev Mod Phys, 2017, 89: 015003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xi J, Nakamura Y, Zhao T, et al. Theoretical studies on the deformation potential, electron-phonon coupling, and carrier transports of layered systems. Acta Physico-Chim Sin, 2018, 34: 961–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazzeri M, Piscanec S, Mauri F, et al. Electron transport and hot phonons in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 95: 236802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloch F. Über die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern. Z Physik, 1929, 52: 555–600

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bardeen J, Shockley W. Deformation potentials and mobilities in nonpolar crystals. Phys Rev, 1950, 80: 72–80

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Giustino F, Cohen M L, Louie S G. Electron-phonon interaction using Wannier functions. Phys Rev B, 2007, 76: 165108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poncé S, Margine E R, Verdi C, et al. EPW: Electron-phonon coupling, transport and superconducting properties using maximally localized Wannier functions. Comput Phys Commun, 2016, 209: 116–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giannozzi P, Baroni S, Bonini N, et al. Quantum Espresso: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys-Condens Matter, 2009, 21: 395502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou J J, Park J, Lu I T, et al. Perturbo: A software package for ab initio electron-phonon interactions, charge transport and ultrafast dynamics. Comput Phys Commun, 2021, 264: 107970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou J J, Park J, Timrov I, et al. Ab initio electron-phonon interactions in correlated electron systems. Phys Rev Lett, 2021, 127: 126404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou J J, Hellman O, Bernardi M. Electron-phonon scattering in the presence of soft modes and electron mobility in SrTiO3 perovskite from first principles. Phys Rev Lett, 2018, 121: 226603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miglio A, Brousseau-Couture V, Godbout E, et al. Predominance of non-adiabatic effects in zero-point renormalization of the electronic band gap. npj Comput Mater, 2020, 6: 167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brunin G, Miranda H P C, Giantomassi M, et al. Electron-phonon beyond fröhlich: Dynamical quadrupoles in polar and covalent solids. Phys Rev Lett, 2020, 125: 136601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jia W, Cao Z, Wang L, et al. The analysis of a plane wave pseudopotential density functional theory code on a GPU machine. Comput Phys Commun, 2013, 184: 9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jia W, Fu J, Cao Z, et al. Fast plane wave density functional theory molecular dynamics calculations on multi-GPU machines. J Comput Phys, 2013, 251: 102–115

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Z. Solid Theory (in Chinese). 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2017. 18–60

    Google Scholar 

  20. Togo A, Tanaka I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scripta Mater, 2015, 108: 1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wannier G H. The structure of electronic excitation levels in insulating crystals. Phys Rev, 1937, 52: 191–197

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Marzari N, Mostofi A A, Yates J R, et al. Maximally localized Wannier functions: theory and applications. Rev Mod Phys, 2012, 84: 1419–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marzari N, Vanderbilt D. Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands. Phys Rev B, 1997, 56: 12847–12865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Souza I, Marzari N, Vanderbilt D. Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands. Phys Rev B, 2001, 65: 035109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain A, Hautier G, Ong S P, et al. Formation enthalpies by mixing GGA and GGA+U calculations. Phys Rev B, 2011, 84: 045115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heyd J, Scuseria G E, Ernzerhof M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential. J Chem Phys, 2003, 118: 8207–8215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mostofi A A, Yates J R, Pizzi G, et al. An updated version of Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions. Comput Phys Commun, 2014, 185: 2309–2310

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Jie J S, Weng M Y, Li S N, et al. A new MaterialGo database and its comparison with other high-throughput electronic structure databases for their predicted energy band gaps. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 1423–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vurgaftman I, Meyer J R, Ram-Mohan L R. Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys. J Appl Phys, 2001, 89: 5815–5875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang Z, Geyer N, Werner P, et al. Metal-assisted chemical etching of silicon: A review. Adv Mater, 2011, 23: 285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Y, Yang J L, Pan F, et al. From intercalation to alloying chemistry: Structural design of silicon anodes for the next generation of lithium-ion batteries (in Chinese). Chin J Struct Chem, 2020, 39: 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  32. Poncé S, Antonius G, Boulanger P, et al. Verification of first-principles codes: Comparison of total energies, phonon frequencies, electron-phonon coupling and zero-point motion correction to the gap between ABINIT and QE/YAMBO. Comput Mater Sci, 2014, 83: 341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goodenough J B, Kim Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater, 2009, 22: 587–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ye Y, Hu Z, Liu J, et al. Research progress of theoretical studies on polarons in cathode materials of lithium-ion batteries. Acta Phys Chim Sin, 2021, 37: 2011003

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu T C, Pan F, Amine K. Prospect and reality of concentration gradient cathode of lithium-ion batteries (in Chinese). Chin J Struct Chem, 2020, 39: 11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang M J, Chen Y S, Pan F, et al. Understanding structural evolution in the synthesis of advanced energy materials (in Chinese). Chin J Struct Chem, 2020, 39: 26–30

    Google Scholar 

  37. van Elp J, Wieland J L, Eskes H, et al. Electronic structure of CoO, Lidoped CoO, and LiCoO2. Phys Rev B, 1991, 44: 6090–6103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Inaba M, Iriyama Y, Ogumi Z, et al. Raman study of layered rock-salt LiCoO2 and its electrochemical lithium deintercalation. J Raman Spectrosc, 1997, 28: 613–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chakraborty A, Dixit M, Aurbach D, et al. Predicting accurate cathode properties of layered oxide materials using the SCAN meta-GGA density functional. npj Comput Mater, 2018, 4: 60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Du T, Xu B, Wu M, et al. Insight into the vibrational and thermodynamic properties of layered lithium transition-metal oxides LiMO2 (M = Co, Ni, Mn): A first-principles study. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120: 5876–5882

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Pan, JiaXin Zheng or Lin-Wang Wang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the starting fund of Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Energy Devices of China (Grant No. 1C-LAB), the Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Grant No. 1922018), the Soft Science Research Project of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2017B030301013), and the Major Science and Technology Infrastructure Project of Material Genome Big-Science Facilities Platform supported by Municipal Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen. The authors would like to thank Dr. Samuel Poncé from École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Dr. Hyungjun Lee from University of Texas at Austin for their kindly help with some details about understanding EPW code.

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Y., Weng, M., Zhang, W. et al. Calculating electron-phonon coupling matrix: Theory introduction, code development and preliminary application. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 204–214 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2113-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2113-y

Keywords

Navigation