Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchical Mean-Field Type Control of Price Dynamics for Electricity in Smart Grid

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper solves a mean-field type hierarchical optimal control problem in electricity market. The authors consider n − 1 prosumers and one producer. The ith prosumer, for 1 < i < n, is a leader of the (i − 1)th prosumer and is a follower of the (i + 1)th prosumer. The first player (agent) is the follower at the bottom whereas the nth is the leader at the top. The problem is described by a linear jump-diffusion system of conditional mean-field type, where the conditioning is with respect to common noise, and a quadratic cost functional involving, the square of the conditional expectation of the controls of the agents. The authors provide a semi-explicit solution of the corresponding mean-field-type hierarchical control problem with common noise. Finally, the authors illustrate the obtained result via a numerical example with two different scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stackelberg H V, The theory of the market economy, Trans. by Peacock A J, London, William Hodge, Originally Published as Grundlagen der Theoretischen Volkswirtschaftlehre, 1948.

  2. Simaan M and Cruz J B, On the stackelberg strategy in nonzero-sum games, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1973, 11(5): 533–555.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagchi A and Basar T, Stackelberg strategies in linear-quadratic stochastic differential games, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1981, 35(3): 443–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan L and Yong J, A differential game with multi-level of hierarchy, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1991, 161(2): 522–544.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Li N and Yu Z, Forward-backward stochastic differential equations and linear-quadratic generalized stackelberg games, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2018, 56(6): 4148–4180.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Simaan M and Cruz J, A stackelberg solution for games with many players, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1973, 18(3): 322–324.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cruz J, Leader-follower strategies for multilevel systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1978, 23(2): 244–255.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner B and Cruz J, Feedback stackelberg strategy for m-level hierarchical games, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1978, 23(3): 489–491.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Basar T and Selbuz H, Closed-loop stackelberg strategies with applications in the optimal control of multilevel systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1979, 24(2): 166–179.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson D and Djehiche B, A maximum principle for sdes of mean-field type, Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 2011, 63(2011): 341–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Buckdahn R, Djehiche B, and Li J, A general stochastic maximum principle for SDEs of mean-field type, Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 2011, 64(2011): 197–216.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Tembine H, Risk-sensitive mean-field-type games with lp-norm drifts, Automatica, 2015, 59(2015): 224–237.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Tcheukam A and Tembine H, Mean-field-type games for distributed power networks in presence of prosumers, 2016 28th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 2016, 446–451.

  14. Djehiche B, Tcheukam A, and Tembine H, Mean-field-type games in engineering, AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2017, 1(1): 18–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tembine H, Mean-field-type games, AIMS Math, 2017, 2(4): 706–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duncan T and Tembine H, Linear-quadratic mean-field-type games: A direct method, Games, 2018, 9(7): 1–18.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Barreiro-Gomez J, Duncan T E, and Tembine H, Linear-quadratic mean-field-type games: Jump-diffusion process with regime switching, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2019, 64(10): 4329–4336.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Barreiro-Gomez J, Duncan T E, and Tembine H, Linear-quadratic mean-field-type games with multiple input constraints, IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2019, 3(3): 511–516.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Djehiche B, Barreiro-Gomez J, and Tembine H, Price dynamics for electricity in smart grid via mean-field-type games, Dynamic Games and Applications, 2020, 10(2020): 798–818.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Evans G C, A simple theory of competition, American Mathematical Monthly, 1922, 29(10): 371–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross C F, A mathematical theory of competition, American Journal of Mathematics, 1925, 47(3): 163–175.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Hobbs B F and Pang J, Nash-cournot equilibria in electric power markets with piecewise linear demand functions and joint constraints, Operations Research, 2007, 55(1): 113–127.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Metzler C, Hobbs B F, and Pang J, Nash-cournot equilibria in power markets on a linearized dc network with arbitrage: Formulations and properties, Networks and Spatial Economics, 2003, 3(2): 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hobbs B E, Linear complementarity models of nash-cournot competition in bilateral and poolco power markets, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(2): 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Willems B, Modeling cournot competition in an electricity market with transmission constraints, The Energy Journal, 2002, 23(3): 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hogan W, A market power model with strategic interaction in electricity networks, The Energy Journal, 1997, 18(4): 107–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wanga B and Huang M, Mean field production output control with sticky prices: Nash and social solutions, Automatica, 2019, 100(2019): 90–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Jovanovic B, Selection and the evolution of industry, Econometrica, 1982, 50(3): 649–670.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support from Tamkeen under the NYU Abu Dhabi Research Institute grant CG002, and U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grant No. FA9550-17-1-0259.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zahrate El Oula Frihi, Salah Eddine Choutri, Julian Barreiro-Gomez or Hamidou Tembine.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor GUO Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frihi, Z.E.O., Choutri, S.E., Barreiro-Gomez, J. et al. Hierarchical Mean-Field Type Control of Price Dynamics for Electricity in Smart Grid. J Syst Sci Complex 35, 1–17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-021-0176-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-021-0176-3

Keywords

Navigation