Abstract
Populus species are well documented for being potentially suitable for phytoremediation purposes regarding their accumulation characteristics. However, published results are contradictory. Based on the data gathered during an extensive literature search, we aimed to assess and revise the metal accumulation potential in the root, stem, and leaf of Populus species growing in contaminated soils, with meta-analysis. We evaluated the influences of pollution level, soil pH, and exposure time on the metal uptake patterns. We found accumulations of Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn to be significant in each plant part, while that was only moderate for Ni, and limited for Mn. By calculating the soil pollution index (PI), we observed significantly intensive, PI-independent accumulation for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn. A decrease in soil pH significantly increased the uptake of Mn and significantly decreased the accumulation of Pb in the stem. Metal uptake was significantly influenced by exposure time as well; Cd concentration was significantly decreased in the stem, while concentrations of Cr in the stem and leaf, and Mn in the stem were significantly increased with time. These aforementioned findings support a well-founded metal-and-growth condition-specific application of poplars in phytoremediation processes, also triggering further in-depth assessments to enhance the efficiency of relevant poplar-based technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Soil pollution and contamination pose a high risk limited not only to the soil itself but also to all the associated compartments and compounds in its environment (Briggs 2003; Skála et al. 2018). The complex and, in many instances, unknown effect mechanism of certain contamination cases has recently been accompanied by the gradually increasing diversity of compounds emitted into our environment, which then turns into an even bigger challenge to face (Delang 2017; Lemmel et al. 2019). Therefore, the nature of contamination urges the need for joint action from stakeholders.
Among chemical substances, metals are widely studied in environmental assessments (Wei et al. 2021). It is known that metal contamination directly affects the lives of tens of millions of people all around the world, while this number is even higher if we consider people indirectly concerned (Shakoor et al. 2013; Zhai et al. 2018). Metals are persistent and non-degradable, which are both critical regarding their fate; in addition, the density of metals highly determines all the basic characteristics of these elements and their compounds (Khalid et al. 2016). Among metals, heavy metals constitute a broad group. The definition and determination of these elements and their compounds are, however, subject to universal debate; according to one of the major consensuses, an excess amount of these substances in the environment is generally harmful (Ali and Khan 2018; Aliyev et al. 2018). This latter finding corroborates the need for thorough assessments of metal contamination.
It has previously been revealed that the prevention of soil contamination is much more desirable than its elimination both from an ecological and economical point of view (Ram et al. 2013). In case the contamination cannot be or is not intended to be avoided, there are still viable options to mitigate the harmful effects of a contaminant in an environmentally sound and economical manner (Jeelani et al. 2017). Phytoremediation, as a continuously developing group of phytotechnologies, exploits the inherent and/or intensified potential of plant species to grow under various conditions, while showing ability to accumulate, stabilize, degrade, and/or transform a wide range of substances (Lee 2013; Cristaldi et al. 2017; Parihar et al. 2021). In contrast with conventional remediation methods, phytoremediation operates with only negligible disturbance caused in its environment offering a mid-to-long-term green cover in the affected area (Ali et al. 2013).
One of the major aspects of plant-based remediation is the accumulation of contaminants (e.g., metals) in tissues, called phytoextraction. The principle behind the mechanism builds on the fact that certain plants can accumulate metals via roots and store a great proportion of those in underground plant parts with contaminant- and species-dependent tendencies to translocate them into aboveground parts (Suman et al. 2018; Antoniadis et al. 2021; Castañeda-Espinoza et al. 2022). To make phytoextraction effective and the whole process economical, selected plant species must represent specific characteristics including rapid growth (biomass production) and a high degree of metal tolerance (Arthur et al. 2005; Shikha and Singh 2021). For these reasons, the best candidates can be found among woody species (Mohsin et al. 2019; Simon et al. 2022). In addition to the abovementioned characteristics, the efficiency of remediation can be facilitated by genetic modification (e.g., overexpression of genes accountable for metal tolerance and uptake) or by increasing the bioavailability of metals in the growing media (Liu et al. 2020; Sarma et al. 2021; Trippe and Pilon-Smits 2021). Earlier papers published beneficial information on the metal accumulation potential of members of the Salicaceae family, out of which Populus (poplar) is a thoroughly mapped genus in this regard (Guerra et al. 2011; Marmiroli et al. 2011). The advantages of this genus over other genera with rapid growth and high biomass production rate (e.g., Brassica and Sorghum species) are its high biomass, soil stabilization effect due to the deep root system, continuous metal accumulation, and applicability in short rotation coppice (SRC) management even in the long term at the same time, favoring its common use for phytoremediation purposes (Chandra et al. 2016; Villette et al. 2019).
Along with the frequent application of poplars, inconsistencies can be discovered among the published results on metal accumulation in plant parts. For instance, Pietrini et al. (2010) studied the Cd accumulation in 10 Populus clones. The authors observed great variability in leaf accumulation among clones, with concentrations remaining generally low. In contrast, Langer et al. (2009) found that leaves were the main metal depositories in Populus × canescens (Aiton) Sm. A variable interspecific uptake pattern was found by Borghi et al. (2008) who demonstrated different responses of poplar species to similar Cu supply. Earlier papers also indicated that differences in metal uptake in organisms can be traced back to variations in pollution levels of their habitats. Adams et al. (2011) presented major differences in metal accumulation of Populus trichocarpa Torr. & A.Gray ex Hook. growing in environments with different levels of Zn contamination. Studying differently contaminated sites, Algreen et al. (2014) found a positive correlation between plant and soil Cd and Ni concentrations, while results for Cu and Zn were contradictory. A great number of studies indicated that soil acidity (pH) is highly relevant in determining the bioavailability, thus the intensity of accumulation in woody species. Mleczek et al. (2009) found a negative correlation between soil pH and metal uptake in Salix viminalis L. individuals. The same phenomenon was presented by Hu et al. (2019) for Ni in the case of Populus hopeiensis Hu & H.F.Chow. Additionally, the length of time that plants are exposed to the heavy metal may also be an important determining factor of accumulation. Di Baccio et al. (2009) highlighted for Populus × canadensis Moench (also known as Populus euramericana (Dode) Guinier) that the species showed a highly exposure time-dependent Zn accumulation. However, a positive correlation between time of exposure and tissue metal enrichment was reported to be non-significant in woody species after reaching certain concentrations (Tőzsér et al. 2017). In conclusion, the evaluation of these factors can be valid in studies to get a comprehensive view of selected species.
This study aimed to investigate and consolidate the published data on metal uptake among the selected plant parts (root, stem, and leaf) of Populus spp. grown in contaminated soils with tools of meta-analysis. We selected studied metals by their environmental relevancy and data availability; therefore, accumulations of cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) were assessed. In this paper, we studied, how and to what degree (I) Populus spp. accumulate metals in plant parts; (II) metal uptake is correlated with the pollution intensity level of soil; (III) plants accumulate metals under acidic and alkaline soil conditions; (IV) metal concentrations are correlated with exposure time in plant parts.
Materials and methods
Literature search and data selection
We collected the data through a literature search using all the databases available on the Web of Science for the period 1975–2021. On this platform, we used the following terms: TOPIC = (Populus) AND TOPIC = (metal OR phytoremediation). To have an extensive overview of the publications being appropriate for the analyses we also reviewed the reference section of each paper. We considered a publication appropriate for the meta-analysis in case it reported the mean concentrations (in mg kg-1, referred to dry matter) with their variances and sample sizes for one or more of the most relevant metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn) in plant parts (root and/or stem and/or leaf) and in soil from both contaminated and uncontaminated (control) areas. Papers assessing the effects of accumulation-stimulative compounds on the accumulation pattern of plants were excluded from the analyses. We retrieved the required data from text, tables, and figures.
Statistical analyses
We calculated unbiased standardized mean difference (Hedges’ g) for the meta-analyses, as a common effect size of the contaminated-uncontaminated comparisons.
and
where \(\overline{X_U}\) and \(\overline{X_C}\) are the mean metal concentration (mg kg-1) in plant parts of poplars growing in uncontaminated (U) and contaminated (C) soils, \(n_{U}\) and \(n_{C}\) are the sample sizes for poplar parts growing in uncontaminated (U) and contaminated (C) soils, \(S_{U}\) and \(S_{C}\) and are the standard deviations. Negative g values refer to a higher metal concentration in plant parts of poplars from contaminated soils than individuals from uncontaminated ones. We used subgroup meta-analysis to assess the similarity in metal accumulation from contaminated soils among the different plant parts of the poplar species; the three subgroups were root, stem, and leaf.
We performed a random-effects model to estimate the overall effect and the effects of moderators (plant parts of poplars). Generally, there is a high variation in locations, conditions, experimental setups, and methods used in the individual studies, which did not enable us to estimate a common effect size; thus, we used a random-effects model (Borenstein et al., 2009). Random-effect models have a higher degree of plausibility than fixed-effect ones; they attribute the distribution of effect sizes to real differences among studies and do not assume sampling error as the only source of differences in effect sizes (Borenstein et al., 2009). As more than a single effect size was computed from one study, we included a publication-level random effect as a nesting factor in the random-effect models. We considered the mean effect size statistically significant if the 95% bootstrap confidence interval (CI; calculated with 999 iterations) did not include zero.
We also assessed effect size homogeneity across studies; in the case of variable effect sizes, the interpretation of results would be substantially different than in the case of consistent ones. We also calculated complementary measures of heterogeneity (Q, T2, and I2) to describe the heterogeneity of effects between studies (Borenstein et al., 2009). We partitioned total variance (Qtotal) into within-groups (Qwithin) and between-groups (Qbetween) variances using a Q test based on the analysis of variance; we tested these different components of variance for statistical significance (Borenstein et al., 2009). We considered variance between groups (Qbetween) significant if metal accumulation from contaminated soils was significantly different (p<0.05) among plant parts of poplars. Additionally, we evaluated the proportion of true variance explained by covariates (subgroup classification) by the calculation of R2 (Borenstein et al., 2009). We excluded subgroups with less than four cases from the analyses during calculations.
In meta-analyses, publication bias resulting in missing studies and biased effect sizes are also common. We used funnel plots and Egger’s test to assess publication bias (Borenstein et al., 2009). In addition, we used the trim and fill method in case of significant asymmetry (Duval and Tweedie, 2000). The trim and fill method calculates the number of missing studies, while their effect sizes and standard errors are also computed. Missing studies are then added to the dataset of the meta-analysis, followed by the re-computation of the summary effect size. Using this method, an unbiased estimate of the summary effect size is given (Borenstein et al. 2009).
We performed subgroup meta-analyses to investigate whether metal accumulation was different among species from soils with different levels of pollution. The subgroups were the soils with different pollution intensity levels. We studied the level of pollution by calculating the pollution index (PI); it represents the ratio of the measured and the background soil metal concentration (mg kg-1) (Faiz et al. 2009):
where Mc is soil metal concentration presented by selected papers; Bc is background soil metal concentration. According to the equation, the following pollution intensity level groups were set: PI ≤ 1 (low), 1 ≤ PI ≤ 2 (moderate), 2 ≤ PI ≤ 5 (high), and PI ≥ 5 (extreme) (Lu et al. 2007; Simon et al. 2013; Tőzsér et al. 2019). We extracted reference background metal concentrations from the Geochemical Atlas of Europe Part 1 (Salminen et al. 2006).
We performed each of the meta-analyses, heterogeneity measures, and assessment of publication bias using the MAd and metafor packages (Viechtbauer 2010; Del Re and Hoyt 2014) operated in the R (version 4.1.2; R Core Team 2018). To assess soil acidity-dependent and temporal metal accumulation in plant parts of poplars, we analyzed the relationship between Hedges’ g (standardized mean difference) and soil pH, and between Hedges’ g and exposure time, respectively. We assessed the relationships by linear models using the lm method, carried out in the R.
Results
Literature search
The literature search provided 15,347 publications. Out of these, 29 papers presented results on the mean concentrations of metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and/or Zn) with their variances and sample sizes from soils and plants, in case of both contaminated and uncontaminated (control) sites (Table 1, Supplementary Materials A). Assessing the selected publications, a total number of 528 comparisons could be extracted. The level of contamination in soils was very wide-ranging in case each of the studied metals (0.12–150 mg kg-1 for Cd, 20.8–13,600 mg kg-1 for Cr, 14.4–2396 mg kg-1 for Cu, 287–2790 mg kg-1 for Mn, 13.2–111 mg kg-1 for Ni, 7.0–970 mg kg-1 for Pb, and 49.1–6013 mg kg-1 for Zn. In the selected publications, 11 Populus species, clones, and hybrids were studied (Table 1). As a preliminary assessment, we found metal accumulation trends in plant parts similar both when analyzing the species separately and together (results are not shown); thus, in further analyses, we assessed Populus species together.
Accumulation of metals in Populus tissues
Accumulation was significantly higher in all plant parts (root, stem, and leaf) for Cd, Cr, and Zn, compared to control individuals. It was significantly higher in the root and leaf, but not in the stem for Cu and Pb. The accumulation in all plant parts for Ni was higher, while that for Mn was lower in individuals growing in contaminated soils compared to ones growing in uncontaminated soils, although these differences were not significant (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Materials B1–B7). We found differences 2790 in the accumulation of Cr, Pb, and Zn among plant parts (Supplementary Materials B1–B7). In the overall model, total heterogeneity was significant for each of the studied metals, while significant residual, unexplained heterogeneity was also found (Supplementary Materials B1–B7). In the funnel plot, both (classical and random-effects) versions of Egger’s test indicated significant asymmetry for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn, while for Mn the classical version did not indicate significant asymmetry; however, the random-effects version did (Supplementary Materials C1–C7). Further, the number of missing values estimated by the trim and fill method was 36 for Cd, 34 for Zn, 19 for Pb, 13 for Cu, 5 for Ni, and 0 for Cr and Mn (Supplementary Materials C1–C7). Adding the detected missing data points, however, did not change the outcome of the models (Supplementary Materials C1–C7).
Correlation between soil pollution index (PI) and metal accumulation in Populus tissues
Accumulation patterns of plant parts under different pollution intensity levels could be assessed for Cd in the leaf, Cr in the root, and Zn in the stem and leaf, having a sample size of n≥4. During the analysis, we found no significant relationship between the accumulation rate in plant tissues and the pollution intensity (Supplementary Materials D).
Correlation between soil pH and metal accumulation in Populus tissues
Studying the metal accumulation in plant parts of Populus spp. under different acidity conditions, we found one significant and one marginally significant correlation (Supplementary Materials E1–E7). Accumulation of Mn in leaves was marginally significantly decreased with the increase of soil pH (F=4.32, n=20, p=0.052, R=0.44); it means that the difference in leaf metal concentrations decreased between individuals from contaminated sites and uncontaminated ones with increasing soil pH.
Contrarily, accumulation rates of Pb in stems were significantly increased with the increase of soil pH (Fig. 2), which means that the difference in stem metal concentrations significantly increased between individuals from contaminated sites and uncontaminated ones with increasing soil pH.
Temporal accumulation of metals in Populus tissues
To study the time-dependent accumulation of the studied metals in Populus spp. tissues, we found four significant correlations (Table 2; for the other relationships see Supplementary Materials F1–F7). The rate of Cd accumulation was significantly decreased with exposure time in stems of Populus spp., suggesting a significantly decreasing difference with time in Cd concentrations of stems between Populus spp. from contaminated vs. uncontaminated sites.
In contrast, the accumulation of Cr in stems and leaves, and Mn in stems of Populus spp. were significantly increased with exposure time (Table 2); it indicated that a strong increase could be expected in the accumulation intensity of the metals in Populus plant parts as the exposure got longer.
Discussion
Accumulation of metals in Populus tissues
We identified that among the seven studied metals Cd, Cr, and Zn were accumulated in Populus spp. in significantly higher concentrations from contaminated soils than in individuals from uncontaminated ones. However, accumulation among plant parts varied according to the heavy metal. For Cu, Ni, and Pb, differences were non-significant in some cases and significant in others. The accumulation intensity of Mn was lower in individuals growing on contaminated soils than in individuals on uncontaminated ones. Reading the earlier results of phytoremediation studies, the results about the accumulation patterns of metals in Populus spp. are contradictory.
We demonstrated using meta-analysis that the root, stem, and leaf of Populus spp. accumulated Cd in similarly high concentrations; thus, we did not find significant differences among the plant parts. There is variation among published results regarding the level of accumulation and the compartmentation of Cd in plants. Besides highlighting the overall great accumulation potential of the species, Baldantoni et al. (2014) found significantly higher Cd concentrations in leaves than in stems and roots of Populus nigra L. In cases of three Populus spp. clones Ruttens et al. (2011) also confirmed the Cd accumulation primarily in leaves; the phenomenon was linked to the good translocation potential of Cd in Populus spp. and the simultaneous large bioavailable quantity of the metal in the studied low-nutrient soil. On the contrary, growing four poplar hybrids in a media with elevated (100–500 mg l-1) Cd supply, Chandra et al. (2016) found the concentration much higher in roots than in leaves and stems. Shim et al. (2013) also identified root compartmentation of Cd in transgenic poplars, explaining the results by the increased Cd-storing capacity of the more extensive root system compared to genetically non-modified species. Among all metal-plant part relations, we found the accumulation of Cd to be the most intensive in roots, followed by the leaves of poplars; in particular, a great proportion of the relevant data was presented for Populus alba L., P. nigra, and their relative hybrids, which suggests outstanding Cd accumulation performance not only for the genus in general but also for these specified species and hybrids. Intensive root accumulation could thus be attributed to the wide species-dependent variation of poplars in metal uptake and transport, based on the strategy developed to avoid aboveground parts being impaired under metal stress (Iori et al. 2016). According to Pajević et al. (2009), the role of metal interactions in the soil determines the Cd accumulation in poplars; the authors found multi-contamination to cause condition drop-based accumulation discrepancies in Populus deltoides W.Bartram ex Marshall and P. euramericana. Dos Santos Utmazian et al. (2007) also listed, besides other factors, the elemental composition of soils as a major force influencing the uptake of Cd in poplars. In this analysis, papers involving genetically modified poplars and soils with different levels of metal contamination were also included, thus the (mutual) weight of these factors in forming the accumulation pattern should not be excluded. Nonetheless, we found only minor differences in Cd accumulation among plant parts, which supports the conscious handling of the whole individuals during and after the remediation of Cd-affected soils.
Similar to the result for Cd, we did not indicate significant differences in Cr accumulation among plant parts of poplars, while the level of uptake was significant in each case as well. Studying the phytoremediation potential of P. nigra hybrid “Monviso,” Ancona et al. (2017) reported much higher Cr concentrations in roots than in leaves; the authors supported the use of the hybrid for Cr phytostabilization instead of for phytoextraction purposes. Pulford and Watson (2003) explained the low translocation of Cr in plants by the specific physico-chemical properties of the metal, which make Cr one of the metals generally immobilized in roots and root zone. In our study, we also observed the prime role of root accumulation for Populus (particularly for P. alba and P. deltoides, which two species and their hybrids gave two-thirds of the total Cr-related comparisons in the analyses), while the difference was, however, less pronounced than indicated by several previous papers. In their experiment, Kacálková et al. (2014) described the studied hybrid (Populus nigra L. × Populus maximowiczii A.Henry “NM6”) as a root accumulator for Cr by moderate soil contamination (total soil concentrations: 39–141 mg kg-1) levels. The authors found low (<1.1 mg kg-1) tissue concentrations in each case, which was the result of the very low (<0.005 mg kg-1) bioavailable fraction in soil, which latter was a result of soil parameters such as pH and organic matter content. Low uptake and translocation rates were reported by Chandra et al. (2016) in cases of four poplar hybrids. Bing et al. (2016) also found low accumulation rates for Cr in Populus purdomii Rehder root; however, as a contrary finding, aboveground plant parts were identified as the main Cr depots, which reflected on a potential atmospheric source. In this study, we aimed to include papers with a sampling design characterized by a low risk of metal accumulation via atmospheric pathways, focusing on the soil uptake of metals exclusively.
Metal accumulation potential of poplars for Cu was significant in roots and leaves, and marginally significant in stems, without showing major differences among plant parts. After comparing several candidate species for phytoextraction, Antonijević et al. (2012) referred to P. nigra as a root accumulator for Cu with very high (170–2400 mg kg-1) tissue concentrations growing in moderately to heavily contaminated (440–3800 mg kg-1) soils. Likewise, Pietrini et al. (2017) found significantly higher concentrations in roots than in aboveground parts of P. nigra hybrid “Monviso,” confirming a specifically restricted translocation of Cu in poplars reported by earlier papers (Pulford and Watson 2003). Contrasting results can also be recovered from the literature. Cordero et al. (2013) observed the Cu remediation potential of P. nigra to be only moderate with the highest concentrations detected in leaves. Kalubi et al. (2016) came to the same conclusion studying Populus tremuloides Michx.; soil parameters and adaptation mechanisms of the species were mentioned as the major influences. Besides these factors, interspecific variation in metal accumulation and compartmentation was also listed as accountable for the different results under similar experimental conditions (Borghi et al. 2008) and the accumulation pattern presented in this paper.
For Mn, we found that accumulation was very restricted in leaves and stems of poplars; accumulation was hindered in species growing in contaminated soils. The low accumulation rates can be traced back to the specific traits of Mn and soils. De Santo et al. (2002) assessed the foliar Mn concentration in Populus tremula L. individuals and reported it to be low to moderate; this pattern was linked to the organic matter content of the soil, which, despite the relatively large mobile pool, bound Mn strongly to make the metal barely available for plants. Millaleo et al. (2010) emphasized that many plant species have well-developed defensive (avoidance) mechanisms to cope with Mn contamination (e.g., sequestration in less active compartments). As an interpretation of low Mn uptake in previous papers, Cd-antagonism (Wang et al. 2018), root retention by metal complexes, and interactions with nutrients (e.g., K and Mg) (Alam et al. 2005) have already been introduced. Further, species-specific accumulation is very characteristic of Mn (Foy et al. 1988; Millaleo et al. 2010), which was also proved by Shukla et al. (2011), who found major differences among the four studied woody species; the tissue-soil accumulation ratio for Mn of P. alba exceeded that for Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn. Monitoring several plants growing in an industrial area Saba et al. (2015) concluded that P. nigra had the highest Mn remediation performance based on its very high leaf concentrations. Giachetti et al. (2006) also found intensive Mn translocation in poplars. In this paper, we found low translocation of Mn into aboveground plant parts, while due to the lack of data on root concentrations, we can neither support nor deny the possibility of root retention.
Based on the data available, we presented good accumulation potential for Ni in poplars in contaminated soils, but the rate of uptake was non-significant in each of the plant parts. Ni is known to be a metal intensively translocated from roots towards leaves (Pulford and Watson 2003). In line with our findings, Kalubi et al. (2016) found the highest Ni concentrations in leaves compared to roots and aboveground woody parts; however, the differences the authors reported were significant among plant parts and concerning the soil as well. Similar to our results Bing et al. (2016) observed the highest Ni concentration in the leaves of poplars, whereas uptake intensity from soil remained low. The available literature established the good translocation potential of Ni; however, the role of factors such as interspecific variation (Houda et al. 2016), metal amount, speciation, interactions, and other soil parameters (e.g., pH, Pajević et al. 2009; Hassan et al. 2019) in accumulation patterns should also be considered. Consequently, under specific soil conditions, poplars could retain Ni in roots; Kacálková et al. (2014) reported that after being exposed to a multi-contaminated environment 66% of the accumulated Ni remained in roots. We suppose that moderate (13–111 mg kg-1) soil Ni concentrations and elemental composition of the soils involved in this paper, and the variety of species in individual studies contributed to the overall moderate performance of poplars respecting Ni accumulation.
During the analyses, we found the accumulation of Pb to be significant in leaves and roots, while uptake was also substantial in stems of poplars. Pb is usually referred to as one of the least mobile elements, thus with very limited bioavailability (Amin et al., 2018). Previous research results on the accumulation of Pb in poplars confirmed this prior statement, but exceptions also exist. Baldantoni et al. (2014) found that P. alba and P. nigra can sequester most Pb in root vacuoles, thereby protecting the physiologically vulnerable organs from being affected by metal toxicity. In a study on Pb uptake in P. nigra Mrnka et al. (2012) found lower Pb concentrations in leaves than in shoots in each of the experimental designs. In accordance, Ruttens et al. (2011) reported higher Pb concentrations in the leaf than in the stem of three poplar clones. Different experimental build-ups (soil elemental compositions), however, resulted in different accumulation patterns of P. nigra “Monviso” in the study of Ancona et al. (2017); in the first and second sets, the authors found elevated Pb in leaves compared to roots, while the contrary was observed in the third and fourth sets, which underlined the basic role of metal interactions. In our study, roots were the primary organ of Pb accumulation, while the adaptation/avoidance mechanism was assumed to have a lowering effect on the Pb concentration in the stem and leaf.
Analyzing the data from the papers involved, we demonstrated poplars to have significant Zn accumulation potential in roots, stems, and leaves as well, with leaves having higher metal concentrations than the other two plant parts. The high degree of Zn mobility from the soil into roots and then into aboveground parts was confirmed by Todeschini et al. (2011) from single-contaminated and by Vollenweider et al. (2011) from multi-contaminated experiments, who named the leaf as the plant part of poplars with the highest remediation potential. In contrast, Benyó et al. (2016) presented low translocation rates for Zn from roots into leaves, concluding that roots of P. deltoides and P. canadensis accumulated and restrained most of the metals growing in Cu/Zn multi-contaminated media. The uptake of Zn is frequently discussed concerning the presence of other metals, mainly Cd (Tőzsér et al. 2017). The correlation between the two metals is not uniformly evaluated; some papers supposed a positive correlation (synergism) in plant accumulation between Zn and Cd (Brekken and Steinnes 2004; De Oliveira and Tibbett 2018), while others found a negative correlation (antagonism) between them (Adiloglu 2002; Podar et al. 2004; Tkalec et al. 2014). We found comparable accumulation patterns for Zn and Cd in this study; however, trends among plant parts and the degree of accumulation were different—thus, we do not suppose antagonism between the metals. Further, Xue et al. (2020) referred to short rotation coppice as an effective technique for enhancing the extraction of several metals, among others Cd from the soil. However, Nissim et al. (2019) observed differences in Cd accumulation in poplars involved in short rotation management by individual size and age. Without the opportunity to study these factors in this analysis, we suppose that the latter points to a variable that should be considered in future assessment studies.
As individual studies are based on different experimental conditions, the synthetic findings of this paper should be defined in light of the potential effects of environmental influences. Besides the range of factors highlighted above in the cases of selected metals, factors such as study location (O’Connor et al. 2019), extreme abiotic stress (Sarma et al. 2021), and sampling season (Bidar et al. 2009) are of major importance when assessing metal accumulation in plant tissues. Thereby, it would be advantageous if future studies put more emphasis on the assessment of one or more of these factors, which would enable a more comprehensive overview done by integrating research built on their results.
Correlation between soil pollution index (PI) and metal accumulation in Populus tissues
As we presented, there was no significant correlation between soil pollution intensity levels and metal (Cd, Cr, and Zn) uptake in plant parts of poplars, proposing that the accumulation of the metals was intensive from soils, independent of the degree of contamination in the growing media. Corresponding to metal accumulation alone, pollution intensity-dependent changes in tissue Cd, Cr, and Zn concentrations are also disparately discussed in papers.
In response to increasing metal stress, Jakovljević et al. (2014) found a non-significant but positive correlation in Cd concentration between soil and each of the studied plant parts (root, stem, and leaf) of P. nigra. The same conclusion has been drawn by Jun and Ling (2012) in cases of five poplar species; among plant parts, Cd enrichment was the most intensive in aboveground tissues. Radojčić Redovniković et al. (2017) reported on the limited applicability of P. nigra to an increased level of contamination. The authors found high remediation potential in soils with low to moderate contamination levels, while the correlation became nonlinear between Cd in tissues and soils by highly contaminated (Cd>25 mg kg-1) media. Under increased metal stress, it has been described that concentration drop in (primarily aboveground) tissues could be the result of the so-called dilution effect, which occurs when the intensity of biomass production of plants exceeds the extent of metal uptake (Robinson et al. 2000). In highly Cd-contaminated soils, not only changes in accumulation patterns but also toxicity symptoms such as growth reduction and necrosis have been observed (Marzilli et al. 2018), which could be the explanation behind our results linked to the occurrence of extreme (Cd>50 mg kg-1) soil concentrations in the papers involved.
The accumulation intensity of Cr was also influenced by changes in soil metal concentration. Chandra et al. (2016) indicated a non-significant positive correlation between soil and tissue concentrations in four poplar hybrids under different (5–500 mg l-1) contamination levels. In an earlier study, Renninger et al. (2013) reported an increase in P. deltoides leaf Cr concentration in response to elevated levels in soil; the correlation was also non-significant. Based on the nature of Cr in the soil-plant relation and according to the results presented here and in previous papers, we assume that poplars could make use of an effective exclusion mechanism when growing in highly and extremely contaminated soils (Cornejo et al. 2017), causing a decrease in Cr uptake intensity and translocation into stems and leaves.
Responses of poplars to Zn stress were also found to vary among the reported studies; however, the effect of the contamination level was considered to be major driving Zn uptake in earlier papers. In their abovementioned study, Renninger et al. (2013) found significantly higher Zn concentration in roots, stems, and leaves of P. deltoides from highly contaminated soils than in individuals from moderately and slightly contaminated ones. Testing two poplar clones, Fernàndez et al. (2012) demonstrated a uniform positive relationship between soil and tissue concentrations, with significant correlations for soil-young leaves, soil-stems in cases of both clones, and soil-roots in the case of one clone. In our paper, accumulation discrepancies due to toxicity triggered by high Zn contamination (in some cases soil >3000 mg kg-1) should not be excluded, while the role of metal interactions was also assumed (Gupta et al. 2016).
Correlation between soil pH and metal accumulation in Populus tissues
We found a significant negative correlation between soil pH and leaf Mn concentration and a significant positive correlation between soil pH and stem Pb concentration of poplars. In the case of the other heavy metals discussed in this study (es. Zn, Cu), soil pH was not correlated with tissue-specific accumulation patterns.
Previous papers reported that a decrease in soil pH could result in higher mobility (bioavailability) of metals, which thus influences the amount accumulated by plants (Tan et al. 1997; Cloutier-Hurteau et al. 2010; Król et al. 2020). In the case of poplar-based remediation, a specific but not unique characteristic of poplars must also be taken into consideration; poplars can substantially alter acidity conditions in soils. Qasim et al. (2016) demonstrated that during the growth in a metal-contaminated environment, P. euramericana increased the pH of soil pore water by 0.3 to 0.6 units, which was explained by the anion and cation accumulation imbalance in roots. The relevant role of plants was also emphasized by Gonzaga et al. (2009), indicating a decrease in soil pH induced by root exudates. In a study on a 1-year-long experiment, Huynh et al. (2008) presented the contribution of poplars to the initial decrease and subsequent increase of soil pore water pH, thereby to the bioavailability of metals. In this paper, we found low accumulation rates and very wide, predominantly acidic pH ranges (2.7–7.3) for Mn. It is known that only a minor decrease in soil pH can substantially enrich the bioavailable Mn pool (Švec et al. 2016); thus, we assumed a similar trend behind the significant correlation indicated in our paper. A negative correlation was also found by Hu et al. (2019) for P. hopeiensis in soils contaminated by several metals. We found significant stem Pb accumulation under increasing alkalinity, which is not confirmed by previous papers (Heidari et al. 2005; Hu et al. 2019). In line with the transition of soil pH from acidic to alkaline ranges, Pb becomes even more immobile, exerting its toxic effects in a less pronounced manner on plant development; thereby physiological processes such as translocation mechanisms are more favored, enabling a relatively high degree of Pb flux into leaves (Brennan and Shelley 1999; Tangahu et al. 2011; Thakur et al. 2016). Concerning our results, the abovementioned mechanism could be, at least in part, the reason for the significant positive correlation between soil pH and Pb in the stem, as a major metal depository during the translocation process. The discrepancy in the results highlights the need for further research into the specific Pb uptake patterns in poplar.
Temporal accumulation of metals in Populus tissues
For Cd in the stem, we found a significantly decreasing concentration with exposure time. In contrast, increased exposure time results in increased Cr in the stem and leaf, and for Mn in the stem, even until the 138th month. A great variety of results on different metals can also be seen in the relevant literature.
Highlighting their long-term applicability, Pierzynski et al. (2002) showed intensive Cd accumulation in poplar tissues throughout a 30-month-long experiment. Similarly, Scheid et al. (2009) indicated an increase in leaf litter concentration until the 25th month, suggesting the good translocation potential of Cd into the aboveground parts on a long-term basis. As we previously demonstrated, Cd tended to accumulate in the root and leaf, while the stem had relatively lower concentrations. Ruttens et al. (2011) reported that Cd accumulation intensity decreased in poplars after the second year of exposure, which could be related to the specific experimental condition. Temporal depletion of Cd in aboveground woody parts was observed earlier by Hu et al. (2019) in P. hopeiensis, who associated the phenomenon with the so-called stand age effect, suggesting a decline in uptake intensity in older (>10 years) trees than in younger ones. In addition, there is a high seasonal difference in the accumulation pattern of metals; Brekken and Steinnes (2004) identified a general seasonal decrease in Cd concentration in plant parts of poplars from spring to summer. Variations in experimental conditions in individual studies such as stand age and sampling time could have a major influence on the temporal decline of tissue Cd presented in this study.
In consonance with the results of this meta-analysis, Shukla et al. (2011) found a continuous increase in the accumulation of Cr in aboveground poplar tissues during a 12-month-long experiment. On a short-term (4-month long) scale, Zojaji et al. (2015) presented no major differences in Cr uptake in P. deltoides, assuming low short-term variation in Cr dynamics. Long-term effects were not reported consistently; Čudić et al. (2016) observed a significant decrease in Cr uptake in aboveground parts of poplars from the second to the third year of study, which was followed by an increase between the third and fifth years. In our study, Cr concentration of the stem and leaf significantly increased until the 138th month. Nevertheless, data were not available between the 49th and 137th months of experiments and, based on results from previous papers, potential major fluctuations in the intensity of Cr accumulation must not be excluded in this period.
Pottier et al. (2015) monitored the uptake of Mn in 14 poplar genotypes and observed an increase in leaf Mn concentration between April and November. Besides translocation among plant parts, long-term exposure to Mn stress could also facilitate intracellular sequestration mechanisms, which are effective tools for plants to cope with toxicity, and by which such compartmentation of Mn presented in this paper could be supported (Li et al. 2019). In contrast, Zárubová et al. (2015) found gradually decreasing Mn concentration during a 4-year-long study in aboveground parts of poplar clones. The authors attributed this pattern to the dilution effect. As mentioned above, we found low accumulation rates for Mn in poplars in contaminated soils compared to control ones. Yet, on a long (138 months) time scale, significant Mn accumulation occurred in poplar stem, which suggested the applicability of species in the long term (>10 years) rather than in the short- and mid-term (<5 years). It is worth noticing that similar to the results on Cr, continuous mid-and long-term accumulation intensity data are required to get a more extensive look at the Mn uptake patterns in poplars.
Conclusions
In this paper, we demonstrated—with tools of meta-analysis—that poplars are widely applicable for phytoremediation purposes; however, there are major differences in the root, stem, and leaf accumulation among Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn. Individuals growing in contaminated soils were able to accumulate Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn in significantly higher concentrations than control individuals from uncontaminated soils. The uptake of Cu was partly significant, while that of Ni was non-significant in plant parts. Mn accumulation was generally very restricted. Poplars responded to the increasing pollution intensity levels of the growing media only with minor tissue concentration changes; except for Mn, significant accumulation was found for metals from low even to high pollution levels of the soils. In the stem, a decrease in soil pH values increased the accumulation of Mn, while it decreased the uptake of Pb. The accumulation of metals was also affected by exposure time; we observed a temporal decrease in stem Cd concentration, while stem and leaf Cr, and stem Mn accumulations became more intense with time, even until the 138th month of the experiment. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, we found poplars to be great candidates for the remediation of metal-contaminated soils; however, metal uptake preferences of the genus should be considered to achieve the most efficient remediation possible. Further, more extensive data on the factors influencing accumulation and long-term temporal uptake patterns would be needed to get a more thorough view of the prospects and limits of application.
Availability of data and materials
Research data and materials will be made available by request.
References
Adams JP, Adeli A, Hsu CY, Harkess RL, Page GP, dePamphilis CW, Schultz EB, Yuceer C (2011) Poplar maintains zinc homeostasis with heavy metal genes HMA4 and PCS1. J Exp Bot 62:3737–3752. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err025
Adiloglu A (2002) The effect of zinc (Zn) application on uptake of cadmium (Cd) in some cereal species. Arch Agron Soil Sci 48:553–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/0365034021000071837
Alam S, Akiha F, Kamei S, Huq S, Kawai S (2005) Mechanism of potassium alleviation of manganese phytotoxicity in barley. J Plant Nutr 28:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200055572
Algreen M, Trapp S, Rein A (2014) Phytoscreening and phytoextraction of heavy metals at Danish polluted sites using willow and poplar trees. Environ Sci Pollut R 21:8992–9001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2085-z
Ali H, Khan E (2018) What are heavy metals? Long-standing controversy over the scientific use of the term ‘heavy metals’ – proposal of a comprehensive definition. Toxicol Environ Chem 100:6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2017.1413652
Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals – concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91:869–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.075
Aliyev F, Khalilova H, Aliyev F (2018) Heavy metal pollution of ecosystem in an industrialized and urbanized region of the Republic of Azerbaijan. In: Saleh HEDM, Aglan RF (eds) Heavy metals. IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74600
Alizadeh SM, Zahedi-Amiri G, Savaghebi-Firoozabadi G, Etemad V, Shirvany A, Shirmardi M (2012) Assisted phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil using poplar rooted cuttings. Int Agrophys 26:219–224. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10247-012-0032-8
Amin H, Arain BA, Jahangir TM, Abbasi MS, Amin F (2018) Accumulation and distribution of lead (Pb) in plant tissues of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): profitable phytoremediation with biofuel crops. Geol Ecol Landsc 2:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2018.1452464
Ancona V, Caracciolo AB, Grenni P, Di Lenola M, Campanale C, Calabrese A, Uricchio VF, Mascolo G, Massacci A (2017) Plant-assisted bioremediation of a historically PCB and heavy metal-contaminated area in Southern Italy. New Biotechnol 38:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.09.006
Antoniadis V, Shaheen SM, Stärk HJ, Wennrich R, Levizou E, Merbach I, Rinklebe J (2021) Phytoremediation potential of twelve wild plant species for toxic elements in a contaminated soil. Environ Int 146:106233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106233
Antonijević MM, Dimitrijević MD, Milić SM, Nujkić MM (2012) Metal concentrations in the soils and native plants surrounding the old flotation tailings pond of the Copper Mining and Smelting Complex Bor (Serbia). J Environ Monit 14:866–877. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em10803h
Arthur EL, Rice PJ, Rice PJ, Anderson TA, Baladi SM, Henderson KLD, Coats JR (2005) Phytoremediation – an overview. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590952496
Baldantoni D, Cicatelli A, Bellino A, Castiglione S (2014) Different behaviours in phytoremediation capacity of two heavy metal tolerant clones in relation to iron and other trace elements. J Environ Manage 146:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.045
Benyó D, Horváth E, Németh E, Leviczky T, Takács K, Lehotai N, Feigl G, Kolbert Z, Ördög A, Gallé R, Csiszár J, Szabados L, Erdei L, Gallé Á (2016) Physiological and molecular responses to heavy metal stresses suggest different detoxification mechanism of Populus deltoides and P. × canadensis. J Plant Physiol 201:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2016.05.025
Bidar G, Pruvot C, Garçon G, Verdin A, Shirali P, Douay F (2009) Seasonal and annual variations of metal uptake, bioaccumulation, and toxicity in Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne growing in a heavy metal-contaminated field. Environ Sci Pollut R 16:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0021-4
Bing H, Wu Y, Zhou J, Sun H (2016) Biomonitoring trace metal contamination by seven sympatric alpine species in Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Chemosphere 165:388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.042
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK
Borghi M, Tognetti R, Monteforti G, Sebastiani L (2008) Responses of two poplar species (Populus alba and Populus × canadensis) to high copper concentrations. Environ Exp Bot 62:290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.001
Brekken A, Steinnes E (2004) Seasonal concentrations of cadmium and zinc in native pasture plants: consequences for grazing animals. Sci Total Environ 326:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.023
Brennan MA, Shelley ML (1999) A model of the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of lead (Pb) by maize for the purpose of phytoextraction. Ecol Eng 12:271–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00073-1
Briggs D (2003) Environmental pollution and the global burden of disease. Brit Med Bull 68:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg019
Castañeda-Espinoza J, Salinas-Sánchez DO, Mussali-Galante P, Castrejón-Godínez ML, Rodríguez A, González-Cortazar M, Zamilpa-Álvarez A, Tovar-Sánchez E (2022) Dodonaea viscosa (Sapindaceae) as a phytoremediator for soils contaminated by heavy metals in abandoned mines. Environ Sci Pollut R. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22374-5
Castiglione S, Todeschini V, Franchin C, Torrigiani P, Gastaldi D, Cicatelli A, Rinaudo C, Berta G, Biondi S, Lingua G (2009) Clonal differences in survival capacity, copper and zinc accumulation, and correlation with leaf polyamine levels in poplar: A large-scale field trial on heavily polluted soil. Environ Pollut 157:2108–2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.02.011
Chandra R, Cho W, Kang K (2016) Phytoextraction potential of four poplar hybrids under greenhouse conditions. Forest Sci Technol 12:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2016.1180325
Ciadamidaro L, Madejón E, Puschenreiter M, Madejón P (2013) Growth of Populus alba and its influence on soil trace element availability. Sci Total Environ 454-455:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.032
Ciadamidaro L, Madejón E, Robinson B, Madejón P (2014) Soil plant interactions of Populus alba in contrasting environments. J Environ Manage 132:329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.010
Cicatelli A, Lingua G, Todeschini V, Biondi S, Torrigiani P, Castiglione S (2010) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi restore normal growth in a white poplar clone grown on heavy metal-contaminated soil, and this is associated with upregulation of foliar metallothionein and polyamine biosynthetic gene expression. Ann Bot-London 106:791–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq170
Cloutier-Hurteau B, Turmel MC, Sauvé S, Courchesne F (2010) The speciation of water-soluble Al and Zn in the rhizosphere of forest soils. J Environ Monitor 12:1274–1286. https://doi.org/10.1039/C002497J
Cordero C, Incignieri K, Chiacchiarini PA, Lavalle TL, Giaveno MA (2013) Evaluation of plant species for phytoremediation of a mining waste from Andacollo, Neuquén-Argentina. Adv Mater Res-Switz 825:512–515. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.825.512
Cornejo J, Tapia J, Guerra F, Yáñez M, Baettig R, Guajardo J, Alarcón E, Vidal G (2017) Variation in copper accumulation at the tissue level of five hybrid poplars subjected to copper stress. Water Air Soil Poll 228:212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3384-7
Cristaldi A, Conti GO, Jho EH, Zuccarello P, Grasso A, Copat C, Ferrante M (2017) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils by heavy metals and PAHs. A brief review. Environ Technol Innov 8:309–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.08.002
Čudić V, Stojiljković D, Jovović A (2016) Phytoremediation potential of wild plants growing on soil contaminated with heavy metals. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 67:229–239. https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2829
De Oliveira VH, Tibbett M (2018) Tolerance, toxicity and transport of Cd and Zn in Populus trichocarpa. Environ Exp Bot 155:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.07.011
De Santo AV, Fierro A, Berg B, Rutigliano FA, De Marco A (2002) Heavy metals and litter decomposition in coniferous forests. Dev Soil Sci 28:63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(02)80044-7
Del Re AC, Hoyt WT (2014) MAd: meta-analysis with mean with mean differences. R package version 0.8-2. URL: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MAd
Delang CO (2017) Causes and distribution of soil pollution in China. Environ. Socio-econ Stud 5:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/environ-2017-0016
Di Baccio D, Tognetti R, Minnocci A, Sebastiani L (2009) Responses of the Populus × euramericana clone I-214 to excess zinc: carbon assimilation, structural modifications, metal distribution and cellular localization. Environ Exp Bot 67:153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.05.014
Dos Santos Utmazian MN, Wenzel WW (2007) Cadmium and zinc accumulation in willow and poplar species grown on polluted soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 170:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200622073
Dos Santos Utmazian MN, Wieshammer G, Vega R, Wenzel WW (2007) Hydroponic screening for metal resistance and accumulation of cadmium and zinc in twenty clones of willows and poplars. Environ Pollut 148:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.045
Durand TC, Baillif P, Albéric P, Carpin S, Label P, Hausman JF, Morabito D (2011) Cadmium and zinc are differentially distributed in Populus tremula x P. alba exposed to metal excess. Plant Biosyst 145:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.567787
Durand TC, Hausman JF, Carpin S, Albéric P, Baillif P, Label P, Morabito D (2010) Zinc and cadmium effects on growth and ion distribution in Populus tremula × Populus alba. Biol Plantarum 54:191–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0033-z
Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
El-Marouk ESM, Eisa EAEH, Ali HM, Hegazy MAE, El-Gayed MESA (2020) Populus nigra as a phytoremediator for Cd, Cu, and Pb in contaminated soil. BioResources 15:869–893. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.869-893
Evangelou MWH, Robinson BH, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Schulin R (2013) Meal uptake and allocation in trees grown on contaminated land: implications for biomass production. Int J Phytoremediat 15:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2012.670317
Faiz Y, Tufail M, Javed MT, Chaudhry MM, Siddique N (2009) Road dust pollution of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn along Islamabad Expressway, Pakistan. Microchem J 92:186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.03.009
Fernàndez J, Zacchini M, Fleck I (2012) Photosynthetic and growth responses of Populus clones Eridano and I-214 submitted to elevated Zn concentrations. J Geochem Explor 123:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.01.010
Foy C, Scott B, Fisher J (1988) Genetic differences in plant tolerance to manganese toxicity. In: Graham RD, Hannam RJ, Uren NJ (eds) Manganese in Soil and Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 293–307
Giachetti G, Sebastiani L (2006) Metal accumulation in poplar plant grown with industrial wastes. Chemosphere 64:446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.021
Gonzaga MIS, Ma LQ, Santos JAG, Matias MIS (2009) Rhizosphere characteristics of two arsenic hyperaccumulating Pteris ferns. Sci Total Environ 407:4711–4716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.04.037
Guerra F, Gainza F, Pérez R, Zamudio F (2011) Phytoremediation of heavy metals using poplars (Populus spp.): a glimpse of the plant responses to copper, cadmium and zinc stress In: Golubev IA (ed) Handbook of phytoremediation. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp. 387–413
Günthardt-Goerg MS, Vollenweider P, Hermle S, Schulin R (2019) Growth and metal accumulation of young forest trees and understorey plants on contaminated topsoil: influence of subsoil and time. Plant Soil 437:375–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-03986-2
Guo B, Dai S, Wang R, Guo J, Ding Y, Xu Y (2015) Combined effects of elevated CO2 and Cd-contaminated soil on the growth, gas exchange, antioxidant defense, and Cd accumulation of poplars and willows. Environ Exp Bot 115:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.02.002
Gupta N, Ram H, Kumar B (2016) Mechanism of zinc absorption in plants: uptake, transport, translocation and accumulation. Rev Environ Sci Bio 15:89–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-016-9390-1
Hassan MU, Chattha MU, Khan I, Chattha MB, Aamer M, Nawaz M, Ali A, Khan MAU, Khan TA (2019) Nickel toxicity in plants: reasons, toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and remediation possibilities-a review. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:12673–12688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04892-x
Hassinen V, Vallinkoski VM, Issakainen S, Tervahauta A, Kärenlampi S, Servomaa K (2009) Correlation of foliar MT2b expression with Cd and Zn concentrations in hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × tremuloides) grown in contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 157:922–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.10.023
Heidari R, Khayami M, Farboodnia T (2005) Effect of pH and EDTA on Pb accumulation in Zea mays seedlings. J Agron 4:49–54. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2005.49.54
Hermle S, Vollenweider P, Günthardt-Goerg MS, McQuattie CJ, Matyssek R (2007) Leaf responsiveness of Populus tremula and Salix viminalis to soil contaminated with heavy metals and acidic rainwater. Tree Physiol 27:1517–1531. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.11.1517
Houda Z, Bejaoui Z, Albouchi A, Gupta DK, Copras FJ (2016) Comparative study of plant growth of two poplar tree species irrigated with treated wastewater, with particular reference to accumulation of heavy metals (Cd, Pb, As, and Ni). Environ Monit Assess 188:99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5102-0
Hu Y, Gao Z, Huang Y, Chen S, Yang X, Su J, Zhao C, Nan Z (2019) Impact of poplar-based phytomanagement on metal bioavailability in low-phosphorus calcareous soil with multi-metal contamination. Sci Total Environ 686:848–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.072
Hu Y, Nan Z, Jin C, Wang N, Luo H (2013b) Phytoextraction potential of poplar (Populus alba L. var. pyramidalis Bunge) from calcareous agricultural soils contaminated by cadmium. Int J Phytoremediat 16:482–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.798616
Hu Y, Nan Z, Su J, Wang N (2013a) Heavy metal accumulation by poplar in calcareous soil with various degrees of multi-metal contamination: implications for phytoextraction and phytostabilization. Environ Sci Pollut R 20:7194–7203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1711-0
Huynh TT, Laidlaw WS, Singh B, Gregory D, Baker AJM (2008) Effects of phytoextraction on heavy metal concentrations and pH of pore-water of biosolids determined using an in situ sampling technique. Environ Pollut 156:874–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.05.021
Iori V, Gaudet M, Fabbrini F, Pietrini F, Beritognolo I, Zaina G, Mugnozza GS, Zacchini M, Massacci A, Sabatti M (2016) Physiology and genetic architecture of traits associated with cadmium tolerance and accumulation in Populus nigra L. Trees 30:125–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1281-5
Jakovljević T, Bubalo MC, Orlović S, Sedak M, Bilandžić N, Brozinčević I, Redovniković IR (2014) Adaptive response of poplar (Populus nigra L.) after prolonged Cd exposure period. Environ Sci Pollut R 21:3792–3802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2292-7
Jeelani N, Yang W, Xu L, Qiao Y, An S, Leng X (2017) Phytoremediation potential of Acorus calamus in soils co-contaminated with cadmium and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci Rep-UK 7:8028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07831-3
Jun R, Ling T (2012) Increase of Cd accumulation in five poplar (Populus L.) with different supply levels of Cd. Int J Phytoremediat 14:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2010.525564
Kacálková L, Tlustoš P, Száková J (2014) Chromium, nickel, cadmium, and lead accumulation in maize, sunflower, willow, and poplar. Pol J Environ Stud 23:753–761
Kalubi KN, Mehes-Smith M, Omri A (2016) Comparative analysis of metal translocation in red maple (Acer rubrum) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) populations from stressed ecosystems contaminated with metals. Chem Ecol 32:312–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2016.1142978
Khalid S, Shalid M, Niazo NK, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Dumat C (2016) A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J Geochem Explor 182:247–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021
Król A, Mizerna K, Bożym M (2020) An assessment of pH-dependent release and mobility of heavy metals from metallurgical slag. J Hazard Mater 384:121502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121502
Langer I, Krpata D, Fitz WJ, Wenzel WW, Schweiger PF (2009) Zinc accumulation potential and toxicity threshold determined for a metal-accumulating Populus canescens clone in a dose-response study. Environ Pollut 157:2871–2877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.04.003
Lee JH (2013) An overview of phytoremediation as a potentially promising technology for environmental pollution control. Biotechnol Bioproc E 18:431–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0193-8
Lemmel F, Maunoury-Danger F, Fanesi A, Leyval C, Cébron A (2019) Soil properties and multi-pollution affect taxonomic and functional bacterial diversity in a range of French soils displaying an anthropisation gradient. Microbial Ecol 77:993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-018-1297-7
Lettens S, Vandecasteele B, De Vos B, Vansteenkiste D, Verschelde P (2011) Intra- and inter-annual variation of Cd, Zn, Mn and Cu in foliage of poplars on contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 409:2306–2316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.029
Li J, Jia Y, Dong R, Huang R, Liu P, Li X, Wang Z, Liu G, Chen Z (2019) Advances in the mechanisms of plant tolerance to manganese toxicity. Int J Mol Sci 20:5096. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205096
Lingua G, Bona E, Todeschini V, Cattaneo C, Marsano F, Berta G, Cavaletto M (2012) Effects of heavy metals and arbuscular mycorrhiza on the leaf proteome of a selected poplar clone: a time course analysis. PLoS ONE 7:e38662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038662
Lingua G, Franchin C, Todeschini V, Castiglione S, Biondini S, Burlando B, Parravicini V, Torrigiani P, Berta G (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially affect the response to high zinc concentrations of two registered poplar clones. Environ Pollut 153:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.07.012
Liu L, Luo D, Yao G, Huang X, Wie L, Liu Y, Wu Q, Mai X, Liu G, Xiao T (2020) Comparative activation process of Pb, Cd and Tl using chelating agents from contaminated red soils. Int J Env Res Pub He 17:497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020497
Lu Y, Zhu F, Chen J, Gan H, Guo Y (2007) Chemical fraction of heavy metals in urban soils of Guangzhou, China. Environ Monit Assess 134:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9634-1
Madejón P, Marañón T, Murillo JM, Robinson B (2004) White poplar (Populus alba) as a biomonitor of trace elements in contaminated riparian forests. Environ Pollut 132:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.015
Mandre M (2014) Heavy metals uptake and accumulation by the hybrid aspen in alkalised soil. Water Air Soil Poll 225:1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1808-6
Marmiroli M, Pietrini F, Maestri E, Zacchini M, Marmiroli N, Massacci A (2011) Growth, physiological and molecular traits in Salicaceae trees investigated for phytoremediation of heavy metals and organics. Tree Physiol 31:1319–1334. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr090
Marzilli M, Di Santo P, Palumbo G, Maiuro L, Paura B, Tognetti R, Cocozza C (2018) Cd and Cu accumulation, translocation and tolerance in Populus alba clone (Villafranca) in autotrophic in vitro screening. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:10058–10068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1299-5
Millaleo R, Reyes-Diaz M, Ivanov AG, Mora ML, Alberdi M (2010) Manganese as essential and toxic element for plants: transport, accumulation and resistance mechanisms. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10:470–481. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162010000200008
Mleczek M, Magdziak Z, Rissmann I, Golinski P (2009) Effect of different soil conditions on selected heavy metal accumulation by Salix viminalis tissues. J Environ Sci Heal A 44:1609–1616. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520903263645
Mohsin M, Kuittinen S, Abdus Salam MM, Peräniemi S, Laine S, Pulkkinen P, Kaipiainen E, Vepsäläinen J, Pappinen A (2019) Chelate-assisted phytoextraction: growth and ecophysiological responses by Salix schwerinii E.L Wolf grown in artificially polluted soils. J Geochem Explor 205:106335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.106335
Mrnka L, Kuchár M, Cieslarová Z, Matějka P, Száková J, Tlustoš P, Vosátka M (2012) Effects of endo- and ectomycorrhizal fungi on physiological parameters and heavy metals accumulation of two species from the family Salicaceae. Water Air Soil Poll 223:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0868-8
Nikolić N, Zorić L, Cvetković I, Pajević S, Borišev M, Orlović S, Pilipović A (2017) Assessment of cadmium tolerance and phytoextraction ability in young Populus deltoides L. and Populus × euramericana plants through morpho-anatomical and physiological responses to growth in cadmium enriched soil. iForest 10:635–644. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2165-010
Nissim WG, Palm E, Mancuso S, Azzarello E (2019) Trace element partitioning in a poplar phytoextraction stand in relation to stem size. J Environ Manage 247:688–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.105
O’Connor D, Zheng X, Hou D, Shen Z, Li G, Miao G, O’Connell S, Guo M (2019) Phytoremediation: Climate change resilience and sustainability assessment at a coastal brownfield redevelopment. Environ Int 130:104945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104945
Pajević S, Borišev M, Nikolić N, Krstić B, Pilipović A, Orlović S (2009) Phytoremediation capacity of poplar (Polulus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) clones in relation to photosynthesis. Arch Biol Sci 61:239–247. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS0902239P
Parihar JK, Parihar PK, Pakade YB, Katnoria JK (2021) Bioaccumulation potential of indigenous plants for heavy metal phytoremediation in rural areas of Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, Punjab (India). Environ Sci Pollut R 28:2426–2442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10454-3
Pierzynyki GM, Schnoor JL, Youngman A, Licht L, Erickson LE (2002) Poplar trees for phytostabilization of abandoned zinc-lead smelter. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 6:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2002)6:3(177)
Pietrini F, Di Baccio D, Iori V, Veliksar S, Lemanova N, Juškaitė L, Maruška A, Zacchini M (2017) Investigation on metal tolerance and phytoremoval activity in the poplar hybrid clone “Monviso” under Cu-spiked water: potential use for wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 592:412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.101
Pietrini F, Zacchini M, Iori V, Pietrosanti L, Bianconi D, Massacci A (2010) Screening of poplar clones for cadmium phytoremediation using photosynthesis, biomass and cadmium content analyses. Int J Phytoremediat 12:105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510902767163
Pilipović A, Zalesny RS Jr, Rončević S, Nikolić N, Orlović S, Beljin J, Katanić M (2019) Growth, physiology, and phytoextraction potential of poplar and willow established in soils amended with heavy-metal contaminated, dredged river sediments. J Environ Manage 239:352–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.072
Podar D, Ramsey MH, Hutchings MJ (2004) Effect of cadmium, zinc and substrate heterogeneity on yield, shoot metal concentration and metal uptake by Brassica juncea: implications for human health risk assessment and phytoremediation. New Phytol 163:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01122.x
Pottier M, García de la Torre VS, Victor C, David LC, Chalot M, Thomine S (2015) Genotypic variations in the dynamics of metal concentrations in poplar leaves: a field study with a perspective on phytoremediation. Environ Pollut 199:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.010
Pulford D, Watson C (2003) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees – a review. Environ Int 29:529–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00152-6
Qasim B, Motelica-Heino M, Bourgerie S, Gauthier A, Morabito D (2016) Rhizosphere effects of Populus euramericana Dorskamp on the mobility of Zn, Pb and Cd in contaminated technosols. J Soil Sediment 16:811–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1270-8
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
Rafati M, Khorasani N, Moattar F, Shirvany A, Moraghebi F, Hosseinzadeh S (2011) Phytoremediation potential of Populus alba and Morus alba for cadmium, chromium and nickel absorption from polluted soil. Int J Environ Res 5:961–970. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJER.2011.453
Ram NM, McTiernan L, Kinney L (2013) Estimating remediation costs at contaminated sites with varying amounts of available information. Remediation J 23:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21365
Radojčić Redovniković I, De Marco A, Proietti C, Hanousek K, Sedak M, Bilandžić N, Jakovljević T (2017) Poplar response to cadmium and lead soil contamination. Ecotox Environ Safe 144:482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.011
Renninger HJ, Wadhwa S, Gallagher FJ, Vanderklein D, Schäfer KVR (2013) Allometry and photosynthetic capacity of poplar (Populus deltoides) along a metal contamination gradient in an urban brownfield. Urban Ecosyst 16:247–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0259-y
Robinson BH, Mills TM, Petit D, Fung LE, Green SR, Clothier BE (2000) Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: implications for phytoremediation. Plant Soil 227:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026515007319
Ruttens A, Boulet J, Weyens N, Smeets K, Adriaensen K, Meers E, Van Slycken S, Tack F, Meiresonne L, Thewys T, Witters N, Carleer R, Dupae J, Vangronsveld J (2011) Short rotation coppice culture of willows and poplars as energy crops on metal contaminated agricultural soils. Int J Phytoremediat 13:194–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2011.568543
Saba G, Parizanganeh AH, Zamani A, Saba J (2015) Phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated environments: screening for native accumulator plants in Zanjan-Iran. Int. J Environ Res 9:309–316
Salminen R, Plant J, Reeder S et al (2006) FOREGS Geochemical atlas of Europe. Part 1, Background information, methodology and maps. Espoo, Finland, Geological Survey of Finland
Sarma H, Islam NF, Prasad R, Prasad MNV, Ma LQ, Rinklebe J (2021) Enhancing phytoremediation of hazardous metal(loid)s using genome engineering CRISPR–Cas9 technology. J Hazard Mater 414:125493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125493
Scheid S, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Schulin R, Nowack B (2009) Accumulation and solubility of metals during leaf litter decomposition in non-polluted and polluted soil. Eur J Soil Sci 60Í:613–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01153.x
Sebastiani L, Scebba F, Tognetti R (2004) Heavy metal accumulation and growth responses in poplar clones Eridano (Populus deltoides × maximowiczii) and I-214 (P. × euramericana) exposed to industrial waste. Environ Exp Bot 52:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.01.003
Shakoor MB, Ali S, Farid M, Farooq MA, Tauqeer HM, Iftikhar U, Hannan F, Bharwana SA (2013) Heavy metal pollution, a global problem and its remediation by chemically enhanced phytoremediation: A Review. J Biodiv Environ Sci 3:12–20
Shikha D, Singh PK (2021) In situ phytoremediation of heavy metal–contaminated soil and groundwater: a green inventive approach. Environ Sci Pollut R 28:4104–4124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11600-7
Shim D, Kim S, Choi YI, Song WY, Park J, Youk ES, Jeong SC, Martinoia E, Noh EW, Lee Y (2013) Transgenic poplar trees expressing yeast cadmium factor 1 exhibit the characteristics necessary for the phytoremediation of mine tailing soil. Chemosphere 90:1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.044
Shukla OP, Juwarkar AA, Singh SK, Khan S, Rai UN (2011) Growth responses and metal accumulation capabilities of woody plants during the phytoremediation of tannery sludge. Waste Manage 31:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.08.022
Simon E, Vidic A, Braun M, Fábián I, Tóthmérész B (2013) Trace element concentrations in soils along urbanization gradients in the city of Wien, Austria. Environ Sci Pollut R 20:917–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1091-x
Simon L, Makádi M, Uri Z, Vigh S, Irinyiné-Oláh K, Vincze G, Tóth C (2022) Phytoextraction of toxic elements and chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves of energy willow (Salix sp.), treated with wastewater solids and wood ash. Agrokem es Talajt 71:77–99. https://doi.org/10.1556/0088.2022.00122
Skála J, Vácha R, Čupr P (2018) Which compounds contribute most to elevated soil pollution and the corresponding health risks in floodplains in the headwater areas of the Central European watershed? Int J Env Res Pub He 15:1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061146
Stobrawa K, Lorenc-Plucińska G (2008) Thresholds of heavy-metal toxicity in cuttings of European black poplar (Populus nigra L.) determined according to antioxidant status of fine roots and morphometrical disorders. Sci Total Environ 390:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.024
Suman J, Uhlik O, Viktorova J, Macek T (2018) Phytoextraction of heavy metals: a promising tool for clean-up of polluted environment? Front Plant Sci 9:1476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01476
Švec P, Kováčik J, Hedbavný J, Babula P, Rotková G, Klejdus B (2016) Impact of anions, cations, and pH on manganese accumulation and toxicity in the green alga Scenedesmus quadricauda. Water Air Soil Poll 227:161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2859-2
Szuba A, Lorenc-Plucińska G (2017) Field proteomics of Populus alba grown in a heavily modified environment – an example of a tannery waste landfill. Sci Total Environ 610-611:1557–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.102
Tan LC, Choa V, Tay JH (1997) The influence of pH on mobility of heavy metals from municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash. Environ Monit Assess 44:275–284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005744811206
Tangahu BV, Abdullah SRS, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M (2011) A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int J Chem Eng 2011:939161. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/939161
Thakur S, Singh L, Wahid ZA, Siddiqui MF, Atnaw SM, Din MFM (2016) Plant-driven removal of heavy metals from soil: uptake, translocation, tolerance mechanism, challenges, and future perspectives. Environ Monit Assess 188:206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5211-9
Tkalec M, Štefanić PP, Cvjetko P, Šikić S, Pavlica M, Balen B (2014) The effects of cadmium-zinc interactions on biochemical responses in tobacco seedlings and adult plants. Plos One 9:e87582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087582
Todeschini V, Lingua G, D`Agostino G, Carniato F, Roccotiello E, Berta G (2011) Effects of high zinc concentration on poplar leaves: A morphological and biochemical study. Environ Exp Bot 71:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.018
Tőzsér D, Magura T, Simon E (2017) Heavy metal uptake by plant parts of willow species: a meta-analysis. J Hazard Mater 336:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.068
Tőzsér D, Magura T, Simon E, Mizser S, Papp D, Tóthmérész B (2019) Pollution intensity-dependent metal accumulation in ground beetles: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:32092–32102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06294-5
Trippe RC, Pilon-Smits EAH (2021) Selenium transport and metabolism in plants: Phytoremediation and biofortification implications. J Hazard Mater 404:124178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124178
Vandecasteele B, Lauriks R, De Vos B, Tack FMG (2003) Cd and Zn concentration in hybrid poplar foliage and leaf beetles grown on polluted sediment-derived soils. Environ Monit Assess 89:263–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026199315337
Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
Villette C, Maurer L, Delecolle J, Zumsteg J, Erhardt M, Heintz D (2019) In situ localization of micropollutants and associated stress response in Populus nigra leaves. Environ Int 126:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.066
Vollenweider P, Menard T, Günthardt-Goerg MS (2011) Compartmentation of metals in foliage of Populus tremula grown on soils with mixed contamination. I. From the tree crown to leaf cell level. Environ Pollut 159:324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.07.013
Wang M, Yang Y, Chen W (2018) Manganese, zinc, and pH affect cadmium accumulation in rice grain under field conditions in Southern China. J Environ Qual 47:306–311. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.06.0237
Wei Z, Van Le Q, Peng W, Yang Y, Yang H, Gu H, Lam SS, Sonne C (2021) A review on phytoremediation of contaminants in air, water and soil. J Hazard Mater 403:123658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123658
Wu F, Yang W, Zhang J, Zhou L (2010) Cadmium accumulation and growth responses of a poplar (Populus deltoides × Populus nigra) in cadmium contaminated purple soil and alluvial soil. J Hazard Mater 177:268–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.028
Xue K, Van Nostrand JD, Zhou J, Neu S, Müller I, Giagnoni L, Renella G (2020) Phytomanagement reduces metal availability and microbial metal resistance in a metal contaminated soil. Front Microbiol 7:1899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01899
Zárubová P, Hejcman M, Vondráčková S, Mrnka L, Száková J, Tlustoš P (2015) Distribution of P, K, Ca, Mg, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn in wood and bark age classes of willows and poplars used for phytoextraction on soils contaminated by risk elements. Environ Sci Pollut R 22:18801–18813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5043-0
Zhai X, Li Z, Huang B, Luo N, Huang M, Zhang Q, Zeng G (2018) Remediation of multiple heavy metal-contaminated soil through the combination of soil washing and in situ immobilization. Sci Total Environ 635:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.119
Zojaji F, Hassani AH, Sayadi MH (2015) A comparative study on heavy metal content of plants irrigated with tap and wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Te 12:865–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0698-5
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Debrecen. This work was supported by the New National Excellence Program (ÚNKP) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the Natural Research, Development and Innovation Fund (Receiver: Dávid Tőzsér; grant number: ÚNKP-21-4-II-DE-142).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dávid Tőzsér: data collection, statistical analyses, and writing and editing; Roland Horváth: data collection, and writing and editing; Edina Simon: conceptualization, and writing and editing; Tibor Magura: methodology, statistical analyses, and writing and editing. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Elena Maestri
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tőzsér, D., Horváth, R., Simon, E. et al. Heavy metal uptake by plant parts of Populus species: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 69416–69430 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27244-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27244-2