Abstract
Due to the rise in clothing consumption per person and growing consumer awareness of environmental issues with products, the textile industry must adopt new practices for improving sustainability. The current study thoroughly investigates the benefits of using organic cotton fiber instead of conventional cotton fiber. Because of the extensive use of natural resources in the production of cotton, the primary raw material for textiles, which accounts for the environmental effects of a pair of jeans, a life cycle assessment methodology was used to examine these effects in four different scenarios. The additional scenarios were chosen based on the user preferences for washing temperatures, drying methods, and the type of cotton fiber used in the product. The environmental impact categories of global warming potential, eutrophication potential terrestrial ecotoxicity potential, acidification potential, and freshwater ecotoxicity potential were analyzed by the CML-IA method. The life cycle assessment results revealed that the lowest environmental impacts were obtained for scenario 4 with 100% organic cotton fiber with an improvement of 87% in terrestrial ecotoxicity potential and 59% in freshwater ecotoxicity potential. All of the selected environmental impacts of a pair of jeans are reduced in all scenarios when organic cotton is used. Additionally, consumer habits had a significant impact on all impact categories. Using a drying machine instead of a line dryer during the use phase is just as important as the washing temperature. The environmental impact hotspots for a pair of jeans were revealed to be the eutrophication potential, acidification potential, and global warming potential categories during the use phase, and the terrestrial ecotoxicity potential and freshwater ecotoxicity potential categories during the fabric manufacturing including cotton cultivation. The use of organic cotton as a raw material in manufacturing processes, as well as consumer preferences for washing temperature and drying methods, appears to have significant environmental impacts on a pair of jeans’ further sustainable life cycle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- LCA :
-
Life cycle assessment
- LCI :
-
Life cycle inventory
- LCIA :
-
Life cycle impact assessment
- GWP :
-
Global warming potential
- EP :
-
Eutrophication potential
- TEP :
-
Terrestrial ecotoxicity potential
- AP :
-
Acidification potential
- FAEP :
-
Freshwater ecotoxicity potential
- CO2 eq.:
-
Carbon dioxide equivalent
- 1.4-DB Eq.:
-
1,4 Dichlorobenzene equivalent
- SO2 eq.:
-
Sulfur dioxide
- PO4 eq.:
-
Phosphate-equivalent
References
A.I.S.E (2013) I prefer 30° the case for the “A.I.S.E. Low Temperature Washing Initiative” substantiation dossier. Accessed 15 February 2021
Allwood JM et al (2006) ‘Well dressed’, the present and future sustainability of clothing and textiles in the United Kingdom, 1. Journal of the Home Economics Institute of Australia 22(1):42
Arçelik (2021a) ‘Drying Machine User Manual’
Arçelik (2021b) ‘Washing Machine User Manual’
Åslund Hedman E (2018) Comparative life cycle assessment of jeans: a case study performed at Nudie Jeans. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Baumann H, Tillman AM (2004) The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.02.008
Baydar G, Ciliz N, Mammadov A (2015) Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007
Bevilacqua M et al (2014) Environmental analysis of a cotton yarn supply chain. J Clean Prod 82:154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.082
Braun G et al (2021) Environmental consequences of closing the textile loop—life cycle assessment of a circular polyester jacket. Appl Sci 11(7):2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11072964
Browne M et al (2005) Life cycle assessment in the supply chain: a review and case study. Transp Rev 25(6):761–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500360993
Chapagain AK et al (2006) The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecol Econ 60(1):186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
CLC EN (2020) ‘60456:2016/A11:2020 Clothes washing machines for household use - methods for measuring the performance
Collins M, Aumônier S (2002) Streamlined life cycle assessment of two Marks & Spencer plc apparel products. https://researchingsustainability.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/streamlined-lca-of-2-marks-spencer-pls-apparel-products.pdf. Accessed 26 October 2021
Dahlbo H et al (2017) Increasing textile circulation—consequences and requirements. Sustainable Production and Consumption 9:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.06.005
Daystar J et al (2019) Quantifying apparel consumer use behavior in six countries: addressing a data need in life cycle assessment modeling. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management 11(1)
De Saxce M, Pesnel S, Perwuelz A (2012) LCA of bed sheets–some relevant parameters for lifetime assessment. J Clean Prod 37:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.012
Downey L (2014) ‘A short history of denim. Levi Strauss & Co’, Historian https://www.levistrauss.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/A-Short-History-of-Denim2.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2021
Esteve-Turrillas FA, de La Guardia M (2017) Environmental impact of recover cotton in textile industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 116:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.034
European Commission EC (2019) Document 32019R2014: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2014 of 11 March 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of household washing machines and household washer-dryers and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1061/2010 and Commission Directive 96/60/EC (Text with EEA relevance.)
Fidan FŞ, Aydoğan EK, Uzal N (2021a) An integrated life cycle assessment approach for denim fabric production using recycled cotton fibers and combined heat and power plant. J Clean Prod 287:125439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125439
Fidan FŞ, Aydoğan EK, Uzal N (2021b) Multi-dimensional sustainability evaluation of ındigo rope dyeing with a life cycle approach and hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J Clean Prod 309:127454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127454
Giagnorio M et al (2017) Environmental impacts of detergents and benefits of their recovery in the laundering industry. J Clean Prod 154:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.012
Global Fashion Agenda & Boston Consulting Group (2017) Pulse of the Fashion Industry, Available at: https://www.copenhagenfashionsummit.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/05/Pulse-of-the-Fashion-Industry_2017.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2021
Grosso M, Motta A, Rigamonti L (2010) Efficiency of energy recovery from waste incineration, in the light of the new Waste Framework Directive. Waste Manage 30(7):1238–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.036
Guinée JB, Lindeijer E (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978897
Hackett T (2015) A comparative life cycle assessment of denim jeans and a cotton T-shirt: the production of fast fashion essential items from cradle to gate. Dissertation, University of Kentucky
Ibrahim NA, Eid BM (2018) Emerging technologies for source reduction and end-of-pipe treatments of cotton based textile industry. Handbook of textile effluent remediation. New York: Pan Stanford Publishing, Taylor & Francis Group: 185–202
Ingram M (2002) Producing the natural fiber naturally: technological change and the US organic cotton industry. Agric Hum Values 19(4):325–336. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021140001193
ISO (2006a) ‘14044’, Environmental management: life cycle assessment; requirements and guidelines, 14044
ISO (2006b) ‘14040’, Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework, pp. 235–248
Jack T (2013) Laundry routine and resource consumption in Australia. Int J Consum Stud 37(6):666–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12048
Kalliala EM, Nousiainen P (1999) Environmental profile of cotton and polyester-cotton fabrics. AUTEX Research Journal 1(1):8–20
Kazan H, Akgul D, Kerc A (2020) Life cycle assessment of cotton woven shirts and alternative manufacturing techniques. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22(4):849–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01826-x
Khan EAN et al (2018) Lifecycle analysis (LCA) of a white cotton T-shirt and ınvestigation of sustainability hot spots: a case study. London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal 18(3):21–31
Koligkioni A et al (2018) Environmental assessment of end-of-life textiles in Denmark. Procedia CIRP 69:962–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.090
La Rosa AD, Grammatikos SA (2019) Comparative life cycle assessment of cotton and other natural fibers for textile applications. Fibers 7(12):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7120101
Laitala K, Klepp IG (2016) Wool wash: technical performance and consumer habits. Tenside, Surfactants, Deterg 53(5):458–469. https://doi.org/10.3139/113.110457
Laitala K, Klepp IG, Henry B (2017) Use phase of apparel: a literature review for Life Cycle Assessment with focus on wool. SIFO: Oslo, Norway, p. 162
Laitala K, Klepp IG, Henry B (2018) Does use matter? Comparison of environmental impacts of clothing based on fiber type. Sustainability 10(7):2524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072524
Levänen J et al (2021) Innovative recycling or extended use? Comparing the global warming potential of different ownership and end-of-life scenarios for textiles. Environ Res Lett 16(5):054069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfac3
Levi Strauss (2015) The life cycle of jean: understanding the environmental ımpact of a pair of Levi’s 501 Jeans
Moazzem S et al (2018) Assessing environmental impact of textile supply chain using life cycle assessment methodology. The Journal of the Textile Institute 109(12):1574–1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2018.1434113
Moazzem S et al (2021) Life cycle assessment of apparel consumption in Australia. Rigas Tehniskas Universitates Zinatniskie Raksti 25(1):71–111. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0006
Morita AM et al (2020) Assessment of potential alternatives for improving environmental trouser jeans manufacturing performance in Brazil. J Clean Prod 247:119156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119156
Nellström M, Sarclca M (2019) A comparative life cycle assessment of Nudie Jeans’ repair and reuse concept. Dissertation, Chalmers University Of Technology
Pakula C, Stamminger R (2010) Electricity and water consumption for laundry washing by washing machine worldwide. Energ Effi 3(4):365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9072-8
Patwary SU (2020) An investigation of the substitution rate and environmental impact associated with secondhand clothing consumption in the United States. Kansas State University
Periyasamy AP, Militky J (2017) Denim and consumers’ phase of life cycle. in Sustainability in denim. Elsevier: 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00010-1
Pré Consultants (2016) Simapro Software. Available at: https://network.simapro.com/esuservices
Roos S et al (2015) Environmental assessment of Swedish fashion consumption. Five garments–sustainable futures. Mistra Future Fashion. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30502.27205
Samani P, van der Meer Y (2020) Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on flame retardants: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 274:123259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123259
Sandin G, Peters GM (2018) Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling–a review. J Clean Prod 184:353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266
Scheffer MR (2001) A sustainable vision on the cotton industry after 2005. Proceedings of the Speech Held at the General Assembly of EUROCOTON, Brussels, Belgium, 30
Shen L, Patel MK (2010) Life cycle assessment of man-made cellulose fibres. Lenzinger Berichte 88:1–59
Shen L, Worrell E, Patel MK (2010) Open-loop recycling: a LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(1):34–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.014
Shui S, Plastina A (2013) World apparel fiber consumption survey. FAO and ICAC, Tech. https://sewitagain.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/FAO-ICAC-Survey-2013-Update-and-2011-Text.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2021
Sipperly E et al (2019) Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic cotton cultivation for the production of a t-shirt
Textile Exchange (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of organic cotton-a global average. https://www.ajsosteniblebcn.cat/the-life-cycle-assessment-of-organic-cotton-fiber_38172.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2021
Thinkstep Sustainability Solutions (2019) Life cycle assessment of cotton cultivation systems better cotton, conventional cotton and organic cotton. Available at: https://www.laudesfoundation.org/en/resources/4332environmentallcareportjune19.pdf
Vakıf Investment (2018) Durable goods industry report. Available at: https://www.vkyanaliz.com/Files/docs/durablesreports-636612958058593677.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2021
van der Velden NM, Patel MK, Vogtländer JG (2014) LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19(2):331–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0626-9
Walser T et al (2011) Prospective environmental life cycle assessment of nanosilver T-shirts. Environ Sci Technol 45(10):4570–4578. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2001248
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Wiedemann S, Biggs L, Nebel B et al (2020) Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 25(8):1486–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01766-0
Yasin S, Behary N, Curti M et al (2016a) Global consumption of flame retardants and related environmental concerns: a study on possible mechanical recycling of flame retardant textiles. Fibers 4(2):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib4020016
Yasin S, Behary N, Rovero G et al (2016b) Statistical analysis of use-phase energy consumption of textile products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(12):1776–1788
Yasin S et al (2018) Life cycle assessment of flame retardant cotton textiles with optimized end-of-life phase. J Clean Prod 172:1080–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.198
Yasin S, Sun D (2019) Propelling textile waste to ascend the ladder of sustainability: EOL study on probing environmental parity in technical textiles. J Clean Prod 233:1451–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.009
Zamani B, Sandin G, Peters GM (2017) Life cycle assessment of clothing libraries: can collaborative consumption reduce the environmental impact of fast fashion. J Clean Prod 162:1368–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.128
Zhang Y, Liu X, Xiao R et al (2015) Life cycle assessment of cotton T-shirts in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(7):994–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0889-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Fatma Şener Fidan: execute the experimental works, prepare manuscript, and edits. Emel Kızılkaya Aydoğan: prepare manuscript, edits, review, and supervision. Niğmet Uzal: prepare manuscript, edits, review, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Loubet
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Şener Fidan, F., Kızılkaya Aydoğan, E. & Uzal, N. The impact of organic cotton use and consumer habits in the sustainability of jean production using the LCA approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 8853–8867 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22872-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22872-6