Abstract
Through an analogy with the Budyko curves in catchment hydrology science, this study defines the supply and demand limits for the flocculation system of cohesive particles (the supply limit can be represented by the potential floc size growth, whereas the demand limit can be represented by the steady-state floc size) and attempts to adopt Budyko-type models to estimate the temporal evolution of floc size during flocculation. Seventeen experimental datasets are collected to test the accuracy of the Budyko model with an average high correlation coefficient of 0.9784 and average low relative error and root mean squared error values of 0.1304 and 0.0605, respectively. Either the potential floc size growth or the steady-state floc size is a monotonic function of the flow shear rate, and a simple empiric power law function can be used to describe them. Other Budyko-type models are also found to show good prediction accuracies against the experimental datasets. This study indicates that Budyko-type models have potential as a good addition to existing flocculation models for predicting the temporal variation in the size population of flocs in a turbulent flow, provided that some coefficients have been calibrated by limited data points prior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All of data and material are provided in the text.
References
Ahn JH (2012) Size distribution and settling velocities of suspended particles in a tidal embayment. Water Res 46:3219–3228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.038
Biggs C, Lant P, Hounslow M (2003) Modelling the effect of shear history on activated sludge flocculation. Water Sci Technol 47:251–257. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0612
Biggs CA, Lant PA (2000) Activated sludge flocculation: on-line determination of floc size and the effect of shear. Water Res 34:2542–2550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00431-5
Budyko MI (1958) The heat balance of the earth’s surface. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
Budyko MI (1974) Climate and Life. Academic, New York
Burban PY, Lick W, Lick J (1989) The flocculation of fine-grained sediments in estuarine waters. J Geophys Res 94:8323–8330. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC06p08323
Chaignon V, Lartiges BS, El Samrani A, Mustin C (2002) Evolution of size distribution and transfer of mineral particles between flocs in activated sludges: an insight into floc exchange dynamics. Water Res 36:676–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00266-4
Choudhury BJ (1999) Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model. J Hydrol 216:99–110
Daly E, Calabrese S, Yin J, Porporato A 2019 Linking parametric and water-balance models of the Budyko and Turc spaces. Adv Water Resour 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103435
Dyer KR 1989 Sediment processes in estuaries: future research requirements. J Geophys Res 94. https://doi.org/10.1029/jc094ic10p14327
Fang H, Chen Y, Huang L, He G (2017) Biofilm growth on cohesive sediment deposits: laboratory experiment and model validation. Hydrobiologia 799:261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3224-1
Fawell PD, Nguyen TV, Solnordal CB, Stephens DW 2019 Enhancing gravity thickener feedwell design and operation for optimal flocculation through the application of computational fluid dynamics. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev, pp 1-15https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2019.1678156
Fu BP (1981) On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface [in Chinese]. Sci Atmos Sin 5(1):23–31
Gan G, Liu Y, Sun G 2021 Understanding interactions among climate, water, and vegetation with the Budyko framework. Earth-Science Rev 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103451
Gratiot N, Bildstein A, Anh TT, Thoss H, Denis H, Michallet H, Apel H (2017) Sediment flocculation in the Mekong River estuary, Vietnam, an important driver of geomorphological changes. Comptes Rendus - Geosci 349:260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2017.09.012
Gregory J (2004) Monitoring floc formation and breakage. Water Sci Technol 50:163–170. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0709
Guérin L, Coufort-Saudejaud C, Liné A, Frances C (2017) Dynamics of aggregate size and shape properties under sequenced flocculation in a turbulent Taylor-Couette reactor. J Colloid Interface Sci 491:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.042
Herbert RA (1999) Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 23:563–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00414.x
Hill PS, Newgard JP, Law BA, Milligan TG (2013) Flocculation on a muddy intertidal flat in Willapa Bay, Washington, Part II : observations of suspended particle size in a secondary channel and adjacent flat. Cont Shelf Res 60:S145–S156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.06.006
Jarvis P, Jefferson B, Gregory J, Parsons SA (2005) A review of floc strength and breakage. Water Res 39:3121–3137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.022
Jeldres RI, Fawell PD, Florio BJ (2018) Population balance modelling to describe the particle aggregation process: a review. Powder Technol 326:190–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.033
Jiang C, Xiong L, Wang D, Liu P, Guo S, Xu CY (2015) Separating the impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff using the Budyko-type equations with time-varying parameters. J Hydrol 522:326–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.060
Keyvani A, Strom K (2014) Influence of cycles of high and low turbulent shear on the growth rate and equilibrium size of mud flocs. Mar Geol 354:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2014.04.010
Kim D, Chun JA (2021) Revisiting a two-parameter budyko equation with the complementary evaporation principle for proper consideration of surface energy balance. Water Resour Res 57:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030838
Kranenburg C (1999) Effects of floc strength on viscosity and deposition of cohesive sediment suspensions. Cont Shelf Res 19:1665–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(98)00095-8
Kuprenas R, Tran D, Strom K 2018 A shear-limited flocculation model for dynamically. pp 6736–6752. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014154
Lai H, Fang H, Huang L, He G, Reible D (2018) A review on sediment bioflocculation: dynamics, influencing factors and modeling. Sci Total Environ 642:1184–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.101
Lhomme JP, Moussa R (2016) Matching the Budyko functions with the complementary evaporation relationship: consequences for the drying power of the air and the Priestley-Taylor coefficient. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:4857–4865. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4857-2016
Li D, Li Z, Gao Z (2019) Quadrature-based moment methods for the population balance equation: an algorithm review. Chinese J Chem Eng 27:483–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.11.028
Li W, Yang S, Hu J, Fu X, Zhang P (2016) Field measurements of settling velocities of fine sediments in Three Gorges Reservoir using ADV. Int J Sediment Res 31:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2016.05.002
Liang L, Peng Y, Tan J, Xie G (2015) A review of the modern characterization techniques for flocs in mineral processing. Miner Eng 84:130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2015.10.011
Liu D, Edraki M, Fawell P, Berry L (2020) Improved water recovery: a review of clay-rich tailings and saline water interactions. Powder Technol 364:604–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.01.039
Liu WC (2005) Modeling the influence of settling velocity on cohesive sediment transport in Tanshui River estuary. Environ Geol 47:535–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1176-z
Maggi F (2008) Stochastic flocculation of cohesive sediment: analysis of floc mobility within the floc size spectrum. Water Resour Res 44:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006109
Maggi F 2007 Effect of variable fractal dimension on the floc size distribution of suspended cohesive sediment, pp 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.035
Mezentsev VS (1955) More on the calculation of average total evaporation. Meteorol Gidrol 5:24–26
Mianabadi A, Davary K, Pourreza-Bilondi M, Coenders-Gerrits AMJ (2020) Budyko framework; towards non-steady state conditions. J Hydrol 588:125089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125089
Mietta F, Chassagne C, Manning AJ, Winterwerp JC (2009) Influence of shear rate, organic matter content, pH and salinity on mud flocculation. Ocean Dyn 59:751–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-009-0231-4
Nan J, Wang Z, Yao M, Yang Y, Zhang X (2016) Characterization of re-grown floc size and structure: effect of mixing conditions during floc growth, breakage and re-growth process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:23750–23757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7628-7
Oles V (1992) Shear-induced aggregation and breakup of polystyrene latex particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 154:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(92)90149-G
Ol’dekop EM (1911) On evaporation from the surface of river basins Trans. Meteorol Obs Univ Tartu 4:200
Parker DS, Kaufman WJ, Jenkins D (1972) Floc break-up in turbulent flocculation processes. J Sanit Eng pro Div Am Soc Civ Eng 98(SA1):79–99
Pike JG (1964) The estimation of annual run-off from meteorological data in a tropical climate. J Hydrol 2:116–123
Rau MJ, Ackleson SG, Smith GB (2018) Effects of turbulent aggregation on clay floc breakup and implications for the oceanic environment. PLoS One 13:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207809
Ruan Z, Wu A, Bürger R, Betancourt F, Ordoñez R, Wang J, Wang S, Wang Y (2021) A population balance model for shear-induced polymer-bridging flocculation of total tailings. Minerals 12:40. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010040
Schreiber J (1904) Jesuit Astronomy. Popular Astronomy 12:9–20
Serra T, Casamitjana X (1998) Structure of the aggregates during the process of aggregation and breakup under a shear flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 206:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.5714
Serra T, Colomer J, Casamitjana X (1997) Aggregation and breakup of particles in a shear flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 187:466–473. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.4710
Shang QQ, Fang HW, Zhao HM, He GJ, Cui ZH (2014) Biofilm effects on size gradation, drag coefficient and settling velocity of sediment particles. Int J Sediment Res 29:471–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(14)60060-3
Sharif HO, Crow W, Miller NL, Wood EF (2007) Multidecadal high-resolution hydrologic modeling of the Arkansas-Red River basin. J Hydrometeorol 8(5):1111–1127. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM622.1
Shen X, Lee BJ, Fettweis M, Toorman EA (2018a) A tri-modal flocculation model coupled with TELEMAC for estuarine muds both in the laboratory and in the field. Water Res 145:473–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.062
Shen X, Lin M, Zhu Y, Ha HK, Fettweis M, Hou T, Toorman EA, Maa JPY, Zhang J (2021) A quasi-Monte Carlo based flocculation model for fine-grained cohesive sediments in aquatic environments. Water Res 194:116953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.116953
Shen X, Maa JPY (2016) Numerical simulations of particle size distributions: comparison with analytical solutions and kaolinite flocculation experiments. Mar Geol 379:84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2016.05.014
Shen X, Toorman EA, Lee BJ, Fettweis M (2018b) Biophysical flocculation of suspended particulate matters in Belgian coastal zones. J Hydrol 567:238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.028
Sherwood CR, Aretxabaleta AL, Harris CK, Rinehimer JP, Verney R, Sherwood CCR 2018 Cohesive and mixed sediment in the Regional Ocean Modeling System ( ROMS v3 . 6 ) implemented in the Coupled Ocean – Atmosphere – Wave – Sediment Transport Modeling System ( COAWST r1234), pp 1849–1871
Shin HJ, Son M, Lee GH (2015) Stochastic flocculation model for cohesive sediment suspended in water. Water (Switzerland) 7:2527–2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052527
Slavik I, Müller S, Mokosch R, Azongbilla JA, Uhl W (2012) Impact of shear stress and pH changes on floc size and removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM). Water Res 46:6543–6553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.033
Smoluchowski M (1917) Versuch einer Mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik Kolloider LoÈ sungen. Z Phys Chem 92:129–168
Son M, Hsu TJ (2009) The effect of variable yield strength and variable fractal dimension on flocculation of cohesive sediment. Water Res 43:3582–3592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.016
Son M, Hsu TJ (2008) Flocculation model of cohesive sediment using variable fractal dimension. Environ Fluid Mech 8:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9050-7
Soulsby RL, Manning AJ, Spearman J, Whitehouse RJS (2013) Settling velocity and mass settling flux of flocculated estuarine sediments. Mar Geol 339:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2013.04.006
Spicer PT, Pratsinis SE, Raper J, Amal R, Bushell G, Meesters G (1998) Effect of shear schedule on particle size, density, and structure during flocculation in stirred tanks. Powder Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(97)03389-5
Sporleder F, Borka Z, Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA (2012) On the population balance equation. Rev Chem Eng 28:149–169. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2011-0013
Stone M, Krishnappan BG (2003) Floc morphology and size distributions of cohesive sediment in steady-state flow. Water Res 37:2739–2747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00082-4
Strom K, Keyvani A (2011) An explicit full-range settling velocity equation for mud flocs. J Sediment Res 81:921–934. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2011.62
Tang FHM, Maggi F (2016) A mesocosm experiment of suspended particulate matter dynamics in nutrient- and biomass-affected waters. Water Res 89:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.033
Thomas DN, Judd SJ, Fawcett N (1999) Flocculation modelling: a review. Water Res 33:1579–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00392-3
Tran D, Kuprenas R, Strom K (2018) How do changes in suspended sediment concentration alone influence the size of mud flocs under steady turbulent shearing? Cont Shelf Res 158:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2018.02.008
Tran D, Strom K (2017) Suspended clays and silts: are they independent or dependent fractions when it comes to settling in a turbulent suspension∗. Cont Shelf Res 138:81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2017.02.011
Tsai CH, Iacobellis S, Lick W (1987) Flocculation of fine-grained lake sediments due to a uniform shear stress. J Great Lakes Res 13:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(87)71637-2
Turc L (1954) Le bilan d’eau des sols: relation entre la precipitations, l’evaporation et l’ecoulement. Ann Agronomiques 5:491–569
Vahedi A, Gorczyca B (2012) Predicting the settling velocity of flocs formed in water treatment using multiple fractal dimensions. Water Res 46:4188–4194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.031
Vahedi A, Gorczyca B (2011) Application of fractal dimensions to study the structure of flocs formed in lime softening process. Water Res 45:545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.014
Van de Ven TGM (1989) Colloidal Hydrodynamics. Academic Press Inc., London
Wang B, Shui Y, He M, Liu P (2017) Comparison of flocs characteristics using before and after composite coagulants under different coagulation mechanisms. Biochem Eng J 121:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.01.020
Wang Z, Nan J, Ji X, Yang Y (2018) Effect of the micro-flocculation stage on the flocculation/sedimentation process: the role of shear rate. Sci Total Environ 633:1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.286
Wang Z, Nan J, Yao M, Ren P, Yang Y (2016) Evaluation of kaolin floc characteristics during coagulation process: a case study with a continuous flow device. RSC Adv 6:48745–48752. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra06046c
Winterwerp JC (1998) A simple model for turbulence induced flocculation of cohesive sediment. J Hydraul Res 36:309–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498621
Xiao F, Yi P, Pan XR, Zhang BJ, Lee C (2010) Comparative study of the effects of experimental variables on growth rates of aluminum and iron hydroxide flocs during coagulation and their structural characteristics. Desalination 250:902–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.050
Xiao Y, Wu Z, Cai H, Tang H (2018) Suspended sediment dynamics in a well-mixed estuary: the role of high suspended sediment concentration (SSC) from the adjacent sea area. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 209:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.05.018
Xu C, Dong P (2017) A dynamic model for coastal mud flocs with distributed fractal dimension. J Coast Res 33:218–225. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00110.1
Xu F, Wang DP, Riemer N (2008) Modeling flocculation processes of fine-grained particles using a size-resolved method: comparison with published laboratory experiments. Cont Shelf Res 28:2668–2677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.09.001
Xu H, Pei H, Xiao H, Jin Y, Li X, Hu W, Ma C, Sun J, Li H (2016) Behaviors of Microcystis aeruginosa cells during floc storage in drinking water treatment process. Sci Rep 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34943
Xu W, Gao B (2012) Effect of shear conditions on floc properties and membrane fouling in coagulation/ultrafiltration hybrid process-the significance of Al b species. J Memb Sci 415–416:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.046
Xu W, Gao B, Yue Q, Bo X (2011) Influence of pH on flocs formation, breakage and fractal properties—the role of Al13 polymer. J Water Sustain 1:45–57. https://doi.org/10.11912/jws.1.1.45-57
Xu W, Gao B, Yue Q, Wang Y (2010) Effect of shear force and solution pH on flocs breakage and re-growth formed by nano-Al13 polymer. Water Res 44:1893–1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.029
Yang H, Yang D, Lei Z, Sun F (2008) New analytical derivation of the mean annual water-energy balance equation. Water Resour Res 44:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135
Yi C, Jackson N 2021 A review of measuring ecosystem resilience to disturbance. Environ Res Lett 16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdf09
Yu W, Xu L, Graham N, Qu J 2015 Contribution of Fe3O4nanoparticles to the fouling of ultrafiltration with coagulation pre-treatment. Sci Rep 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13067
Yuan Y, Farnood RR (2010) Strength and breakage of activated sludge flocs. Powder Technol 199:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.11.021
Zhang H, Yang L, Zang X, Cheng S, Zhang X (2019) Effect of shear rate on floc characteristics and concentration factors for the harvesting of Chlorella vulgaris using coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation. Sci Total Environ 688:811–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.321
Zhang L, Brutsaert W (2021) Blending the evaporation precipitation ratio with the complementary principle function for the prediction of evaporation. Water Resour Res 57:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029729
Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37:701–708. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900325
Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes WR, Chiew FHS, Western AW, Briggs PR (2004) A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration. Water Resour Res 40:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002710
Zhao K, Vowinckel B, Hsu TJ, Köllner T, Bai B, Meiburg E (2020) An efficient cellular flow model for cohesive particle flocculation in turbulence. J Fluid Mech 889:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.79
Zhou S, Yu B, Huang Y, Wang G (2015) The complementary relationship and generation of the Budyko functions. Geophys Res Lett 42:1781–1790. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063511
Zhu Z, Peng D (2019) Using Shannon entropy to model turbulence-induced flocculation of cohesive sediment in water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:959–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3462-4
Zhu Z, Dou J (2021) An extended entropic model for cohesive sediment flocculation in a piecewise varied shear environment. Entropy 23:30–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23101263
Funding
This work was supported by the Open Research Foundation of Key Laboratory of the Pearl River Estuary Regulation and Protection of Ministry of Water Resources, China (Grant number: 2021KJ02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and writing-original draft preparation: Zhongfan Zhu.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The author is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record.
Consent to participate
This is to confirm that the author is consent to participate.
Consent for publication
This is to confirm that the author is consent to publish.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Angeles Blanco
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Z. Predicting the flocculation kinetics of fine particles in a turbulent flow using a Budyko-type model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 84268–84286 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21518-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21518-x