Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of the health risk related to exposure to ultrafine, fine, and total particulates and metals in a metal finishing plant

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The materials and byproducts of the processes used in the metal finishing industry are released as particle contaminants into the air in the workplace. The present study aimed to determine the concentrations and size distributions of these particles and of elements chromium, nickel, copper, manganese, cobalt, and lead (Cr, Ni, Cu, Mn, Co, and Pb, respectively) in a metal finishing industry and evaluate their potential health risks. Particles that are airborne from the dipping baths in the plant were sampled using a Sioutas cascade impactor at five different size fractions (PM>2.5, PM1.0–2.5, PM0.5–1.0, PM0.25–0.5, PM<0.25) and gravimetric analyses were conducted on the sampled filters. The GF-AAS 600 graphite atomic absorption spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze the elements and the method of USEPA was used to assess the health risk. The ratio of fine particles (PM2.5) to total suspended particles (TSPs) was 0.6. We observed that 50% of TSPs were composed of PM1.0 and that 68–88% of the metals were found in the fine particle fractions. Pb, Cr, and Mn were significantly positively correlated in the PM1.0 fraction, and the highest linear relationship was found between Pb and Cr (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). The total hazard quotient (HQ) for PM2.5 was 1.43, which is higher than the acceptable limit of 1.0. The excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) for hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) in PM2.5 was 6.09 × 10-5 for female workers and 6.54 × 10-5 for male workers, which are higher than the acceptable limit of 1.0 × 10-6, while total ELCRs for female and male workers were 6.21 × 10-5 and 6.21 × 10-5, respectively. The lifetime cancer risk associated with Cr(VI) in Cr electroplating plants should be taken into consideration as a significant health risk for the workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida SM, Félix PM, Franco C, Freitas MC, Barreiros A, Alves L, Garcia SM, Pinheiro T (2010) Using the exhaled breath condensate as a tool for non-invasive evaluation of pollutant exposure. Int J Environ Health 4:293–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bağlarbunarı P (2010) Air quality in workplace of an aluminum whell production plant, PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İzmir, Turkey

  • Bonin MP, Holve DJ (1996) Measuring particle size and concentration emissions from electroplating processes. Met Finish 94(10):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin MP, Flower WL, Renzi RF, Peng LW (1995) Size and concentration measurements of particles produced in commercial chromium plating processes. Air Waste Manag 45:902–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlaza LJS, Cosep EMR, Kim S, Lee K, Joo H, Park M, Bate D, Cayetano MG, Park K (2018) Oxidative potential of fine ambient particles in various environments. Environ Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bright P, Burge PS, O’Hickey SP, Gannon PFG, Robertson AS, Boran A (1997) Occupational asthma due to chrome and nickel electroplating. Thorax 52:28–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caglieri A, Goldoni M, Acampa O, Andreoli R, Vettori MV, Corradi M, Apostoli P, Mutti A (2005) The effect of inhaled chromium on different exhaled breath condensate biomarkers among chrome-plating workers. Environ Health Perspect 114(4):542–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) (2016) Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Nickel compounds. oehha.ca.gov/chemicals/nickel-compounds. Accessed in: 14.10.2018

  • ÇSGB (The Ministry of Labor and Social Security)( 2013a) Regulation on health and safety protections in working with chemicals. www.mevzuat.gov.tr. Accessed in June 2018

  • ÇSGB (The Ministry of Labor and Social Security) (2013b) Regulation on protections from dust. http://www.csgb.gov.tr/csgbPortal/isggm.portal?page = mevzuat&id = 3. Accessed in May 2018

  • Dahlman-Höglund A, Lindgren Å, Mattsby-Baltzer I (2016) Endotoxin in size-separated metal working fluid aerosol particles. Ann Occup Hyg 60(7):836–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon T (2004) Metalworking fluid-the toxicity of a complex mixture. J Toxicol Environ Health A 67(3):209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hengstler JG, Bolm-Audorff U, Faldum A, Janssen K, Reifenrath M, Götte W, Jung D, Mayer-Popken O, Fuchs J, Gebhard S, Bienfait HG, Schlink K, Dietrich C, Faust D, Epe B, Oesch F (2003) Occupational exposure to heavy metals: DNA damage induction and DNA repair inhibition prove co-exposures to cadmium, cobalt and lead as more dangerous than hitherdo expected. Carcinogenesis 24(1):63–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Pellón A, Nischkauer W, Limbeck A, Fernández-Olmo I (2018) Metal (loid) bioaccessibility and inhalation risk assessment: a comparison between an urban and an industrial area. Environ Res 165:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsien-Wen K, Jim-Shoung L, Tsai-In L (1997) Concentration and size distribution of airborne hexavalent chromium in electroplating factories. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 58:29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Agency Research on Cancer (IARC) (2006) Inorganic and organic lead compounds, monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 87th edn. Stylus Publishing, LLC, Sterling

    Google Scholar 

  • International Agency Research on Cancer (IARC) (2012) A review of human carcinogens, Part C:arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts, 100. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. pp 499

  • Koropchak JA, Roychowdhury SB (1990) Evidence for aerosol Ionic redistribution within aerosols produced by chrome electroplating. Environ Sci Technol 24:1861–1863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo HW, Lai JS, Lin TI (1997) Nasal septum lesions and lung function in workers exposed to chromic acid in electroplating factories. Int Arch Occup Environ Health

  • Lin SC, Tai CC, Chan CC, Wang JD (1994) Nasal septum lesions caused by chromium exposure among chromium electroplating workers. Am J Ind Med 26(2):221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes M, Pereira Maia EC, Filho SS, Albinati C (2002) Assessment of occupational exposure and contamination by means of airborne particulate matter and biomonitors using k0 instrumental neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 254(3):499–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni Bandpi A, Eslami A, Shahsavani A, Khodagholi F, Aliaghaei A, Alinejad A (2017) Water-soluble and organic extracts of ambient PM2.5 in Tehran air: assessment of genotoxic effects on human lung epithelial cells (A549) by the Comet assay. Toxin Rev 36(2):116–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavian NA, Mansouri N, Nezhadkurki F (2017) Estimation of heavy metal exposure in workplace and health risk exposure assessment in steel industries in Iran. Measurement 102:286–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemery B (1990) Metal toxicity and the respiratory tract. Eur Respir J 3:202–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH, (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) (1998) https://www.osha.gov/dsg/annotated-pels/tablez-1.html#z-1. Accessed in March 2018

  • Pavloska I, Martinsone Z, Vanadzins I, Martinsone I, Seile A, Sudmalis P (2016) Occupational exposure parameters for characterization of nanoparticulate matter toxicity: metal versus wood processing. Proccess Saf Environ Protect 102:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilat MJ, Pegnam RC (2006) Particle emissions from Chrome plating. Aerosol Sci Technol 40:639–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajput P, Izhar S, Gupta T (2018) Deposition modelling of ambient aerosols in human respiratory system: Health implication of fine particles penetration into pulmonary region. Atmos Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.08.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roff M, Bagon DA, Chambers H, Dilworth EM, Warren N (2004) Dermal exposure to electroplating fluids and metalworking fluids in the UK. Ann Occup Hyg 48(3-1):209–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin AÜ, Kurutaş B (2012) Assessment of fine particulate matter and gaseous pollutants in workplace atmosphere of metallic industry. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89(4):898–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Johnson G, Harbison RD (2015) Human health risk characterization of petroleum coke calcining facility emissions. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73(3):706–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taner S, Pekey B, Pekey H (2013) Fine particulate matter in the indoor air of barbeque restaurants: Elemental compositions, sources and health risks. SciTotal Environ 1;454–455:79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tola S, Kilpiö J, Virtamo M (1979) Urinary and plasma concentrations of nickel as indicators of exposure to nickel in an electroplating shop. J Occup Med 21(3):184–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai PJ, Werner MA, Vincent JH, Maldonado G (1996) Worker exposure to nickel-containing aerosol in two electroplating shops: comparison between inhalable and total aerosol. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 11:484–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TUIK (2019) Turkish Statistical Institute. Available online: http://tuik.gov.tr/Start.do. Accessed on 25 September 2019

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1996) AP 42, Fifth Edition. Compilation of air pollutants emission factors, Volume 1, Chapter 12: Metallurgical industry, final section-Supplement B, July 1996.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1987) National Center for Environmental Assessment. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Chemical assessment Summary, Status of data for Chromium (VI)

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1991) Office of solid waste and emergency response, role of the baseline risk assessment in Superfund remedy selection decisions. Oswer Directive 9355.0-30. Washington DC: EPA

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2009) Risk assessment guidance for Superfund: Volume I-human health evaluation manual (Part F, supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment). Washington DC: EPA

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2016) https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/chromium-compounds.pdf. Accessed in August 2018

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (n.d.) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). http://www.epa.gov/iris. Accessed in October 2018

  • Voutsa D, Anthemidis A, Giakisikli G, Mitani K, Besis A, Tsolakidou A, Samara C (2015) Size distribution of total and water soluble fractions of particle-bound elements-assessment of possible risks via inhalation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:13412–13426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F-Y, Wu W-Y, Kuo H-W, Liu C-S, Wang R-Y (2001) Effect of genotoxic exposure to chromium among electroplating workers in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 279(1-3):21–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Kleinstreuer C (2004) Airflow structures and nano-particle deposition in a human upper airway model. J Comput Phys 198(1):178–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XH, Zhang X, Wang XC, Jin LF, Yang ZP, Jiang CX, Chen Q, Ren XB, Cao JZ, Wang Q, Zhu YM (2011) Chronic occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium causes dna damage in electroplating workers. BMC Public Health 11:224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by the Research Fund of the University of Istanbul with the projects number 58394 and 54454. The authors declare no conflict of interest relating to the material presented in this Article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Environmental Engineering Department, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34320, Istanbul, Avcılar, Turkey

    Burcu Onat, Nevran Sultan Çalışkan, Ülkü Alver Şahin & Burcu Uzun

Authors
  1. Burcu Onat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nevran Sultan Çalışkan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ülkü Alver Şahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Burcu Uzun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burcu Onat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The article contents, including any opinions and/or conclusions expressed, are solely those of the authors.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onat, B., Çalışkan, N.S., Şahin, Ü.A. et al. Assessment of the health risk related to exposure to ultrafine, fine, and total particulates and metals in a metal finishing plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 4058–4066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06891-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06891-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation