Abstract
The epigenetic structure in wild plant populations remains largely unknown despite the substantial interest in evaluating epigenetic diversity in non-model organisms living in nature. The forces that shape natural epigenetic variation continue to be elusive and the potential challenge of neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory is still an open question. In this work, we estimated epigenetic diversity and differentiation within and between five natural wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) populations in northern Greece. By using a combination of either EcoRI/HpaII, or EcoRI/MspI restriction enzymes, we found low epigenetic polymorphism and weak epigenetic structure. In total, 324 methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphic (MSAP) marker bands were detected across 93 wild cherry individuals examined. They represented 272 methylation-susceptible and 52 non-methylated epiloci. The total 5′-CCGG-methylation level, ranged from 37.05 to 59.39 %, presenting an overall mean of 49.67 % and the difference among populations was significant. The relative levels of full-methylation (m-subepiloci), hemi-methylation (h-subepiloci), and non-methylation (n-subepiloci), presented an overall mean of 47.07, 30.99, and 21.92 % respectively. Most of the epigenetic variation (97 %) resided within populations (ΦST = 0.017; p < 0.001). Epigenetic and genetic diversity did not differ significantly and were not significantly correlated. Epigenetic variation was not congruent to genetic variation that was assessed in the same populations and individuals by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers and by the S-locus. This study supports the thesis that epigenetic variation is uncoupled from genetic variation. It presents a first insight into the partitioning of epigenetic diversity within and among natural wild cherry populations.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11295-015-0921-7/MediaObjects/11295_2015_921_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11295-015-0921-7/MediaObjects/11295_2015_921_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11295-015-0921-7/MediaObjects/11295_2015_921_Fig3_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
![](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10682-016-9877-9/MediaObjects/10682_2016_9877_Fig1_HTML.gif)
References
Aravanopoulos FA (2014) Genomics of trees. In: Ramawat KG, Merillon JM, Ahuja MR (eds) Tree biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 514–557
Arzate-Mejía RG, Valle-García D, Recillas-Targa F (2011) Signaling epigenetics: novel insights on cell signaling and epigenetic regulation. IUBMB life 63:881–895
Avramidou E, Ganopoulos IV, Aravanopoulos FA (2010) DNA fingerprinting of elite Greek wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using microsatellite markers. Forestry 83:527–533
Avramidou EV, Doulis AG, Aravanopoulos FA (2015) Determination of epigenetic inheritance, genetic inheritance, and estimation of genome DNA methylation in a full-sib family of Cupressus sempervirens L. Gene 162:180–187
Bonduriansky R, Crean AJ, Day T (2012) The implications of nongenetic inheritance for evolution in changing environments. Evol Appl 5:192–201
Bossdorf O, Richards CL, Pigliucci M (2008) Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecol Lett 11:106–115
Cara NS, Marfil CF, Masuelli RW (2013) Epigenetic patterns newly established after interspecific hybridization in natural populations of Solanum. Ecol Evol 3:3764–3779
Cervera MT, Ruiz-Garcia L, Martinez-Zapater J (2002) Analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana based on methylation-sensitive AFLP markers. Mol Genet Genomics 268:543–552
Chwedorzewska K, Bednarek P (2012) Genetic and epigenetic variation in a cosmopolitan grass Poa annua from Antarctic and Polish populations. Pol Polar Res 33:63–80
Doyle JJ (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15
Ganopoulos I, Aravanopoulos FA, Argiriou A, Kalivas A, Tsaftaris A (2011) Is the genetic diversity of small scattered forest tree populations at the southern limits of their range more prone to stochastic events? A wild cherry case study by microsatellite-based markers. Tree Genet Genomes 7:1299–1313
Ganopoulos IV, Aravanopoulos FA, Tsaftaris A (2012a) Genetic differentiation and gene flow between wild and cultivated Prunus avium: an analysis of molecular genetic evidence at a regional scale. Plant Biosyst 147:678–685
Ganopoulos I, Aravanopoulos F, Argiriou A, Tsaftaris A (2012b) Genome and population dynamics under selection and neutrality: an example of S-allele diversity in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Tree Genet Genomes 8:1181–1190
Grativol C, Hemerly AS, Ferreira PCG (2012) Genetic and epigenetic regulation of stress responses in natural plant populations. BBA Gene Regul Mech 1819:176–185
Herrera CM, Bazaga P (2010) Epigenetic differentiation and relationship to adaptive genetic divergence in discrete populations of the violet Viola cazorlensis. New Phytol 187:867–876
Herrera CM, Medrano M, Bazaga P (2013) Epigenetic differentiation persists after male gametogenesis in natural populations of the perennial herb Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). PLoS One 8:e70730
Kalisz S, Purugganan MD (2004) Epialleles via DNA methylation: consequences for plant evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:309–314
Li Y, Shan X, Liu X, Hu L, Guo W, Liu B (2008) Utility of the methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) marker for detection of DNA methylation polymorphism and epigenetic population structure in a wild barley species (Hordeum brevisubulatum). Ecol Res 23:927–930
Lira-Medeiros CF, Parisod C, Fernandes RA, Mata CS, Cardoso MA, Ferreira PCG (2010) Epigenetic variation in mangrove plants occurring in contrasting natural environment. PLoS One 5:e10326
Ma K, Song Y, Yang X, Zhang Z, Zhang D (2013) Variation in genomic methylation in natural populations of Chinese white poplar. PLoS One 8:e63977
Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
Mariette S, Tavaud M, Arunyawat U, Capdeville G, Millan M, Salin F (2010) Population structure and genetic bottleneck in sweet cherry estimated with SSRs and the gametophytic self-incompatibility locus. BMC Genet 11:77
Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590
Okhovat M, Berrio A, Ophir AG, Lysak N, Phelps SM (2014) Balancing selection promotes epigenetic variation in prairie vole spatial memory circuit. Department, Oxford University Press, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513, USA, pp E326–E326
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539
Penn SCP, Siemens DH (2010) Ecological genomics—changing perspectives on Darwin’s basic concerns. Mol Ecol 19:3025–3030
Potter D (2011) Prunus. Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 129–145
Rapp RA, Wendel JF (2005) Epigenetics and plant evolution. New Phytol 168:81–91
Renn SCP, Siemens DH (2010) Ecological genomics—changing perspectives on Darwin’s basic concerns. Mol Ecol 19:3025–3030
Reyna-López GE, Ruiz-Herrera J (2004) Specificity of DNA methylation changes during fungal dimorphism and its relationship to polyamines. Curr Microbiol 48:118–123
Richards EJ (2006) Opinion—inherited epigenetic variation—revisiting soft inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 7:395–U392
Richards CL, Schrey AW, Pigliucci M (2012) Invasion of diverse habitats by few Japanese knotweed genotypes is correlated with epigenetic differentiation. Ecol Lett 15:1016–1025
Rico L, Ogaya R, Barbeta A, Penuelas J (2014) Changes in DNA methylation fingerprint of Quercus ilex trees in response to experimental field drought simulating projected climate change. Plant Biol 16:419–427
Rinehart TA (2004) AFLP analysis using GeneMapper® software and an Excel® macro that aligns and converts output to binary. Biotechniques 37:186–187
Salmon A, Ainouche ML, Wendel JF (2005) Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae). Mol Ecol 14:1163–1175
Schmitz RJ, Ecker JR (2012) Epigenetic and epigenomic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends Plant Sci 17:149–154
Schrey AW, Alvarez M, Foust CM, Kilvitis HJ, Lee JD, Liebl AL, Martin LB, Richards CL, Robertson M (2013) Ecological epigenetics: beyond MS-AFLP. Integr Compar Biol 53:340–350
Schulz B, Eckstein RL, Durka W (2013) Scoring and analysis of methylation‐sensitive amplification polymorphisms for epigenetic population studies. Mol Ecol Res 13:642–653
Schulz B, Eckstein RL, Durka W (2014) Epigenetic variation reflects dynamic habitat conditions in a rare floodplain herb. Mol Ecol 23:3523–3537
Shan XH, Li YD, Liu XM, Wu Y, Zhang MZ, Guo WL, Liu B, Yuan YP (2011) Comparative analyses of genetic/epigenetic diversities and structures in a wild barley species (Hordeum brevisubulatum) using MSAP, SSAP and AFLP. Genet Mol Res 11:2749–2759
Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldán‐Ruiz I (2002) Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol 11:139–151
Wenzel MA, Piertney SB (2014) Fine-scale population epigenetic structure in relation to gastrointestinal parasite load in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica). Mol Ecol 23:4256–4273
Xiong LZ, Xu CG, Maroof MAS, Zhang Q (1999) Patterns of cytosine methylation in an elite rice hybrid and its parental lines, detected by a methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism technique. Molec Gen Genet 261:439–446
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by V. Decroocq
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Germplasm Diversity
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avramidou, E.V., Ganopoulos, I.V., Doulis, A.G. et al. Beyond population genetics: natural epigenetic variation in wild cherry (Prunus avium). Tree Genetics & Genomes 11, 95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0921-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0921-7