Skip to main content
Log in

Epigenetic variation within Phragmites australis among lineages, genotypes, and ramets

  • PHRAGMITES INVASION
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epigenetics is likely an important factor in morphological and physiological acclimation, phenotypic plasticity, and potentially ecological dynamics such as invasiveness. We propose that Phragmites australis is an ideal model species for studies of epigenetics as a factor in plant invasions and ecology due to natural clonal replication (controlling for genetic variation) and the co-occurrence of subspecies with distinct life history strategies such as differences in invasiveness. In earlier work, genotypes and constituent clonal ramets were identified using microsatellite markers. In this pilot study, we screened the same ramets for epigenetic variation with Methylation-Sensitive AFLPs (MS-AFLPs), a modified type of AFLP dependent on differentially methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. We found a significant difference in epigenetic signatures between introduced and native subspecies, and found that introduced P. australis demonstrated more epigenetic variation than their native counterparts. In both subspecies we observed moderate variation between genotypes relative to the higher degree of epigenetic variation found within genotypes (among ramets), suggesting that epigenotype may be more closely aligned with microhabitat than within-subspecies genotype. Finally, we observed potential epigenetic variation by site. This is the first study to investigate natural variation in DNA methylation patterns of P. australis and establishes the baseline in our understanding of the ecological relevance of epigenetics in this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpert P, Simms E (2002) The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol 16:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossdorf O, Richards CL, Pigliucci M (2008) Epigenetic for ecologists. Ecol Lett 11:106–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bossdorf O, Arcuri D, Richards CL, Pigliucci M (2010) Experimental alteration of DNA methylation affects phenotypic plasticity of ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol Ecol 24:541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RM, Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K (1999) Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquat Bot 64:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14:419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue K (2014) The epigenetics of adaptation: focusing on epigenetic stability as an evolving trait. Evolution 68–3:617–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douhovnikoff V, Dodd RS (2014) Epigenetics: a potential mechanism for clonal plant success. Plant Ecol 216(2):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douhovnikoff V, Hazelton ELG (2014) Clonal growth: invasion or stability? A comparative study of clonal architecture and diversity in native and introduced lineages of Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Am J Bot 101(9):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douhovnikoff V, Taylor SH, Hazelton ELG, Smith CM, O’Brien J (2016) Maximal stomatal conductance to water and plasticity in stomatal traits differ between native and invasive introduced lineages of Phragmites australis in North America. AoB Plants 8:plw006. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plw006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L, Geng Y, Li BO, Chen J, Yang JI (2010) Genome-wide DNA methylation alterations of Alternanthera philoxeroides in natural and manipulated habitats: implications for epigenetic regulation of rapid responses to environmental fluctuation and phenotypic variation. Plant Cell Environ 33:1820–1827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman JJ, Spencer HG, Donohue K, Sultan SE (2013) How stable “should” epigenetic modifications be? Insights from adaptive plasticity and bet hedging. Evolution 68:632–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM, Bazaga P (2011) Untangling individual variation in natural populations: ecological, genetic, and epigenetic correlates of long-term inequality in herbivory. Mol Ecol 20:1675–1688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte R, Angers B (2011) General-purpose genotype or how epigenetics extend the flexibility of a genotype. Genet Res Int 2012:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson LA, Cronin JT, Pyšek P (2016) Phragmites australis as a model organism for studying plant invasions. Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1132-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozdzer T, Megonigal JP (2012) Jack-and-master trait responses to elevated CO2 and N: a comparison of native and introduce Phragmites australis. PLoS ONE 7(10):e42794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mozdzer T, Zieman J (2012) Ecophysiological differences between genetic lineages facilitate the invasion of non-native Phragmites australis in North American Atlantic coast wetlands. PLOS ONE 7(10):e42794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pál C (1998) Plasticity, memory and the adaptive landscape of the genotype. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1319–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Figuéroa A (2013) msap: a tool for the statistical analysis of methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism data. Mol Ecol Resour 13:522–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards EJ (2008) Population epigenetics. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18:221–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:981–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards CL, Schrey AW, Pigliucci M (2012) Invasion of diverse habitats by few Japanese knotweed genotypes is correlated with epigenetic differentiation. Ecol (Lett) 15:1016–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven KJF, Preite V (2014) Epigenetic variation in asexually reproducing organisms. Evolution 68(3):644–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven KJF, Jansen JJ, van Dijk PJ, Biere A (2010) Stress-induced DNA methylation changes and their heritability in asexual dandelions. New Phytol 185:1108–1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Douhovnikoff.

Additional information

Guest editors: Laura A. Meyerson and Kristin Saltonstall/Phragmites invasion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spens, A.E., Douhovnikoff, V. Epigenetic variation within Phragmites australis among lineages, genotypes, and ramets. Biol Invasions 18, 2457–2462 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1223-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1223-1

Keywords

Navigation