Abstract
The methylotrophic yeast Komagataella phaffii (syn. Pichia pastoris) is a widely used host for extracellularly producing heterologous proteins via an expression cassette integrated into the yeast genome. A strong promoter in the expression cassette is not always the most favorable choice for heterologous protein production, especially if the correct folding of the protein and/or post-translational processing is the limiting step. The transcriptional terminator is another regulatory element in the expression cassette that can modify the expression levels of the heterologous gene. In this work, we identified and functionally characterized the promoter (P1033) and transcriptional terminator (T1033) of a constitutive gene (i.e., the 1033 gene) with a weak non-methanol-dependent transcriptional activity. We constructed two K. phaffii strains with two combinations of the regulatory DNA elements from the 1033 and AOX1 genes (i.e., P1033-TAOX1 and P1033-T1033 pairs) and evaluated the impact of the regulatory element combinations on the transcript levels of the heterologous gene and endogenous 1033 and GAPDH genes in cells grown in glucose or glycerol, and on the extracellular product/biomass yield. The results indicate that the P1033 has a 2–3% transcriptional activity of the GAP promoter and it is tunable by cell growth and the carbon source. The combinations of the regulatory elements rendered different transcriptional activity of the heterologous and endogenous genes that were dependent on the carbon source. The promoter-terminator pair and the carbon source affected the heterologous gene translation and/or protein secretion pathway. Moreover, low heterologous gene-transcript levels along with glycerol cultures increased translation and/or protein secretion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Barbay D, Mačáková M, Sützl L, De S, Mattanovich D, Gasser B (2021) Two homologs of the Cat8 transcription factor are involved in the regulation of ethanol utilization in Komagataella phaffii. Curr Genet 67:641–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01165-4
Caballero-Pérez A, Viader-Salvadó JM, Herrera-Estala AL, Fuentes-Garibay JA, Guerrero-Olazarán M (2021) Buried Kex2 sites in glargine precursor aggregates prevent its intracellular processing in Pichia pastoris MutS strains and the effect of methanol-feeding strategy and induction temperature on glargine precursor production parameters. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 193:2806–2829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03567-z
Cereghino JL, Cregg JM (2000) Heterologous protein expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:45–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00532.x
Curran KA, Karim AS, Gupta A, Alper HS (2013) Use of expression-enhancing terminators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase mRNA half-life and improve gene expression control for metabolic engineering applications. Metab Eng 19:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.07.001
De Schutter K, Lin YC, Tiels P, Van Hecke A, Glinka S, Weber-Lehmann J, Rouzé P, Van de Peer Y, Callewaert N (2009) Genome sequence of the recombinant protein production host Pichia pastoris. Nat Biotechnol 27:561–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1544
Donczew R, Hahn S (2018) Mechanistic differences in transcription initiation at TATA-less and TATA-containing promoters. Mol Cell Biol 38:e00448–e00417. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00448-17
Dou W, Zhu Q, Zhang M, Jia Z, Guan W (2021) Screening and evaluation of the strong endogenous promoters in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 20:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-021-01648-6
Garcia-Ortega X, Ferrer P, Montesinos JL, Valero F (2013) Fed-batch operational strategies for recombinant fab production with Pichia pastoris using the constitutive GAP promoter. Biochem Eng J 79:172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2013.07.013
García-Ortega X, Cámara E, Ferrer P, Albiol J, Montesinos-Seguí JL, Valero F (2019) Rational development of bioprocess engineering strategies for recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) using the methanol-free GAP promoter. Where do we stand? N Biotechnol 53:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2019.06.002
Graber JH, McAllister GD, Smith TF (2002) Probabilistic prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA 3′-processing sites. Nucleic Acids Res 30:1851–1858. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.8.1851
Green MR, Sambrook J (2012) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
Guerrero-Olazarán M, Rodríguez-Blanco L, Carreon-Treviño JG, Gallegos-López JA, Viader-Salvadó JM (2010) Expression of a Bacillus phytase C gene in Pichia pastoris and properties of the recombinant enzyme. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5601–5608. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00762-10
Hartner FS, Ruth C, Langenegger D, Johnson SN, Hyka P, Lin-Cereghino GP, Lin-Cereghino J, Kovar K, Cregg JM, Glieder A (2008) Promoter library designed for fine-tuned gene expression in Pichia pastoris. Nucleic Acids Res 36:e76. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn369
Herrera-Estala AL, Fuentes-Garibay JA, Guerrero-Olazarán M, Viader-Salvadó JM (2022) Low specific growth rate and temperature in fed-batch cultures of a beta-propeller phytase producing Pichia pastoris strain under GAP promoter trigger increased KAR2 and PSA1-1 gene expression yielding enhanced extracellular productivity. J Biotechnol 352:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.05.010
Hohenblum H, Gasser B, Maurer M, Borth N, Mattanovich D (2004) Effects of gene dosage, promoters, and substrates on unfolded protein stress of recombinant Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioeng 85:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10904
Ito Y, Terai G, Ishigami M, Hashiba N, Nakamura Y, Bamba T, Kumokita R, Hasunuma T, Asai K, Ishii J, Kondo A (2020) Exchange of endogenous and heterogeneous yeast terminators in Pichia pastoris to tune mRNA stability and gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res 48:13000–13012. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1066
Jin LQ, Jin WR, Ma ZC, Shen Q, Cai X, Liu ZQ, Zheng YG (2019) Promoter engineering strategies for the overproduction of valuable metabolites in microbes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:8725–8736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10172-y
Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2015) HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12:357–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3317
Kuersten S, Goodwin E (2003) The power of the 3′UTR: translational control and development. Nat Rev Genet 4:626–637. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1125
Liu Y, Beyer A, Aebersold R (2016) On the dependency of cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance. Cell 165:535–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.014
Looser V, Bruhlmann B, Bumbak F, Stenger C, Costa M, Camattari A, Fotiadis D, Kovar K (2015) Cultivation strategies to enhance productivity of Pichia pastoris: a review. Biotechnol Adv 33:1177–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.05.008
Lu Z, Lin Z (2021) The origin and evolution of a distinct mechanism of transcription initiation in yeasts. Genome Res 31(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.264325.120
Matsuyama T (2019) Recent developments in terminator technology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 128:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.06.006
Mattanovich D, Gasser B, Hohenblum H, Sauer M (2004) Stress in recombinant protein producing yeasts. J Biotechnol 113:121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.04.035
Mattanovich D, Jungo C, Wenger J, Dabros M, Maurer M (2014) Yeast suspension culture. In: Meyer H, Schmidhalter DR (eds) Industrial scale suspension culture of living cells. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 94–129
Mayr C (2019) What are 3’UTRs doing? Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 11:a034728. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a034728
Mombeni M, Arjmand S, Siadat SOR, Alizadeh H, Abbasi A (2020) pMOX: a new powerful promoter for recombinant protein production in yeast Pichia pastoris. Enzyme Microb Technol 139:109582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109582
Prielhofer R, Maurer M, Klein J, Wenger J, Kiziak C, Gasser B, Mattanovich D (2013) Induction without methanol: novel regulated promoters enable high-level expression in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-5
Qin X, Qian J, Yao G, Zhuang Y, Zhang S, Chu J (2011) GAP promoter library for fine-tuning of gene expression in Pichia pastoris. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3600–3608. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02843-10
Ramakrishnan K, Prattipati M, Samuel P, Sankaranarayanan M (2020) Transcriptional control of gene expression in Pichia pastoris by manipulation of terminators. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:7841–7851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10785-8
Ruth C, Zuellig T, Mellitzer A, Weis R, Looser V, Kovar K, Glieder A (2010) Variable production windows for porcine trypsinogen employing synthetic inducible promoter variants in Pichia pastoris. Syst Synth Biol 4:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-010-9057-0
Schüller HJ (2003) Transcriptional control of nonfermentative metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 43:139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-003-0381-8
Sears IB, O’Connor J, Rossanese OW, Glick BS (1998) A versatile set of vectors for constitutive and regulated gene expression in Pichia pastoris. Yeast 14:783–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980615)14:83.0.CO;2-Y
Segal E, Widom J (2009) Poly (dA:dT) tracts: major determinants of nucleosome organization. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2009.01.004
Struhl K (1985) Naturally occurring poly (dA-dT) sequences are upstream promoter elements for constitutive transcription in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 82:8419–8423. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.24.8419
Struhl K (1986) Constitutive and inducible Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters: evidence for two distinct molecular mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 6:3847–3853. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.6.11.3847-3853.1986
Thomas-Chollier M, Hufton A, Heinig M, O’Keeffe S, Masri NE, Roider HG, Manke T, Vingron M (2011) Transcription factor binding predictions using TRAP for the analysis of ChIP-seq data and regulatory SNPs. Nat Protoc 6:1860–1869. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.409
Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP (2013) Integrative Genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 14:178–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs017
Turcotte B, Liang XB, Robert F, Soontorngun N (2010) Transcriptional regulation of nonfermentable carbon utilization in budding yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 10:2–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00555.x
van Helden JV, Olmo MLD, Pérez-Ortín JE (2000) Statistical analysis of yeast genomic downstream sequences reveals putative polyadenylation signals. Nucleic Acids Res 28:1000–1010. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.4.1000
Viader-Salvadó JM, Gallegos-López JA, Carreón-Trevino JG, Castillo-Galván M, Rojo-Domínguez A, Guerrero-Olazarán M (2010) Design of thermostable beta-propeller phytases with activity over a broad range of pHs and their overproduction by Pichia pastoris. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6423–6430. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00253-10
Vogl T, Glieder A (2013) Regulation of Pichia pastoris promoters and its consequences for protein production. N Biotechnol 30:385–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.11.010
Vogl T, Sturmberger L, Kickenweiz T, Wasmayer R, Schmid C, Hatzl AM, Gerstmann MA, Pitzer J, Wagner M, Thallinger GG, Geier M, Glieder A (2016) A toolbox of diverse promoters related to methanol utilization: functionally verified parts for heterologous pathway expression in Pichia pastoris. ACS Synth Biol 5:172–186. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00199
Ward N, Moreno-Hagelsieb G (2014) Quickly finding orthologs as reciprocal best hits with BLAT, LAST, and UBLAST: how much do we miss? PLoS ONE 9:e101850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101850
Waterham HR, Digan ME, Koutz PJ, Lair SV, Cregg JM (1997) Isolation of the Pichia pastoris glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene and regulation and use of its promoter. Gene 186:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00675-0
Yang C, Bolotin E, Jiang T, Sladek FM, Martinez E (2007) Prevalence of the initiator over the TATA box in human and yeast genes and identification of DNA motifs enriched in human TATA-less core promoters. Gene 389:52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2006.09.029
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Glen D. Wheeler for his stylistic suggestions in the preparation of the manuscript. Y.R.-del-P. and A.L.H.-E. thank CONACYT for their fellowship.
Funding
This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Mexico (Grant No CB-2016-286093) and the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (Grant Nos. CN1599-21 and CN604-22, PAICYT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Y.R.-del-P. and A.L.H.-E. All authors performed the data analysis and interpretation. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Y.R.-del-P., J.M.V.-S. and M.G.-O. All further improvements and the final version of the manuscript were prepared by J.M.V.-S. and M.G.-O. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Robainas-del-Pino, Y., Viader-Salvadó, J.M., Herrera-Estala, A.L. et al. Functional characterization of the Komagataella phaffii 1033 gene promoter and transcriptional terminator. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39, 246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03682-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03682-5