Skip to main content
Log in

Drought Risk Assessment for Surface Water Distribution Systems in Irrigation Districts

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study puts forward a practical risk assessment framework for agricultural Surface Water Distribution Systems (SWDS) operation under drought conditions. It accounts for situations when the diverted flow from the diversion dam fails to cover the total water rights within the districts. The risk probability is based on drought analysis and the Stream Drought Index (SDI) classification using the DrinC calculator. The risk consequence is determined based on SWDS operational performance appraisal, which includes hydraulic simulation by HEC-RAS, temporal analysis of adequacy, efficiency, and equity indices, spatial assessment in GIS, and combining performance evaluation indices using the Simple Weighted Sum (SAW) method. SWDS risk assessment is conducted considering the probability and consequences of drought hazard on the monthly and annual time scales. The obtained results show the monthly and yearly risks vary between (73.7, 76.1) % and (46.3, 63.9) % under the extreme-critical condition; (46.0, 53.2) % and (38.1, 51.1) % under the critical condition; (24.4, 35.1) % and (18.7, 27.5) % under the semi-critical condition; and (16.6, 25.5) % and (10.7, 16.6) % under the normal condition. The outcomes of the present study can empower dam owners, utility companies, and irrigation district managers to have realistic water planning, emergence action, and recovery plans for optimum surface water distribution between the hydraulic off-take structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

All the data used in this study can be requested by email to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

Cms:

Cubic meters per second

DrinC:

Drought Indices Calculator

ED:

Extreme Drought

HEC-RAS:

Hydrologic Engineering Center- River Analysis System

HPO:

Historical Probability of Occurrence

IUs:

Irrigated Units

MAE:

Mean Absolute Error

MCDM:

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

MCM:

Million Cubic Meters

O_Sc:

Operational Scenarios

RMSE:

Root Mean Square Error

SAW:

Simple Weighted Sum

SDI:

Stream Drought Index

SWDS:

Surface Water Distribution Systems

USBR:

US Bureau of Reclamation

WSC:

Weighting Scenarios

References

  • Avargani HK, Shahdany SMH, Kamrani K, Jose MM, Garmdareh SEH, Liaghat A (2022) Prioritization of surface water distribution in irrigation districts to mitigate crop yield reduction during water scarcity. Agric Water Manag 269:107653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaei M, Roozbahani A, Shahdany SMH (2018) Risk Assessment of Agricultural Water Conveyance and Delivery Systems by Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis Method. Water Resour Manag 32:4079–4101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkhordari S, Shahadany SH, Taghvaeian S, Firoozfar A, Maestre J (2020) Reducing losses in earthen agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems by employing automatic control systems. Comput Electron Agric 168:105122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayat F, Roozbahani A, Hashemy SM (2022) Performance evaluation of agricultural surface water distribution systems based on water-food-energy nexus and using AHP-Entropy-WASPAS technique. Water Resour Manag 36:4697–4720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgi A, Roozbahani A, Hashemy Shahdany SM, Abbassi R (2021) Development of multi-hazard risk assessment model for agricultural water supply and distribution systems using bayesian network. Water Resour Manag 35:3139–3159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David V, Davidová T (2017) Relating hydrological and meteorological drought indices in order to identify causes of low flows in the catchment of blanice river. Environ Process 4:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejen ZA, Schultz B, Hayde L (2015) Water Delivery Performance at Metahara Large-Scale Irrigation Scheme, Ethiopia. Irrig Drain 64:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong X, Guo S, Zhou Y, Xiong L (2015) Uncertainties in assessing hydrological drought using streamflow drought index for the upper Yangtze River basin. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29:1235–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaghazchi A, Shahdany SMH, Firoozfar A (2022) Prioritization of agricultural water distribution operating systems based on the sustainable development indicators. Sustain Dev 30:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orojloo M, Hashemy Shahdany SM, Roozbahani A (2018) Developing an integrated risk management framework for agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems within fuzzy decision making approaches. Sci Total Environ 627:1363–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra P, Salvati L, Queralt E, Pin C, Gonzalez O, Pons X (2016) Estimating Water Consumption and Irrigation Requirements in a Long-Established Mediterranean Rural Community by Remote Sensing and Field Data. Irrig Drain 65:578–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theron SN, Midgley S, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Archer E, Tramberand S, Walker S (2023) Agricultural resilience and adaptive capacity during severe drought in the Western Cape, South Africa. Reg Environ Change 23:98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigkas D, Vangelis H, Tsakiris G (2015) DrinC: a software for drought analysis based on drought indices. Earth Sci Inf 8:697–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SF, Wu DH, Yu GH, Cheng KS (2023) Risk-based irrigation decision-making for the Shihmen Reservoir Irrigation District of Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ 1–12

  • Tsihrintzis VA (2017) Integrated water resources management, efficient and sustainable water systems, protection and restoration of the environment. Environ Process 4:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong K, Guan G, Tian X, Maestre JM, Mao Z (2020) Evaluating Optimization Objectives in Linear Quadratic Control Applied to Open Canal Automation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 146:04020087

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JP: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Modeling & Simulation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. - SMHS: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing. - AR: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany or Abbas Roozbahani.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pourmahmoud, J., Hashemy Shahdany, S. & Roozbahani, A. Drought Risk Assessment for Surface Water Distribution Systems in Irrigation Districts. Water Resour Manage 37, 5325–5342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03608-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03608-8

Keywords

Navigation