Abstract
Scarce data and uncertainties in the spatial variation of geological properties lead to different possible models of these heterogeneities. The aim of this study is to compare the pressure results and \(\hbox {CO}_2\) behavior of different permeability field models for a large-scale \(\hbox {CO}_2\) injection in a deep saline aquifer. Five ways of representing heterogeneities are tested and compared. The simplest representation defines homogeneous equivalent properties over the entire domain. A second representation is obtained by considering homogeneous layers. Two other models represent the lateral and vertical variations in permeability in greater detail by geostatistical methods with either a continuous model or a discontinuous model (discrete values). The last model is the semi-homogeneous model combining a heterogeneous area and a homogeneous area depending on the complexity of the flow process. Highly variable predictions arise from the heterogeneities, and significant differences in estimates are obtained using the various modeling methods. The optimum resolution depends on the type of response to be estimated. Averaged properties at large scale are not adequate to estimate the critical pressure propagation far from the well. Averaged properties in the injection area are not sufficient to assess the maximum increase in pressure or the extent of \(\hbox {CO}_2\) migration. Lateral and vertical connectivities, and reservoir compartmentalization modeling are required to obtain reliable results. But the resolution requirements are not to be at the finest scale: The discontinuous model (discrete values) gives satisfactory results compared to the continuous model. The way to represent spatial variability of porosity and pore compressibility is also studied. The influence of these two properties is far lower than that of permeability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Differences between minimum and maximum pressure perturbations.
References
Andre, L., Audigane, P., Azaroual, M., Menjoz, A.: Numerical modeling of fluid-rock chemical interactions at the supercritical \(\text{ CO }_2\)-liquid interface during \(\text{ CO }_2\) injection into a carbonate reservoir, the Dogger aquifer (Paris Basin, France). Energy Convers. Manag. 48(6), 1782–1797 (2007)
Bandilla, K., Celia, M., Elliot, T., Person, M., Ellett, K., Rupp, J., Gable, C., Zhang, Y.: Modeling carbon sequestration in the illinois basin using a vertically-integrated approach. Comput. Vis. Sci. 15(1), 39–51 (2012)
Birkholzer, J., Zhou, Q., Tsang, C.F.: Large-scale impact of \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage in deep saline aquifers: a sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3(2), 181–194 (2009)
Birkholzer, J., Zhou, Q., Cortis, A., Finsterle, S.: A sensitivity study on regional pressure buildup from large-scale \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage projects. Energy Procedia 4, 4371–4378 (2011)
Bouquet, S., Bruel, D., de Fouquet, C.: Influence of heterogeneities and upscaling on \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage prediction at large scale in deep saline aquifer. Energy Procedia 37, 4445–4456 (2013)
Brosse, E., Badinier, G., Blanchard, F., Caspard, E., Collin, P., Delmas, J., Dezayes, C., Dreux, R., Dufournet, A., Durst, P., et al.: Selection and characterization of geological sites able to host a pilot-scale \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage in the paris basin ( GéoCarbone-PICOREF). Oil Gas Sci. Technol.- Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole 65(3), 375–403 (2010)
Buscheck, T., Sun, Y., Chen, M., Hao, Y., Wolery, T., Bourcier, W., Court, B., Celia, M., Friedmann, J., Aines, R.: Active \(\text{ CO }_2\) reservoir management for carbon storage: analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 6, 230–245 (2012)
Casteleyn, L., Robion, P., Collin, P., Menendez, B., David, C., Desaubliaux, G., Fernandes, N., Dreux, R., Badiner, G., Brosse, E., Rigollet, C.: Interrelations of the petrophysical, sedimentological and microstructural properties of the Oolithe Blanche Formation (Bathonian, saline aquifer of the Paris Basin). Sediment. Geol. 230(3–4), 123–138 (2010)
Chadwick, R., Noy, D.J., Holloway, S.: Flow processes and pressure evolution in aquifers during the injection of supercritical \(\text{ CO }_2\) as a greenhouse gas mitigation measure. Pet. Geosci. 15(1), 59–73 (2009)
Chilès, J.-P., Delfiner, P.: Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. Wiley, New York (1999)
De Lucia, M.: Influenza della variabilità spaziale sul trasporto reattivo—Influence de la variabilité spatiale sur le transport réactif. Ph.D. thesis, Universita di Bologna and MINES ParisTech (2008)
de Fouquet, C., Beucher, H., Galli, A., Ravenne, C.: Conditional simulation of random sets: application to an argillaceous sandstone reservoir. In: Armstrong, M. (ed.) Geostatistics, vol. 2, pp. 517–530. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1989)
Delmas, J., Brosse, E., Houel, P.: Petrophysical properties of the middle jurassic carbonates in the PICOREF Sector (South Champagne, Paris Basin, France). Oil Gas Sci. Technol.- Rev. IFP 65(3), 405–434 (2010)
Diedro, F.: Influence de la variabilité pétrophysique et minéralogique des réservoirs géologiques sur le transfert réactif. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne (2009)
Doughty, C.: Investigation of \(\text{ CO }_2\) plume behavior for a large-scale pilot test of geologic carbon storage in a saline formation. Transp. Porous Media 82(1), 49–76 (2009)
Farajzadeh, R., Ranganathan, P., Zitha, P., Bruining, J.: The effect of heterogeneity on the character of density-driven natural convection of \(\text{ CO }_2\) overlying a brine layer. Adv. Water Resour. 34(3), 327–339 (2011)
Flett, M., Gurton, R., Weir, G.: Heterogeneous saline formations for carbon dioxide disposal: impact of varying heterogeneity on containment and trapping. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 57(1–2), 106–118 (2007)
Hansen, O., Gilding, D., Nazarian, B., Osdal, B.: Snøhvit: the history of injecting and storing 1 Mt \(\text{ CO }_2\) in the fluvial Tubåen Fm. Energy Procedia 37, 3565–3573 (2013)
Heath, J.E., Kobos, P.H., Roach, J.D., Dewers, T.A., Mckenna, S.A.: Geologic heterogeneity and economic uncertainty of subsurface carbon dioxide storage. SPE Econ. Manag. 4(1), 32–41 (2012)
Horne, R.N.: Modern Well Test Analysis: A Computer-Aided Approach, 2nd edn. Petroway Inc, Palo Alto (1995)
Holloway, S. (ed.): Best Practice Manual from SACS-Saline Aquifer CO\(_2\) Storage Project. Statoil Research Center, Trondheim, Norway (2003)
Keating, G.N., Middleton, R.S., Viswanathan, H.S., Stauffer, P.H., Pawar, R.J.: How storage uncertainty will drive CCS infrastructure. Energy Procedia 4, 2393–2400 (2011)
Koch, J., He, X., Jensen, K.H., Refsgaard, J.C.: Challenges in conditioning a stochastic geological model of a heterogeneous glacial aquifer to a comprehensive soft data set. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18(8), 2907–2923 (2014)
Lemieux, J.-M.: Review: the potential impact of underground geological storage of carbon dioxide in deep saline aquifers on shallow groundwater resources. Hydrogeol. J. 19(4), 757–778 (2011)
Lengler, U., De Lucia, M., Kühn, M.: The impact of heterogeneity on the distribution of \(\text{ CO }_2\): numerical simulation of \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage at Ketzin. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4(6), 1016–1025 (2010)
Leverett, M.C.: Capillary behavior in porous solids. Trans. AIME 142, 152–169 (1941)
Li, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X.: A study of conceptual model uncertainty in large-scale \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage simulation. Water Resources Research 47(5), 5534 (2011)
Lopez, S., Hamm, V., Le Brun, M., Schaper, L., Boissier, F., Cotiche, C., Giuglaris, E.: 40 years of Dogger aquifer management in Ile-de-France, Paris Basin, France. Geothermics 39(4), 339–356 (2010)
Marsily, G., Delay, F., Goncalves, J., Renard, P., Teles, V., Violette, S.: Dealing with spatial heterogeneity. Hydrogeol. J. 13(1), 161–183 (2005)
Matheron, G.: Elements pour une théorie des milieux poreux. Mason, Paris (1967)
Mathias, S., Gluyas, J., de Miguel, G.González Martínez, Bryant, S., Wilson, D.: On relative permeability data uncertainty and \(\text{ CO }_2\) injectivity estimation for brine aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 12, 200–212 (2013)
Middleton, R.S., Keating, G.N., Viswanathan, H.S., Stauffer, P.H., Pawar, R.J.: Effects of geologic reservoir uncertainty on \(\text{ CO }_2\) transport and storage infrastructure. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 8, 132–142 (2012)
Nicot, J.-P.: Evaluation of large-scale \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: an example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2(4), 582–593 (2008)
Nordbotten, J., Flemisch, B., Gasda, S., Nilsen, H., Fan, Y., Pickup, G., Wiese, B., Celia, M., Dahle, H., Eigestad, G., Pruess, K.: Uncertainties in practical simulation of \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 9, 234–242 (2012)
Person, M., Banerjee, A., Rupp, J., Medina, C., Lichtner, P., Gable, C., Pawar, R., Celia, M., McIntosh, J., Bense, V.: Assessment of basin-scale hydrologic impacts of \(\text{ CO }_2\) sequestration, Illinois basin. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4(5), 840–854 (2010)
Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C.M.: TOUGH2 User’s Guide, Version 2.0. Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 (1999)
Refsgaard, J.C., Christensen, S., Sonnenborg, T.O., Seifert, D., Hjberg, A.L., Troldborg, L.: Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling. Adv. Water Resour. 36, 36–50 (2012)
Renard, P.: Stochastic hydrogeology: what professionals really need? Ground Water 45(5), 31–541 (2007)
Rohmer, J., Seyedi, D.: Coupled large scale hydromechanical modelling for caprock failure risk assessment of \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage in deep saline aquifers. Oil Gas Sci. Technol.-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole 65(3), 503–517 (2010)
Rojas, J., Giot, D., Nindre, Y.M., Criaud, A., Lambert, M.: Caractérisation et modélisation du réservoir géothermique du Dogger Bassin Parisien, France rapport final. Technical report, Report BRGM/RR-30169-FR, BRGM, Orleans, France (1989)
Shi, J.-Q., Imrie, C., Sinayuc, C., Durucan, S., Korre, A.: Snøhvit \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage project : assessment of \(\text{ CO }_2\) injection performance through history matching of the injection well pressure over a 32-months period. Energy Procedia 37, 3267–3274 (2013)
Wang, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, K.: Investigation of \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage capacity in open saline aquifers with numerical models. Procedia Eng. 31, 886–892 (2012)
Yamamoto, H., Zhang, K., Karasaki, K., Marui, A., Uehara, H., Nishikawa, N.: Numerical investigation concerning the impact of \(\text{ CO }_2\) geologic storage on regional groundwater flow. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3(5), 586–599 (2009)
Zhao, R., Cheng, J., Zhang, K.: \(\text{ CO }_2\) plume evolution and pressure buildup of large-scale \(\text{ CO }_2\) injection into saline aquifers in Sanzhao Depression, Songliao Basin, China. Transp. Porous Media 95(2), 407–424 (2012)
Zhou, Q., Birkholzer, J.T., Mehnert, E., Lin, Y.-F., Zhang, K.: Modeling basin- and plume-scale processes of \(\text{ CO }_2\) storage for full-scale deployment. Ground Water 48(4), 494–514 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouquet, S., Bruel, D. & de Fouquet, C. Large-Scale \(\hbox {CO}_2\) Storage in a Deep Saline Aquifer: Uncertainties in Predictions Due to Spatial Variability of Flow Parameters and Their Modeling. Transp Porous Med 111, 215–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0590-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0590-x