Abstract
Agave sisalana is hapaxanthic monocotyledonous plant yielding a hard fibre of commercial value. It is also a source of medicinally important glycosides such as hecogenin and tigogenin. Sisal plantations can play a significant role in reforestation of hilly barren land. Unfortunately, natural propagation is not sufficient to fulfill the demands; besides, hyperhydricity is a severe problem in the in vitro propagation method of A. sisalana. The present study for the first time demonstrates that, the hyperhydricity problem can be solved by inclusion of osmotic stress inducing agents like sodium chloride (NaCl) and polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) (0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5% w/v) in MS medium. The response of hyperhydric shoots, normal shoots and hyperhydric reverted shoots with the treatments was analyzed for water content, chlorophyll content, osmolyte accumulation and oxidative damage. The principal component analysis showed the significant positive and negative variations in the net photosynthesis, stomata conductance, internal CO2, transpiration, and water use efficiency between normal, hyperhydric and hyperhydric reverted shoots among all the time points of day and night period. Besides, detailed anatomical and ultra-structural observations were made to discern the changes that occurred in epidermis, mesophyll cells, vascular bundles, and stomata. About 85 and 58% of hyperhydric shoots were reverted on medium fortified with 0.2% NaCl and 0.1% PEG, respectively. All reverted shoots were normal and survived when transferred to the field conditions. The improved protocol with the treatment of NaCl for recovery of hyperhydric shoots was not cost intensive and without any harmful effects on shoots and plantlets.
Key message
First report on change in physiology and recovery of hyperhydricity with NaCl and PEG in shoots and somatic embryos of Agave sisalana which allows additional 38% plantlets available for plantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG III) (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Bot J Linn Soc 161:105–121
Ardelean M, Cachita-Cosma D, Ardelean A, Ladasiu C, Mihali VC (2014) The effect of heat stress on hyperhydricity and guaiacol peroxidase activity (Gpox) at the Foliar Lamina of Sedum telephium L. Ssp. Maximum (L.) Krock Vitroplantlets. An Stiintifice Univ Al. I. Cuza din Iasi 60(2):21–31
Arizaga S, Ezcurra E (2002) Propagation mechanisms in Agave macroacantha (Agavaceae), a tropical arid-land succulent rosette. Am J Bot 89(4):632–641
Badr-Elden AM, Nower AA, Ibrahim IA, Ebrahim MK, Elaziem TMA (2012) Minimizing the hyperhydricity associated with in vitro growth and development of watermelon by modifying the culture conditions. Afr J Biotech 11(35):8705–8717
Binh LT, Muoi LT, Oanh HTK, Thang TD, Phong DT (1990) Rapid propagation of Agave by in vitro tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 23(1):67–70
Castillo FJ (1996) Antioxidative protection in the inducible CAM plant Sedum album L. following the imposition of severe water stress and recovery. Oecologia 107(4):469–477
Chakrabarty D, Park SY, Ali MB, Shin KS, Paek KY (2006) Hyperhydricity in apple: ultrastructural and physiological aspects. Tree Physiol 26:377–388
Debnath M, Mukeshwar P, Sharma R, Thakur GS, Lal P (2010) Biotechnological intervention of Agave sisalana: a unique fibre yielding plant with medicinal property. J Med Plants Res 4(3):177–187
FAO W (2012) IFAD. The state of food insecurity in the world 65
Fauguel CM, Vega TA, Nestares G, Zorzoli R, Picardi LA (2008) Anatomy of normal, and hyperhydric sunflower shoots regenerated in vitro. Helia 31(48):17–26
Fontes MA, Otoni WC, Carolino SMB, Brommonschenkel SH, Fontes EPB, Fari M, Louro RP (1999) Hyperhydricity in pepper plants regenerated in vitro: involvement of BiP (binding protein) and ultrastructural aspects. Plant Cell Rep 19(1):81–87
Franck T, Gaspar T, Kevers C, Penel C, Dommes J, Hausman JF (2001) Are hyperhydric shoots of Prunus avium L. energy deficient? Plant Sci 106(6):1145–1151
Gao H, Xia X, An L, Xin X, Liang Y (2017) Reversion of hyperhydricity in pink (Dianthus chinensis L.) plantlets by AgNO3 and its associated mechanism during in vitro culture. Plant Sci 254:1–11
Gao H, Li J, Ji H, An L, Xia X (2018) Hyperhydricity-induced ultrastructural and physiological changes in blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 133:65–76
Ghuge SA, Rai AN, Suprasanna P (2010) Comparative effects of NaCl, PEG and mannitol iso-osmotic stress on solute accumulation and antioxidant enzyme system in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Stress—Glob Sci Books 4(1):50–55
Gonzalez JTC, Dillon AJP, Perez-Perez AR, Fontana R, Bergmann CP (2015) Enzymatic surface modification of Sisal fibres (Agave sisalana) by Penicillium echinulatum cellulases. Fibres Polym 16(10):2112–2120
Hazra SK, Das S, Das AK (2002) Sisal plant regeneration via organogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 70:235–240
Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 125(1):189–198
Ivanova M, Van Staden J (2011) Influence of gelling agent and cytokinins on the control of hyperhydricity in Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 104:13–21
Kacem NS, Delporte F, Muhovski Y, Djekoun A, Watillon B (2017) In vitro screening of durum wheat against water-stress mediated through polyethylene glycol. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 15:239–247
Kundu DK, Sarkar S, Saha AR, Jha AK, Behera MS (2018) Application of micro-irrigation and micronutrients to improve fibre yield and water use efficiency in sisal (Agave sisalana Perr. Ex Engelm.). Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 7(10):2101–2108
Lee SB, Jung SJ, Go YS, Kim HU, Kim JK, Cho HJ, Suh MC (2009) Two Arabidopsis 3-ketoacyl CoA synthase genes, KCS20 and KCS2/DAISY, are functionally redundant in cuticular wax and root suberin biosynthesis, but differentially controlled by osmotic stress. Plant J 60:462–475
Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C (2001) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-Vis spectroscopy. In: Wrolstad RE, Acree TE, An H, Decker EA, Penner MH, Reid DS, Schwartz SJ, Shoemaker CF, Sporns P (eds) Current protocols in food analytical chemistry (CPFA). Wiley, New York, pp F4.3.1–F4.3.8
McLaughlin SP, Schuck SM (1991) Fiber properties of several species of Agavaceae from the southwestern United States and northern Mexico. Econ Bot 45:480–486
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Mwaniki AM, Kisangau DP, Musimba NLR (2017) Socio-economic factors affecting Sisal cultivation and adoption in Kiomo Division, Kitui County. Int J Agron Agri R 11(3):97–103
Nikam TD (1997) High frequency shoot regeneration in Agave sisalana. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 51:225–228
Nikam TD, Bansude GM, Kumar KA (2003) Somatic embryogenesis in Sisal (Agave sisalana Perr. ex. Engelm). Plant Cell Rep 22:188–194
Olmos E, Hellıin E (1998) Ultrastructural differences of hyperhydric and normal leaves from regenerated carnation plants. Sci Hort 75:91–101
Parent C, Capelli N, Berger A, Crevecoeur M, Dat JF (2008) An overview of plant responses to soil waterlogging. Plant Stress 2(1):20–27
Picoli EAT, Paiva EAS, Xavier A, Aguiar RM, Carolino SMB, Fari MG, Otoni WC (2008) Ultrastructural and biochemical aspects of normal and hyperhydric Eucalypt. Int J Hort Sci 14:61–69
Piqueras A, Cortina M, Serna MD, Casas JL (2002) Polyamines and hyperhydricity in micropropagated carnation plants. Plant Sci 162:671–678
Pompelli MF, Martins SCV, Celin EF, Ventrella MC, DaMatta FM (2010) What is the influence of ordinary epidermal cells and stomata on the leaf plasticity of coffee plants grown under full-sun and shady conditions? Braz J Biol 70:1083–1088
Portillo L, Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F (2006) Factibilidad de uso de un nuevos sistema de inmersion temporal (Orbitabion®) para embriogenesis somatica de Agave tequilana Weber cultivar azul. Bol Nakari 17:43–48
Reyes-Zambrano SJ, Lecona-Guzman CA, Barredo-Pool FA, Calderon JDA, Abud-Archila M, Rincon-Rosales R, Gutierrez-Miceli FA (2016) Plant growth regulators optimization for maximize shoots number in Agave americana L. by indirect organogenesis. Gayana Bot 73(1):124–131
Rodriguez-Garay B (2016) In: Loyola-Vargas V, Ochoa-Alejo N (eds) Book chapter- somatic embryogenesis: fundamental aspects and applications. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 267–282
Rossetto M, Dixon KW, Bunn E (1992) Aeration: a simple method to control vitrification and improve in vitro culture of rare Australian plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 28:192–196
Saher S, Piqueras A, Hellin E, Olmos E (2004) Hyperhydricity in micropropagated carnation shoots: the role of oxidative stress. Physiol Plant 120(1):152–161
Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F, Portillo L (2009) Thin cell suspension layer as a new methodology for somatic embryogenesis in Agave tequilana Weber cultivar azul. Ind Crop Prod 29:609–614
Santos J, Vieira I, Braz-Filho R, Branco A (2015) Chemicals from Agave sisalana biomass: isolation and identification. Int J Mol Sci 16(4):8761–8771
Sarkar S, Jha AK (2017) Research for sisal (Agave sp.) fibre production in India. Int J Curr Res 9(11):61136–61146
Sarkar S, Jha AK, Majumdar B, Saha AR (2018) Influence of drip irrigation, manure and fertilizers on production of planting materials in sisal (Agave sisalana Perr. Ex Engelm.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7(9):1934–1941
Shelke DB, Pandey M, Nikalje GC, Zaware BN, Suprasanna P, Nikam TD (2017) Salt responsive physiological, photosynthetic and biochemical attributes at early seedling stage for screening soybean genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem 118:519–528
Steinmacher DA, Guerra MP, Saare-Surminski K, Lieberei R (2011) A temporary immersion system improves in vitro regeneration of peach palm through secondary somatic embryogenesis. Ann Bot 108:1463–1475
Sullivan CY (1972) Mechanisms of heat and drought resistance in grain sorghum and methods of measurement. In: Rao NGP, House LR (eds) Sorghum in Seventies. Oxford & IBH Pub. Co., New Delhi, pp 247–264
Taiz L, Zeiger E (2010) Plant physiology. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA
Tewari D, Tripathi YC, Anjum N (2014) Agave sisalana: a plant with high chemical diversity and medicinal importance. World J Pharm Res 3(8):238–249
Van den Dries N, Gianni S, Czerednik A, Krens FA, de Klerk GJM (2013) Flooding of the apoplast is a key factor in the development of hyperhydricity. J Exp Bot 64:5221–5230
Watanabe S, Kojima K, Ide Y, Sasaki S (2000) Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 63:199–206
Weber B, Bowker M, Zhang Y, Belnap J (2016) Natural recovery of biological soil crusts after disturbance. In: Weber B, Budel B, Belnap J (eds) Biological soil crusts: an organizing principle in drylands, ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol 226. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham, pp 479–498
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to University Grant Commission (UGC) for financial support for the Project F. No. 37-468/2009 (MS) (SR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TDN and MLA conceived the experiments. KVM, MRC, and HAN performed the experiments. TDN, KVM, MLA, and MRC analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Sergio Rosales-Mendoza.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nikam, T.D., Mulye, K.V., Chambhare, M.R. et al. Reduction in hyperhydricity and improvement in in vitro propagation of commercial hard fibre and medicinal glycoside yielding Agave sisalana Perr. ex Engelm by NaCl and polyethylene glycol. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 138, 67–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01603-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01603-9